User:Reconrabbit

My name is Myles.

Thank you for reading

Next up

[edit]
[edit]

In Good Article reviews, I try to check either 10 sources or 15% of the total, whichever is larger. Good/Featured topic mock-ups for order Lagomorpha

Extant species only

[edit]
  • 13.8% Stub-Class
  • 41.4% Start-Class
  • 20.7% C-Class
  • 6.9% B-Class
  • 17.2% GA-Class
  • 3.4% FA-Class
  • 7.6% Stub-Class
  • 28.8% Start-Class
  • 16.7% C-Class
  • 15.2% B-Class
  • 28.8% GA-Class
  • 3% FA-Class

All lagomorphs

[edit]

This would be a much, much harder goal given the number and ambiguity of extinct genera and species.

  • 25% Start-Class
  • 50% C-Class
  • 25% B-Class

Leporidae

[edit]
  • 13.6% Stub-Class
  • 6.8% Start-Class
  • 4.5% C-Class
  • 4.5% B-Class
  • 11.4% GA-Class
  • 59.1% remaining

^It is highly likely that the list of extinct genera is inaccurate due to synonyms and such that Wikipedia has not caught up to.

  • 66.7% Stub-Class
  • 33.3% B-Class
  • 5.9% Stub-Class
  • 41.2% Start-Class
  • 23.5% C-Class
  • 5.9% B-Class
  • 20.6% GA-Class
  • 2.9% FA-Class
  • Notability of this subspecies is not verified


  • 25% Stub-Class
  • 25% Start-Class
  • 50% C-Class
  • 60% Stub-Class
  • 20% B-Class
  • 20% GA-Class
  • 16.7% Start-Class
  • 83.3% GA-Class
  • 29.6% Stub-Class
  • 18.5% Start-Class
  • 14.8% C-Class
  • 14.8% B-Class
  • 14.8% GA-Class
  • 7.4% remaining

Ochotonidae

[edit]
  • 10% C-Class
  • 5% B-Class
  • 85% remaining
  • Ochotonidae and Ochotona technically need to be split. It isn't clear which would remain the Pika article.


Ochotona topic: all extant and extinct species

  • Plus however many valid extinct species there are.