The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This talk page is for discussing improvements to the article about Daily Mail, a publication, organization, or individual that is or has been used as a source for Wikipedia articles. It is not the proper venue for discussing the reliability of the publication, organization, or individual as a source for other, unrelated articles.
The subject in question may or may not be considered reliable for a particular article or topic area or for the encyclopedia as a whole, depending on editor consensus.
Policy permits limited use of material published by subjects as sources for articles about themselves, provided that the claim is not exceptional, contentious, or reasonably disputed.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
I think this might be worth a brief mention, if a good secondary source could be found. For those unfamiliar with Brian Bilston, the poem is as follows:
"How Much I Dislike the Daily Mail"
I would rather eat Quavers that are six week’s stale, blow dry the hair of Gareth Bale, listen to the songs of Jimmy Nail, than read one page of the Daily Mail.
If I were bored in a waiting room in Perivale, on a twelve hour trip on British rail or a world circumnavigational sail, I would not read the Daily Mail.
I would happily read the complete works of Peter Mayle, the autobiography of Dan Quayle, selected scripts from Emmerdale, but I couldn't ever read the Daily Mail.
Far better to stand outside in a storm of hail, be blown out to sea in a powerful gale then swallowed by a humpback whale than have to read the Daily Mail.
From: You Took the Last Bus Home: The Poems of Brian Bilston (2017)
The newspaper is neither formally affiliated with a recognized Zionist organization nor informally associated with a Zionist movement. It’s difficult to believe that the previous editor’s addition of “Zionism” as a political alignment for the paper was based on anything other than personal opinion. J F-T (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. That’s quite bold to put in an infobox - especially with no citation or evidence. Maybe in the controversy section RJ2677 (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, there's no way I'm getting into an edit war over this; in fact I'm surprised it's still there ("discussion needed" addendum notwithstanding). I could present a ton of valid references attesting the DM as a Zionist publication and it'd still be erased eventually, for no reason, so feel free to do so! :-) AnyDosMilVint (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2025 and 16 May 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sara.badura, Sarabadura1 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Cerberus313.