![]() | This article is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. This template was placed by Fred Hsu (talk · contribs). If this article has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This article was last edited by Fred Hsu (talk | contribs) 15 seconds ago. (Update timer) |
Contributor note: The article has been rewritten and expanded recently. It is near book-length now, and is undergoing the next transition to split it into linked child articles. Please see the Talk page for details. |


Inline skates are boots with wheels arranged in a single line from front to back, allowing one to move in an ice skate-like fashion. Inline skates are technically a type of roller skate, but most people associate the term roller skates with quad skates, another type of roller skate with a two-by-two wheel arrangement similar to a car. Quad skates were popularized in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Inline skates became prominent in the late 1980s with the rise of Rollerblade, Inc., and peaked in the late 1990s. The registered trademark Rollerblade has since become a generic trademark due to its popularity. To this day, "rollerblades" continues to be used in everyday language to refer to inline skates.
In the 21st century, inline skates come in many varieties, suitable for different types of inline skating activities and sports such as recreational skating, urban skating, roller hockey, street hockey, speed skating, slalom skating, aggressive skating, vert skating, and artistic inline skating. Inline skaters can be found at traditional roller rinks, street hockey rinks, skateparks, and on urban streets. In cities around the world, skaters organize urban group skates. Paris Friday Night Fever Skate (Randonnée du Vendredi Soir) is renowned for its large crowd size, as well as its iconic +10 mile urban routes.[1][2] Wednesday Night Skate NYC is its equivalent in New York City, also run by volunteers, albeit smaller in size.[3][4]
History
[edit]The documented history of inline skates dates back to the early 18th century, when enterprising inventors sought to make boots roll on wheels to emulate the gliding of ice blades on dry land. Because these wheeled skates were modeled after ice blades, their wheels were arranged in a single line. Skates were simply assumed to have a single runner, whether it was a steel blade on an ice skate or a row of wheels on a wheeled skate.[5]

The first patented wheeled skate was filed in France in 1819 by Charles-Louis Petibled.[6] From that point forward, more patents and documented designs continued to explore wheeled alternatives to ice skates.[7] Around 1960, wheeled skates began to gain popularity, and new patents appeared under names such as roller-skates and parlor skates. As inventions increased, roller skates began to diverge from the original single-line layout.[8] Inventors experimented with two rows of wheels as a learning platform for beginner skaters.[9] These double-row skates offered greater stability, but they were difficult to turn.[10]

In 1863, James Plimpton invented a roller skate with four wheels arranged in a two-by-two configuration, similar to a wagon, and added a clever mechanism for turning.[11] It was the first double-row skate that allowed beginners to steer easily by simply leaning in the desired direction.[12] Plimpton's invention sparked a rapid rise in roller skate popularity and spread across both sides of the Atlantic, creating a period of "rinkomania" during the 1860s and 1870s.[13] His design also redefined the term roller skate, which no longer referred to all wheeled skates but became synonymous with the two-by-two Plimpton style.[A]

The development of precision ball bearings in the mid-19th century helped make bicycles more efficient and practical.[15] By the 1880s, Plimpton-style roller skates similarly incorporated ball bearings into their wheel assemblies, making skates roll more efficiently.[16] At the same time, manufacturers began operating skating rinks as promotional ventures from the 1880s through the 1910s. All of these further fueled the Plimpton skate craze.[7]: 19–20, 25
Although Plimpton's roller skates took center stage, inventors and enterprises continued to introduce new roller skates with a single line of wheels between the 1870s and the 1910s.[17] These models included features such as brakes, pneumatic tires, and foot stands placed below the center of the wheels.

From the 1910s through the 1970s, many new variations of single-line wheeled skates were patented and manufactured.[18] While still in the shadow of 2x2 roller skates, some models began to gain popularity among ice hockey players by the 1960s and 1970s, due to their better emulation of ice blades. In particular, off-season training skates used by USSR speed skaters inspired Gordon Ware of the Chicago Roller Skate Company to develop and patent a wheeled skate,[19] which was sold through Montgomery Ward in 1965 under the name "Roller-Blade".[20][B] In 1973, Ralph Backstrom promoted the Super Sport Skate,[21] a joint venture with his friend Maury Silver, as an off-season training tool for hockey players.[22][C] Both of these skate models became direct precursors to modern inline skates.

In a related development, the ski boot manufacturer Lange introduced the first molded plastic ski boots with internal liners in the 1960s.[24] In the 1970s, Lange entered the ice hockey market with similar hard plastic boots featuring hinged cuffs and achieved some success.[25] Meanwhile, skateboarding reached new heights during the 1970s, thanks to the introduction of polyurethane wheels and their superior performance.[26] The confluence of molded plastic boots with hinged cuffs, polyurethane wheels, Super Sport Skates, and the earlier Chicago Roller-Blade laid the foundation for the emergence of Rollerblade in the 1980s and its widespread appeal among the general public.[27]: 12–16 [20]


In 1979, Scott Olson, a hockey player from Minneapolis, discovered the Super Sport Skate. He began selling them to local hockey players as a licensed distributor and soon started modifying them.[28] Olson, his brothers, and his friends replaced the stock boots with customers' old hockey boots and swapped out the original wheels for polyurethane ones.[29] Through further tinkering, prototyping and road testing everywhere he could, Olson eventually arrived at a skate design with an adjustable/expandable frame, polyurethane wheels and double ball bearings.[30] The skate rolled faster, and remained more reliable on road surfaces. However, a patent search revealed that the Chicago Roller-Blade already covered many of these features. In 1981, Olson persuaded the Chicago Roller Skate Company to transfer the patent to him in exchange for a share of future profits.[31]
Thus began the modern history of inline skates, with Olson's company eventually becoming known as Rollerblade, Inc. by around 1988.[32] The registered trademark "Rollerblade" became so well-known that it entered common usage as a generic term.[33][34] Around this time, the company began promoting the term in-line skating in an effort to prevent "rollerblading" from becoming a verb.[35] The campaign proved effective, as media outlets, newspapers, and competitors adopted "in-line skating" as the preferred term by 1990.[36] The phrase was soon shortened to inline, the name by which these skates are known today.
Modern inline skates became practical for mass production and appealing as a recreational activity once key technologies came together. These included polyurethane wheels, ISO 608 standard ball bearings, and molded plastic boots. These skates incorporate double ball bearings with dual-purpose axles from Chomin Harry (1925), single-piece frames from Christian Siffert (1938), adjustable wheel rockering from Gordon Ware (1966), single-unit boot/frame, longer frames and larger wheels from Maury Silver (1975), plus additional innovations.
Design and function
[edit]Anatomy
[edit]
All modern inline skates share a common basic blueprint. A skate comprises a boot, worn on the foot. To the bottom of the boot is attached a frame, the most rigid part of the skate. The frame holds a number of wheels in place with wheel axles. In between a wheel and an axle are two bearings. Bearings allow a wheel to rotate freely around its axle. Finally, a rubber brake typically attaches to the frame of the right boot, on recreational skates.[27]: 17–27 [37]: 14–39 [38]: 41–51
For many skaters, the frame is never removed or replaced. But wheels are consumables, as they wear down with use, and require periodic mounting rotations and even replacements.[33]: 81–86 Inline skates usually come with a skate tool for wheel, bearing and frame maintenance. The tool will have a hex wrench or a Torx wrench for removing wheel axles from a frame, and wherever applicable, for removing bearings from a wheel, and for removing a frame from a boot.[39][27]: 39–45 [37]: 39–51

In the 1980s and 1990s, all inline skates had hard boots, borrowed from ski boot designs. A removable liner in a hard boot provides a snug yet comfortable fit between a skater's foot and the hard shell. Around 1996, K2 introduced soft boots with an exoskeleton. These provide the most comfortable fit, at the expense of reduced rigidity. In the 2010s, hybrid (soft) boots with an endoskeleton were introduced to the high-end market. A hybrid boot has an integrated, non-removable liner. This is glued to a rigid endoskeleton shell integrated with the sole, providing direct power transfer from the foot to the wheels.[40]: 142 [41][42]
All three types are able to secure a foot in them without slack, with proper closure systems. Soft boots are often laced, and hard shells are usually secured with buckles. Velcro straps are also common in all types of boots. Well-designed boots provide proper heel support and ankle support to a skater.[37]: 14–39 [38]: 47–52 [40]: 142
The length of a frame positively affects stability and negatively affects turning agility. Longer frames accommodate more wheels, and taller frames larger wheels; both positively affect top skating speed. Modern inline skates are equipped with polyurethane wheels. Softer wheels provide a better grip on smooth indoor surfaces, while harder wheels wear down less on rough outdoor surfaces. Beginners skate with all wheels touching the ground, for enhanced stability, known as a "flat" wheel setup. Advanced skaters may choose to configure wheels in a "rockered" setup for enhanced maneuverability. The weight of a skate is an important consideration for some disciplines. Lighter boots, frames, and wheels are preferred. However, weight reduction is only achieved with escalating costs and diminishing returns.[37]: 14–39 [43]: 19–33
Striding and gliding
[edit]Recreational inline skating involves a continuous interplay between striding and gliding. As one foot pushes laterally against the ground during the striding phase, it converts sideways force into forward momentum. Meanwhile, the opposite foot glides ahead, supporting the skater’s weight. These phases overlap fluidly, with each skate alternating between pushing and gliding in a coordinated rhythm that sustains forward motion.[44][38]: 57–75
These two movements place distinct and often conflicting demands on skate design. A powerful stride benefits from a large contact area between the wheels and the ground, maximizing friction for a more forceful push-off. In contrast, a smooth and sustained glide calls for minimal contact to reduce friction and rolling resistance. Much of inline skate design involves balancing these opposing requirements to achieve both propulsion and efficiency.[45][46]
Edging and turning
[edit]

Modern inline skate design was heavily influenced by ice hockey. Early inline skates from the 1980s aimed to replicate the feel of hockey skate blades, often using a rockered wheel setup to allow easier turning and quick directional changes. While slalom skaters relied on these rockered setups and hockey players made rapid turns using crossover maneuvers, recreational skaters soon realized that even a flat wheel setup could support effective turning, thanks to the grip provided by polyurethane wheels on pavement. As with ice skating, inline skaters could shift their body weight and apply pressure to one side of the skate to gradually turn while gliding.[33]: 81–86 [44][45][46]
This technique is known as edging, which involves tilting the skate to roll on one side of the wheels. Skaters use both sides of the wheels for different maneuvers. The inside edge refers to the side of the wheel facing the skater’s body, while the outside edge faces away. Edging is essential not only for turning but also for powerful stride pushes, which require a strong edge angle. Deep edging, however, requires proper support from the boot, frame, and wheels to prevent the foot from wobbling within the boot and to keep the wheels from sliding out from under the skater.[D][37]: 37–38 [43]: 19–24 [38]: 47–52 [37]: 19–20
Heel support
[edit]Heel support refers to the ability of a boot to keep a skater's heel comfortably seated and firmly locked down in the heel pocket of the boot, even during aggressive maneuvering.

A heel pocket is formed by the shell, inner liner and sole of a boot. A properly designed boot has a heel pocket that hugs the heel, with an anatomical contour. A proper closure system causes the "facing" (where eyelet tabs are) to push the instep against the heel pocket, preventing the foot from shifting or lifting during maneuvers. As a result, the heel remains in contact with the footbed at all times.[37]: 15–18
Heel lock
[edit]Proper heel lock serves as a stable foundation for the entire foot. It allows a skater to adopt an athletic stance for skating by flexing the lower leg forward, without raising the heel. A snug fit means reduced movement of the foot within the skate, and thus reduced opportunity for friction to cause blisters. At the same time, the whole skate becomes transfixed to the foot as an extension of it, allowing efficient strides with a faithful transfer of power from the foot to the ground.[47]: 35–36, 79–80
Ankle support
[edit]
Ankle support refers to the ability of a boot to prevent sideways movement of a skater's ankle and lower leg, while allowing the shin to flex forward into an athletic stance. In some skates, such as recreational and aggressive skates, this is achieved via a hinged cuff. In other skates, such as hockey skates, this is enabled by rigid, and anatomically shaped quarter panels that lock both ankle bones in place, from two sides, leaving the shin to freely pivot forward.[37]: 5, 15–18 [48][40]: 142 [49]
Proper ankle support allows a skater to keep a skate upright as a straight extension of their entire leg, when observed from the front. Without rigid support on both sides of the ankle, the foot may wobble within the boot, causing the skate to tilt inward or outward. This creates pronation, making it harder for a skater to glide on a single skate at best, and resulting in sprains and other injuries at worst.[50]
Forward flex
[edit]
A properly designed boot does not hinder the mobility of the ankle joint, allowing a skater to pivot the lower leg (the shin) forward, adopting a squatting (athletic) stance. This forward flex (or forward leaning) is known as dorsiflexion of the foot. It places the center of body mass atop the ball of the foot, a balancing skill crucial to most skating moves. Without such a squatting stance, the leg and the skate form a 90° angle, placing the entire body weight of a skater on the rear wheel of the skate. This is dangerous for a beginner because a small backward shift of the upper body will cause a skater to pivot their entire body on the rear wheel, and thus fall uncontrollably backward.[37]: 67–77 [38]: 57–59 [44]
Types
[edit]
There are a variety of ways to design and make modern inline skates. Different types of inline skates reflect needs specific to different inline skating disciplines, such as recreational skating, urban skating, roller hockey, street hockey, speed skating, slalom skating, aggressive skating, and artistic inline skating.
Manufacturers and resellers generally classify inline skates based on disciplines, such as aggressive skates, speed skates and hockey skates.[37]: 30–38 Some disciplines are not large enough to warrant their own classification. Thus, dissimilar disciplines with similar equipment needs are grouped under a single skate category. For instance, freestyle skating, slalom skating, wizard skating, city commuting, and urban skating may be crammed into a single "urban skates" category.[51] Then, there are the rest of skaters who casually skate, skate for fitness, or skate for cross-training. These purposes constitute 90% of actual inline skate sales. Skates suitable for these activities are often grouped together as "recreational skates".[41]
Recreational
[edit]Some makers refer to recreational skates as "fitness skates". Others split them into two or more categories: recreational, fitness, and cross-training. Usually, the fitness and cross-training categories reflect increasing cost and thus quality of skates.[E] Soft boots with an exoskeleton are usually the least expensive. Hard boots with removable liners are often priced higher. Hybrid boots with an endoskeleton are high-end models.[48][42]
This category can be better understood as "unspecialized" inline skates, or generic skates. All other types of skates can be thought of as specialized deviations from this basic type.[41] Recreational skates usually come with four wheels of average size, and a frame of average length, which is just slightly longer than the boot. This places the front wheel halfway ahead of the toe box, and the rear wheel halfway behind the heel pocket, a design that remained unchanged since Scott Olson's adoption of Super Sport Skate from 1979.[21] Recreational skates are equipped with heel brakes. These allow beginners to learn to stop rolling, with a simple pivot of a foot on its heel.[27]: 25–26, 44–45, 52–57
Aggressive
[edit]
Aggressive skates are the most specialized inline skates, in contrast to recreational skates. They are designed for one specific purpose only: grinds. Grinding is the art of sliding on street obstacles such as stairs, rails, benches, curbs, ramps and walls.[40]: 134–163 To support these stunts, aggressive skates are generally built with strong hard boots based on ski boots and bolted to thick frames which are fitted with the smallest wheels in all of inline skating.[52] To help a skater lock onto an obstacle of interest during a grind, an aggressive skate provides channels and surfaces such as H-blocks, frame grooves, backslide grooves, grind plates, soulplates, etc.[53] Transitioning between these stunts, a skater often jumps considerable heights, or rides down a long flight of stairs (known as stair bashing).[37]: 33, 156–168 Thus, aggressive boots are often fitted with shock absorbers to dampen shocks upon landing.
Rollerblade Lightning TRS has been widely credited for enabling aggressive inline skating as a sport, with its durable boot and nylon-reinforced frame.[54] Aggressive skates co-evolved with the discipline which started as inline stunts.[47]: 98–110 It then turned into streetstyle skating, and finally into aggressive inline skating. The word "street" in street-style meant that skaters performed tricks on and over street obstacles, following nomenclature from skateboarding.[27]: 6, 64–77, 170–174 Skaters grind on street obstacles (termed street skating), perform stunts at skateparks (termed park skating), and take to the air at the top of ramps (termed vert skating).[37]: 33, 156–168

Aggressive skates have standardized on UFS, the Universal Frame System. Most UFS frames accommodate small wheels up to 60 mm.[55] Some UFS frames with frame grooves and H-blocks are designed with thick walls to prevent wheel bites. allowing them to be used with a flat wheel setup.[53] Other UFS frames without prevention measures against wheel bites can be set up with an anti-rocker wheel configuration, with even smaller and harder "grindwheels" (or "antirockers") in the middle.[56] Some skaters go one step further, replacing the two middle wheels with non-rotating "juice blocks".[57]
The name "aggressive" has been controversial.[58] Many in the community call aggressive skating rollerblading (or simply blading), and thus members bladers.[41] Others call it aggro.[40]: 134–163 [F] Some skate manufacturers eschew the label "aggressive", choosing to market their aggressive skates instead as street skates or park skates.[59]: 40–41 [G]
Hockey
[edit]
In the 21st century, the boots used for inline hockey skates (roller hockey skates) are constructed using a process that differs significantly from those of other inline skates.[60] They are primarily produced by ice hockey manufacturers such as CCM, Bauer (Mission), True, and Marsblade.[37]: 37–38 [H] In many cases, the same boot is used across both sports, with either a blade holder for ice hockey or an inline frame for roller hockey.[I][J] As a result, inline hockey skates continue to rely on the rivet-based mounting system used in ice hockey, even though replaceable frame standards have become common in other skate categories.[55]

Hockey skates feature some of the shortest frames among all inline skates, enabling players to make tight turns and perform crossovers without interference. Hockey boots are designed to sit as low to the ground as possible, limiting them to smaller wheels. This configuration maximizes stability for hard edging maneuvers. Wheels with a rounder profile are preferred, as they offer improved grip and control during sharp turns at all edging angles.[43]: 19–24 [37]: 37–38 Many hockey skates use a hi-lo wheel setup, with larger wheels in the rear and smaller ones in the front. This raises the heel and lowers the toe cap, thus the name hi-lo. It causes a player to forward flex naturally, for greater stability and stronger strokes.[63]
The modern inline skate was originally created by Scott Olson as a substitute for ice hockey skates, featuring a boot with a hard shell, pivoting cuff, and removable liner.[33] This style of boot construction remains popular across all inline disciplines, ironically with the exception of inline hockey. Instead, hockey boots have followed their own path.[64][K] They are built to be as lightweight as economically feasible while still delivering excellent heel and ankle support, along with protection against impacts from flying pucks. Direct and immediate power transfer from foot to wheel is also essential. To achieve this, hockey boots are constructed around an unyielding wall with anatomical contours to hug the heel and both sides of the ankle. This structure is called the quarter package, made of left and right quarter panels bolted to a rigid outsole platform.[62][60] The rest of the boot is built around this base, including a thick tongue that supports the shin in a forward-leaning athletic stance, and a reinforced toe cap. The liner is integrated into the boot and not removable, with strategically varied thickness for best anatomical fit. Hockey skates are secured with eyelets and laces, rather than buckles or straps.[65][61]
Speed
[edit]
Speed skates (or race skates) are purpose-built inline skates with a single goal: speed. They enable a racer to generate the most efficient strides and to glide with the least amount of friction.[66]: 3–9, 283–318 Joey Mantia holds the world record for the outdoor 10-kilometers at over 27 miles per hour.[67]
Speed skating differs from other inline disciplines in that a speed skater tilts her body trunk forward for up to 60° when racing, to reduce air resistance. A speed skater bends her knees aggressively for up to 80° in a deep-seated squatting position which requires a deep forward leaning of the shin (dorsiflexion) for proper balance. This deep squatting posture produces the most powerful push-offs, with the farthest displacement of the pushing skate.[66]: 5–11

Because of the need for a deep dorsiflexion, speed skates have no eyelets, buckles, or straps above middle eyelets at 45° angle. In order for racers to freely flex their foot around ankle bones, speed boots are cut the lowest among all inline skates, around or below the ankle bones. The removal of shaft and cuff significantly reduces a boot's weight. [37]: 17, 34–36 [66]: 3–30, 308–311 Most speed boots are custom-fitted without much padding, or else heat-moldable, to prevent the foot from the slightest wobbling.[68][L]
The frame may be made of aircraft-quality aluminum, magnesium, or possibly lightweight carbon fiber, such that it flexes very little and transmits power from the foot to the wheels more directly. The length and height of a frame determine the number and size of wheels it can accommodate. More wheels and bigger wheels increase mass, making acceleration harder and slower. But once rolling at speed, a skater can more easily maintain top speed given the rotational inertia. In the 21st century, wheel size ranges from 90 mm to 125 mm. A setup with four 110 mm wheels (4x110mm) is typical for competitive speed skating, and three 125 mm wheels (3x125mm) for marathon skates at marathon events.[37]: 18–24, 34–36 [70] Speed skates generally adopt either the 165mm or the 195mm mounting standard. Both of these 2-point mounting standards feature a built-in heel lift that pitches a skater forward, creating forward flex.[71]
Speed skating generally adopts harder and high-rebound wheels to minimize energy lost to elastic hysteresis. Speed wheels have a pointy bullet profile that reduces friction from drags when gliding upright, while still providing a large contact surface for improved traction and control when pushing off at a deep edging angle.[66]: 315–316 Speed skaters use High-quality bearings with precision ratings, and perform regular cleaning and lubrication to remove trapped dirt and restore them to their optimal performance.[27]: 128–130
Urban
[edit]
Urban skate is an umbrella term for a type of skate suitable for several niche inline disciplines: freestyle skating, slalom skating, wizard skating, city commuting, and urban skating. These activities take place on relatively flat ground, but the surface may not always be paved or smooth.[51]
Freestyle skating is named after its counterpart in skateboarding, just like aggressive street, park, and vert skating are named after street, park, and vert skateboarding, respectively. Freestyle skating is the art of performing skating tricks on relatively flat ground, free of obstacles.[72] Freestyle slalom skating is a form of freestyle skating where tricks are performed around slalom cones. This is standardized by the International Freestyle Skaters Association (IFSA) and World Skate as freestyle slalom to distinguish it from speed slalom, which is a form of speed skating around cones on flat ground.[73][74] Freestyle skating requires skates that support rigorous turning and edging maneuvers, with characteristics similar to hockey skates. A rockered setup with 76-80 mm wheels on a relatively short frame is common for freestyle skating.[75]: 15–25 [52]


Urban skating and city commuting take the activity to the street. But the term 'street skating' is already taken as a subdiscipline of aggressive skating, for grinding on street obstacles. Thus, this niche market is variously promoted as skating on paved roads or commuting to work on skates. These activities demand longer frames and larger wheels for higher cruising speed, stable tracking, and more comfortable rides on uneven surfaces, similar to speed skates for marathon events. Common wheel setups include 4x80mm, 4x90mm, 4x100mm, 3x100mm, 3x110mm, and 3x125mm.[51][52] Most urban skate boots support either the 165mm or Trinity mounting standard, and can be customized with a short frame and average-sized wheels for slalom skating, or with a long frame and large wheels for long-distance road skating.[55][76] Both the 165mm and Trinity mounting standards raise the heel mounting platform higher than the toe, creating a slight heel-to-toe drop, also known as a heel lift. This drop causes the skater to lean forward by default, simulating a subtle forward flex similar in purpose to the hi-lo wheel setup used in hockey skates.[55][77]
Wizard skating is named after the company Wizard Skating, founded by Leon Basin in 2014. This form of skating is characterized by flowing footwork from freestyle, slalom, and figure skating, while a skater blazes through roads, rolls over curbs, skates up ramps, bashes down stairs, and parkours on walls. Leon perfected a type of "Wizard" skate for this sport, featuring a long frame, large wheels, and a rockered wheel setup for either 4 wheels or 5 wheels.[78][52] Skaters are increasingly referring to this style as flow skating.[41]
Boots
[edit]Hard boots
[edit]Hard boots dominated the inline skate market in the 1980s and 1990s at the inception of modern inline skating. They are made of plastic, fiberglass, carbon fiber, or other solid materials. A removable liner in a hard boot provides a snug yet comfortable fit between a skater's foot and the hard shell.[48][42][79]
Hard boots use a combination of velcro straps and plastic buckles as closures. Some also use laces for the facing of the boot, while others have a front strap (or buckle) instead of or in addition to laces. The front lace and top buckle secure the foot inside the boot. To achieve proper heel lock, the liner is shaped to fit the heel, and the 45° strap (or buckle) presses the instep of the foot against the contour of the liner.[37]: 15–18
Hard boots have a high cuff (or shaft) to provide proper ankle support. In order to accommodate dorsiflexion, the cuff is made to pivot near the ankle bones. As a skater leans their shin forward, the hinged cuff rotates to follow the lower leg while continuing to provide lateral ankle support.[37]: 15–18
Molds used in plastic injection molding are expensive to make. As a result, plastic hard boots are usually available only in so-called "dual sizes". One hard shell is made for two US and EU shoe sizes (e.g. US 9-10, and EU 42-43). A thicker liner is provided for US 9 and EU 42 to fill the gaps, while a thinner liner is provided for US 10 and EU 43. Some manufacturers offer "dual fit" liners, where the same liner can accommodate two shoe sizes using elastic parts, memory foam, and other compressible space-filling materials.[48][37]: 15–18
Soft boots
[edit]
K2 introduced soft boots to inline skating in 1993 with its Exotech line of recreational skates, marking the company’s entry into the sport. Building on this innovation, K2 later released the legendary K2 Fatty, an aggressive skate featuring the same soft-boot design. Since then, similar soft boots have come to dominate the recreational skate market.[80][81]
They are akin to hiking shoes, made of textiles, mesh, neoprene, and other soft materials. Liners are integrated into the soft boot, and are thus not removable or replaceable. A soft boot is reinforced in strategic areas with a plastic exoskeleton for structural support.[42][79][37]: 15–18
A soft boot uses a pivoting cuff to support the lower leg, like hard boots. Otherwise, its exoskeleton covers only a small area of the foot. This allows the boot to provide superior airflow through its fabric for moisture extraction, to keep the foot cool.[48]
Soft boots use closure systems similar to those of hard boots. These include laces, velcro straps, and buckles. Lacing the front of the boot is key to securing the foot within the boot, due to the lack of exoskeleton support in this area. On the other hand, the flexible front of the boot readily accommodates different shapes of foot. Soft boots thus provide a more comfortable fit at the expense of reduced rigidity and support, making them suitable for beginners and casual skaters. Committed enthusiasts, however, generally avoid soft boots due to their lack of direct and immediate response to skating moves, a result of elastic hysteresis.[48]
Soft boots are lighter and generally more affordable than hard boots. They are also easier to manufacture in precise shoe sizes. While hard boots typically come in dual sizes, soft boots are available in half sizes for US shoe measurements (e.g., US 9.5, 10, and 10.5) and, in some cases, for EU sizes as well (e.g., EU 39.5, 40, and 40.5).[48][37]: 15–18
Hybrid boots
[edit]Hybrid boots, also known as hybrid soft boots, look superficially similar to soft boots, complete with soft materials covering a large part of the boot. Unlike soft boots, however, hybrid boots have no exoskeleton reinforcement apart from the pivoting cuff. These boots have an endoskeleton instead, in the form of a composite shell. The shell serves as the sole of the boot, with shell walls extending upward from the sole. The soft upper part of the boot is pulled taut over the shell and glued onto it.[42][48]
Hybrid boots are lighter than hard boots and soft boots. Yet they remain rigid where the foot meets the boot. Integrated liners in hybrid boots can be made thinner than removable liners in hard boots. In higher-end hybrid boots, the integrated liner is heat-moldable for the best custom fit, and the shell is made of carbon fiber. A hybrid shell sits much closer to the foot than a hard shell or the exoskeleton of a soft boot. As a result, hybrid boots provide more direct and responsive power transfer from a foot to wheels.[42][82]
Hybrid boots originated from the development of carbon shells in speed skates during the 1990s and 2000s. In the 2020s, manufacturers like Powerslide offer hybrid inline skates, including models such as the Hardcore Evo, Tau, and Swell. However, the term "hybrid" has yet to gain universal acceptance, and these boots are often marketed as high-end soft boots.[42][83][84]
One-piece carbon boots
[edit]
In the 21st century, hockey skates increasingly favor one-piece carbon boots with a monocoque shell that were first developed in the 1990s for speed skating. These boots are unlike the three common types of inline boots: hard, soft and hybrid. The one-piece boots are built around a carbon fiber-reinforced composite shell, where the shell almost completely surrounds a foot. After eyelet holes are punched out of a shell, the shell is usable as a functional boot if laced.[85]
For instance, Easton's Synergy 1300C came out in 2005, with a unitary shell made with carbon and aramid fibers. This is widely recognized as the first retail hockey skate with a composite shell.[86][87] Heat molding became possible in 2006, with the Easton Synergy 1500C.[88][89] Other hockey makers, such as VH Hockey, took it one step further, creating a single, unbroken composite shell that also incorporates the "facing" portion where eyelets are located.[82] A heat-moldable monocoque shell requires no breaking-in, unlike traditional hockey skates.[90]
True Temper Sports bought VH Hockey in 2016, and started to mass produce retail hokey skates with heat-moldable monocoque shells, as well as scaling up 3D scanning of feet at retail stores for custom True hockey skates,[90][91][92] leading to inline hockey skates such as the TF9 Roller Skate, and the TF Pro Custom Roller Skate in 2020.[93][94]
Frames
[edit]
An inline skate frame, sometimes referred to as the chassis in certain disciplines such as hockey[93], serves as the structural link between the boot and the wheels. It connects to the ground through the wheels mounted on it, and to the skater's foot through the sole of the boot.
Frame dimensions
[edit]Frame length, also known as wheelbase, refers to the distance between the centers of the first and last wheel axles. In disciplines like hockey and slalom, skaters use short frames with closely packed wheels to enhance maneuverability and enable fluid footwork. In contrast, speed skating relies on longer frames, which space out the wheels to provide greater stability at high speeds.[95]
Frame height, deck height, and ride height are related but loosely defined terms in inline skating. All three describe how low a boot can be positioned relative to the ground in a given setup, considering the number and size of the wheels. Ideally, a skater wants the boot as close to the ground as possible, while allowing enough clearance between the sole and the wheel tops for free rotation.[96][97] All three terms may refer to the distance from the frame's deck to the wheel axle center, excluding wheel size. In other cases, they are defined as sole-to-ground distance, incorporating both the structure of a frame and of actual wheel size.[M][95][98]
Frame rigidity
[edit]

Frame rigidity is essential for an efficient transfer of power from a skater's foot to the ground. A rigid frame does not suffer from elastic hysteresis.[37]: 18–21 For this reason, even entry-level inline skates often use fiberglass-reinforced plastic, instead or softer but cheaper plastic to make frames. For a stiffer yet lightweight frame, aircraft-grade aluminum alloys such as the 6000 and 7000 series are used. Hockey and speed skating often call for magnesium frames, which are even stiffer and lighter than aluminum. Some speed skaters use carbon fiber frames that are the most rigid and lightweight frames available.[55][99]
Rigidity of a frame is an important factor in choosing one. However, other considerations, including cost and weight, also influence the decision.[100] Sometimes, a discipline's needs trump many of these factors. For instance, aggressive skaters exclusively use fiberglass-reinforced plastic frames for their superior performance and consistent friction when grinding against all types of surfaces.[40]: 138 Some of the most rigid frames, such as those made of carbon fiber, can be too brittle for hockey. These frames shatter rather than deform under impact or extreme stress due to their low fracture toughness.[101] In addition, some skaters value comfort, which is at odds with rigid frames; increased rigidity transmits all imperfections of the road surface to the skater unattenuated, reducing comfort.[102]
Rockerable frames
[edit]Wheel rockering can be achieved by using wheels of different diameters, or by using a frame with built-in support for a rockered arrangement of identical wheels. Such rockerable frames may be configured in either a flat setup for long-distance skating, or a banana-rockered setup for highly maneuverable disciplines like hockey, with sharp turns and quick footwork.[33]: 81–86 [75]: 20–21
Some frames are compatible with toggleable hardware for quick and reliable switching of wheel setups. These involved the use of frame spacers, axle guides, mounting hole inserts, or axle bolts that fit oblong mounting holes in two or more ways, in order to shift the axle’s center to a preset position.[38]: 44–45 [N]
With the advent of mounting standards and easily-swappable frames in the 21st century, some inline frames now eschew toggleable hardware in pursuit of reduction in complexity, weight, and number of components. Each brand offers its own pre-rockered frame with custom axle holes to create a wheel arrangement that it deems optimal.[75]: 20–21 [104]
Non-standard frames
[edit]

Modern inline skates began as off-season training tools for ice skaters.[55] Early frames, including those used by the USSR speed skating team in the 1960s, featured adjustable lengths and variable wheel positions to fit different shoe sizes.[20] This approach continued in the 1966 Chicago Roller-Blade and early 1980s Rollerblade skates.[B][O] Early inline skates lacked mounting standards. The 1962 USSR skate and 1966 Chicago Roller-Blade fit flat-soled shoes, while the 1975 Super Sport Skate, modeled after hockey boots, used a raised heel mount that created a built-in heel lift.[C]
Non-standard frames still dominate entry-level skates and are often non-replaceable. Most lack adjustment for pronation or supination. Some, like the 2024 Powerslide One Zoom, use riveted frames that cannot be customized.[55] Outside the entry-level market, most inline skates follow one of three mounting standards: UFS, 165mm, or Trinity.[96][97] The exception is hockey skates, which still use riveted mounts like ice hockey boots. All hockey skates, from budget to hig-end custom models, have proprietary, non-replaceable frames.[H]
165mm and 195mm frames
[edit]
In 1974, Inze Bont, founder of the speed skate manufacturer Bont, created fiberglass-reinforced boots for short track racing, featuring 2 mounting holes spaced 165mm apart. An adjustable ice blade was attached to the boot using these holes. As inline skating gained popularity in the mid-1980s, companies like Darkstar, Mogema, and Raps began producing inline frames designed to mount onto these short track boots. This led to the establishment of the first inline skate mounting standard.[106][55]

The 165mm mounting standard incorporates a height differential of approximately 10 mm between the front and rear mounting points. This creates a heel lift, also known as pitch or heel-to-toe drop, allowing speed skaters to achieve more powerful push-offs through deeper dorsiflexion. Due to this height difference, the two mounting platforms on a frame are usually not contiguous. Other than the 165mm interaxial distance, the standard does not specify a frame width, mount width or exact mounting locations on the boot. In practice, Bont boots provide relatively small contact surfaces between the frame and the boot, compared to traditional rivet mounting. However, this is not an issue for rigid speed boots made from fiberglass, and even less so for Bont’s later innovations - kevlar boots (1986) and carbon fiber boots (1989).[71][95][55][107][108]
Roces Impala skates from the mid 1990s were the first to adopt the 165mm 2-point mounting standard outside of speed skating, paving the way for other inline skate manufacturers to follow. This standard became widely used across various inline skate disciplines, from recreational and aggressive skating to slalom skating. However, unlike speed boots, these disciplines do not rely solely on composite boots with extremely rigid soles. On softer soles, the small mounting platforms can cause the frame to wobble under load. To mitigate this, some boots reinforce the mounting areas with metal plates.[55][71][109][110]

The 165mm standard, also known as SSM (Standard Speed Mount), was developed when speed skates primarily used five small wheels (e.g. 5x80mm). However, as longer frames with fewer but larger wheels became popular (e.g. 4x100mm), the positioning of the mounting bolts interfered with some wheels, forcing frames to become taller. This increased a skate's center of gravity and reduced a skater's performance. Some speed frames relocated middle wheels or reduce their sizes to fit the standard.[70][107][109][71][66]: 311–316
To address this, the 195mm 2-point standard was introduced in 2003, also known as LSM (Long Speed Mount). By increasing the interaxial distance to 195mm, this standard prevented bolts from interfering with middle wheels, enabling the use of larger wheels and longer frames without increasing frame height. This design provides a stable ride at high speeds by maintaining a relatively low center of gravity in proportion to the longer wheelbase.[107][109][111][110][112]
The 195mm standard retains the same heel lift as the 165mm standard. In general, only speed skating boots use 195mm, while most other inline boots continue to rely on 165mm. However, many inline frames include dual mounting slots on the front mount to accommodate boots of either standard.[76][71]
UFS frames
[edit]The ESPN X Games introduced aggressive inline skating in 1995, propelling the sport into the spotlight. As its popularity grew, more enthusiasts took up aggressive skating, prompting companies to develop their own specialized skate lines to meet the rising demand.[113][114]
In 1996, K2 released the Fatty, a legendary skate that integrated the wheel frame into its soulplate for the first time. In this early stage of its evolution, the soulplate still consisted of two separate sections, a design inherited from riveted boots with separate toe and heel mounting platforms, as seen in the Rollerblade Lightning TRS. However, the K2 Fatty reduced the height difference between these mounting platforms, and eliminated the hollow between these two platforms. It frame was now shaped like a solid rectangular bar.[54][114][115]
In 1998, Roces too, released an aggressive skate featuring a combined soulplate and frame: the 5th Element. This design not only incorporated a rectangular frame without distinct mounting platforms, but also featured a completely flat soulplate with no height difference between the front and rear sections. This flat sole significantly improved soul grinding and was soon adopted by other skate manufacturers. Additionally, the 5th Element’s integrated soul/frame unit could be easily removed from the boot by loosening just three screws.[54][114][116]
In 1999, Salomon, along with USD, Razors, Kizer, 7XL/Able, and Fifty/50, collaborated to establish a standardized mounting system for aggressive skates: the Universal Frame System (UFS). This standard capitalized on the emerging trend of flat soulplates, requiring a single, flat rectangular mounting surface 41 mm wide and long enough to accommodate two mounting holes spaced 167 mm apart. In 2001, Salomon introduced the Aaron Feinberg Pro Model, the first skate to feature the UFS mounting standard. The model quickly gained popularity and set a new industry benchmark.[54][114][117][118]
Unlike other mounting systems of the time, UFS eliminated built-in heel lift, positioning the heel level with the toes for the first time. However, most brands followed Salomon’s lead in incorporating a thick shock absorber at the heel. This provided better impact support for hard landings from high jumps, but accidentally reintroduced a small amount of heel lift.[54][114][119]
Trinity frames
[edit]The 165mm mounting standard, originally from speed skating, has dominated the inline skate market since the mid-1990s, except in aggressive skates that use UFS mounting and hockey skates that rely on rivets. However, not all inline boots are made from the stiff carbon-composite materials typical of speed boots. The small 165mm mounting area can lead to frame wobbles on boots lacking a rigid sole or reinforced mounting platforms.[55][109]
As larger wheels gained popularity in the 21st century, 165mm frames evolved to accommodate setups with bigger and sometimes fewer wheels. Some manufacturers increased frame height, which negatively affected stability and performance.[111][109] Others relocated or downsized middle wheels to avoid interference with mounting bolts.[70][120] Some brands even shifted the mounting platforms forward or backward to fit specific wheel setups, causing front-to-back centering issues when mixing and matching boots and frames.[109][71] For instance, Rollerblade Twister and certain Seba boots have unconventional 165mm mount placements, making it difficult or even impossible to achieve proper longitudinal centering with aftermarket frames. To meet demand for these popular boots, Endless Blading released a version of its Endless 100 frame specifically tweaked to fit them.[121]
The 195mm standard, introduced in 2003, better supported larger wheel setups without increasing frame height, relocating middle wheels, downsizing middle wheels, or shifting mounts.[110][70] However, it also spread the mounting points farther apart – beyond the optimal heel-to-ball length that best supports an average foot. The 195mm standard required exceptionally stiff soles and boots, which were unavailable outside the speed skating market until the late 2010s. As a result, only speed boots made of carbon fiber adopted the 195mm standard.[70][122][123]
In 2016, Powerslide introduced the Trinity mounting system to accommodate a wide range of modern wheel setups while addressing the shortcomings of both the 165mm and 195mm standards. Demonstrating its versatility, Powerslide launched Trinity-mounted boots and frames across multiple disciplines, including recreational, urban, speed, slalom, hockey, and off-road skating.[124][107]
The name "Trinity" reflects its three mounting points, in contrast to the two-point systems used in 165mm, 195mm, and UFS. Trinity features two front mounting points positioned on the sides with a longitudinal offset, avoiding the centerline where the two frontmost wheels are located. The vacated centerline allows front wheels of any size or configuration to be placed within millimeters of the boot sole. The rear mount is elevated by 10 mm, creating a heel lift similar to the 165mm standard. Positioned under the heel and in line with the rear wheels, the rear mounting bolt remains unobtrusive due to the 10 mm rise. The longitudinal offset positions the two front mounts asymmetrically under the medial and lateral sides of the ball of the foot. The three mounting points create a triangular configuration with sides measuring 150 mm, 135 mm, and 55 mm. This design provides structural support tailored to a typical foot, ensuring optimal heel-to-ball alignment.[125][77][122][70][95]
A Trinity frame generally exhibits less wobble than 165mm and 195mm frames when comparing boots with similar sole rigidity and mounting platform strength. This is because a 165mm frame depends on the boot sole to function as a cantilever beam, with each side extending outward and applying bending forces to the centrally located mounting bolts. In contrast, a Trinity frame distributes structural support across the full width of the ball of the foot, much like a hockey blade holder with two front mounting wings. This broader support reinforces the sole and shortens its effective cantilever length on each side of the boot, resulting in better transfer of power from foot to wheels and support for weight transfer when leaning into an edge.[109][126][127][124]
A Trinity frame typically has a lower "front" mount height than its 165mm counterpart when using the same wheel setup. This is because the front mount of a Trinity frame can be positioned significantly lower than the tops of the front wheels due to its open centerline. However, a reduction in mount height alone is not a meaningful metric for skaters. The true advantage of a Trinity frame lies in its ability to position the front of the boot as close to the ground as the front wheels allow, effectively lowering the skate’s center of gravity. This improves control and stability, resulting in a safer and more responsive skating experience.[109][98][124]
Heel brakes and toe stops
[edit]A hard rubber brake attached to the heel of the frame, known as a heel brake, allows a skater to stop by lifting the toes of the skate and pressing the brake against the ground. Learning to use the heel brake is crucial for beginners, as it provides the easiest method to stop in emergencies and control speed on downhills. Recreational and fitness skates typically include one brake unit, which can be mounted on either the right or left skate. Most righthanded skaters choose to attach the brake to the right skate.[27]: 25–26
However, heel brakes can interfere with certain skating techniques. Hockey players and speed racers, for example, rely heavily on crossover turns, where one leg crosses over the other to execute sharp turns without losing speed. In such moves, a heel brake becomes an hindrance. Similarly, heel brakes limit a skater’s ability to perform freestyle slalom tricks and aggressive grinds. For this reason, specialized skates designed for racing, hockey, slalom, and aggressive skating generally do not come equipped with a brake.[128][37]: 30–38

Some urban skates come with a brake included in the box but left unattached, while others are not designed to accommodate a brake at all. Many intermediate and advanced skaters eventually remove the brakes from their recreational skates once they master stopping techniques that don't rely on them. Moves such as the T-stop are commonly used to slow down; one skate is placed perpendicular behind the other to form a "T" and increase friction. However, most braking maneuvers like these cause significant wear on wheels by grinding them against the ground. As a result, some skaters prefer to focus on obstacle avoidance using slalom techniques and controlled turns, which minimize wheel wear.[128][79][37]: 87–96, 101–114 [75]: 24
Inline figure skates are unique among inline designs in that they use a toe stop instead of a heel brake. Toe stops are essential for performing many artistic roller skating moves and jumps.
Wheels
[edit]Polyurethane wheels
[edit]Modern inline wheels are made of polyurethane, a material that revolutionized skating. Before the widespread adoption polyurethane, roller skates and skateboards used composition wheels made from clay or rubber mixed with sawdust and other fibers. These composition wheels were prone to swelling from moisture and could shatter on impact, contributing to a decline in skateboarding by the late 1960s.[20][129][130][131][P]
In the early 1970s, roller skaters experimented with polyurethane wheels, but they proved too grippy and slow for roller rinks with wooden floors, where composition wheels performed better. However, by the mid-1970s, skateboarders repurposed polyurethane wheels from roller skates, shaving them down to fit skateboards. These wheels excelled on streets and urban terrain, offering greater durability and impact resistance compared to their predecessors. Their elasticity provided a smoother ride over rough surfaces, helping to spark a resurgence in skateboarding after its late-1960s slump.[134][135][136]
In the early 1980s, Scott Olson similarly repurposed polyurethane wheels from roller skates, shaving down tens of thousands to fit the skates sold by his company, Ole’s Innovative Sports – later known as Rollerblade. The same qualities that made polyurethane wheels ideal for skateboarding, such as durability, impact resistance, and a smooth ride, also benefited inline skating. This innovation helped bring inline skating out of obscurity and transform it into a popular outdoor sport during the 1980s.[137][29][20][138]
What truly set polyurethane (or urethane) apart from previous wheel materials was its versatility. As an elastomer, it could be molded into any shape and formulated to achieve a wide range of properties including color, hardness, grippiness and rebound. This adaptability allowed for the development of specialized wheels for different inline skating disciplines, from large, hard wheels with pointed bullet profiles for outdoor racing to small, soft wheels with rounded profiles for indoor hockey.[139][138][37]: 20–26 [Q]
Another remarkable aspect of a polyurethane compound is that it can be formulated to achieve high elasticity, regardless of the desired values for other properties such as hardness. In material science, this elasticity is often measured with the Bayshore Resilience test. In the inline skating industry, it is referred to as wheel rebound. A wheel with high rebound efficiently converts energy from a skater's stride into acceleration, while a wheel with low rebound dissipates much of that energy, leaving little to propel the skater forward. High-rebound wheels are beneficial across all inline skating disciplines, enhancing performance and efficiency.[141][R][37]: 24–26
Wheel structure
[edit]From the 1910s to the 1970s, many wheeled skates served as precursors to modern inline skates. Most of these early skates featured small wheels made of rubber or rubber reinforced with fibers, often with relatively simple constructions. In many cases, the wheel was merely a rubber ring shaped like a donut, with a bearing cylinder press-fit into its hollow center – an example of which can be seen in the 1966 Chicago Roller-Blade.[19] Other designs incorporated two metal discs to enclose the bearing cylinder more securely within the rubber wheel, as seen in the 1975 Super Sport Skate.[21]
These early rubber wheels were designed to flex under load, providing grip on road surfaces. Nevertheless, the same elasticity that enhanced their performance also made them increasingly unsuitable for securely housing precision ball bearings, which inline skates began adopting from roller skates in the 1980s. A misaligned bearing could cause the wheel to tilt, resulting in constant dragging against the frame. This friction not only impaired performance but also generated heat, which could soften the wheel and further compound the misalignment issue.[142][143]

To address this in roller skates, metal bushings were introduced to hold two ball bearings and a spacer in precise alignment at a 90° angle to the wheel axle. While effective, these bushings added weight and introduced new issues such as metal grinding noises. As plastic became more common, metal bushings were replaced by injection-molded plastic hubs. These single-piece hubs not only securely encased the bearing assembly but also interlocked with the elastic wheel without additional hardware. Furthermore, plastic hubs reduced overall wheel weight, unlike metal bushings, which increased it.[142]
In the 1980s, Rollerblade collaborated with Kryptonics to develop polyurethane wheels for inline skates. The inline industry adapted hub innovations from roller skates, integrating them into inline wheels. These wheels were manufactured by placing a plastic hub at the center of a mold and then pouring molten polyurethane around it. The liquid polyurethane flowed into cavities and holes in the hub before settling. As it cooled and solidified, it formed a secure interlock with the hub.[N][103][Q][S]

Modern inline wheels consist of two main components: an outer polyurethane tire, shaped like a donut, and an inner plastic hub, also known as a core. The hub features a hollow center designed to accommodate a spacer and two ISO 608 ball bearings. Made of hard plastic, the hub securely holds the bearings in place through a friction fit - something the softer polyurethane tire cannot achieve. On the other hand, the soft polyurethane tire is able to deform upon ground contact, cushioning the landing and gripping the ground.[103][Q][45]
Wheel hubs
[edit]The outer rim of the hub, known as the interlock, is buried within the polyurethane tire. Unless the tire is made from clear urethane, this rim remains hidden from view. Its size, shape, and design vary depending on the wheel’s outer diameter and the demands of different skating disciplines. Beyond mechanically securing the tire to the hub, the interlock rim also enhances the wheel’s overall structural rigidity.[T][S][144][145] Some manufacturers apply a bonding agent to the hub before pouring the polyurethane, creating a chemical bond that reduces reliance on mechanical interlocking. Others use polyurethane-blended plastic hubs, such as "Estaloc," developed by Robert J. Labeda of Labeda Wheels in collaboration with B.F. Goodrich, which chemically bonds with the polyurethane tire during the molding process.[Q][146]
The visible portion of the hub varies in size depending on the wheel’s overall dimensions and the requirements of specific skating disciplines. In some small wheels used for aggressive skating, the visible hub may appear as a thin ring between the bearings and the tire, just large enough to serve as a bearing housing. In contrast, larger racing wheels from the 1990s, typically around 82 mm in diameter, often featured hubs occupying nearly 50% of the wheel’s diameter. By the 2020s, even larger wheels from 110 mm to 125 mm feature hubs that take up most of the wheel’s diameter.[43]: 19–24 [37]: 26–27 [145][147]
As wheel sizes increase, so too do their visible hubs. A solid polyurethane wheel of substantial size would be prohibitively heavy and excessively flexible, making it impractical for inline skating. To address this, large inline wheels adapted design principles from polyurethane stroller wheels, incorporating lightweight yet rigid spoked hubs with an interlock rim to secure the polyurethane tire. These spoked hubs, also known as open cores, feature an outer rim connected to the bearing housing by distinct spokes. In contrast, a full hub, also referred to as a closed core, consists of a solid disc with no clear separation between the outer rim and the bearing housing. Between these two designs is the semi-open core, which features a solid disc but with small hollows drilled between the outer rim and bearing housing to reduce weight.[148][145][37]: 26–27 [138]
Spoked cores are generally lighter than full cores but may offer reduced rigidity and structural integrity. As a result, aggressive skaters typically favor small wheels with robust full cores to ensure durability against the high impact of jumps and landings. Conversely, speed and marathon skaters prefer large wheels with spoked hubs, as the open core design allows air to circulate around the hub, helping dissipate heat generated by the bearings during prolonged high-speed use. Without adequate heat dissipation, the polyurethane tire may soften, increasing deformation during rolling and potentially leading to separation from the hub.[138][45][103][149]
Wheel diameter and profile
[edit]
Inline skate wheels in the 2020s range from as small as 55 mm to as large as 125 mm in diameter.[150][145] However, their width remains industry-standard at 24 mm, regardless of size. Wheel frames are designed for specific setups, accommodating a set number of wheels of particular diameters. Despite these variations, all frames assume a uniform 24 mm hub width and polyurethane tires no wider than 24 mm.[45][143][151]
Wheel profile refers to the shape of the wheel’s contact surface when viewed head-on, that is, the portion of the wheel that touches the ground. While any wheel diameter can, in theory, be paired with any profile, certain combinations prove optimal for different skating disciplines.[151][152]
Some inline wheels feature a flat contact profile, resembling car tires with a rounded rectangular shape. This shape provides a stable upright rolling experience with a strong grip on the ground, due to the larger surface area. Flat-profile wheels work well for disciplines that keep skates upright while rolling, such as aggressive skating.[149][143] Typical aggressive wheels are relatively small, ranging from 55 mm to 64 mm in diameter. Grindwheels, installed as middle wheels, are even smaller, typically under 50 mm. Made from hard polyurethane or plastic, they have reduced traction to minimize wheel bite during a grind. However, where grip is needed, such as during stair bashing, the flat profile’s large contact surface helps compensate for the grindwheels' inherently low traction.[153][81][150][57] In the 1990s, aggressive wheels and grindwheels trended toward completely flat profiles. However, in the 2020s and beyond, aggressive skaters began favoring wheels with slightly rounder profiles, offering a balance between stability and maneuverability.[152]
Most inline wheels have a round profile rather than a flat one. This is because skaters don't always roll with their skates perfectly upright. Much like ice skating with blades, many inline skating techniques involve edging - that is, skating on the side of the wheels. This requires the skate to tilt at various angles, depending on the move being performed.[D][49] A round profile maintains a consistent, usable contact surface across different edging angles, even if that surface is smaller than what a flat-profile wheel provides when fully upright. Disciplines like inline hockey and freestyle slalom typically favor round-profile wheels of smallish to medium size, with diameters no larger than 80 mm.[151][152][145]
At the opposite end of the spectrum from the flat profile is the bullet profile, also known as the pointy, thin, narrow, or elliptical profile. This shape is usually found in larger wheels ranging from 90 mm to 125 mm in diameter. The combination of a bullet profile and large diameter serves the unique demands of speed skating, where racers aim to satisfy two seemingly conflicting goals.[38]: 51–52 [138][152][52]
The first goal is to maximize static friction between wheel and ground during the stride phase with a deep edging angle, converting as much energy as possible from a lateral push-off into forward kinetic motion. The bullet profile supports this by offering a generous contact surface when the skate is deeply tilted, effectively extending the power phase of the stride, covering a large striding distance.[45][66]: 316 The second goal is to minimize rolling friction, more appropriately called rolling resistance, during the glide phase. When the skate returns to an upright position, the bullet profile offers a small point of contact with the ground, reducing rolling resistance and enabling longer, faster glides with minimal energy loss.[45][66]: 316

In addition, large wheels function like flywheels, storing substantial rotational energy, which helps the racer reach and maintain high speeds over long distances. The gyroscopic effect of these large spinning wheels further enhances efficiency by stabilizing the skate’s direction, promoting straight-line tracking and reducing energy lost to unwanted lateral drift. However, this benefit comes with a trade-off: larger wheels have greater mass, which makes them harder and slower to accelerate.[45][37]: 24–25
In contrast, small wheels are easier to accelerate due to their lower rotational inertia, enabling faster starts and quicker maneuvers. They also lower a skater's center of gravity, improving control and stability. However, smaller wheels can result in a bumpier ride, as they struggle more over obstacles like bumps, cracks, sticks, and pebbles.[138][79][150]
Wheel hardness and deformation
[edit]
Polyurethane wheels deform under the weight of the skater, and a certain amount of deformation is desirable because it increases the contact area between the wheel and the ground, enhancing grip. This deformed contact area, often referred to as the footprint in the literature, differs slightly from the profile of an unloaded wheel.[143][46][45] The ideal amount of deformation depends on the skating surface. On smooth, slippery indoor rinks with polished wood floors, softer wheels are preferred, as their greater deformation allows them to mold to the surface and improve traction. In contrast, outdoor roads with asphalt surfaces call for harder wheels that deform less, since the naturally rough texture of the ground already provides sufficient grip with minimal footprint.[75]: 18–19 [147][154][43]: 21
Achieving the right balance of grip is crucial. Too little grip can cause the skater to slip during the stride phase, wasting energy without translating it into forward motion. On the other hand, too much grip creates excessive rolling resistance, which quickly saps speed during the glide phase.[45][46]
In general, softer wheels generate more rolling resistance due to their greater deformation, while harder wheels require less effort to start rolling and maintain speed on smooth surfaces. However, rolling resistance is also influenced by the roughness of the terrain. When a hard wheel rolls over a bumpy surface, energy is wasted as it repeatedly lifts the skater’s weight over each small surface imperfection, offsetting some of the advantages typically associated with hard wheels, such as quick acceleration and higher sustained speed. In contrast, the smoother ride provided by softer wheels can help absorb these irregularities, reducing energy loss and partially compensating for the speed sacrificed to deformation.[155][156][157][158]
The actual degree of wheel deformation is influenced by three main factors: the skater's weight, the wheel's intrinsic hardness, and its current temperature. A skater’s weight remains relatively constant, and wheel hardness is fixed at the time of manufacture. However, wheel temperature varies; it is influenced by ambient conditions, heat absorbed from rolling over warm surfaces, and heat generated by the bearings during prolonged high-speed skating. As wheel temperature rises, the polyurethane softens and deforms more easily, temporarily reducing the wheel’s effective hardness.[N][159][45]
Wheel hardness is measured using the Shore durometer type A scale, which is designed for relatively soft materials. The scale ranges from 0A (the softest) to 100A (the hardest). Inline skate wheels typically fall between 72A and 95A, depending on their intended use. Indoor hockey wheels are among the softest, usually rated between 72A and 78A. Outdoor wheels for recreation use slightly harder compounds, typically ranging from 80A to 84A. Freestyle slalom and urban skating wheels fall in the medium-hard range, from 83A to 88A. At the upper end, aggressive skating wheels are some of the hardest, rated between 88A and 95A.[43]: 21–22 [151][154][147]
Within the suitable hardness range for a given activity, skaters would choose wheels at the softer end to benefit from improved grip, which allows for quicker acceleration during lateral strides. Softer wheels also offer a more comfortable ride on uneven surfaces, as their greater deformation helps absorb vibrations and reduces energy loss. But this comes at the cost of faster wear. Conversely, wheels at the harder end of the range enable skaters to reach and maintain higher top speeds during gliding. Harder wheels are more resistant to wear on rough surfaces and provide a more direct, responsive feel. But this can result in a bumpier ride and some loss of energy.[138][160][147]
Dual density wheels
[edit]For nearly two decades after polyurethane wheels became standard on modern inline skates, skaters faced a difficult compromise: selecting a single wheel hardness to balance two conflicting sets of needs. On one hand, softer wheels were desirable for shock absorption over rough terrain and for maintaining grip at deep edging angles. On the other hand, harder wheels offered better wear resistance on abrasive surfaces and allowed for higher top speeds while gliding upright. Skaters had to weigh these trade-offs carefully, as no single hardness could perfectly satisfy both demands.[155][161][45]

In 1997, K2 filed a patent for what it called a dual durometer wheel - later known in the industry as a dual density wheel - designed to offer the comfort of a smooth ride over rough terrain without sacrificing the key advantages of hard wheels: wear resistance and high top speed. Unlike conventional wheels made from a single polyurethane compound, this design featured two layers: a hard outer tire, typically rated between 70A and 100A, and a soft inner ring, rated between 20A and 75A. The compressible inner ring absorbed shocks and vibrations, while the hard outer layer maintained durability and top speed.[155]

That same year, Neal Piper and Tom Peterson of Hyper Wheels filed a patent for a similar concept, but with a key difference: instead of using a soft polyurethane ring, their design featured an inner foam mandrel with a triangular cross-section. This approach aimed not only to deliver the same advantages offered by K2’s dual-durometer wheels, but also to enhance grip during deep edging. The foam mandrel was encased in an airtight skin, which shaped load-bearing side walls in the hard outer tire. The triangular foam shape preserved the tip of the wheel profile from deforming when skating upright, while allowing the sides of the profile to deform under the angled loads of striding and turning at around a 30° tilt, improving grip during these maneuvers.[46]
In 2004, Neal Piper, widely regarded as one of the most influential skate wheel chemists,[45] filed a patent for a multi-density wheel that approached the same problem from the opposite direction of his earlier 1997 Hyper Wheels design. Instead of using a hard outer layer with a soft inner ring, this new design featured a soft polyurethane outer layer, typically rated between 60A and 75A, molded over an internal support structure made from much harder materials, usually rated between 80A and 95A or even higher. The concept first materialized as the Revision Variant hockey wheels, and later evolved into the Recoil and Flex product lines. These wheels allowed hockey players to achieve top speed without sacrificing high grip.[162][163]
Wheel rebound
[edit]
Wheel rebound refers to the amount of energy a polyurethane wheel returns as it recovers its shape after being deformed by weight or force. While the term is commonly used, there is no consensus on how to consistently measure and publish rebound ratings. However, the relative rebound of different wheels can be easily compared by dropping them from the same height and observing how high each one bounces back from the floor.[37]: 24–26 [43]: 21–22
Rebound is a universally-desirable trait, unlike other wheel characteristics that must be carefully chosen to suit a skater’s style, terrain, and preferences. Across all disciplines and surfaces, the higher the rebound, the better. Such is not true of diameter, profile, or hardness. If cost were no concern, skaters would always choose the wheels with the highest rebound.[154]

A high-rebound wheel feels lively, snappy, and responsive, while a low-rebound wheel feels dead. Skaters on high-rebound wheels roll faster and with less effort, as more of the energy generated by each push against the ground is returned by the wheels and converted into forward motion. In contrast, low-rebound wheels behave more like flat tires; they absorb energy rather than returning it, forcing the skater to work harder to maintain speed, much like walking on soft sand.[141][159]
A polyurethane compound can be formulated to exhibit a wide range of rebound characteristics, independent of its hardness. These are distinct properties of a polyurethane wheel. Hardness determines how much the wheel deforms under load, such as the compression caused by a skater’s weight. Rebound refers to how much of that deformation energy is returned to help propel the skater forward.[R][45][37]: 24–26

Rebound can be measured in several ways, including the Bayshore Resilience test and the Rebound Resilience test. The former calculates the ratio of rebound height to drop height, while the latter measures the percentage of energy returned after an impact. When applied to polyurethane, these tests are often described collectively as measuring polyurethane resilience, an industry term synonymous with rebound. Although both tests aim to quantify a material’s elasticity, their results are not directly comparable or convertible. In the context of inline skate wheels, rebound is rarely specified in technical datasheets. When it is, it’s typically presented using vague, consumer-friendly labels such as High Rebound (HR), Super High Rebound (SHR), or Ultra High Rebound (UHR).[141][164][143][154][145]
In mechanics, rebound is often characterized by its complementary property, elastic hysteresis. Rebound refers to the amount of energy a wheel returns after deformation. On the other hand, elastic hysteresis measures the amount of energy lost, typically as heat, during the deformation and recovery cycle. These two properties are inversely proportional: a wheel with high elastic hysteresis dissipates more energy as heat when compressed and released, resulting in lower rebound.[165][141]
Rolling resistance
[edit]
Rolling resistance is often the main factor limiting a skater’s ability to reach top speed. Also known as rolling friction or rolling drag, it refers to the force that opposes the rolling motion of the wheels as the skater glides across a surface.[66][46]
Several factors influence rolling resistance, but the most significant is typically elastic hysteresis. Recognizing its impact, all reputable wheel manufacturers formulate polyurethane compounds to deliver high rebound and thus low elastic hysteresis. This is particularly crucial in speed skating, where maximizing top speed is the primary objective.[156][75]: 18–19 [66]: 316

The weight of the skater and the hardness of the wheel together determine the degree of wheel deformation and the resulting increase in footprint under load. Footprint is another key contributor to rolling resistance. In general, speed skaters favor hard wheels with a pointy profile, which create smaller footprints and therefore minimize rolling resistance when skated upright. The desire to reduce gliding footprint while maintaining comfort led to the development of dual-density wheels.[46][66]: 316
The roughness of the terrain is another key contributor to rolling resistance. As a wheel rolls over a bumpy surface, energy is lost in repeatedly lifting the skater’s weight over each small imperfection. The need to cushion bumpy rides without increasing the wheel’s footprint under load was a major driving force behind the development of dual-density wheels.[157][156][155][158]
Wheel diameter is another important factor in rolling resistance, particularly on rough terrain. In general, larger wheels roll more easily over uneven surfaces. Increasing wheel diameter reduces the coefficient of rolling resistance by decreasing the angle of incidence between the wheel perimeter and surface imperfections. In other words, a larger wheel can bridge bumps and irregularities more smoothly, resulting in less energy loss and easier rolling. This is why relatively large wheels, typically ranging from 90 mm to 125 mm, are commonly used in urban skating and marathon skating, where both speed and the ability to handle imperfect surfaces are essential.[158][157][52]
Bearings
[edit]How bearings work
[edit]Ball bearings enable inline skate wheels to rotate freely and smoothly. The adoption of modern ISO 608 ball bearings, combined with polyurethane wheels, helped propel inline skating to peak popularity in the 1990s.[166][137][41]
Ball bearings separate the skate’s only moving parts, the wheels, from the non-moving structure. Wheels rotate around axles, which are bolted tightly to the frame. The frame is, in turns, firmly attached to the boot. Thus all non-moving parts of the skate remain fixed in place, securely connected using glue, rivets, welds, bolts, or other fastening methods. Bearings minimize friction between the wheel and the axle, allowing skaters to reach higher speeds with less effort.[37]: 26–29, 39–45 [U]
Bearings are precision-made to endure high-speed rotations. On flat terrain, a skater on 80 mm wheels can cruise at a speed of 20 km/h (12.4 mph). At that speed, the wheels, and thus the bearings, rotate at 1,326 revolutions per minute (RPM). To withstand the heat and stress of such speeds, bearings are typically made from durable materials like stainless steel, chrome steel, or ceramic.[167][168][169]
A ball bearing consists of two concentric rings: an outer race and an inner race, separated by a set of rolling balls, usually between 5 and 8 in an ISO 608 bearing. The outer race is fixed to the wheel hub and rotates with it, while the inner race is fixed to the axle and remains stationary. Deep grooves are machined into the races to form raceways that securely hold the balls in place. A retainer, or cage, separates the balls and distributes them evenly along the raceways.[169][37]: 26–29, 39–45 [U][170]
Purpose-built bearings
[edit]
Bearings are commonly rated on the ABEC scale, which measures manufacturing precision tolerances, with ratings ranging from 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest) in odd numbers. Originally developed for high-speed industrial machinery, the ABEC scale does not consider material type, material quality, or durability - factors that significantly impact bearing performance in skates. It also ignores how bearing enclosures respond to dirt, moisture, and other real-world skating conditions. While higher ABEC ratings may indicate better precision, they represent only one of many factors that determine a bearing’s suitability for inline skating.[37]: 27–28 [167][169][166]
ABEC precision ratings do not directly indicate how fast a bearing can safely spin. The actual maximum speed, called the mechanical limiting speed, depends on other factors such as materials, lubrication, load, and operating temperature. Manufacturers typically publish datasheets specifying the limiting speed for each tolerance class. For example, SKF, a Swedish bearing manufacturer, lists a limiting speed of 38,000 RPM for its ABEC 3-rated 608 bearings. That is more than sufficient for inline skating, considering that an average skater cruising on 80 mm wheels reaches only about 1,326 RPM, or 3.5% of the limiting speed.[V][171]

Recognizing the unique demands that skating places on bearings, George Powell of Powell Peralta collaborated with a Swiss bearing manufacturer in the early 1980s to develop 608 bearings specifically tailored for skateboarding. Unlike conventional 608 bearings designed for electric motors operating in clean environments, these purpose-built bearings were engineered to better withstand multi-directional loads from street skating. The outer-facing side featured a serviceable shield that could be easily pried open with a pin for cleaning, while the inner side was left open, as it sat protected within the wheel hub. Understanding that even high-precision bearings degrade when clogged with dirt, Powell replaced standard metal retainers with molded plastic ones, allowing skaters to easily remove these retainers and clean the balls and raceways. He also formulated a custom lubricant optimized for skating conditions. The result was the launch of Bones Swiss in 1983, a product that remains a gold standard for both skateboarders and inline skaters to this day.[172][173][174][166][175]

Reputable skate bearing manufacturers generally avoid using ABEC ratings, as they do not reflect the engineering tailored specifically for skating. Instead, bearings are marketed under specialized product lines. For example, Bones Bearings offers models such as Bones Swiss, Bones Swiss Ceramic, Bones REDS®, and Bones Big Balls®. All of these are labeled Skate Rated™, indicating that every component is designed and tested with the demands of real skating in mind. Powell’s “Swiss” design and engineering has become an unofficial standard in the skating industry, with copycat brands offering bearings labeled Swiss that mimic the same structure and claimed quality, despite not being manufactured in Switzerland.[66]: 317–318 [75]: 22–24 [176][177]

Similarly, TWINCAM bearings were developed in the early 1990s specifically for inline skating and were promoted with the slogan “Beyond ABEC”. In 1991, the company launched serviceable bearings featuring removable shields held in place with a C-clip, allowing for easier maintenance. The following year, it introduced TK CLASSIC Racing Gel, a water-repellent lubricant formulated for inline skating. In 2002, TWINCAM debuted the ILQ-9, a 6-ball bearing - an alternative to the standard 7-ball 608 bearings widely used at the time. The company later expanded the line with models such as ILQ-9 Pro with rubber shields, ILQ-7 with 7 balls (commonly found in OEM skates), ILQ-X mr2 with a 29% weight reduction, and ILQ-Midget with 11 balls. TWINCAM trademarked ILQ (InLine Qualified) as a proprietary quality rating system, positioning it as a specialized alternative to the ABEC scale. Various ILQ models are rebranded and distributed by major inline skate companies, including FR Skates, K2, Rollerblade, and Powerslide/Wicked.[178][179][68]
Contamination and bearing friction
[edit]
In addition to the rolling resistance generated by the wheels, skaters also experience energy loss due to bearing friction. As the outer race of a bearing rotates around the inner race, various internal components - such as the balls, cage, lubricant, raceways, and seals - dissipate energy through rolling friction, sliding contact, and viscous drag. Bearing friction encompasses all of these sources of energy loss.[180][181]
In practice, however, bearing friction in clean, properly lubricated bearings is insignificant compared to the rolling resistance of polyurethane wheels. Purpose-built bearings from reputable brands usually meet or exceed ABEC 3 specifications. As a result, bearing selection has a comparatively small impact on overall performance for the majority of inline skaters, while bearings are still new and clean.[157][171][66]: 317–318 [75]: 22–24
Bearing selection, however, plays a significant role in determining how long bearings perform efficiently and reliably as advertised, before requiring cleaning or replacement. This largely depends on the bearing’s ability to resist contamination from dirt, dust, and moisture. Even microscopic debris, such as particles the size of a human hair, can scratch raceways and interfere with smooth rotation. Among all factors affecting bearing performance, contamination is considered the most detrimental. It can significantly reduce efficiency, slow rotation, or in severe cases, cause the bearing to seize. Under such conditions, any theoretical performance advantages based on manufacturer specifications become irrelevant.[182][173] Skaters often joke that the fastest bearings in the world are simply ones that are new or freshly cleaned and lubricated.[174][167]
Bearing shields
[edit]Inline skate bearings are protected from external contamination primarily through the use of shields. While 608 bearings in general can employ various shield types, inline skating and skateboarding commonly use one of four: non-serviceable metal gap shields (Z), serviceable metal gap shields with a C-ring (ZS), serviceable rubber gap shields bonded to a metal insert (RS), and full-contact labyrinth rubber lip seals (RSL).[166][W][43]: 42–45
Z Shields: Z-type metal shields are among the most common on 608 bearings. These simple metal shields are labeled "Z" by manufacturers and skate brands. They snap into a groove on the outer race and do not contact the inner race, leaving a small gap that prevents friction but allows dirt and moisture to enter. A non-contact gap shield allows the inner race to rotate freely without drags from the shield. Bearings shielded on both sides in this manner are designated "ZZ", and are non-serviceable, as the shields cannot be removed without being bent or deformed. Rollerblade SG bearings are typical examples of ZZ-shielded bearings.[174][187][170][W]
ZS Shields: ZS metal shields are held in place by a removable C-clip (or C-ring) seated in the outer race. Bearings with this design on both sides are labeled "2ZS" or "ZZS". Like Z shields, ZS shields are non-contact and impose minimal drag on the bearing, but they offer limited protection against dirt and moisture, because of the gap. Their key advantage is serviceability: skaters can remove and reattach the shields without damage, enabling regular cleaning and relubrication to keep bearings working at top condition. SKF manufactures such bearings, and TWINCAM has made this shield style popular with its ILQ inline bearings.[169][166][170][W]
RS Shields: In skating, RS rubber shields specifically refer to the style popularized by Bones Swiss. These consist of a nitrile rubber shield bonded to a metal insert. The shield snaps into the outer race and can be pried off for maintenance. RS shields are non-contact and offer improved protection over Z and ZS shields, particularly against microscopic particles. However, moisture can still penetrate and cause corrosion. Many popular skate brands avoid double-shielded 2RS bearings and instead use a single RS shield, leaving the opposite face of the bearing open for ease of maintenance. This open side is positioned inward when mounted inside the wheel hub, which effectively protects it from external debris. This configuration allows skaters to remove the plastic retainer and lubricate the bearing balls without needing to remove the shield, providing both protection and convenient access for servicing.[182][185][186][170][W]

RSL Seals: Full-contact labyrinth rubber seals (RSL) represent a stark departure from non-contact shield designs. These seals feature a lip with a labyrinth-shaped profile lightly touching a surface of the inner race. This configuration effectively seals out not only dirt but also moisture. Typical bearings with non-contact shields use light oil as a lubricant, since grease tends to trap any debris that makes it past the shield, accelerating internal wear. Bearings with RSL seals, however, are far more resistant to contaminants, allowing them to be packed with heavy, viscous grease. This grease provides longer-lasting lubrication and superior protection in sealed environments compared to the lighter oil formulations used in non-contact shielded designs.[185][170][W]
RSL-sealed bearings are designed for near-zero maintenance, with the tradeoff being increased bearing drag. Contact seals alone can account for about 60% of total bearing friction, with an additional 30% from the viscous grease, and only 10% from rolling friction between the balls, cage, and raceways. In addition, Heavily greased bearings do not spin freely when unloaded. However, when subjected to a skater’s full body weight, the pressure forces the grease out of the ball paths, enabling smooth and efficient wheel rotation under load. Dragon Bearings offers several 2RSL models featuring full-contact labyrinth seals on both sides of the bearing.[180][185]
Skate tuning
[edit]Terminology around skate setup, customization and tuning can vary depending on the skating discipline. For an urban skater, a big-wheel setup typically means either a four-wheel configuration with wheels larger than usual (e.g. 4x90mm), or a triskate with three wheels, usually 110 mm or larger. In contrast, for aggressive skaters, anything with wheels 80 mm or larger qualifies as a big-wheel setup. Meanwhile, for speed skaters, large wheels are the standard. To them, a triskate with wheels smaller than 125 mm is considered small and unconventional. Labels such as "big-wheel" and "triskate" refer not just to the wheels but also to the frame and boot. For example, a triskate with 125 mm wheels requires a more robust frame and a supportive boot to handle the increased leverage and speed.[188][189][51][68]
Generally, a wheel setup refers to both the number and size of wheels on a skate. A 4x80mm setup, which uses four wheels each measuring 80 mm in diameter, is common for recreational skates. A 3x110mm setup, featuring three 110 mm wheels, has become popular among urban skaters in the 2020s. There are also five-wheel configurations such as 5x80mm, which were widely used in the speed skating scene during the 1990s but are now primarily associated with wizard skating.[52][78]
Beyond count and size, wheel setups also differ in how the wheels are arranged, resulting in distinct skating experiences even with identical wheel numbers and sizes. For example, when all four wheels in a 4x80mm setup touch the ground evenly, it’s called a flat setup or flat configuration. When the front and rear wheels are slightly raised, forming a banana-like curve in the profile of the wheel set, it’s known as a classic rockered setup. Another variation is the hi-lo setup, where progressively smaller wheels are installed from rear to front (for example, 80-78-76-74 mm). In this setup, all four wheels remain in contact with the ground, but the heel sits higher than the toe, simulating a slight forward lean or flex.[56][63]
A skater may customize a single boot with different wheel setups depending on the intended use. For example, a short frame with four soft 80 mm wheels might be mounted for indoor skating. On another day, the same boot could be fitted with a longer frame using three harder 110 mm wheels for outdoor long-distance sessions. Some frames are designed to support multiple configurations. The Endless 90 frame, for instance, is well known for accommodating both a 4x90mm setup and a 3x110mm setup. Even without changing the frame or boot, swapping wheels with different hardness, rebound, diameter, or profile can significantly alter the skating experience.[76][190]
Regardless of the setup, skaters must rotate their wheels periodically to maintain even wear and preserve the intended wheel profile. For example, the front wheel often wears out more quickly, which can gradually shift a flat setup into a front-rockered one, if rotations are neglected. In some cases, specific rotation patterns take advantage of natural wear to achieve a particular profile, such as the hi-lo configuration.[33]: 81–86
Wheel rotation
[edit]
Inline skate wheels are consumable components that wear down with use and require periodic rotation and eventual replacement. Typically, front wheels experience faster wear than rear wheels, and the inside edges degrade more quickly than the outside. Right-handed skaters often cause greater wear on the wheels of the right skate, the dominant foot, compared to the left. Excessive lopsided wear on one edge causes that side to lose its original wheel profile, compromising its intended performance. Severely worn polyurethane tires may become too thin and risk de-coring (disbonding from wheel hub) while a skater is in motion.[33]: 81–86 [37]: 45–50 [191][192]
Regular wheel rotation helps distribute wear evenly, similar to tire rotation in car. This practice prevents any single wheel from becoming prematurely unusable and extends the functional lifespan of the entire set.[33]: 81–86 [192]
Wheel rotation generally involves three types of adjustments. First, wheels can be repositioned between axles to balance diameter differences, typically by moving less-worn wheels to positions that experience faster wear. Second, wheels can be flipped to reverse the inside and outside edges, mitigating lopsided wear caused by specific skating motions such as push-offs. Third, wheels can be swapped between the left and right skates to address asymmetrical wear due to foot dominance.[143][43]: 41–42 [38]: 41–45 [191]

The most commonly used rotation pattern for a four-wheel setup in the 21st century is the 1-3/2-4 rotation. This method involves exchanging the first (frontmost) wheel with the third, and the second with the fourth (rearmost). This repositioning helps balance differences in wheel diameter caused by uneven wear. Simultaneously, each wheel is swapped between the left and right skates, effectively flipping them so that a worn inside edge becomes the outside edge on the opposite skate. This process addresses both lopsided edge wear and asymmetrical wear between skates. At some point, all of these regularly rotated wheels become severely worn and can be replaced together with a new set.[191][192][37]: 45–50 [38]: 41–45

Various other rotation patterns may be appropriate depending on the skater’s style, discipline, and equipment. The optimal rotation method and frequency should be determined based on observed wear patterns, which can be influenced by factors such as the skater's weight, technique, skating surface roughness, and local climate conditions.[43]: 41–42 [37]: 45–50 [191]
Another widely used rotation pattern, the first documented method, is the 4-1-2-3 rotation. It was first described in Rollerblades: Dryland Training for Ice Hockey, a book commissioned by Scott Olson in 1985. In this pattern, the frontmost wheel is moved to the fourth axle position, while the second, third, and rearmost wheels each shift forward by one position. Over time, each wheel rotates through all four axle positions in a typical four-wheel setup. Like the 1-3/2-4 rotation, this method helps distribute wear evenly across all wheels, allowing the entire set to be replaced at once when fully worn.[33]: 81–86 [191][143]

Yet another rotation method, known as the hi-lo rotation, is designed to minimize abrupt changes in effective wheel diameters that can occur following full wheel set replacements, an unintended side effect of both the 1-3/2-4 and 4-1-2-3 patterns. In this method, four wheels are removed from each skate, and all eight are stacked into a vertical column, sorted by observed diameter from largest (at the bottom) to smallest and most worn (at the top). If needed, the two most worn wheels at the top are discarded, and two new wheels are added to the bottom of the stack. The smallest remaining wheel is then mounted on the frontmost axle of the non-dominant skate, with its worn side facing outward. The second smallest wheel is mounted on the frontmost axle of the dominant skate. This process continues in ascending order of diameter, ending with the largest new wheel mounted on the rearmost axle of the dominant skate. The result is a hi-lo wheel setup that simulates forward flex, which some skaters prefer. Additionally, this method introduces minimal perceptible variation in ride height across rotations.[191]
Assemblies
[edit]
Customization discussions often focus on swapping or upgrading individual skate components. A given boot can accommodate a variety of compatible frames, and each frame is designed to receive a specific range of wheel sizes. Bearings and spacers within the wheels can be upgraded or replaced, as can axle screws, bolts, and bushings. In some cases, a particular combination of components is treated as a single unit during customization conversations.[143][43]: 19–24
While consumers and retailers typically lack standardized terms for these combinations, the skate industry uses the term assembly to describe them. In patent applications, where consistency and precision are important within individual applications, several types of assemblies are commonly defined. An axle assembly generally refers to the rods, screws, bolts, and bushings that form an axle capable of securing a wheel to the frame. A bearing assembly consists of two ball bearings separated by a spacer. When a bearing assembly is installed into a wheel hub with a polyurethane tire, the complete unit is often called a wheel assembly.[193][168][194]
The term frame assembly typically refers to all components of a skate excluding the boot and wheel assemblies. In a standard recreational skate, this includes the frame itself, the brake unit, the hardware used to attach the frame to the boot, and the axle assemblies that secure the wheel assemblies to the frame. In aggressive skates, the frame assembly may also include H-blocks and other structural elements designed to support grinding and related maneuvers.[194][195]
Bearing alignment
[edit]When skaters customize their setups or rotate wheels, careful attention must be paid to how bearings are re-installed. If bearings are not properly aligned, or if they are allowed to shift after installation, the wheels can tilt. Misaligned wheels roll unevenly, drag against the frame, generate vibrations, and overheat the polyurethane tires, hubs, and bearing assembly. This not only reduces performance but can also cause tires to debond from their hubs and lead to premature wear on bearings and axles. Bearing misalignment is one of the most harmful issues in skating, second only to bearing contamination from dirt.[143][142][103][196][37]: 39–45

In the 1980s, Rollerblade and Kryptonics jointly developed plastic hubs for inline skate wheels. A key design objective was to create precise, rigid bearing seats within the hub to hold and align the bearings accurately. Each bearing seat is formed on the side of the hub as a bearing recess measuring 7 mm deep, the exact width of an ISO 608 ball bearing, allowing the bearings to be press-fit with a flush mount.[103][197][198][169]
Inline skate wheel hubs have a standardized width of 24 mm, and all inline frames are designed to accommodate hubs of this exact size. With bearings mounted flush on either side, this leaves a 10 mm gap between them. This gap is filled by a bearing abutment, an internal protrusion molded into the hub that acts as a mechanical shoulder to precisely position and support the bearings.[45][103]

A ball bearing consists of two concentric races that rotate relative to each other. The outer race is friction-mounted into the bearing seat, becoming fixed in place with the hub and, by extension, the polyurethane tire. As a result, it rotates together with the wheel.[197]

The inner race, by contrast, is held stationary as part of the axle assembly. A spacer matching the 10 mm length of the hub’s bearing abutment is placed between the two inner races. When the axle bolt is tightened, it clamps the frame walls around the bearing assembly, which includes the two inner races and the spacer. This creates a rigid structure that binds the axle, spacer, and inner races together as a single fixture attached to the frame and, ultimately, the boot.[103][197][43]: 19–24 [38]: 43–44
The bearing abutment and the outer face of the bearing together define a bearing plane. Each bearing establishes its own plane, and the two planes should be parallel and spaced exactly 10 mm apart. The spacer and the inner races should also meet at these planes. Bearing alignment refers to the condition in which all of these geometric relationships are correctly maintained.[103][197]
Axial play to support side load
[edit]
ISO 608 bearings used in inline skates are classified as deep groove ball bearings, as opposed to angular contact ball bearings or cylindrical roller bearings. Deep groove ball bearings, also referred to as radial ball bearings, are primarily designed to support loads applied perpendicular (radial) to the axle shaft. In inline skating, the skater's weight is transmitted from the boot to the frame and then to the axles, which are bound to the inner races of the bearings. As a result, the inner races apply radial loads to the bearing balls, which in turn press against the outer races. Radial load in skating is thus colloquially known as vertical load.[199][200][172]
Deep groove ball bearings are also capable of handling a certain amount of axial load from both directions. In inline skating, axial loads refer to side forces acting along the direction of the axles during skating, and are colloquially known as side load. These forces are produced by maneuvers that involve a deep edge, such as turning, crossovers, power slides, and power stops. Additional axial loads may arise from techniques like slalom and the double push.[201][200][176]
Some purpose-built bearings, such as the Bones Swiss, are designed with larger internal clearance to better accommodate side loading.[172][176][200] This contrasts with 608 bearings used in electronic appliances, which typically have tight clearances - meaning minimal gaps between the balls and raceways. It is important to distinguish larger clearance from lower manufacturing precision, as these are two separate specifications in bearing design. Increased axial clearance (or axial play) in skate bearings is intentional, allowing the inner race to shift slightly relative to the outer race. This lateral movement changes the contact angle between the balls and raceways from vertical to oblique, improving the bearing’s ability to support axial loads without causing the balls to bind against the race shoulders.[202][203][187]
Bearing preload
[edit]
Increased internal clearance in skate bearings allows inline skaters to perform side-loading maneuvers without causing the ball bearings to bind. However, this larger clearance also creates a distinction between a load-bearing zone and a non-load-bearing zone around the circumference of the bearing. When a skater’s weight is applied to the skate, the vertical load on the inner race is supported primarily by the ball at the bottom and its immediate neighbors. These balls form the load-bearing zone, while the remaining balls make up the non-load-bearing zone and do not support the skater's weight, resulting in an uneven load distribution over balls.[204][205]

As the balls rotate through the bearing, they enter and exit the load-bearing zone, experiencing stress levels beyond their intended design when they temporarily shoulder the skater's weight. This repeated overloading leads to accelerated wear and a reduced bearing lifespan.[206] On the other hand, when a ball reaches the top of the rotation, it loses contact with the outer race due to the clearance gap, creating a momentary separation. These unloaded balls tend to skid rather than roll, producing noise, wasting energy, and further increasing wear.[205] In addition, uneven road surfaces apply constantly changing, multi-directional forces to the wheels and outer races. Because of the clearance gaps, these forces shake the outer races against the inner races, resulting in axle vibrations and amplifying any existing bearing misalignment.[187][204][207]

Uneven load distribution can be significantly reduced by preloading the bearings. In inline skates, bearing preload refers to a specific type of axial load in which the axle bolt clamps the inner race of a bearing against a properly sized spacer. This setup pre-tensions the bearing balls at an oblique contact angle between the inner and outer races, reducing or eliminating internal clearance. As a result, all the balls remain engaged in supporting the skater’s weight throughout rotation, ensuring an even distribution of load.[202][204]
Spacer length
[edit]
Preloading is especially beneficial in disciplines that demand high-speed skating, such as downhill racing. In scenarios where even minimal wheel wobble can pose a safety risk, preload helps eliminate clearance gaps and prevents skidding between components, thereby reducing axle displacement during skating. This increases the rigidity of the entire wheel assembly, giving the skater enhanced stability, precision, and control.[202][208]
For a given combination of frame, axle bolt, wheel hub, and bearings, it is possible to select a spacer of the right length so that, when the axle bolt is tightened, it clamps the inner races and the spacer with just the right amount of tension to achieve optimal preload.[209][77] This results in a slight negative internal clearance of approximately -0.01 mm. This level of preload has been shown to minimize wear and maximize bearing lifespan by improving load distribution, which increases the bearing's load-carrying capacity. As a result, the bearing can better support the skater’s weight and reduce damage from high-impact maneuvers such as jumps.[208][206][210]

Due to manufacturing imperfections, it is rare for a spacer to exactly match the bearing abutment length within a wheel hub. Injection-molded plastic hubs lack the precision of ABEC-rated bearings and are often manually cleaned up after molding. Although the abutment is theoretically designed to measure 10 mm, its actual length can vary from one hub to another, and even within different areas of the same bore. To accommodate these variations, aluminum spacers are produced in a range of lengths, allowing skaters to custom-match spacers to the specific dimensions of each wheel assembly.[Q][197][45][X]
If a spacer is too short, a skater can overtighten the axle bolt beyond the optimal preload tension. In mild cases, the spacer may be only slightly undersized by a small fraction of a millimeter. But even this can result in excessive negative clearance. The resulting over-tension increases bearing friction and can reduce bearing lifespan by an order of magnitude. In more severe cases, the spacer is so short that the bearing balls bind between the inner and outer races, potentially locking the wheels against the frame.[211][202][Y]

To address over-tension caused by short spacers, skaters sometimes mistakenly loosen the axle bolts, believing this will properly relieve the excess preload when the wheels begin to spin freely again. However, in this loosened state, the spacer rattle and the inner races skid, as they are no longer firmly clamped to the frame by the axles. Skating with this setup often produces noticeable metal clunking sounds due to the significant gaps between the axle bolt and the bores of the spacers and inner races. Bearing planes can tilt out of vertical alignment, with the ample gap between the inner race and the axle. Side loads from skating maneuvers and jumps will cause excessive wear to the balls and raceways, effectively subjecting the inner races to repeated cycles of over-preload and under-tension. This problem is even more severe when skaters omit spacers altogether during wheel installation. Without a spacer to support the inner races under axial load, bearings thus worn may explode when subjected to significant side forces.[37]: 39–45 [185][212]

When a perfectly sized spacer is not available, and a choice must be made between a slightly longer or slightly shorter one, it is recommended to use the longer spacer. This helps avoid bearing friction and severe wear caused by over-tensioning, which can occur with a shorter spacer. A slightly longer spacer prevents the axle bolt from applying preload to the bearings at all, because the outer races are unable to brace against the bearing abutments. However, it still allows the axle bolt to securely clamp the inner races and the spacer, effectively transfixing them to the frame.[197]
With a longer spacer, the outer races are held in place only by the friction of the press-fit between the bearings and the hub’s bearing recess. This press-fit is often insufficient to prevent the outer races from shifting during skating, especially under maneuvers that generate strong side loads. Over time, this movement can wear out the bearing recess, allowing the entire wheel to shift laterally between the frame walls. A common symptom of this is a clicking sound during skating.[197]
For recreational skating at moderate speeds, a slightly longer spacer is generally acceptable. The most common spacer length for inline skates is 10.2 mm, just slightly longer than the nominal 10 mm bearing abutment. However, to prevent wheel wobble at high speeds, competitive skaters carefully match each wheel with a spacer of precisely the correct length to achieve optimal preload. Spacer kits with assorted lengths are available for this purpose.[202][196][45][X]
Wheel setup
[edit]
Wheel setup can refer to various aspects related to the selection and configuration of wheels. The total number of wheels and their diameter are often expressed in the form {number of wheels} x {wheel diameter in mm}. For instance, a common recreational skate setup is 4x80mm, which means four wheels, each with a diameter of 80 millimeters. Wheel arrangement patterns are typically named according to the profile formed by the wheels at their contact points with the ground. In a flat setup, all wheels maintain contact with the ground simultaneously. A classic rockered setup, by contrast, creates a banana-like profile along the bottom.[52][56]
Flat setup
[edit]

A flat setup is the most common wheel configuration used on inline skates. The majority of non-aggressive skates are sold with this arrangement. In a flat setup, all wheels make contact with the ground simultaneously when the skate is rolling on a level surface. While not as maneuverable as a rockered setup, a flat setup excels in disciplines that prioritize speed, stability, and long-distance efficiency. It is the standard choice for speed skaters and marathon skaters. Flat wheel setups are typically noted in the format {number of wheels} x {wheel diameter in mm}. For example, a common recreational setup is 4x80mm or simply 4x80, indicating four wheels, each with a diameter of 80 millimeters. [33]: 81–86 [75]: 20–21 [52][109][44]
Because all wheels in a flat setup share the skater’s weight, the load is distributed evenly across the entire frame. This balanced distribution reduces individual wheel wear and increases the overall load-bearing capacity of the skate. Each wheel deforms less under load, resulting in a smaller wheel footprint with the ground. This helps to minimize rolling resistance and improve efficiency.[46][45]

A flat setup does not require all wheels to be the same size, nor does it require all axles to sit on the same horizontal plane within the frame. The hi-lo setup is a good example of this. Although many skaters mistakenly consider the hi-lo setup a type of rockering, it is in fact a variation of the flat setup. Because all wheels maintain ground contact at the same time, a hi-lo setup confers upon a skater the same stability as a flat setup. Some hi-lo configurations use wheels of varying diameters to create a forward-leaning stance, while others achieve the same effect by positioning the axles at different heights within the frame.[63][151]

With the growing trend toward larger wheels, the front mounting platform on traditional 165mm frames began to interfere with the second or third wheel. To address this, some 165mm frames were redesigned to reposition the middle wheels or to use smaller middle wheels. These adaptations are still variations of the flat setup, as all wheels maintain simultaneous contact with the ground. For example, the ROCKIN’ MIX4 100/90 frame changes the axle heights and wheel diameters of the two middle wheels while maintaining a flat contact profile. Similarly, speed skates using large wheels on 165mm frames often relocate and reduce the size of the second wheel to prevent interference while retaining flat setup characteristics.[120][70][71]
Rockered setup
[edit]
A rockered setup, also called a full rockered setup or banana rocker, involves altering the wheel alignment to increase maneuverability. In a four-wheel inline skate, this typically means raising the bottom of the front and rear wheels by about 2 millimeters, so that only the two middle wheels touch the ground when standing on a flat surface. This setup mimics the profile of an ice skate blade, and is known as the "banana rocker" after its curved profile.[33]: 81–86 [151][43]: 28 [56][104]
A rockered setup generally produces the opposite skating characteristics of a flat setup. It offers much greater maneuverability and allows for quicker, easier turning. Freestyle slalom skaters and artistic inline skaters consider the rockered setup indispensable, as it enables gliding on just the front two wheels, the middle two wheels, or the rear two wheels, depending on the move. Having a short frame in combination with a full rocker is optimum for achieving the highest maneuverability when skating. However, this setup makes it more difficult to maintain stability at high speeds, since the skater cannot glide on all four wheels at once and is more prone to wheel wobbles when skating in a straight line.[75]: 20–21 [37]: 29–30 [78]


Although rockering is now widely associated with slalom skaters and Wizard skaters, this was not always the case. When modern Rollerblade skates were first introduced in the 1980s by Scott Olson, their frames were specifically designed to support both flat and rockered setups. Predecessors inline skates such as the Chicago skates, USSR skates, and Super Sport Skate also allowed skaters to switch between the two configurations. These skates featured rockerable frames, typically using oblong mounting holes or alternate hole positions to accommodate both setups. Early competitors like Ultra Wheels likewise offered frames with optional rockering. Over time, more refined toggleable hardware was developed, including frame spacers, axle guides, and mounting hole inserts, to make switching between configurations faster and more reliable.[O][19][20][21][38]: 44–45 [143]

Modern inline skate design was heavily influenced by ice hockey. Olson’s 1985 book Rollerblades: Dryland Training for Ice Hockey, the first published work on inline skating, reflects this focus. The book aimed to establish inline skates as direct counterparts to ice hockey skates. Ice hockey blades are rockered by default, and this standard carried over to the emerging sport of inline skating. The book concluded with a chapter covering wheels, wheel rotation, and the differences between flat and rockered setups. In fact, the desire to emulate curved ice blades can be traced back to the earliest roller skates. Robert John Tyers’s Volito skates, patented in 1823, featured a pronounced rocker. Similarly, Henry Pennie’s 1861 design included what would now be called a front rocker setup.[33][213][9]
The popularity of rockering declined in the 1990s with the rise of aggressive skating. Early aggressive bladers preferred a flat wheel setup, but many eventually adopted the anti-rocker configuration, which used smaller middle wheels that did not touch the ground. It would take another two decades before aggressive skaters re-discovered rockered setups and pre-rockered frames, led by the Wizard skating movement that emerged in the early 2010s.[78][53][57][52]

A frame designed for a flat setup can still be converted into a rockered configuration by mounting smaller wheels at the front and rear. For example, a standard 4x80mm flat frame can become rockered by installing 76 mm wheels at the front and rear, while keeping 80 mm wheels in the middle. This customization creates a 2 mm height offset between the outer and middle wheels, mimicking the standard banana rocker profile. Skaters commonly notate mixed wheel sizes in millimeters, listed from the rear wheel to the front. The rockered configuration described above is typically written as 76-80-80-76.[75]: 20–21 [56]
Natural rocker
[edit]
Natural rockering can also occur through regular use, on a flat frame. Beginners often wear down the front wheels faster than the rear ones, resulting in a natural hi-lo setup over time without the need for purchase and install different-sized wheels. Similarly, certain skating patterns wear the front and rear wheels more than the middle ones, gradually creating a natural rocker. Skaters who want to restore a flat setup with worn wheels can use specific rotation patterns to even out wheel size. However, when a rocker is desired, rotation strategies can instead be used to enhance the effect. For example, wheels can be sorted by remaining diameter, and the most worn ones placed back at the front and rear to maintain a consistent rocker across rotations.[191][120][143]
Although natural rockering typically results in a height difference smaller than the standard 2 mm, this more subtle profile is often preferred by skaters who are not focused on slalom. In particular, big-wheel urban skaters and participants in the Wizard skating movement of the 2010s and 2020s promote their factory-tuned, pre-rockered frames as recreating the feel of a naturally worn rocker, despite being fitted with brand new wheels of identical diameter. Wizard even named its classic four-wheel frame NR, after "natural rocker".[214][78][63][215]
Front rocker
[edit]

A front rocker setup raises only the front wheel, while the remaining three wheels stay in a flat configuration. This design serves as a compromise between a full rockered setup and a flat setup. By gliding and striding primarily on the three rear wheels, the skater achieves greater top speed and improved stability, with less wheel wobble than in a full rockered setup. At the same time, the raised front wheel enhances maneuverability during turns, offering better agility than a fully flat setup when rolling on the front two wheels.[216][75]: 20–21
This raised front wheel also helps guide the skate more smoothly over uneven terrain, reducing the chance of catching or tripping on surface imperfections. This feature is particularly valuable in urban environments. When a single pair of skates needs to perform well across different terrains and skating styles, such as riding stairs, navigating city streets, or playing hockey, the front rocker setup provides a versatile and balanced solution.[56][75]: 20–21
Hi-lo setup
[edit]


The hi-lo setup, also known as HiLo, is commonly found in hockey skates. Hi-lo is technically a flat setup, since all wheels maintain contact with the ground when the skate rests on a level surface. The term “hi-lo” refers not to the wheel contact profile, but to the vertical positioning of the boot. It raises the heel and lowers the toe, creating a heel-to-toe drop that encourages a natural forward lean. This forward flex promotes a more aggressive stance, enhances push-off power, and helps prevent backward falls. Unlike terms like “flat” or “rockered,” which describe how wheels touch the ground, “hi-lo” describes how the boot is angled forward.[216][56][38]: 57–59
This forward pitch can be achieved through a combination of frame design and wheel sizing. The mounting platforms on the frame may feature a built-in height offset between the heel and toe areas, resulting in a heel lift. This design is common in hockey skates and is standard on 165mm, 195mm, and Trinity mounting systems. However, raising the heel increases the overall ride height, which can reduce control and stability. To counter this, the ride height can be lowered by reducing the size of the front wheels without changing the boot's pitch. Many hi-lo frames place the axles at progressively lower positions from heel to toe, with progressively smaller wheels, allowing the front of the boot to sit as low as possible. This design maintains the forward lean while restoring a lower ride height, combining better power transfer during push-offs with improved control and stability.[217][55][109][66]: 311–314 [37]: 18–24
Hi-lo setups with smaller front wheels are often marketed as providing quicker acceleration, while the larger rear wheels are said to help with achieving and maintaining top speed. While it is true that smaller wheels accelerate more quickly and larger wheels maintain speed more easily, these performance traits are not the reason for the hi-lo configuration. The smaller front wheels are used out of necessity - to lower the toe of the boot and preserve the forward pitch - rather than for their isolated performance benefits alone. In practice, the smaller front wheels trade top speed for a lower and more stable ride.[217][63][Z]
Bauer and Mission helped popularize a type of hi-lo hockey frame in which the two front axles are positioned 2 mm lower than the rear. These frames typically use two 80 mm wheels in the back and two 76 mm wheels in the front, annotated as 80-80-76-76. This setup maintains full ground contact while adding a 4 mm heel-to-toe height offset, enhancing the forward pitch of the skate.[217][56]

Alternatively, a hi-lo setup can be created using a standard flat frame by fitting progressively smaller wheels from rear to front. The last axle is fitted with the largest wheel that the frame can accommodate - typically 80 mm for a hockey frame. A height offset is then selected based on the desired degree of forward pitch, commonly 2 mm per wheel. Thus each wheel is 2 mm smaller in diameter than the one behind it, resulting in a configuration written as 80-78-76-74. This arrangement produces a total heel-to-toe height offset of 6 mm while maintaining full ground contact.[216][63]

Instead of purchasing wheels in different diameters, a skater can gradually create a hi-lo setup through a hi-lo rotation strategy. This method involves sorting worn wheels by remaining diameter, placing the most worn wheels at the front and the least worn at the rear. Once the desired forward pitch is achieved, it can be maintained across future rotations by discarding the most worn wheel and adding a new one at the rear. This approach also minimizes noticeable changes in ride height between rotations, offering a consistent skating feel over time.[191]
Many skaters casually refer to any mixed-size wheel configuration as a "rocker," which leads to the common but inaccurate use of the term "hi-lo rocker" to describe a standard hi-lo setup. This is a poor choice of words, as the hi-lo setup is a flat configuration - all wheels touch the ground, with no front or rear rockering. The confusion deepens when a standard hi-lo setup is further modified by lifting the front and rear wheels, prompting some to call it a "full hi-lo rocker" instead of the more accurate "hi-lo with rocker" or simply "rockered hi-lo." Some skaters also misuse "rocker" as a general synonym for "wheel setup", leading to additional confusion, such as referring to a flat setup as a "flat rocker".[56][AA][AB]
Alternatives to hi-lo
[edit]
Hi-lo is not the only approach to achieving a pitched boot with a low ride height. Speed skaters, for example, also benefit from forward flex and a low center of gravity, while favoring the use of increasingly larger wheels for performance gains. However, larger wheels raise the overall ride height, adding to the elevation already introduced by a heel lift. To address this, some 165mm frames are designed with a relocated second axle or a smaller second wheel. These modifications create clearance that allows the front of the boot to sit lower, enabling the use of 100 mm or larger wheels while keeping ride height to a minimum.[70][71]
The MIX4 100/90 frame from ROCKIN' takes a similar approach to lowering ride height by using smaller middle wheels and repositioning the middle axles. This 165mm frame supports two 100 mm outer wheels and two 90 mm middle wheels, forming a 100-90-90-100 flat setup. As a result, the entire boot sits noticeably lower to the ground.[120][78]

The Trinity mounting system offers another solution for combining forward pitch with a low ride height. Unlike the 165mm and 195mm standards, which use a single front mounting point, Trinity frames use two front mounting points positioned on either side of the boot’s centerline. This leaves the centerline clear where the front wheels are located, allowing those wheels to be placed much closer to the sole of the boot. As a result, the front of the boot can sit just millimeters above the front wheels. For example, an Endless Trinity 90 frame configured in a 3x110mm flat setup positions the toe approximately 110 mm from the ground.[109][98]
Wizard frames use the UFS mounting standard, which is designed for boots with a flat, level sole and no built-in forward pitch. Classic Wizard frames, such as the Wizard NR90, use wheels of equal size but still manage to angle the boot forward. This is achieved by incorporating a sloped mounting surface into the frame itself. However, the overall ride height is typically higher compared to Trinity setups, due to the limitations of the UFS mounting system.[78][215]
Forward lean with a rocker
[edit]A new variation of rockered skating emerged in the early 2010s, led by a new generation of aggressive skaters who rediscovered the benefits of rockered setups, this time using larger wheels on longer frames. This approach stood in stark contrast to the anti-rocker setups with small wheels and short frames that had dominated aggressive skating for years.[78][52]

One of the key pioneers of this movement is Wizard Skating, founded by Leon Basin. Still a leading influence in the 2020s, Wizard frames are designed for flat UFS boots but incorporate a subtly sloped mounting surface to introduce a slight forward lean, similar to the effect of a hi-lo flat setup. The Wizard NR frame is pre-rockered, and features what the company calls the Natural Rocker, a mild banana rocker. The NR90 model of this NR family accommodates four wheels of the same size, in a 90-90-90-90 rockered configuration.[215]

Similarly, the Endless Blading 90 frame is pre-rockered to support four 90 mm wheels. This setup, branded as the Balanced Rocker, is another mild version of the banana rocker. The frame uses the 165mm mounting standard, which inherently includes a forward pitch built into the boot-frame interface.[218]

Another example is the Ninja NN 90 frame from NN Skates, which also features a pre-rockered design. It is available in UFS, 165mm, and Trinity mount versions. Both the 165mm and Trinity versions naturally provide forward lean as part of their respective mounting standards. The NN 90 introduces NN Skates' proprietary V.m Rocker, short for "modified V Rocker" which evolved from the brand’s first-generation "rear rocker" design.[219]

All of these pre-rockered frames are variations of the full rockered setup, combined with built-in forward lean. However, they are sometimes marketed using simplified illustrations that "horizon-correct" the top surface of the frame, showing the boot level and the skate pivoting primarily on the third wheel. This conceptual stance is often described as a "V-shaped" wheel contact profile, a "V rocker," or a "3rd-wheel down" configuration. In practice, however, skaters do not glide on a single wheel. Instead, they roll on two wheels at a time, as is typical in all rockered setups. When rolling on the second and third wheels, the boot naturally tilts forward into a toe-down posture, similar to what occurs in a hi-lo setup.[104][78][220][215]
Some skaters therefore refer to this combination of forward pitch and rocker as the "hi-lo rocker" or full hi-lo rocker. However, these terms can be confusing, especially since "hi-lo rocker" is also used colloquially to describe standard hi-lo setups, and even flat setups are sometimes called "flat rockers". Naomi Grigg described this setup as a hi-lo frame with a banana rocker. At present, however, there is no consistent industry terminology for this specific combination of banana rocker and forward lean in a pre-rockered frame.[56][191][AA][AB]
Anti-rocker setup
[edit]
The anti-rocker setup is the most widely used wheel configuration among aggressive skaters. It gets its name from being the opposite of a rockered setup. In an anti-rocker configuration, the two middle wheels are raised off the ground, leaving only the front and rear wheels to make contact on flat surfaces. The middle wheels are typically spaced farther apart than in standard four-wheel setups, and are often made of harder materials with minimal grip. These hard wheels are commonly referred to as grindwheels, antirockers, or anti-rocker wheels.[56][57]
Grindwheels are not intended for rolling and rarely touch the ground, except on uneven terrain like ramps. Smaller, harder, and widely spaced, they are designed for one task alone: to make grinding on ledges and rails easier. By reducing the risk of wheel bite, they help guide the skate into position, allowing the H-block to lock more securely onto street obstacles during grinds.[53]
Compared to a flat setup, the anti-rocker setup is not well suited for regular inline skating. With only two wheels rolling, the skate is slower, less stable, and more difficult to turn. The outer wheels wear down faster and offer a rougher ride. However, a skater using a flat setup will struggle to grind effectively on street obstacles, where the larger middle wheels interfere with locking onto rails or ledges. For aggressive skating, the trade-offs of the anti-rocker setup are considered essential.[221]
Freestyle setup
[edit]
The freestyle setup is a another wheel configuration favored by aggressive skaters. Despite the name, it is unrelated to freestyle slalom around cones or freestyle skating on flat ground free of street obstacles. This setup features only two outer wheels, with the middle portion of the frame replaced by solid material that resembles an extended H-block, optimized for grinding.[53][57]

The company Fifty-50 pioneered a convertible setup design with its Balance Frame, which could accommodate either grindwheels or juice blocks - a type of solid grind block - in the center. When juice blocks are used in place of grindwheels, they fill out the space between frame walls and effectively extend the H-block, creating a smooth and solid grinding surface. A Balance Frame configured this way functions as a freestyle frame.[222][57]
Freestyle frames are lighter than anti-rocker frames due to the absence of middle wheels and bearings. They also eliminate the risk of wheel bite during grinds, since no middle wheels are present to catch on surfaces. However, this setup sacrifices stability when riding on rough terrain or bashing down stairs, where the lack of middle wheels can make moving over these surfaces unpredictable.[57]
See also
[edit]- Roller skates - Inline skates are technically a type of roller skate, but roller skates now exclusively refer to quad skates.
- Ice skates - Inline skates traces back to the origin of ice skates, as a way to glide on non-ice surfaces, with wheels.
- Inline skating - Different types of inline skates reflect needs specific to different inline skating disciplines.
- Roller sports - Inline skating is one of many sports that use human-powered roller vehicles, in this case, inline skates.
Notes
[edit]- ^ Vandervell and Witham's 1880 book on figure skating not only covered ice skating, but dedicated a full chapter 5, named "Roller-Skating", to Plimpton's roller skates and to equivalencies of outside edges and club figures between his roller skates and ice skates. By 1880, the term "roller skates" were synonymous with Plimpton skates.[14]: 70–99
- ^ a b See ads for the Chicago Roller-Blade in the 1965 Fall & Winter Montgomery Ward catalog, page 1082, archived here, and in the 1965 Spring & Summer Catalog, page 846, archived here.
- ^ a b See ad for Super Sport Skates endorsed by Ralph Backstrom in "Faceoff" 73 / 74 season by World Hockey Association.[23] Also see archived pictures one, two, three and four, from an antique listing.
- ^ a b Inline skating adopts the terms "outside edge" and "inside edge" from ice skating, even though inline wheels lack the sharp dual edges of ice blades. The outside edge refers to the side of the wheel facing away from the skater's body, while the inside edge is the side facing inward.[33]: 27–31, 41–42, 49–52
- ^ See catalog pages from various makers and resellers in Jan 2025, for wildly different ways they classify recreational, fitness and cross-training skates: Rollerblade (archived), Powerslide (archived), Roces (archived), K2 (archived), and Inline Warehouse (archived). See Ivo Vegter's Youtube video on the classifications of recreational skates.[41]
- ^ Page 77 of Skaters magazine from 1990 featured an ad by Rollerblade on "Aggro Culture", an alternative term for aggressive inline skating. It urged readers to send $4 for an "Aggro Culture Poster". It's not clear whether Rollerblade promoted this term beyond 1990.[44]
- ^ See archived product pages from Rollerblade: 2011 page showing a selection of Rollerblade "Street Skates", 2016 selection, and 2024 selection.
- ^ a b See inline hockey skates made by ice hockey manufacturers, archived here: CCM Super Tacks 9370R, Bauer Vapor 3X Pro, Mission Inhaler WM02, True TF9 Roller Hockey Skate, and Marsblade R1 Kraft Crew.
- ^ Refer to this video showing the production process of a Bauer hockey skate (both ice and inline), corresponding to the US patent 7,316,083. See FIG. 9: an exploded view showing components used in the construction of a traditional hockey skate in the 2010s.[61][60]
- ^ See US patent 7,039,977 filed by Mission Hockey in 2003, showing the same hockey boot construction, mounted on an ice blade (FIG. 1), and on a wheeled frame (FIG. 2).[62]
- ^ See background section discussion on why hard boots with hinged cuff and thick liners do not work to either ice hockey or roller hockey, in US patent 7,039,977 from Bauer/Mission.[62]
- ^ Refer to this video showing the production process of a speed skate with a custom-molded carbon-fiber shell (both ice and inline).[69]
- ^ The loosely defined terms "frame height," "deck height," and "ride height" are usually absent from the technical specifications of skates or frames. However, they are frequently used in reviews and buying guides for comparison. In the following articles, the distance from the bottom of a boot (i.e., the sole) to the ground is variously referred to as frame height, deck height, and ride height: Skating Magic archive, Inline Warehouse archive, Cadomotus archive, Loco Skates archive 1, and Loco Skates archive 2. Similarly, the distance from the top of a mount (i.e., roughly the sole) to the center of a wheel axle is described as deck height and ride height in these articles: Atom Skates archive and Loco Skates archive 3. Only in rare instances, such as on this product page, does "frame height" actually refer to the physical measurement of the frame itself.
- ^ a b c Brennan Olson's patent application filed in 1987 described key innovations in the 1988 Lightning skate: a single-piece plastic frame with reinforcement bridges, toggleable inserts for mounting hole for rockering (named axle aperture plug in the specification), and wheel hubs each with an interlock rim (named outer annular ring 16P) over which polyurethane is molded to reduce wheel deformation and heat buildup.[103]
- ^ a b See pictures of the new generation of early Rollerblade skates with heel brakes, from Vintage Minnesota Hockey: picture, picture, picture and picture, archived here, here, here and here. These have a refined version of the adjustable frame from the Ultimate Street Skate, and a similar hard boot. These skates witnessed the transition of Scott Olson's company from "Ole's Innovative Sports", to "North American Sports Training Corp.", and finally to "Rollerblade", as attested by marketing materials.[105]
- ^ Roller Derby made clay composition wheels in the 1960s for their "sidewalk surfboards" (skateboards).[132][133] The same wheels were used in their Royal Sidewalk line of roller skates as late as 1974 (archived catalog page). By 1978, however, the same Royal Sidewalk line adopted polyurethane wheels under the brand Fireball (archived catalog page). See archived entry and images of this Etsy listing showing a pair of Royal Sidewalk skates with these clay wheels: listing page, image 1, and image 2.
- ^ a b c d e Ricardo Lino toured the factory floor of Aend Industries, a polyurethane wheel factory, with co-owner Tony Gabriel. Discussions cover all aspects of wheel-making, including history of the company, co-ownership with Neil Piper, machines bought from Tom Peterson, brands they OEM for, injection molding of hubs (cores), trimming of hubs, polyurethane coloring, urethane bonding, dual-density urethane, hardness vs grippiness, hardness vs profile, heating of urethane before pouring, casting urethane into molds, baking after casting, cutting/shaving wheels to final profile, quality control, washing, printing, and packaging.[140]
- ^ a b See table in the Gallagher article showing polyurethane compounds with varying hardness from 60A to 95A and varying rebound values (Bayshore Resilience) from 25% to 60%, with no correlations. A YouTube video (archived) from the article demonstrates "polyurethane resilience" tests (yet another name for Bayshore Resilience) showing two balls with the same hardness, but opposite rebound values. At 0:41, an inline skate wheel with high rebound was shown bouncing off the floor.[141]
- ^ a b Page 79 of Skaters magazine from 1990 features a Kryptonics ad showing the cross section of a Kryptonics wheel with polyurethane molded over a hub through holes in its interlock rim. Page 77 of the same 1990 Skaters magazine features a Rollerblade ad stating that Kryptonics is the official wheel supplier for rollerblade skates.[44]
- ^ Brennan Olson's 1987 patent described wheels with polyurethane poured over a hub with an interlock rim (outer rigid ring 46), and showed drawings of the same.[103]
- ^ a b Consult sections on bearings, spacers, wheel assembly, and bearing preloading from the Big Wheel article.[77]
- ^ SKF’s 1,152-page rolling bearings catalog lists a limiting speed of 38,000 RPM for its Explorer-class 608-2Z bearings (pages 135 and 262). These bearings meet ISO 492 Class 6 precision tolerances, which are equivalent to ABEC 3, as noted on pages 7, 36, 248, and 250.[170]
- ^ a b c d e Bearing shielding and sealing are designated by suffixes that vary between manufacturers. These designations are typically published in technical handbooks and catalogs.[183] One NTN suffix conversion table can be found on page 178 of the Bearing Nomenclature Guide by BDS.[184] There is no industry-wide standard that clearly defines when a "shield" becomes a "seal," nor where non-contact shields end and light-contact or non-contact seals begin. Likewise, the skating industry adopts suffixes inspired by those used in the bearing industry, but does not apply them consistently across brands.[166] Generally, removable metal gap shields are labeled with the suffix "Z" in a fairly uniform way. See Rollerblade SG9 bearings (archived). C-ring mounted metal gap shields, popularized by TWINCAM, are rarely marked with a distinct suffix, but when they are, they follow the "ZS" convention used by SKF.[169][170] The skating industry’s use of the "RS" suffix typically refers to a non-contact NBR shield that physically resembles the RS/2RS contact lip seals used by INA/Schaeffler, but instead leaves a narrow gap, similar to SKF’s non-contact "RZ" shields.[182][185][186][170] The "RSL" suffix in skating refers to a full-contact labyrinth seal, comparable to SKF’s own RSL low-friction seals, except that SKF RSL leaves small gaps while bending the contamination path.[185][170]
- ^ a b A Wicked spacer kit (archived) includes assorted spacers of these lengths: 9.90 mm, 9.95 mm, 10.00 mm 10.05 mm, 10.10 mm, 10.15 mm, (10.20 mm), 10.25 mm, 10.30 mm, 10.35 mm.
- ^ See charts from NASA research and bearing manufacturers that illustrate bearing life as a function of internal clearance in radial ball bearings. At approximately -0.01 mm clearance (representing optimal preload), bearing life reaches 100%. If under-tensioned (i.e. the axle bolt is not fully tightened), bearing life drops by nearly half with a positive clearance gap of 0.05 mm. Conversely, if over-tensioned (i.e. using a spacer that is too short), an additional negative clearance of just -0.01 mm can reduce bearing life to 20%.[206][210]
- ^ Misleading marketing is common, where hi-lo frames are advertised as offering quicker acceleration due to the smaller front wheels and higher top speeds thanks to the larger rear wheels. These claims often ignore the primary design purpose: creating forward lean by allowing the front of the boot to sit lower, which enhances forward pitch and skating posture. See for instance, Hi-lo Frames from Powerslide (archived here), and A Guide to Roller Hockey Wheels from Willies (archived here). If these marketing claims were entirely accurate, we would expect to see hockey frames with extremely small front wheels (e.g. 50 mm) and oversized rear wheels (e.g. 110 mm) to further enhance acceleration and top speed, without any design features to leverage vacated front space to pitch the boot forward. In reality, such frames do not exist.
- ^ a b Even professional skaters occasionally write "hi-lo rocker" when they mean "hi-lo flat". See Thierstein, for instance. Redditors often write "hi-lo rocker", using the word "rocker" for any mixed-size wheel configuration. See this, this and this, for instance.
- ^ a b Even professional skaters occasionally write "flat rocker" when they mean "flat setup". See This Is Soul, Big Wheel Blading, and Naomi's book, for instance.[75]: 20–21
References
[edit]- ^ "The night of a thousand wheels". BBC News. 20 July 2002. Archived from the original on 2008-06-24.
- ^ "Pari Roller – La Friday Night Fever !". Archived from the original on 30 January 2008.
- ^ "Clubs and Leagues: Group Skates". New York City Inline Skating Guide. Archived from the original on 2022-12-03.
- ^ "NYC Skating Info Links". Empire Skate Club of New York. Archived from the original on 2022-07-09.
- ^ "The First Roller Skates". National Museum of Roller Skating Audio Tour. Archived from the original on 2024-11-25.
- ^ "Charles-Louis Petibled : le premier brevet de l'histoire du patin à roulettes". Le Roller en Ligne. 30 March 2019. Archived from the original on 2024-01-29.
- ^ a b Turner, James; Zaidman, Michael (1997). The History of Roller Skating. Lincoln, Nebraska: National Museum of Roller Skating. ISBN 0965819205. Illustrated with museum collections and archives.
- ^ "The History of Skating from 1760 till Today". OLS Online Skating. 12 November 2023. Archived from the original on 2024-11-28.
- ^ a b "Historical Notes on Roller Skates No. 2". The Engineer. Vol. 41. London: Morgan-Grampian. 1876-02-11. pp. 102–103. Retrieved 2024-11-30.
- ^ "Historical Notes on Roller Skates No. 3". The Engineer. Vol. 41. London: Morgan-Grampian. 1876-02-18. pp. 121–122. Retrieved 2024-11-30.
- ^ US 37305, Plimpton, James, "Improvement in skates", published 1863-01-06
- ^ "The Father of the Modern Roller Skating". National Museum of Roller Skating Audio Tour. Archived from the original on 2024-11-28.
- ^ "The Victorian craze that sparked a mini-sexual revolution". BBC News. 6 April 2015. Archived from the original on 2024-11-28.
- ^ Vandervell, H.E.; Witham, T. Maxwell (1880). A System of Figure-skating: Being the Theory and Practice of the Art as Developed in England with a Glance at Its Origin and History. London: Horace Cox. pp. 4–7. Retrieved 2024-11-24.
- ^ Dowson, Duncan; Hamrock, Bernard J. (1981). "History of Ball Bearings" (PDF). NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-11-30.
- ^ US 308990, Richardson, Levant Marvin, "Roller-Skate", published 1884-12-09, issued 1884-12-09
- ^ "The History of Inline Skating". National Museum of Roller Skating. Archived from the original on 2019-04-10.
- ^ Burnson, Robert. "The Illustrated History of Inline Skate Design At the U.S. Patent Office: Siffert's Jet Skate, 1938". The Inline Planet. Archived from the original on 2021-12-07.
- ^ a b c US 3287023, Ware, Gordon K, "Roller skate", published 1966-11-22, issued 1966-11-22
- ^ a b c d e f Paul A. Dunn and Sharry Beck Paprocki (June–July 1990). "Joseph Shevelson interviewed by Paul A. Dunn and Sharry Beck Paprocki on the Golden Days of Skating" (PDF). Skaters. Vol. 1, no. 1: Premier Issue. Mt. Morris, Ill.: CFW Enterprises, Inc. pp. 12–18. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2024-06-19. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
- ^ a b c d US 3880441, Silver, Morris L, "Tandem roller hockey skate", published 1975-04-29, issued 1975-04-29
- ^ Ross, Emily; Holland, Angus (2006). "Rollerblade - Live your product". 100 Great Businesses and the Minds Behind Them. Naperville, Illinois: Sourcebooks, Inc. pp. 151–155. ISBN 978-1402206313. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
- ^ "Ad for Super Sport Skates by Super Skate Inc. sponsored by Ralph Backstrom". Faceoff 73 / 74 season. World Hockey Association. 1973. Archived from the original on 18 December 2024. Retrieved 2024-12-21.
- ^ "The early years - 1957 to 1963". Lange - The History of an All-American Brand. Archived from the original on 2023-11-24. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
- ^ "From racing glory to bleeding "Flo" - 1970 to 1973". Lange - The History of an All-American Brand. 2009-02-01. Archived from the original on 2023-11-24. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
- ^ "The Roller Renaissance: Forgiving, quiet urethane wheels and new suspension tricks have put a great sport back on its feet". Popular Mechanics. Vol. 151, no. 6. Chicago: Popular Mechanics Company. June 1979. p. 94. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
- ^ a b c d e f g Fried-Cassorla, Albert (1995). In-line Skating: The Ultimate How-to Guide. Fried-Cassorla authored a 1976 book on skateboarding before this 1995 book on inline skating: The Skateboarder's Bibble: technique, equipment, stunts, terms, etc. California: Prima Publishing. ISBN 1559586486. Archived from the original on 2011-12-02. Retrieved 2025-01-11.
- ^ Hahn, Steve (2012-02-06). Steve Hahn interviews Scott Olson ( Rollerblade Founder ) (video). Steven Hahn – via YouTube. Refer to the video transcript for this long interview, a part of the "Hockey in the Park" Series.
- ^ a b "Mind in motion: The MIA's Leonardo show traces Scott Olson's inventive impulse". Minneapolis Institute of Art. Archived from the original on 2024-02-27.
- ^ "A Business That's On a Roll". Star Tribune (Minneapolis). Minneapolis. 1985-11-17. Retrieved 2024-12-23.
- ^ Paula Schroeder (host) (1995-07-31). Voices of Minnesota: Interview with Scott Olson (Part 1 of 3) (audio). Minnesota: Minnesota Public Radio. Transcript 1/3 in PDF (PDF). Retrieved 2024-12-25.
- ^ Paula Schroeder (host) (1995-07-31). Voices of Minnesota: Interview with Scott Olson (Part 2 of 3) (audio). Minnesota: Minnesota Public Radio. Transcript 2/3 in PDF (PDF). Retrieved 2024-12-25.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Middlebrook, Chris, ed. (1985). Rollerblades: Dryland Training for Ice Hockey. Chapters by Randy Gregg, Jack Blatherwick, Laura Stamm, Brad Buetow, Scott Olson, Brennan Olson. Minneapolis, Minn.: Ole's Innovative Sports. Archived from the original on 2025-01-08. Retrieved 2025-01-08.
- ^ "Inventor of the Week Archive: Scott & Brennan Olson (spelling corrected per rowbike.com -ed.)". MIT School of Engineering. August 1997. Archived from the original on 2003-03-02. Retrieved 2007-02-25.
- ^ Peippo, Kathleen; Rhodes, Nelson (2000). "Rollerblade, Inc.". International Directory of Company Histories. Vol. 34. Detroit: St. James Press. pp. 388–392. Retrieved 2024-12-23.
- ^ "A Craze May Outsprint Its Creator". New York Times. New York. 1990-08-07. Archived from the original on 2014-03-21. Retrieved 2024-12-22.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao Powell, Mark; Svensson, John (1998). In-line Skating. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics. ISBN 0880116595. Retrieved 2024-12-23.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Miller, Liz (2003). Get Rolling: The Beginner's Guide to In-line Skating (3rd ed.). California: Get Rolling Books. ISBN 0963219634. Retrieved 2025-01-02.
- ^ Vegter, Ivo (2022-03-13). Everything About Skate Tools (video). This is Soul – via YouTube. See video transcript on all types of skate tools with hex, Torx and other wrench tips for removing wheel, axels, frames and bearings.
- ^ a b c d e f Gutman, Bill; Frederick, Shawn (2004). Catching Air: the excitement and daring of individual action sports - snowboarding, skateboarding, BMX biking, in-line skating. New York: Citadel Press. ISBN 0806525401. Retrieved 2025-01-04.
- ^ a b c d e f g Vegter, Ivo (2024-12-09). "The Strange History Behind Inline Skating // Many Names" (video). thisissoul.com. See video transcript on history on different types of inline skates and skating, including naming, relationships and differences: Rollerblade, Bladers, skeeler, Partines, Roller Freestyle, Recreational inline, soft boot, hard boot, Slalom inline, Freestyle inline, Urban inline, Flow inline, Tri-Skates, and Aggressive inline. The history intro also discusses quad skates, skateboarding and their shared history with inline skating, including wheels, axles and ISO 608 bearings. This is Soul.
- ^ a b c d e f g Knoll, Matthias; Pfitzner, Jürgen (2018-07-20). Inline skate differences - hard boot, soft boot, hybrid ?! (video). Discourses on hard boot vs. soft boot with exoskeleton vs. hybrid boot with endoskeleton. Powerslide – via YouTube.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Joyner, Stephen Christopher (1995). In-line Roller Hockey: The Official Guide and Resource Book. Chicago: Contemporary Books. ISBN 0809234483. Retrieved 2025-01-01.
- ^ a b c d e f Chris Morris (June–July 1990). "In-Lines: Getting Started - Tips for the beginner" (PDF). Skaters. Vol. 1, no. 1: Premier Issue. Mt. Morris, Ill.: CFW Enterprises, Inc. pp. 32–36. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2024-06-19. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r "Physics of the inline skate wheel". Le Roller en Ligne. Archived from the original on 2025-03-22. Retrieved 2025-03-27.
- ^ a b c d e f g h US 5922151, Piper, Neal & Peterson, Tom, "Polyurethane skate wheel with shaped foam core", published 1999-07-13, issued 1999-07-13, assigned to Hyper Corp (Hyper Wheels)
- ^ a b Feineman, Neil (1991). Wheel Excitement. New York: Hearst Books. ISBN 0688108148. Retrieved 2024-12-23.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Vegter, Ivo (2021-06-27). "Hardboot VS Softboot" (video). thisissoul.com. See video transcript on how recreational skates range from inexpensive soft boots with exoskeletons, to mid-end hard boots, to high-end (hybrid) soft boots with endoskeleton - and varied levels of ankle support. This is Soul.
- ^ a b Pat Parnell (June–July 1990). "Quads vs. In-Lines" (PDF). Skaters. Vol. 1, no. 1: Premier Issue. Mt. Morris, Ill.: CFW Enterprises, Inc. pp. 37–42. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2024-06-19. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
- ^ "How to Inline Skate". Xinhai Dude. 2022-04-24. Archived from the original on 2024-11-18. Retrieved 2025-01-03.
- ^ a b c d "How to Choose Urban Inline Skates". Inline Warehouse. Archived from the original on 2025-01-26. Retrieved 2025-01-26.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Welch, Jan (21 June 2023). "Demystifying Inline Skating Disciplines: A Complete Guide". Big Wheel Blading. Archived from the original on 2024-12-13. Retrieved 2025-01-04.
- ^ a b c d e "How aggressive inline skates are built". Bladeville. Archived from the original on 2025-01-12. Retrieved 2025-01-12.
- ^ a b c d e What is UFS? Past, Present and Future of frame mounting (video). See video transcript on discussions on origin of not just UFS, but also of original rivet mounts in Rollerblade TRS, and K2 Fatty. Aggressive makers rallied around the Salomon boot with a flat sole and created UFS standard. Back to Blading. 2018-10-25. Archived from the original on 2025-02-16. Retrieved 2025-05-04 – via YouTube.
{{cite AV media}}
: CS1 maint: others in cite AV media (notes) (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "Everything about Frames". This Is Soul. 4 January 2022. Archived from the original on 2025-01-15. Retrieved 2025-01-16.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Thierstein, Markus. "Inline Skating Knowledge: Rockering". Skating Thierstein. Archived from the original on 2019-04-16. Retrieved 2025-01-20.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Everything about Grindwheels". This Is Soul. 29 May 2023. Archived from the original on 2025-01-22. Retrieved 2025-01-22.
- ^ "What's in a name? Describing Skating to the Masses". Be-Mag. 2023-01-29. Archived from the original on 2024-09-15. Retrieved 2025-01-13.
- ^ Irwin, Dawn (2000). Superguides: Inline Skating. London: DK Pub. ISBN 0789465426. Retrieved 2024-12-29. p. 11:
A picture of 1981 Ultimate Hockey Skate is shown under the headline: Modern inline skate
- ^ a b c US 7316083, Labonté, Ivan, "Footwear having an outer shell of foam", published 2005-09-29, issued 2008-01-08, assigned to Bauer Hockey LLC
- ^ a b "Ice Skates: How It's Made (Hockey Skates)" (video). discoveryuk.com. Discovery UK. 2020-06-05. Video shows the production process of a traditional hockey skate, with a boot that is fitted to either an ice blade or an inline wheel frame.
- ^ a b c US 7039977, Wilder, Thomas V., "Contoured skate boot", published 2004-05-06, issued 2006-05-09, assigned to Mission Itech Hockey Inc and Bauer Hockey LLC
- ^ a b c d e f All The Inline Skating Setups I've Tried So Far - My Setup Journey (video). See transcript for discussions on inline skate setups with different combinations of boots, frames, wheels and wheel setups. Rerolling Inline. 2023-04-18. Archived from the original on 2025-04-27. Retrieved 2025-05-04 – via YouTube.
{{cite AV media}}
: CS1 maint: others in cite AV media (notes) (link) - ^ "The History of Hockey Skates, Part II: The Rise of Hockey-specific Skates". Pure Hockey / Hockey Resource Center. Archived from the original on 2025-01-17. Retrieved 2025-01-17. See discussion on how Lange hard boots did not fare well in ice hockey.
- ^ US 8329083, Jou, Wern-Shiarng, "Method of making a lasted skate boot", published 2010-11-04, issued 2012-12-11, assigned to Bauer Hockey LLC
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Publow, Barry (1999). Speed on Skates: a complete technique, training and racing guide for in-line and ice skaters. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics. ISBN 0880117214. Retrieved 2025-01-05.
- ^ "World Speed Records - updated 2023". World Skate. Archived from the original on 2025-01-24. Retrieved 2025-01-24.
- ^ a b c "Buying Speed Skates". SkatePro. Archived from the original on 2025-01-25. Retrieved 2025-01-25.
- ^ "How It's Made: Speed Skates" (video). discoveryplus.com. Discovery Plus. 2022-04-14. Video shows the production process of custom-molded speed skates, with boots that could be fitted to either an ice blade or an inline wheel frame.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "Mounting your inline boot on an ice blade? Why that doesn't fit (unfortunately)". Cádomotus. discusses 165mm and 195mm mounting standards, and explains why a 195mm boot will not fit a standard ice blade tailored to average heel-to-ball distances. 2020-12-29. Archived from the original on 2025-03-01. Retrieved 2025-03-01.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h "Inline Skate Frames". Bladeville. Archived from the original on 2025-02-17. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
- ^ Vegter, Ivo (2019-09-29). "Freestyle vs Aggressive vs Street skating // Terminology" (video). thisissoul.com. Discussion on freestyle inline skating, aggressive inline skating, and their relationship to BMX biking and skateboarding. This video explains how various disciplines acquired their names. It also clarifies labels under which skates suitable for these disciplines are marketed. This is Soul.
- ^ "IFSA Freestyle Slalom Rules". International Freestyle Skaters Association. Archived from the original on 2025-02-05. Retrieved 2025-02-05.
- ^ "World Skate Inline Freestyle Regulation". World Skate. Archived from the original on 2024-07-18. Retrieved 2025-02-05.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Grigg, Naomi (2014). The Art of Falling: Freestyle Slalom Skating. San Francisco: Patson Media. ISBN 9780692227374.
- ^ a b c "Inline Skate Frame Buying Guide". Inline Warehouse. Archived from the original on 2025-02-05. Retrieved 2025-02-05.
- ^ a b c d "Reign Ares as big-wheel skates for urban marathons". Xinhai Dude. 2024-11-16. Archived from the original on 2025-03-02. Retrieved 2025-03-02.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Rockering in Wizard Frames & Rest of the Pack". Bladeville. Archived from the original on 2025-02-05. Retrieved 2025-02-05.
- ^ a b c d "What is Inline Skating – Inline Skating in Brief". SkaMiDan – Skating School & Skateshop. 16 November 2023. Archived from the original on 2025-01-09. Retrieved 2025-02-09.
- ^ Luhn, Andy (2002-07-23). "K2 Corporation (K2 Sports) — a History". HistoryLink.org. Archived from the original on 2024-09-14. Retrieved 2025-02-18.
- ^ a b Gorski, Chris. "Skate-O-Pedia / Articles / Aggressive Skates". Inlineskates.com. Archived from the original on 2021-10-18. Retrieved 2025-02-09.
- ^ a b "What are Carbon-fiber Inline Skates?". Xinhai Dude. 2024-10-21. Archived from the original on 2025-01-19. Retrieved 2025-01-19.
- ^ "Softboots - not that bad, actually!". Bladeville. 2022-04-02. Archived from the original on 2023-05-25. Retrieved 2025-02-01.
- ^ Lino, Ricardo (2017-08-02). Soft boot vs hard boot - skates vlog132 (video) – via YouTube. See video transcript.
- ^ "About VH Hockey". VH Hockey. Archived from the original on 2015-02-25. Retrieved 2025-01-18.
- ^ "Easton Synergy 1300C Hockey Skates ('05 Model)- Senior". Perani's Hockey World. Archived from the original on 2025-01-19. Retrieved 2025-01-19.
- ^ "Easton Synergy Skates Break-In?". Hockey Forum. Archived from the original on 2025-01-19. Retrieved 2025-01-19.
- ^ "What's New: Recreation". Popular Science. Vol. 270, no. 1. January 2007. p. 26. Retrieved 2025-01-18.
- ^ "Easton Synergy 1500C IHS Hockey Skates". Sideline Swap. Archived from the original on 2025-01-19. Retrieved 2025-01-19.
- ^ a b O'Connor, Dana (2023-09-07). "Ep 21 Scott Van Horne - True - Legendary Skate Builder - Got Hockey" (video). Got Hockey. See transcript for this 45 minute chat with Scott Van Horne.
- ^ "True Temper Sports Acquires VH Footwear: 2016-09-22". Hockey World Blog. 22 November 2016. Archived from the original on 2025-01-19. Retrieved 2025-01-19.
- ^ True Hockey Skate Factory Tour (video). Inline Warehouse. 2023-07-26 – via YouTube. Scott Van Horne showing the manufacturing process of a True hockey skate with a monocoque shell, as specified in VH Footware's US patent 9,656,153.
- ^ a b "TRUE TF9 Senior Roller Hockey Skates". The Hockey Shop. Archived from the original on 2025-01-19. Retrieved 2025-01-19.
- ^ "True Pro Custom Roller Hockey Skate Senior". Coast to Coast Hockey Shop. Archived from the original on 2025-01-19. Retrieved 2025-01-19.
- ^ a b c d "Powerslide Frames Guide" (PDF). Powerslide. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-05-28. Retrieved 2025-03-08.
- ^ a b "Inline Skate Frame Buying Guide". Skating Magic. 2021-07-31. Archived from the original on 2025-03-05. Retrieved 2025-03-05.
- ^ a b "Frame Mounting for Inline Skates - Everything You Need To Know". Loco Skates. 2024-05-30. Archived from the original on 2025-01-20. Retrieved 2025-03-05.
- ^ a b c Lino, Ricardo (2017-11-07). Why Trinity? The latest generation inline skates frame system // vlog 182 (video) – via YouTube. See video transcript.
- ^ "Which skate frame for which use?". Le Roller en Ligne. 3 November 2010. Archived from the original on 2025-02-15. Retrieved 2025-02-15.
- ^ "The manufacturing processes of skate frames". Le Roller en Ligne. 23 November 2007. Archived from the original on 2025-02-15. Retrieved 2025-02-15.
- ^ "Anatomy of a skate frame". Le Roller en Ligne. 6 December 2007. Archived from the original on 2025-02-15. Retrieved 2025-02-15.
- ^ "Which material for your skate frames: Magnesium or aluminum?". Le Roller en Ligne. 25 January 2011. Archived from the original on 2025-02-15. Retrieved 2025-02-15.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j US 4909523, Olson, Brennan J., "In-line roller skate with frame", published 1990-03-20, issued 1990-03-20, assigned to Rollerblade Inc
- ^ a b c "The Geometry of Inline Skate Rocker Designs". Endless Blading. 11 July 2020. Archived from the original on 2025-02-16. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
- ^ "Minnesota In-Line Hockey and History of In-Line Skates". Vintage Minnesota Hockey. Archived from the original on 2024-07-15. Retrieved 2024-12-26. A picture gallery at the bottom of the page shows rare historical images of early Rollerblade prototypes and products including the Ultimate Street Skate.
- ^ "Interview with Alexander Bont, owner of the Australian Brand". Le Roller en Ligne. 2015-07-22. Archived from the original on 2025-02-17. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
- ^ a b c d "Glossary of terms in rollerblading". Bladeville. Archived from the original on 2025-02-17. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
- ^ "Bont - About Us - Who we are". Bont. Archived from the original on 2024-11-26. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "Trinity system – incoming revolution". Że co, przepraszam?!. Interview with Powerslide on the upcoming Trinity mounting system (2016) with respect to popular 165mm and 195mm mounting systems. 2016-01-15. Archived from the original on 2025-02-17. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ a b c Briand, Pascal (2021-08-18). Pit Stop - Discover the different mounting systems of inline skates (video). Covers Trinity, 195mm, UFS, 165mm, and riveted mounting systems. Powerslide – via YouTube.
- ^ a b "Is 2015 the comeback year of 165mm mounting?". Le Roller en Ligne. 2015-04-10. Archived from the original on 2025-02-17. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
- ^ "195 Mounting". Powerslide. Archived from the original on 2025-02-17. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
- ^ "Our X Games History". X Games. Archived from the original on 2025-02-15. Retrieved 2025-02-20.
- ^ a b c d e "What is UFS - Universal Frame System". Bladeville. 2022-03-10. Archived from the original on 2022-08-31. Retrieved 2025-02-21.
- ^ What Happened to the K2 Fatty? // Aggressive Inline Skating (video). Back to Blading. 2018-10-05 – via YouTube. See video transcript on discussions on origin of K2 Fatty, prototype/sample of Fatty Pro, and 2018 Fatty.
- ^ Vegter, Ivo (2022-05-08). "Review: Roces 5th Element" (video). thisissoul.com. This is Soul. See video transcript on history of Roces, relationship to Rollerblade, 1998 Roces 5th Element, and 2020 version of the 5th Element.
- ^ "La norme UFS (Universal Frame System)". Le Roller en Ligne (in French). 2018-08-22. Archived from the original on 2025-02-22. Retrieved 2025-02-22.
- ^ US 6648346, Borel, René, "Frame for a sport article (UFS standard)", published 2003-11-18, issued 2003-11-18, assigned to Salomon SAS
- ^ "Into Detail: About Frames" (video). www.thisissoul.com. This Is Soul. 2020-10-18. This is the companion video of the article on "Everything about Frames".
- ^ a b c d "Let's talk facts: ROCKIN' MIX4 100/90". ROCKIN’ Frames. 2022-02-10. Archived from the original on 2025-03-02. Retrieved 2025-03-02.
- ^ "Endless 100 RB Frame". Endless Blading. Archived from the original on 2025-03-02. Retrieved 2025-03-02. A 165mm frame designed specifically for the Rollerblade RB/Twister series, Adapt Hyperskates, Seba, and other 165mm boots that can't properly center 3rd-party frames.
- ^ a b "Why Heel-to-Ball Is Essential". The Brannock Device Company. Archived from the original on 2025-01-29. Retrieved 2025-03-02.
- ^ WO application 2010051657, So, Kai Nin, "Bottom structure for inline roller skate shoes", published 2010-05-14
- ^ a b c Knoll, Matthias; Pfitzner, Jürgen; Arlidge, Scott (2016-07-27). Trinity Mount - The next level (video). Powerslide – via YouTube. Powerslide introduced Trinity for all skating disciplines.
- ^ US 10524533, Knoll, Matthias, "Roller skate system having a rail and a boot", published 2020-01-07, issued 2020-01-07, assigned to Powerslide GmbH
- ^ Choong, Adam (2018-05-15). "Trinity Three Point Mount". Inlinex. Archived from the original on 2025-03-03. Retrieved 2025-03-03.
- ^ Briand, Pascal (2022-03-22). Trinity vs 195 Mounting - PS live stream (video). Powerslide. Archived from the original on 2024-03-23. Retrieved 2025-05-04 – via YouTube. Pascal talks about Trinity's development history and specifications. He compares Trinity mounting to 195mm mounting, including the wide front mounts for better control and pushes.
- ^ a b "Types of Inline Skates". Inline Skates. Archived from the original on 2018-10-17. Retrieved 2025-01-06.
- ^ "Roller Skating 1: Development of the Skate". Hickok Sports - Sports History. Archived from the original on 2010-04-01. Retrieved 2025-03-08.
- ^ US 2664317, Thomas, Glynn & Cleever, John W, "Composition roller skate wheel", published 1953-12-29, issued 1953-12-29, assigned to Raybestos Manhattan Inc
- ^ Vegter, Ivo (4 January 2022). "Everything about wheels". This Is Soul. Archived from the original on 2024-09-13. Retrieved 2025-03-07.
- ^ Winner, Tara (2018-06-07). "Sidewalk Surfing: The Gnarly History of Skateboarding Part I (1940s to 1972)". The Strong - National Museum of Play. Archived from the original on 2025-03-16. Retrieved 2025-03-16.
- ^ "Main's skateboard collection and the Paul Conibear Ramprocker". Overplywood - The History of Skateboarding in Swansea. 2013-02-28. Archived from the original on 2025-03-16. Retrieved 2025-03-16.
- ^ "Chicago Skates Timeline". Chicago Skates (Chicago Roller Skates). Archived from the original on 2024-09-16. Retrieved 2025-03-08.
- ^ Weiss, Eric M. (2004-08-17). "A Reinvention Of the Wheel". Washington Post. Washington DC. Archived from the original on 2007-08-08. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
- ^ "Are Polyurethane Skateboard Wheels Good?". Custom Moulded Polyurethane. 2022-08-24. Archived from the original on 2025-03-08. Retrieved 2025-03-08.
- ^ a b Bernstein, Ross (2007). "In-Line Hockey In Minnesota". More... Frozen Memories: Celebrating a Century of Minnesota Hockey. Minneapolis, Minn.: Nodin Press. pp. 184–185. ISBN 978-1932472493. Retrieved 2024-12-24.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Anatomy of an inline skate wheel". Le Roller en Ligne. 2020-11-03. Archived from the original on 2025-03-08. Retrieved 2025-03-08.
- ^ "Urethane vs. Polyurethane". Gallagher Corporation. Archived from the original on 2025-03-09. Retrieved 2025-03-09. Quote: "when discussing industrial applications, urethane and polyurethane are essentially the same material. The terms are used interchangeably, and there is no functional difference between them."
- ^ Lino, Ricardo (2022-06-23). This Factory Makes the Best Wheels for Inline & Quad Skating, Skateboarding & Scooters (video) – via YouTube. See video transcript for a tour of factory floor and discussions on all aspects of wheel-making.
- ^ a b c d e "Polyurethane-Resilience". Gallagher Corporation. Archived from the original on 2024-08-03. Retrieved 2025-03-08.
- ^ a b c US 2697010, August, Hirschmugl Robert, "Roller skate wheel", published 1954-12-14, issued 1954-12-14
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Anthony D. Chen (1992-05-17). "Skate FAQs: Wheels and Hop-up Kits". Newsgroup: rec.skate. Archived from the original on 2025-03-29. Retrieved 2025-03-29.
- ^ US 5312844, Gonsior, Stanley, "Method of producing polyurethane injection molded in-line skate wheels", published 1994-05-17, issued 1994-05-17, assigned to S&W Plastics Inc
- ^ a b c d e f "Powerslide Wheels Guide" (PDF). Powerslide. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-05-31. Retrieved 2025-03-22.
- ^ "Hockey brands faq - Labeda". Hockey Office. Archived from the original on 2025-03-29. Retrieved 2025-03-29.
- ^ a b c d "Wheels for Inline Skates - A Complete Guide". SkatePro. Archived from the original on 2025-01-31. Retrieved 2025-03-27.
- ^ US 4447093, Cunard, Joel C. & Ziegler, William H., "Wheel", published 1984-05-08, issued 1984-05-08, assigned to Brown Group Recreational Products Inc
- ^ a b Kopitz, Steve. "Buying Guide for Inline Skate Wheels". Inline Skates. Archived from the original on 2021-08-05. Retrieved 2025-04-04.
- ^ a b c Vegter, Ivo. "Everything about wheel diameter". This Is Soul. Archived from the original on 2025-04-04. Retrieved 2025-04-04. Also reference the companion video shown in the article.
- ^ a b c d e f Williams, Carlesa (2017-10-25). "Inline Skate Wheels 101". LiveAbout. Archived from the original on 2025-04-04. Retrieved 2025-04-04.
- ^ a b c d Vegter, Ivo. "Everything about wheel profile". This Is Soul. Archived from the original on 2025-04-04. Retrieved 2025-04-04. Also reference the companion video shown in the article.
- ^ "Aggressive Skate Wheels". SkatePro. Archived from the original on 2025-04-05. Retrieved 2025-04-05.
- ^ a b c d "Choosing hardness of inline skating wheels". Bladeville. 2013-09-17. Archived from the original on 2025-04-18. Retrieved 2025-04-18.
- ^ a b c d US 6227622, Roderick, John A.; Chiang, Albert C. & Vandergrift, James A., "Multilayer skate wheel", published 2001-05-08, issued 2001-05-08, assigned to K2 Corp and Fleet National Bank
- ^ a b c "Causes of tire rolling resistance, and our protocols when testing it". Outside Online. 2021-09-29. Archived from the original on 2025-04-21. Retrieved 2025-04-21.
- ^ a b c d "Rolling Resistance and Industrial Wheels" (PDF). Hamilton Caster & Mfg. Co. 2013-02-01. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2025-04-21. Retrieved 2025-04-21.
- ^ a b c Cross, Rod (2015). "Effects of surface roughness on rolling friction". European Journal of Physics. 36 (6). doi:10.1088/0143-0807/36/6/065029. Archived from the original on 2025-04-27. Retrieved 2025-04-26.
- ^ a b "Inline Skate Wheel Buying Guide". Inline Warehouse. June 2019. Archived from the original on 2025-03-15. Retrieved 2025-04-17.
- ^ Anthony D. Chen (1993-11-04). "Q: What are the origins of in-line skates?". Newsgroup: rec.skate. Archived from the original on 2024-12-23. Retrieved 2024-12-23.
- ^ Chartier, Alexandre 'alfathor' (2015-01-18). "Dual density skate wheels: Where does the technology comes from and what is the use of it?". Le Roller en Ligne. Archived from the original on 2025-04-19. Retrieved 2025-04-19.
- ^ US 7090306, Piper, Neal, "Inline wheel with softer tire and internal support structure", published 2006-08-15, issued 2006-08-15
- ^ "Reivision wheels: Flex, Recoil and Variant". Revision Hockey. Archived from the original on 2025-04-20. Retrieved 2025-04-20.
- ^ "Rebound Resilience". Elastomer Institut, part of OPR Group GmbH. Archived from the original on 2025-04-23. Retrieved 2025-04-23.
- ^ "Hysteresis in Urethane". Gallagher Corporation. Archived from the original on 2025-04-25. Retrieved 2025-04-25.
- ^ a b c d e f Anthony D. Chen (1992-05-02). "Skate FAQs: The Bearing Maintenance File". Newsgroup: rec.skate. Archived from the original on 2025-05-09. Retrieved 2025-05-09.
- ^ a b c Chen, Anthony D. "ABEC = HYPE?". Archived from the original on 15 March 2018. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
- ^ a b US 6309108, Wershe, Richard, "Bearing spacer for in-line skate", published 2001-10-30, issued 2001-10-30
- ^ a b c d e f "Powerslide/Wicked Bearing Guide" (PDF). Powerslide. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-05-19. Retrieved 2025-05-09.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Rolling Bearings" (PDF). SKF Group. A 1,152 document published by SKF Group. October 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2025-04-07. Retrieved 2025-05-13.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ a b Ahrens, Fred (November 2008). "Inline Skates: An Engineer's Perspective". Get Rolling - Liz Miller. Archived from the original on 2010-11-22. Retrieved 2025-05-18.
- ^ a b c Powell, George A. "Bones® Bearings History". Bones Bearings. Archived from the original on 2008-05-10. Retrieved 2025-05-16.
- ^ a b Powell, George A. "Maintaining your Bones® Bearings". Bones Bearings. Archived from the original on 2008-05-10. Retrieved 2025-05-16.
- ^ a b c "Skateboard Bearings - the Truth". Vandem Longboard Shop. Archived from the original on 2020-08-05. Retrieved 2025-05-24.
- ^ Shulgan, Alex (2023-04-20). "Guide to roller and inline skate bearings 2024". InMove Skates. Archived from the original on 2025-05-11. Retrieved 2025-05-16.
- ^ a b c Powell, George A. "Abec vs. Skate Rated™". Bones Bearings. Archived from the original on 2014-10-09. Retrieved 2025-05-16.
- ^ "What are Swiss Bearings?". Devaskation. Archived from the original on 2025-04-18. Retrieved 2025-05-17.
- ^ "TWINCAM home page". TWINCAM Bearing. Archived from the original on 2013-03-05. Retrieved 2025-05-16.
- ^ "What are Twincam and ILQ Bearings?". Loco Skates. 2025-02-13. Archived from the original on 2025-05-12. Retrieved 2025-05-16.
- ^ a b Hambinathan, Arampamoorthy (2020-12-11). "Ceramic Bearings vs Steel Bearings: An Engineering Analysis". Hambini Engineering. Archived from the original on 2021-05-07. Retrieved 2025-05-20.
- ^ Sweeney, Kevin (2024-02-10). "Factors Affecting Friction Torque in Bearings". Pacific International Bearing. Archived from the original on 2025-05-19. Retrieved 2025-05-20.
- ^ a b c "Skate Bearing FAQ". Miniature Bearings Australia. 2004-01-30. Archived from the original on 2005-03-07. Retrieved 2025-05-20.
- ^ Pfeifer, Jeanette. "A Comprehensive Guide to Bearings Seals: Types, Functions, and Applications". BDS Bearings. Archived from the original on 2024-11-14. Retrieved 2025-05-23.
- ^ "Bearing Nomenclature Guide" (PDF). BDS Bearings. 2024. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2025-05-24. Retrieved 2025-05-24.
- ^ a b c d e f "6 Common Misconceptions About Skateboard Bearings". Fireball Supply / Dragon Bearings. 2020-08-17. Archived from the original on 2025-02-14. Retrieved 2025-05-23.
- ^ a b "INA/Schaeffler Product Reference Guide (732 pages)" (PDF). Schaeffler. 2003. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2025-05-24. Retrieved 2025-05-24.
- ^ a b c "NTN Rolling Bearings Handbook" (PDF). NTN-SNR. March 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-09-18. Retrieved 2025-05-23.
- ^ Sanchez, Steven (2022-07-12). "Big wheels inline skates experience". InMove Skates. Archived from the original on 2024-11-05. Retrieved 2025-05-04.
- ^ Lino, Ricardo (2016-12-13). Why Triskates? The Latest Generation Inline Skate (video) – via YouTube. See video transcript.
- ^ "Endless Frame Spec Comparison & Overview". Endless Blading. Archived from the original on 2025-02-16. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Thierstein, Markus. "Inline Skating Knowledge: Rotating Wheels". Skating Thierstein. Archived from the original on 2025-02-28. Retrieved 2025-04-29.
- ^ a b c "Inline Skate Wheel Rotation and Maintenance". Inline Skates. Archived from the original on 2021-10-18. Retrieved 2021-10-18.
- ^ US 6132006, Post, Peter G., "In-line skate wheel axle assembly and frame", published 2000-10-17, issued 2000-10-17
- ^ a b US application 20190247739, Svensson, John Erik, "Single-wall inline skate frame and skate", published 2019-08-15, assigned to K2 Sports LLC
- ^ US 7931283, Wegener, Andreas C., "Frame assembly for in-line skate", published 2009-01-29, issued 2011-04-26, assigned to Sunshine Distribution Inc
- ^ a b Verdone, Peter (2012). "Bearings & Lubrication". PVD Designs. Archived from the original on 2012-02-15. Retrieved 2025-05-31.
- ^ a b c d e f g US 5685649, Demarest, Charles H.; Jensen, Paul C. & Lutz, Gerard F., "Wheel adapted to eliminate bearing click", published 1997-11-11, issued 1997-11-11, assigned to Kryptonics Inc and Bravo Sports Corp
- ^ US 5692809, Hook, Kenneth Wayne, "In-line skate wheels", published 1997-12-02, issued 1997-12-02
- ^ "Radial Ball Bearings". GMN Bearing USA. Archived from the original on 2025-04-26. Retrieved 2025-06-06.
- ^ a b c "Skate Bearings - your essential guide" (PDF). SMB Bearings. 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2025-06-07. Retrieved 2025-06-06.
- ^ "What Are the Differences Between Bearings? The various types and special features of bearings". JTEKT Corporation. 2024-11-20. Archived from the original on 2025-01-13. Retrieved 2025-06-06.
- ^ a b c d e "Ball Bearing Internal Clearance". SMB Bearings. Archived from the original on 2025-06-07. Retrieved 2025-06-07.
- ^ "Precision Ball & Roller Bearings - Internal Geometry of Ball Bearings". New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc. Archived from the original on 2025-06-08. Retrieved 2025-06-07.
- ^ a b c "How to Select the Right Bearing (Part 5): Bearing preload and rigidity". JTEKT Corporation. 2024-11-20. Archived from the original on 2025-06-07. Retrieved 2025-06-07.
- ^ a b "SKF: Bearing damage and failure analysis" (PDF). website. PUB BU/I3 14219/2 EN. June 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2025-04-07. Retrieved 2025-06-08.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ a b c Oswald, Fred B.; Zaretsky, Erwin V.; Poplawski, Joseph V. (April 2012). "Effect of Internal Clearance on Load Distribution and Life of Radially Loaded Ball and Roller Bearings" (PDF). NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-04-24. Retrieved 2025-06-08.
- ^ "Navigating Misalignment: How Deep Groove Ball Bearings Handle the Challenge". Axis - Baart Industrial Group. Archived from the original on 2025-04-26. Retrieved 2025-06-08.
- ^ a b "Bearing Preload" (PDF). SKF Group. 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2025-04-07. Retrieved 2025-05-19.
- ^ Briand, Pascal (2024-02-29). Improve the roll with the WICKED spacer kit - PIT STOP (video). Discourses inline skate spacers: too long, too short, and how to find the right length. Powerslide – via YouTube.
- ^ a b "How to Select the Right Bearing (Part 4): Bearing limiting speed, running accuracy, and fits". JTEKT Corporation. 2024-11-20. Archived from the original on 2025-01-15. Retrieved 2025-06-07.
- ^ Vegter, Ivo (2022-02-13). "Everything About Bearing Spacers" (video). thisissoul.com. See video transcript on all aspects of inline skate bearing spacers, including effects of shorter and longer spaces on bearings and bearing frictions. This is Soul.
- ^ Rajewski, David (2015-06-01). "Why Bearing Spacers Really Matter (skateboards)". Stoked Ride Shop. Archived from the original on 2025-06-21. Retrieved 2025-06-20.
- ^ "Historical Notes on Roller Skates No. 1". The Engineer. Vol. 41. London: Morgan-Grampian. 1876-02-04. pp. 85–86. Retrieved 2024-11-30.
- ^ "Balanced Rocker". Endless Blading. Archived from the original on 2025-06-26. Retrieved 2025-06-26. Balanced rocker setup with 4x90mm wheels on the Endless Trinity 90 frame.
- ^ a b c d "Wizard NR Frames (showing NR90)". Wizard Skating. Archived from the original on 2025-04-18. Retrieved 2025-05-28.
- ^ a b c Kempton, Mark (2007-01-24). "Inline Wheel Setups: A Beginners' Guide - By MarKK". Nottingham Skaters. Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2025-06-26.
- ^ a b c Weaver, Kris (2025-03-30). "Roller Hockey Chassis: Hi-lo system vs. straight wheel system". Madison Rec Hockey. Archived from the original on 2025-06-28. Retrieved 2025-06-28.
- ^ "Endless 90 mk2 Frame (165mm mounting with Balance Rocker)". Endless Blading. Archived from the original on 2025-06-29. Retrieved 2025-06-29.
- ^ "Ninja 90 frame 165mm/Trinity/UFS mountings with V.m Rocker". NN Skates. Archived from the original on 2025-06-29. Retrieved 2025-06-29.
- ^ "NN Skates - FAQs". NN Skates. Archived from the original on 2025-06-29. Retrieved 2025-06-29.
- ^ Vegter, Ivo (2021-08-31). "Everything About Grooves" (video). thisissoul.com. See video transcript on history of frame grooves, soulplates, backslide groove, Rollerblade Lightning, Roces Majestic 12 (M12), UFS mounting holes, split, wheel protection, height of grooves, radius of grooves, etc. This is Soul.
- ^ Ingraham, Lawrence (2018-11-16). What's the history of 50/50? What's the future? // Aggressive Inline Skating (video). Publisher – via YouTube. See video transcript for info on freestyle frame, juice blocks, Balance Frame, etc.
External links
[edit]- The National Museum of Roller Skating - many historical roller and inline skates mentioned in this article are featured in this museum's collections.
- Skating Book FAQ / Bibliography, part 1 of 2 - a listing of inline skating books published in the heyday of inline skating, in the 1990s. Part 1 includes books on inline skating, roller hockey, and quad skating. TOC from each book is reproduced, along with a short summary of the book.