Unified Growth Theory, founded by Oded Galor, explores the evolution of societies across the entire span of human history.[1][2][3][4]
The theory suggests that forces operating in the distant past have shaped the growth process and determined the differential timing of transitions from stagnation to growth across the globe.[4][5] For most of human history, technological progress expanded population size but had little effect on living standards. As technological progress gradually gathered momentum, through the mutually reinforcing interaction between population growth, adaptation, and innovation, the increasing importance of human capital in coping with a rapidly changing technological environment prompted parents to prioritize child quality over quantity, triggering the onset of the demographic transition. The decline in fertility freed the growth process from the counterbalancing effects of population growth and, along with advancements in knowledge and education, laid the foundation for sustained economic expansion and modern prosperity.[1][4][5]
Yet, variations in deeply rooted institutional, cultural, geographical, and human diversity characteristics contributed to the differential timing of this transformation across societies, giving rise to immense global inequality.[1][5]
The dual mysteries of growth and inequality
[edit]The passage of humanity from millennia of stagnation to an age of sustained economic progress represents a defining turning point in the course of human civilization.[5] After millennia of stagnant living standards across the world, the past two centuries have witnessed a momentous transformation: income per person has risen nearly fourteen-fold, while life expectancy has more than doubled.[5][6][7] Yet as prosperity accelerated, it emerged earlier in some regions than in others, marking a second defining transformation that brought about profound inequality among societies. Western European nations and some of their offshoots in the New World underwent extraordinary gains in living standards during the nineteenth century, whereas in most other parts of the world this takeoff occurred only in the latter half of the twentieth century, contributing to wide disparities across regions.[5][6][7]
Unified Growth Theory seeks to explain the factors underlying the significant rise in living standards that followed centuries of relative economic stagnation, as well as the origins of the persistent disparities in income and development across nations and regions in the modern era.[1]
Testable predictions
[edit]The testable predictions of the theory and its underlying mechanisms have been confirmed in empirical and quantitative research in the past decade, and have inspired intensive exploration of the impact of historical and pre-historical forces on comparative economic development and the disparity in the wealth of nations.[8][9][10] the theory as a whole was explored quantitatively.[11][12] Traits that were complementary to the technological environment generated higher level of income, and therefore higher reproductive success. Testable predictions of this evolutionary theory and its underlying mechanisms have been confirmed empirically[13] and quantitatively.[14]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Galor, Oded (2011). Unified Growth Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400838868.
- ^ Galor, Oded (2005). "From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory." In: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (eds.). Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4: 171-293.
Galor, Oded; Weil, David N. (2000). "Population, Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and Beyond" (PDF). American Economic Review. 90 (4): 806–828. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.806. - ^ Ashraf, Quamrul; Galor, Oded (2011). "Dynamics and Stagnation in the Malthusian Epoch". American Economic Review. 101 (5): 2003–2041. doi:10.1257/aer.101.5.2003. PMC 4262154. PMID 25506082.
- ^ a b c Galor, Oded (2025-08-06). "Unified Growth Theory: Roots of Growth and Inequality in the Wealth of Nations". Annual Review of Economics. 17 (1): 197–216. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-090324-034939. ISSN 1941-1383. PMC 12333494. PMID 40785953.
- ^ a b c d e f Galor, Oded (2022). The journey of humanity: the origins of wealth and inequality. New York: Dutton. ISBN 978-0-593-18599-5.
- ^ a b "Rebasing 'Maddison': The shape of long-run economic development". CEPR. 2018-01-25. Retrieved 2025-11-11.
- ^ a b Bolt J, Van Zanden JL. 2014.. The Maddison project: collaborative research on historical national accounts. . Econ. Hist. Rev. 67:(3):627–51
- ^ Ashraf, Quamrul; Galor, Oded (2011). "Dynamics and Stagnation in the Malthusian Epoch". American Economic Review. 101 (5): 2003–2041. doi:10.1257/aer.101.5.2003. PMC 4262154. PMID 25506082.
- ^ Franck, Raphaël; Galor, Oded (2016). "Technology-Skill Complementarity in the Early Phase of Industrialization". IZA Discussion Papers 9758 - Institute for the Study of Labor.
de Pleijt, Alexandra; Nuvolari, Alessandro; Weisdorf, Jacob (2018). "Human Capital Formation during the First Industrial Revolution: Evidence from the Use of Steam Engines". Journal of the European Economic Association. 18: 829–889. - ^ Becker, Sascha; Cinnirella, Francesco; Woessmann, Ludger (2010). "The trade-off between fertility and education: evidence from before the demographic transition" (PDF). Journal of Economic Growth. 15 (3): 177–204. doi:10.1007/s10887-010-9054-x. hdl:1893/1598. S2CID 16014490.
Murphy, Tommy (2015). "Old habits die hard (sometimes)". Journal of Economic Growth. 20 (2): 177–222. doi:10.1007/s10887-015-9111-6. S2CID 154506639.
Fernihough, Alan (2017). "Human capital and the quantity–quality trade-off during the demographic transition" (PDF). Journal of Economic Growth. 22 (1): 35–65. doi:10.1007/s10887-016-9138-3.
Klemp, Marc; Weisdorf, Jacob (2018). "Fecundity, Fertility and the Formation of Human Capital". Economic Journal. 129: 925–960.
Shiue, Carol H. (2017). "Human capital and fertility in Chinese clans before modern growth" (PDF). Journal of Economic Growth. 22 (4): 351–396. doi:10.1007/s10887-017-9148-9. S2CID 73715675. - ^ Lagerlöf, Nils-Petter (2006). "The Galor-Weil Model Revisited: A Quantitative Exercise". Review of Economic Dynamics. 9 (1): 116–142. doi:10.1016/j.red.2005.07.002.
- ^ Galor, Oded; Moav, Omer (2002). "Natural Selection and the Origin of Economic Growth". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 117 (4): 1133–1191. doi:10.1162/003355302320935007. hdl:10419/80194.
- ^ Galor, Oded; Klemp, Mark (2018). "Human Genealogy Establishes Selective Advantage to Moderate Fertility".
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Collins, Jason; Baer, Boris; Weber, Ernst Juerg (2014). "Economic Growth And Evolution: Parental Preference For Quality And Quantity Of Offspring" (PDF). Macroeconomic Dynamics. 18 (8): 1773–1796. doi:10.1017/s1365100513000163. S2CID 28274524.