This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that X's rules were changed when StoneToss sought help from Elon Musk after an anti-fascist group published materials claiming to have revealed their identity?
Current status: Good article
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Webcomics. If you would like to participate in this project, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WebcomicsWikipedia:WikiProject WebcomicsTemplate:WikiProject WebcomicsWebcomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
There is a general sense that the alleged real name should not be added to the article considering available sources at this time (see this discussion).
In this RfC editors agreed that "neo-Nazi" should remain in the first sentence.
In this RfC it was found that there was consensus to include the link to StoneToss's website in the article.
In this RfC there was no consensus found to refer to the revelation of StoneToss's identity as "doxxing".
Edit executed with consensus, no need to keep this discussion open
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Yes but doing some of the comic categories on the person article and some on the comic redirect and not one or the other makes no sense. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think what they're asking for is for the categories for the comic to be on the redirect and the categories for the person to be on this page with less of a jumble across the two pages. Is that correct @PARAKANYAA? Simonm223 (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am looking for a clear statement, something like "We should (add? remove?) this specific category from this specific page." Instead, I see a large amount of narrative backstory and "for the love of god" complaints, but I don't see anything that is a clear actionable request. EdgierEdgar (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
“We should have either all the person categories on one title and all the comic on the other or both”? I’m not telling you which to pick but I’m saying that the status quo must change which is an actionable request. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK, you haven't been able to articulate a specific actionable change, of which specific category or categories you want added or removed from which specific page or pages. Therefore, status quo is fine with me. EdgierEdgar (talk) 23:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The actionable change is pick one of option A or option B. If you fail to understand that I don't really know what to tell you! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
...and to add them to the redirect. Or, alternatively, to remove all of the categories already at the redirect and add them here. The more correct thing was done: categories for "publications", "internet memes", "webcomics" and "websites" were moved to the redirect which has the webcomic as the subject, which subject is also a publication, an internet meme, and a website, whereas StoneToss the pseudonymous author -- the subject of this article -- is not a publication, an internet meme, a webcomic or a website. —Alalch E.09:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. This is fine. I know we get a lot of trolling and POV pushing on this article and that can lead to hyper-vigilance from page watchers but this edit was none of those things. The correct categories are on the redirect and on the main page based on the article topic. It's fine. Good edit. Simonm223 (talk) 11:47, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this edit seems fine and uncontroversial. I have no idea why it was proposed with such "for the love of god" histrionics and a refusal to clearly state which specific categories they wanted to add/remove from what article(s). EdgierEdgar (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1) Because people have been arguing about what categories go on this article since its creation
2) I did clearly state it, the people categories and the publication categories. There is no overlap. Why was that so hard to figure out? PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:37, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Because we lack reliable sources that confirm his identity. Wikipedia isn't a journalistic project and we cannot do our own research - we depend on sources with a strong history of accuracy. This is especially strict when it comes to living people. Many outlets reported on the dox. So far none of them have said that the subject of the dox definitely is that guy. If that changes then so will the article, with very careful attribution. Simonm223 (talk) 00:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I want to remove any mentions of the article calling him a "neo nazi". It's disingenuous considering he himself has proclaimed in the past to not be a neo nazi. If he says he isn't one, then he shouldn't be labeled as one, as it proves that the Wikipedia moderation team has a clear bias and thus makes this particular article misleading and inaccurate. [1]CanonEvent05 (talk) 08:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: Sources describe him as one. What he calls himself is irrelevant. In fact it would introduce MORE bias to prioritise his own description like this. See WP:MANDY — Czello(music)08:58, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
In the sources from the Wired article sourced calling him a neo-nazi it is written:
https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-x-blocked-journalists-researchers-neo-nazi-cartoonist/
“I have rejected the accusation of being a "nazi" at length, for years, on my own website,” the email read. “Not only that, but my statement also provides examples of my work that oppose nazi ideology. As such, the label of "nazi" is not consistent with the facts.”
The artist goes out of their way to write about how they're not a Nazi and yet this article labels them as such. It's disingenuous. A more appropriate term would be a comic artist who frequently criticizes Judaism, Israel, LGTBQ rights, etc. 93.176.148.200 (talk) 00:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Not done: Sources describe him as one. What he calls himself is irrelevant. In fact it would introduce MORE bias to prioritise his own description like this. See WP:MANDY — Czello (music) 08:58, 16 May 2025 (UTC)