Talk:LM358

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Electronics This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The LM358 probably being the most prevalent opamp in the history of mankind, and "detector circuit" not actually meaning anything, I'm manually reverting the addition of that sentence by an anonymous user in 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcusmueller ettus (talk • contribs) 19:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the LM358 does not meet the notability standard to warrant its own article. I don't see the necessary significant coverage. I think the classic 741 would definitely need an article, but not the LM358. Opening this discussion before proposing for deletion. Alan Islas (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it does get deleted, I might suggest it get redirected to an anchor for its row in the table List of LM-series integrated circuits#Operational amplifiers, and then maybe that table can have an additional columns for a "Supply voltage minimum" and "Supply voltage maximum" and "Input voltage minimum" and "Input voltage maximum" and maybe a few other key parameters that distinguish those opamps. Em3rgent0rdr (talk) 20:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the template. Would prefer to see this go through XFD instead of PROD, with more eyes on it. Thanks. Hornpipe2 (talk) 02:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into this. I've nominated the article for deletion. Hopefully you can join in the discussion. Regards, --Alan Islas (talk) 13:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]