User talk:Bonadea

Archives

Archive 1 (Dec 2006 - Jun 2007) Archive 2 (Jun-Jul 2007 - Dec 2007) Archive 3 (Jan 2008 - Jul 2008) Archive 4 (Jul 2008 - Nov 2008) Archive 5 (Nov 2008 - Feb 2009) Archive 6 (Mar 2009 - Nov 2009) Archive 7 (Dec 2009 - Jul 2010) Archive 8 (Jul 2010 - Sep 2010) Archive 9 (Oct 2010 - April 2011) Archive 10 (May 2011 - Nov 2011) Archive 11 (Dec 2011 - May 2012) Archive 12 (Jun 2012 - Dec 2012) Archive 13 (Jan 2013 - Jun 2013) Archive 14 (Jul 2013 - April 2014) Archive 15 (May 2014 - Oct 2014) Archive 16 (Nov 2014 - 15 Nov 2015) Archive 17 (21 Nov 2015 - Mar 2016) Archive 18 (18 Mar 2016 - Dec 2016) Archive 19 (Jan 2017 - Jun 2017) Archive 20 (Jul 2017 - Nov 2017) Archive 21 (Dec 2017 - April 2018) Archive 22 (May 2018 - Oct 2018) Archive 23 (Nov 2018 - May 2019) Archive 24 (June 2019 - Aug 2019) Archive 25 (Aug 2019 - Jan 2020) Archive 26 (31 Jan 2020 – June 2020) Archive 27 (July 2020 – February 2021) Archive 28 (March 2021 – October 2021) Archive 29 (November 2021 – January 2022) Archive 30 (February 2022 – April 2022) Archive 31 (May 2022 – December 2022) Archive 32 (2023) Archive 33 (2024)

Please provide me the permission to submit Draft: Era Joshi for review because I can change the draft to address the concerns of the reviewers.Zoe Sharma (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. You can edit the rejected draft but you may not submit it for AfC review. If you do edit the draft so it shows any shred of notability, you can ask about it, but that must happen first.

What is your connection to Era Joshi? --bonadea contributions talk 13:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Draft:James Brown (New South Wales politician), thank you for your comment on the profile I am submitting (Draft:James Brown (New South Wales politician)) I would like to ask for your guidance to what need to be addressed to resubmit this for approval? For clarity I have added further references from reputable third party sources to back up this submission, however, note that I also don't want my draft to be deleted if it isn't 100% correct. Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you soon Cameronwise (talk) 02:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I trimmed the links above to remove some extra code. --bonadea contributions talk 14:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Cameronwise: and thanks for your message. Drafts are not deleted quite so quickly. Usually, a draft will be deleted 6 months after it was last edited, unless they contain copyright violations, personal attacks, or blatant promotion, none of which applies to this draft. About resubmitting it – I am fairly sure that if you were to resubmit it now, it would be declined again. All the information in the Early life, Education, and Military career lacks citations; in a biography of a living person, all information should have an in-line citation, to verify the content. I can't see any of that information in any of the sources, other than some of the military stuff (though I haven't scrutinised the sources that closely). Where do the claims about his early life, schooling, and personal details such as number of children come from? --bonadea contributions talk 14:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bonadea,

Thank you for your detailed response—it is much appreciated. I am not particularly familiar with the backend processes of Wiki, so your explanation has provided me with much-needed clarity.

Regarding in-line citations, I now understand the importance of verifying content and will address this in the amendments. Once these updates are made, would it be possible to have the submission reviewed by you again before resubmission?

Additionally, I now too, have a better understanding of the guidelines concerning 'self-promotion.' This profile is intended to highlight the individual’s notable contributions as a community leader, not for personal promotion. Considering this, and the origin of the initial submission, would it be better to amend the current submission or start anew with a clean slate?

Once again, thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to your advice on how best to proceed.

Kind regards Cameronwise (talk) 22:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

highly appreciate your contributions. Kindly request to justify the article page of Mukesh Mishra, which is meet notability guidelines as per the Wikipedia page creation. with all available references are realiable and indipendent sources like Prabhat Khabar, Hindustan (newspaper), ETV Network, Josh Talks, e.t.c. request to move in mainspace of article and help to improve @Bonadea Thanks with best regards Dbgbr (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bonadea Could you please help review and provide guidance on improving this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Airpaz? Your feedback would be greatly appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodysetiawan23 (talk • contribs) 08:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you move this back to draft? It looks like the creator of this article bypassed the AfC process and moved into mainspace themselves. Natg 19 (talk) 03:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your last comments — they helped me to understand what to do and improve the submission.

I believe that all the issues, which you specified previously, are addressed now. It includes a drastic size reduction (~70%), using a neutral style, adding additional sources, and removing inline references. I hope that any kind of advertisement is corrected too. In the last page version, there are only facts, sources, and links. No personal opinion.

As you asked I added additional sources — now references have more than 100 sources. Any statement that was not backed up with a source is removed.

I hope that the page is ready for review.

Thanks Atetelbaum (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Mirkster (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:SymphonyAI (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for taking the time to review my draft submission.

C3.ai is another very similar company that is no more notable than SymphonyAI and yet they have an article that was created less than two years ago. Can you please let me know why C3.ai can have a article but not SymphonyAI?

Also the founder and current chairman of SymphonyAI Romesh Wadhwani has his own article so he must be notable enough?

Mirkster (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mirkster: thank you for your message. It is important to recognise the fact that no company – and no person – "has a Wikipedia article", and that there are many, many articles that do not meet the notability criteria or other Wikipedia guidelines. So the fact that there is an article about another company has no bearing on whether or not there could be an article about SymphonyAI. That being said, it is only natural that you should compare articles about other companies; I think there is more notability shown in the article about C3.ai, because it does not simply talk about run-of-the-mill activities like funding and acquisitions (and this source is a textbook example of what is meant by "significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources"). I hope that makes sense. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 21:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bondea: Thank for pointing out the distinction that no company or person has ownership of an article. I meant to say they have an article written about them, not that they own it but I see now that my choice of words did imply ownership.

This is my first article so thank you for providing that textbook example, yes it does make sense now. I am interested in AI technologies and believe there should be article about this company because of its unified AI platform which makes it unique. I will see if I find a good source to verify this.

Thanks again for your comments and guidance. Mirkster (talk) 09:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to comment in concurring with deletion, but I see that the drafts in question have already been deleted. Those drafts that you nominated were not eligible for G4. I don't know whether the timing made them ineligible, but they were definitely ineligible because they were not in the same namespace, which means that they were not sufficiently identical, because the rules for deletion from article space and the rules for deletion from draft space are significantly different. I was about to comment to that effect, but to agree that the drafts should be deleted as violating the policy on biographies of recently dead people when the only newsworthy matter was the death. My point is that G4 never applies to drafts of articles that were deleted. Sometimes when an article is deleted, it is deleted because it should be in draft space. In this case, the drafts were deleted because they should not have been in draft space. So G4 only applies to drafts if they were already deleted from draft space by MFD, not if they were deleted from article space by AFD. That is a precise distinction, and your nomination was sort of an exception to an exception. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I noticed you recently nominated Draft:Atelopus harlequin for G12 speedy deletion. However, you didn't include a link stating the original source, and Earwig isn't showing any copyright violations. I have declined the speedy deletion nomination for now, but if you have more information, feel free to reply here and/or renominate the draft. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:53, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I now see where you placed the source. Unfortunately, I do not have access to it, so I will leave the CSD review for another administrator. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: Thanks for your note! It is a bit of a puzzler where to put the source in a CSD G12 nomination, when it is an offline source. I see another admin did delete the draft, so it is all sorted. Best, --bonadea contributions talk 08:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed my article to be neutral view but arvat do not have any independent coverage. Tanmoy108 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link: Draft:Arvat. @Tanmoy108: In that case, I'm afraid there can't be a Wikipedia article about them, because independent coverage is a fundamental requirement. (Please don't forget to respond to the conflict of interest question on your user talk page!) --bonadea contributions talk 14:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can you tell what are the type of independent coverage required other than any press Tanmoy108 (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to Arvat? --bonadea contributions talk 14:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am the CEO of Arvat Tanmoy108 (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well, the kind of sources that are required is described in the decline notice on your user talk page: in the grey box, the text that begins "This draft's references do not show..." contains crucial information as well as links to policy and guideline pages that explain exactly what kind of sources are necessary. Note that you can't create such sources – they have to exist without the prompting of yourself or anyone else connected to the company (in other words, they must be fully independent). Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 15:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ook thank you Tanmoy108 (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi bonadea, could you help me to review that draft article ? If, there is still something mistake, could you give the guide ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodysetiawan23 (talk • contribs) 08:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jodysetiawan23: You submitted it three minutes before posting here, and it is listed among the drafts waiting for review. Please do not badger the volunteer editors to get preferential treatment for the draft – that's never appropriate, particularly not for someone who is paid to edit Wikipedia. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the draft is currently in the review queue, and I appreciate the time and effort of the volunteer editors. I did not intend to rush the process or seek preferential treatment, and I apologize if my message came across that way.

I’ll wait for the standard review process to take its course. Thank you for your time and for all the work you do in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 10:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is the article Draft:Rama Rajya or Draft:Triggered Insaan ready to be a article? Regards,Ved Sharma (talk) (contribs) 08:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kharavela Deva: No. --bonadea contributions talk 09:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you declined the submission of the Draft:SmartyLLC article with the reason that it "appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia". Would you be willing to point out the specific portions of the article that you are referring to? Jknacnud (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jknacnud: I'm afraid it applies to the entire draft. I have consolidated a number of references – a press release which was republished in several publications – and removed some promotional quotes from the press release, but that does not mean that what remains is any less promotional. --bonadea contributions talk 12:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: Thank you for the feedback! I will keep working on it. Jknacnud (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Bonadea, I've seen you have recently moved Draft:Shouryuv to draftspace citing more sources required, and a possible COI. I had actually reviewed it earlier, then the creator seems to have mistakenly moved it to draft and back to main, causing it to lose the reviewed status. I was wondering why you thought it was not ready for mainspace. It seems to have enough sources, and per WP:DIRECTOR, the movie that this director is known for has significant coverage, which is also cited in the article. I'm not sure about COI, but the article seems to have been written in a neutral tone. Thought to ask your opinion before any doing anything myself. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:58, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bonadea. You have just declined my draft about William Wimmera. I am a new editor and had thought I was saving to my sandbox while I worked on the draft. I have been researching the topic for a number of years and am transferring citations from another document. Please could you advise if I am working on the document in the wrong place or can save changes without pressing 'publish'? Thanks for your help. Queenday23 (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Queenday23: thank you for your message. It looks like another editor submitted the draft (I have no idea why!) and I sympathise with that being frustrating. Don't worry about it; you do have to click "Publish" in order to save anything on Wikipedia, but that does not mean that you are asking for the draft to be reviewed. That only happens if you click the blue "Submit" button on the draft. That your draft was submitted prematurely won't count against it in a future review. Regards --bonadea contributions talk 15:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with this. Will continue working on the draft and hope to get there in the end. Queenday23 (talk) 10:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A copied message with regards to your recent decline of my proposed article:

Hi @Bonadea. Don't quite understand your rationale? The Wikipedia notoriety criteria states that three accurate and reliable sources are required which show significant coverage. I have provided three: 1) Country Life, a full-article feature on Reed. 2) Classic Driver, a high-brow journalistic source with another full-article feature. 3) the Mail Online article, which although tabloid, provides the same information as the former two. While some may argue, it is the content that's notable (i.e., arguably Reed's Land Rover, not Reed herself), it is Reed, her personality and adventures that are being reported on, fuelled by her interest in her Land Rover.

Furthermore, while the podcast and YouTube sources are primary and not peer-reviewed, the frequency of them (plus Reed's undeniable presence throughout them), provides a guide as to her social media influence, and the scope of her out-reach.

Please could you confirm your issues with my sourcing?

TIA... Mac Edmunds (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“I have added multiple reliable sources, including WHED (World Higher Education Database), AD Scientific Index, and other reputable academic references. These sources confirm the university’s notability and credibility. Given these improvements, could you please review the article and consider removing the maintenance templates? Let me know if any further enhancements are needed. Thank you.” Kocaeli Health and Technology University Newinwiki8 (talk) 15:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I want to clarify that I am a student at Kocaeli Health and Technology University and have no financial affiliation with the institution. I am not being compensated in any way for editing this article. My sole intention was to improve the article by adding reliable sources and ensuring that the university is fairly represented, just like many other universities that have pages on Wikipedia, even those without significant recognition.

I have addressed the concerns raised by adding multiple reputable sources, including WHED, AD Scientific Index, and Times Higher Education. These sources confirm the university’s notability. Given these improvements, I kindly request a review of the article and reconsideration of the maintenance templates.

Thank you for your time and consideration.”

Kocaeli Health and Technology University Newinwiki8 (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on your user talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 15:50, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I will keep your advice going forward regarding quotations and sources.

However, I do not understand the reversion to edits of My Husband's Wife, I understand you said to respect other variations of english, but it's an Egyptian movie and as far as I'm aware Egypt does not have an English variant. The plot summary is hard to read as is and seems poorly worded.

I also took the IMDb description of the plot of the movie and added it because it reads much smoother. Factinator5000 (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The revert had nothing to do with English varieties – that was an issue with some of your other edits, but not this one. There are multiple reasons why we can't copy plot descriptions from IMDB: most importantly because it is a copyright violation, but also because such plot descriptions are written in a promotional tone, and almost never cover the entire plot. I agree that the existing plot summary isn't very well-written, but the main problem with it is actually that the reader doesn't find out what happens in the film, only its premise. --bonadea contributions talk 14:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 67, January – February 2025

• East View Press and The Africa Report join the library
• Spotlight: Wikimedia+Libraries International Convention and WikiCredCon
• Tech tip: Suggest page

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --18:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bonadea, thanks for your input on Sudhir Mehta (entrepreneur). It meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO with 11 independent refs—e.g., *Economic Times Auto 2025*, *Fortune India 2025*, *The Times of India 2022*—plus awards (Lokmat 2024). COI’s baseless—I’m unpaid, per User:MH-wiki2025 and Talk:Sudhir Mehta (entrepreneur). I’ve never agreed to AfC-only—WP:AfC’s optional per policy. Can you detail sourcing/notability gaps or AfC pact evidence? I favor mainspace per WP:ATD. MH-wiki2025 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OP has been blocked. --bonadea contributions talk 13:54, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bonadea. You have just declined my draft about Wadiz. May I know which part of the article I need to improve on? It was previously declined for the same reason but I have made many edits and removed sentences that sounded like an advertisement. Also, i tried to write sentences as neutral as i can but it got rejected again. Could you help me to make this draft an article? 진국 (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea, I am slightly confused exactly on where exactly the problem lies, as the pages I had based this one off (Liquitex, Golden Artist Colours, Winsor & Newton, and some other Acrylic paint manufacturers) all have equal or fewer sources (on some of the pages are primarily their own websites too just in different formats like webarchive), less information on their pages, and are written from the same perspective? And I added the brand name to the artist materials brands in the acrylic section as I presumed it was supposed to be a list of any notable brands. How do you suggest I work on this so it has a chance of being approved? I am still fairly new to the whole wikipedia thing and am just struggling to understand a bit. THanks :) Dave83821 (talk) 00:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is there something specific that needs to be addressed for Draft:Venhue to be included along with its peers? I.e. Foxface Natural. Trying to document East Village restaurants. Venhue has been noted on The Today Show, Yelp and other major publications many sources have been provided. Nycrest (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See my response to the inquiry you made on my talk. S0091 (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Kronveldt (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:State of Maine V (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The Maine Maritime Academy has used the Training Ship State of Maine for a number of years. It is mentioned often on their site and in the press including articles about its final training trip -summer 2024- and this replacement ship. The proposed page describes the replacement ship (see reference 1). Note that both the existing TS State of Maine page and the page for National Security Multi-Mission Vessels mention this replacement ship (5 maritime academies are getting replacements). There are some other press accounts, mostly older, but I don't understand what they would add that isn't included in the MMA official press release and the two press accounts I have referenced. Please give me an example of something that I could add that would make this page ok.

Kronveldt (talk) 16:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the Maine Maine Maritime Academy wikipage has a placeholder for this ship in their list of training ships:

Training ships

The academy has utilized a number of vessels over the years to provide hands-on training and instruction opportunities for cadets at sea, usually former U.S. Navy ships. Each of the academy's training ships bear the same name, TS State of Maine, during their respective time in service as the academy training ship.

USS Comfort (AH-6) - 1953-1963

USS Ancon (AGC-4) - 1963-1973

USNS Upshur (T-AP-198) - 1973-1995

TS State of Maine (formerly USNS Tanner (T-AGS-40)) - 6 June 1997-2024

TS State of Maine V (currently undergoing commissioning) Kronveldt (talk) 22:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• MainlandIsland (talk · contribs)
  • User:MainlandIsland/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

MainlandIsland (talk) 18:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: I appreciate your review and redirect to the information on Music Bands for qualifications of Nobility. I noticed line 10, "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable" CJM Productions "Country Fix" Television Show, Aired on ABC Family, CMT (Country Music Television) Aired to over 100,000,000 Households. -How or why wouldn't this qualify?

@MainlandIsland: Does that refer to this link that is listed under "References" but not actually cited as a source? You only quoted a snippet from the criterion, which reads Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, such as a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read the policy and notability guideline on subjects notable only for one event, for further clarifications).It is not clearly notable so the criterion doesn't apply, and that link does not mention Tyler Truth so it doesn't verify your claim that he performed there, much less that he performed the theme music. What is your reason for believing that he did so? --bonadea contributions talk 19:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because he did. The snippet I pulled from the episode air date has him as the HOST of the Country Fix Episode # 516 and music video in Rotation on more episodes. I will reach out to get the actual air dates from the CJM Productions "Country FIX" studios on CMT and ABC Family and add them to the page, if I left them out. I am almost positive I added it in the references but I will double check this. MainlandIsland (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any additional references that I can use for Violet Sky? If not, delete the draft immediately. Aubreeprincess (talk) 07:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aubreeprincess: This is odd; a notice should have been placed on your user talk page when I declined the draft, telling you what kind of sources are necessary. There must have been a software glitch of some kind – sorry about that. In any case, the decline notice on the draft itself contains this information. Read the notice carefully, and follow the links from the keywords "reliable", "secondary", and "independent". If you want to request deletion of the draft, place this at the top of the draft page: {{db-g7}}. That will tag the page for deletion by an administrator. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 07:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just finished writing an article on a Lake in Sweden --- Pulsujärvi (lake), I had used Infobox Water body template but when I added the coordinates, It is not showing the Map preview, I donno if it's an error or something like that, Need Guidance! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 16:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They come under shudra varna.https://www.eklavya.in/pdfs/Books/SSTP/social_studies_7/histroy/10%20Caste%20System.pdf Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that is not a usable source (whatever it is – looks like a school textbook) and "they come under shudra" is unintelligible. --bonadea contributions talk 21:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, could you please explain what you mean by "AI-generated nonsense" in your summary for your recent edit to Technics SL-1200, and your reason for the reversion? Thanks! Audrey Woolf (talk) 18:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea Thank you for your review of the Draft "Huntress" page. We've cut it down quite a bit, so I'm wondering if you could help me understand whether the problem is that there aren't enough details and sources, or if the sources that are included are problematic for some reason.

If the latter, I can certainly replace the MSSP source with this Reuters link.

- https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/cybersecurity-startup-huntress-valued-over-15-bln-after-latest-funding-2024-06-18/

Do I need to find additional sources? More than 1 per fact/sentence?

Thank you for your time!

Michelle18612 (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ben.Gowar (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, why do you declined my draft when the title says better version, not again. Mary Joy 20 Marcial (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For context, you submitted Draft:Timeline of the far future (better version). Don't write drafts that are intended to replace an entire article – edit the article instead. (And "better version" would never be part of an article title). --bonadea contributions talk 14:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Mary Joy 20 Marcial (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here! Mary Joy 20 Marcial (talk) 15:47, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mary Joy 20 Marcial Ahhhh! Joshua Kharis 2014 (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, at your convenience -- I've integrated a massive (mostly) completed re-write of Draft:Christopher Mellon just now here.

I included Draft_talk:Christopher Mellon#Draft integrated -- Notability and References_analysis with extensive scrutiny of all the most frequently used sourcing. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 17:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

could you please help me publish this article and can you guide me so that i can learn editing quickly ! kindly let me know how can i improve my article Santhoesh venkat (talk) 11:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Santhoesh venkat: I'm afraid it takes time to learn how to edit Wikipedia well. I advise you to edit existing articles for a few months before you try to create a new article. I don't mean that you should go through lots of articles and make minor grammar changes – that is not a very good way to learn editing, and it requires a pretty strong command of English, but focus on really improving articles about notable topics.

Draft:Sriram Karthick is very far from becoming an article, and it does not look like there could be an article about him at this time. This is not an acceptable source (automatically generated landing page, and TOI is not a reliable source for biographies); this mentions his name in passing; this doesn't mention him at all. Like the decline notice says, there must be multiple sources that meet all the requirements described in the notice, to show notability. In addition, there is a lot of information in the draft that has no source. How do you know when or where he was born, or that he has received awards? --bonadea contributions talk 13:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thats a lots of information and you made me understand, how important the citations are and i really appreciate your time and effort to make me understand what it is actually ! ill explore more about him and ill try to start improvising other article as you said ! thanks a lot.

ill update the article again once i get more details about him.

Thanks again @Bonadea Santhoesh venkat (talk) 13:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You probably missed that this had been draftificed before? I was sending it to AfD when you moved it. No harm down, it will vanish one way or another. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: yes, I did miss that – I'm sorry! It was immediately restored to mainspace and I have cut it down to a bare-bones version. AfD would have been better, I think. --bonadea contributions talk 10:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It will go. Is now at AfD. I smell UPE and socks. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:18, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ghostiwe, where there is substantial interaction with the pair. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have probably linked this lot with a substantial UPE sock farm. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you feel there is any additional information you are able to add to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ghostiwe? I've been digging away and found linkages or possible linkages to an amazing number of sock farms, which may be linked to or be a larger organisation still. Morsels from others might be valuable.

As for articles by the named sock OgaMusa, I have taken to sending them straight to AfD if there is a reasonable chance of success. The tenuous ones can be handled at SPI of course. I saw you just sent one to draft. I've just given that one a second (and presumably pointless) UPE warning. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 09:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hejsan,

I was thinking (along with dozens of others, apparently...), you would make an excellent admin. I also know that you've previously expressed some reservations about the RfA process – and who could blame you? So I just wanted to flag up, if flagging up was needed, that there is likely an election coming up in 2-3 months' time, and it would be really great if you would consider running. I sure would be happy to nominate you, although I also realise I'm joining the end of a long queue there, with many veritable Big Name admins ahead of me. Anyway, just wanted to float the idea. And if I can provide any advice or other input based on my own experience of having gone through the pilot election last year, let me know.

-- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sooo... I guess your silence should tell me something already, but since I've never been very quick on the uptake, I'll just ignore that and pester you some more. Tomorrow, the next admin election opens for candidate sign-ups/nominations: Administrator elections/July 2025. How's about it? :) DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) 👀. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

👍 —Fortuna, imperatrix 07:35, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear reviewer I have seen your comment left on my draft "CSOP Asset Management". Could you kindly name which references are not sufficient to show notability and non-independent. I have tried many times looking for comprehensive and independent sources and got no direction right now. Your direct and specific advice will be highly appreciated. Thanks! Maggie JL (talk) 09:57, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea, thanks for your feedback on this draft and I wanted to see if you could offer any insight. Zumper is consistently used as a reliable source of rental data by major publications and Wikipedia. I did not add a section about our rental data in the draft nor press articles covering Zumper's data as I thought those would come across as too self promotional and against the guidelines. You can actually see a Wall Street Journal article from today quoting Zumper's NYC rental data (https://www.wsj.com/real-estate/nyc-broker-fee-housing-rent-70b11530). Would adding a section on our rental data that many reputable sources cite help with getting this article approved and published? ZumperCrystal (talk) 17:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources using their data are probably not going to be useful for showing notability. If there are independent, reliable sources that discuss the fact that Zumper's data is used by others, that might be possible to use. But if Wikipedia articles use Zumper as a source, that does not show any notability – Wikipedia is not a reliable source! --bonadea contributions talk 09:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When I edited Frootbat, Not long after Greentreet went up for deletion, Did you follow my path, If so, Did you help set it up for deletion, do you hate me? Sunny's Highway 27 19:55, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sunhighway27: I am not following you. I had to look at your contributions to understand which articles/drafts you meant – it is true that I declined Draft:Frootbat and that I posted to your user talk page asking you to stop moving Greenstreet, Missouri to draftspace, but I never reflected on the fact that the same editor was involved with both articles/drafts. Looking at my own contributions, I declined the Frootbat draft late in the evening of 10 June, and posted to your user talk page about the Greenstreet AfD late in the evening of 11 June (with a loong working day in between), so I think I am forgiven for not noticing the fact that I posted twice to the same user talk page :-) As for the Greenstreet AfD nomination, that was nothing to do with me, and I certainly do not hate you. I was actually going to post to the AfD discussion page to say that I completely understand that it sucks to have an article you created nominated for deletion (I've been there myself), but didn't want to make the discussion even longer. Anyway, I hope this explains things. --bonadea contributions talk 20:27, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what article @bonadea Sunny's Highway 27 20:39, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need to ping people on their own user talk pages. --bonadea contributions talk 10:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

soory you took a while Sunny's Highway 27 16:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Looks like you left a comment on Nischay Malhan ("Triggered Insaan") when it was a draft. The draft failed AfC, but someone just moved it to mainspace a few minutes ago. I figured I'd let you know in case you were interested. Take care. — tony 01:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Gerda Arendt:! That's lovely. --bonadea contributions talk 18:51, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Sunhighway27 § Other people's user pages. so ,what do i do then Sunny's Highway 27 11:44, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sunhighway27: Just don't edit other people's user pages! It's as easy as that. In particular, you should not create pages in other editors' user space. --bonadea contributions talk 13:32, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer, Why do you keep dismissing Draft:Hussain Saddam, it is clearly ready for becoming an article, from draft talk:Greenstreet Sunny's Highway 27 15:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What I was saying was delete it or do something else Sunny's Highway 27 15:08, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 69, May–June 2025

In this issue we highlight a new partnership, Citation Watchlist and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:11, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of Draft:CeraVe is not acceptable? Rafael Hello! 15:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, at your convenience- see the recent updates which indicate to revise review for inclusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mukesh_Mishra

Jnknpl (talk) 08:32, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 70, July–August 2025

• New collections:
  • Times of Malta
  • Africa Intelligence
  • Intelligence Online
  • La Lettre
  • Glitz
• Spotlight: Wikimania

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Bonadea and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

There is nothing wrong with having diverse professional interests. When you've achieved everything in the thespian sphere, you can pivot into exorcism... with a side of tattoo art. That's fine. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is true! I am just being envious of the man's eclectic talents, and at such a young age too. --bonadea contributions talk 14:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Polymath, innit.

BTW, do you know the user from Germany, who pops up every now and then to publish her (?) autobio where she claims to be married to Jason Momoa? I've blocked a few of her accounts recently, and then blocked a /64 range of IPv6 addresses as obvious block evasions of those accounts.

What has this got to do with anything, you ask? Well, when I was looking at the edit history of the Emanuel Krüger article, it had dozens of edits from earlier this year from IPs, and when I clicked on those, they all turned out to be part of the range I'd blocked for BE.

Weird, huh? The same hoaxer, or some German hoax collective? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is weird. I do recall the Bride of Momoa, vaguely, but didn't connect her to this... it could be a coincidence I suppose (how broad are IPv6 ranges anyway?) but still worth keeping an eye on. Btw, there are three registered accounts I know of that have been involved with the Krüger articles: PromiTV which you just blocked, and VMFilms, and S.kranich. The latter two are dormant, but unblocked. --bonadea contributions talk 16:00, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Bride of Momoa" ha! Good one. S0091 (talk) 16:03, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I considered those other two accounts, but since they've not edited for a year or two, I thought I'd leave them for now. S.kranich is already blocked on de.wiki, so clearly up to no good.

I'm certainly not a networking expert (understatement alert!), but AFAIK a /64 is quite unlikely to be allocated to more than one user. When blocking IPv6's with Twinkle, it even recommends blocking the /64 rather than individual nodes.

The Bride of Momoa (LOL) comes across so strange, that it's either someone seriously unhinged, or a hoaxer trying to give that impression. I thought the former, but now I'm not so sure. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Check and see the draft article I made some adjustments to and see what you think. I didn't resubmit it yet. R2025kt (talk) 14:04, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@R2025kt: The draft is still promotional, though not as much as it was before, so that's a step in the right direction. However, there are no independent sources, which means there is no chance that it would be accepted if you submitted it now. --bonadea contributions talk 15:49, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added an independent source of Tehran Bureau from PBS's Frontline 2011 report on silent protests. Ali Arouzi is seen on this report witnessing arrests and activists on reform. How does that work for another source R2025kt (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by the comment you have left under the draft rejection you maybe didn't know this is a long term abuse case/sockmaster promoting their family members. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alitta Cat for more info on them. Best, A09|(talk) 14:40, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I saw the deletion log for the draft I linked to so I realised it was a LTA case, but didn't recognise it. I was trying to work it out through seeing what linked where, but now I know! --bonadea contributions talk 14:45, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bonadea, Please stop approaching my article about futsal. Your expertise seems to be philosophy and linguistic and you should not access areas you do not understand well. Moreover I see a Christian lobbying of Mark Skousen and Greta Thunberg behind your attemps.

Kind Regards Vaclav VaclavHumanAI (talk) 07:38, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not "your" article. It is a poorly cobbled-together word salad, with LLM generated nonsense and copyright violations but it can't be draftified again. And you need to stop it with the personal attacks. --bonadea contributions talk 15:27, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

but what is your expertise ? You are philosopher and linguist, I have played futsal many years.

It is of course not my page. I have created this page to link futsal tournament squads with positions which are different from football (soccer). It was due to not have empty link.

I have created base page , which is not mine, but is available for further update.

It is very hard to describe basic term in different words, so there is 3 or 4 web sources put

together. Linkage known from website is one of advantages of wiki and it was a reason why I have created this page.

Took your friends, organize futsal session and do not try to do politics on wiki.

The main purpose is make myself angry and persuade that corporate software with hierarchy and manageral rules like Oracle, Java, Microsoft are better than Linux, Python, Wiki as democratic and open source.

It is stupid because I am not advocate of open source. I really do not like open source and your

behaviour should push myself off Wiki back to Java and friends.

Regards

Vaclav VaclavHumanAI (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was working on Draft:Mohamed Ishfan some time ago, but it was deleted after remaining unattended for over six months. Now that a new user has attempted to publish an article about the same actor, my content has been replaced with the new version, and I am unable to restore my draft since it is not available in the page history. Is there any way to recover the previous data that was stored in the draft space? ShappeAli (talk) 14:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sultana Yeasmin Laila, which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultana Yeasmin Laila (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion.SodiumBot (botop|talk) 07:27, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roku (comics), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roku (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are interested, you can create a second discord account. You can't run both from the discord app unfortunately, however you can run the secondary account in a separate desktop browser and that is quite functional. You can even sign up with the the same email by modifying it: say you use bonadea@email.com, you can sign up to discord with bonadea+discord@email.com. CMD (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We dealt with it at the same time. Okay. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:41, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A draft that you reviewed (Draft:International Alliance against State Kidnapping and Hostage-Taking) has been pushed through AGAINST your recommendation. See: Alliance Against State Hostage Taking. You are more familiar with this process than I am, but it would seem the issues you raised in the draft are still present. WP:CSD? Must it go to WP:AFD? I'll let you and your expertise guide what to do... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:09, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was sort of a copypaste move; the original draft is still at Draft:International Alliance against State Kidnapping and Hostage-Taking. The new version was created in the main space at Alliance Against State Hostage Taking, moved by the author to International Alliance against State-Kidnapping and Hostage-Taking, and draftified from there to Draft:International Alliance against State-Kidnapping and Hostage-Taking (which has one more hyphen compared with the original). I don't know if it's worth merging the histories, though, it's all (more or less) by the same author. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

how?? John George III (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Bonadea! Thank you for reviewing Draft: TalkingParents so quickly after I submitted for review. I reviewed the feedback you left and was wondering if you could provide some examples on where the article can be improved. Additionally, I included as many sources as I could find that seemed to demonstrate notability. Can you explain whether the issue is that podcast episodes are used as sources, or is it something else I'm missing? The guidelines seemed a bit hazy on whether those would count as primary or secondary, so I can remove anything that fails a portion of the notability test. I'll also be reaching out to the AfC Help Desk and the Teahouse for feedback from other editors. Thank you again for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you. Natiewing (talk) 17:39, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bonadea, I would like to talk about removing Pola Dwurnik- from Edward Dwurnik infobox. She is notable on Polish Wikipedia and quite known artist herself. I would opt to keep her name as Edward’s daughter. Euphat (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Euphat: If she is notable herself, I agree – please include a reliable source when you restore the information, though. --bonadea contributions talk 19:31, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Bonadea! Can you help me to move the article itself to main Wikipedia? Euphat (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it worked! Thank you once again. I've added reliable sources in "Personal Life" section. Euphat (talk) 23:31, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glad it worked! I was away from the computer last night and only saw this now. --bonadea contributions talk 09:04, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bonadea, I need your help/comment on the same subject - notability of Edward Dwurnik's daughter. I believe I have substantiated it well enough but I keep on getting this part suppressed by Viewmont Viking. I did send substantiation to Viewmont Viking but no answer, just back and forward undoing this part of article. Any thoughts? Should I just back off? I still thnk I am correct on this one. Euphat (talk) 16:50, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bonadea, I am confused why my page was rejected. It says it was written by a large language model but I wrote it myself. Have I made a mistake somewhere? Please can you help?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ali_Hughes Cullimorer (talk) 14:11, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullimorer: Well, almost none of the sources actually exist, at least not with the URLs provided. That is usually a sign of a LLM dreaming up references. --bonadea contributions talk 14:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah it could be I've messed up copying and pasting them, let me take a look. Thanks! Cullimorer (talk) 14:41, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, there were a couple of links to old articles which I needed to update. All should be working now. Cullimorer (talk) 14:46, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Could you use your expertise to check my Wikipedia article and tell me what needs to be improved? Your corrections would really help me see where I've made mistakes so I can fix them accurately. Let me know what you find! Draft:Joseph Tito BTCmagazine (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Recently, you rejected the page ‘Amit Kumar Das’ for being not significant enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. However, I believe that the 14 sources I have used back up the notability of Das. I am a bit confused why the article was still rejected. Could you please help me with this? Regards, Allakas Allakas (talk) 10:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Responded here. --bonadea contributions talk 21:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. What do you make of this: Draft:STCLab? It's been created on 7 Nov, but it has a decline template from you dated 19 Oct. There's no earlier deleted version anywhere to be found (that I could find, at least), not with 'STCLab' or 'STC Lab'. There's also nothing in the author's edit history... so now I'm of course thinking there might be another editor (poss. blocked?) in the loop, but wouldn't know where to go looking. So I thought I'd ask if you have any recollection of such a decline? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: bonadea tries to activate brain ... There is a decline notice from me about Draft:NetFunnel on the draft creator's user talk page. It looks like they created Draft:STCLab on 7 November with the decline notices for the NetFunnel draft from October. Which is... a bit eccentric. --bonadea contributions talk 20:59, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. That's it. It's even got the earlier decline from Claudine on both drafts. Why didn't I see that? Maybe I should try that brain-activating-thing you mentioned... is it painful, at all? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It took me some time to see it! I had actually written a completely different response to you, saying that I saw a decline notice from me about STCLab in October, and was about to subit it when that brain thingy kicked in and I saw that the decline was for another draft. I recommend a hot brew made from coffee beans! ("Krossad, sönderslagen, mald till pulver genom ödets grymma kaffekvarn ligger bönan i sin filterpåse.") --bonadea contributions talk 11:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I drink every morning a pint of strong filter coffee (Löfbergs) – i min lilla salong – but evidently I need to up the dose. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you for taking the time to review the draft.

I fully agree that a draft must be supported by reliable, secondary, and strictly independent sources. On that front, all the sources used in this draft clearly meet those three criteria.

I therefore assume that your concern relates to the “in-depth” requirement. I completely understand why the titles of several articles may give the impression of routine announcements, but after carefully re-examining each source, I believe that at least three of them do reach a level of depth that goes well beyond brief mentions.

To make this as transparent as possible, here are the metrics I compiled for each of these sources — including total word count, number of words strictly dedicated to information about Offerpad (excluding quotations), and the share of the article that this represents:

TechCrunch – “Real estate tech startup Offerpad to go public via SPAC merger in $3B deal”

 • Total word count: ~552  
 • Words specifically about Offerpad (excluding quotations): ~445  
 • Approx. share focused on Offerpad: ~80.6%

Forbes – “Startup OfferPad Raises $260M Debt, Equity To Upend Homes Sales Market…”

 • Total word count: ~431  
 • Words specifically about Offerpad (excluding quotations): ~312  
 • Approx. share focused on Offerpad: ~72.4%

The Wall Street Journal – “Offerpad’s Hustle Is Worth Appreciating” (paywalled)

 • Total word count: ~381  
 • Words specifically about Offerpad (excluding quotations): ~262  
 • Approx. share focused on Offerpad: ~68.7%

From my perspective, these three articles provide multi-paragraph, substantive coverage that goes well beyond routine announcements: they discuss the company’s history, operations, funding, competitive positioning, economics, and strategic challenges in detail.

Of course, I may still not be fully aligned with the exact threshold expected for “in-depth” coverage here, and I would genuinely be interested in your perspective on how you interpret this requirement in this specific case.

Thank you in advance for your guidance. Toometa (talk) 20:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Just a quick follow-up in case my previous message got buried. Whenever you have a moment, I’d be grateful for your thoughts. Thanks. Toometa (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Toometa: I'll let Bonadea speak for themself, but my issue with many of those sources is that they are routine business reporting (funding rounds, IPOs, M&A, etc.), which is invariably based on press releases and similar material supplied by the subject and merely regurgitated by the media outlet into something vaguely resembling journalism. As the originator is the subject itself, it means that they are not independent, even when appearing in an otherwise independent publication. (Same goes for interviews etc.) HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, DoubleGrazing. The point about routine announcements does make sense to me. I don’t think we see the independence criterion the same way, but given Bonadea’s note above, I won’t take the discussion further. Thanks again for your time. Toometa (talk) 19:59, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 71, September–October 2025

• Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref 2025 in Nigeria
• Frankfurt Book Fair
• Tech tip: Wikipedia Library access template

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 15:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Bonadea and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hi @Bonadea, thanks for reviewing my article about Remembers Group. At some point I used AI to check grammar and editing, but never to create the content or the references, that is entirely my own work. I have changed it quite a lot but I'm afraid that again can be considered AI written (I have checked with multiple tools, and half of them say 100% human writing, but some of them considered there is still any kind of percentage). Do you have any advice on how to proceed? Fnikli (talk) 17:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bonadea, Thank you for checking in on my AFC of Egyptian Magic. Didn't realize it sounded promotional, thought I was only adding relevant details about the company. I have made changes to the draft. I'm confused about your comment, though, since I didn't add any uses or benefits of the products, only the ingredients. Wouldn't it be considered biased if I added claims regarding what effects the product has or doesn't have? Etumsam (talk) 03:44, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Thanks so much for taking a look at Draft:Legora earlier. I have re-edited the draft taking into account your feedback and resubmitted it. Really appreciate you taking the time to review it. Neilyoung77 (talk) 17:19, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Neilyoung77: you've successfully resubmitted your draft, it will be assessed once a reviewer (not necessarily Bonadea) gets around to it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:25, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Endrabcwizart was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Logan H. Westbrooks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Endrabcwizart (talk) 20:03, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bonadea! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Endrabcwizart (talk) 20:03, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Mae at The Urban Monk (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Pedram Shojai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Hi Bonadea,

I hope this message finds you well. I'm following up on my draft submission for Draft:Pedram Shojai, which you reviewed on November 12.

I posted questions on the draft's talk page on November 15, but I understand you may be busy with many reviews. I wanted to reach out directly to see if you might have time to provide guidance.

My questions:

1. Source requirements: I've added 5 major media sources (Detroit Free Press, LA Times, Women's Health Magazine, TODAY Show, Inc.com). What additional coverage would meet Wikipedia's notability standards?

2. Promotional tone: Which specific sections need rewriting? I want to ensure I address the neutral point of view concerns properly.

I'm committed to meeting Wikipedia's standards and would appreciate any specific feedback you can provide. Thank you for your time and volunteer work reviewing articles.

Best regards, Mae at The Urban Monk (talk) 23:39, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Bonadea. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 19 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 13:20, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Bonadea. thank you for your pointer on the article draft Draft:Circuits (Streaming Platform) but it is seeming to me like you failed to read the article before declining the moving of the article to main space. I have simply addressed all the things you pointed and mentioned and properly structured the article to comply with the Wikipedia encyclopedia standard of article writing. I see no reason now why it shouldn't be accepted into the article main space. I would most importantly appreciate if you can give a proper second look and possibly go through the changes log to see all the updates that has been made over time. I would also appreciate if you can annotate where on the article that needs to be corrected or assist in putting the context right if need be to make the article comply accordingly. Samlodias (talk) 14:24, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new here and i wanna contribute to the radio articles that i wanna make. I just wanna know what am i missing from the article that i need to put? I put the website links to the info box and the webcast links as well for this article for proof, I deleted the history because Wiki sources is not accepted apparently and its not enough. If you can, I need some help. Thanks! In-FRED-ible (talk) 21:59, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@In-FRED-ible: Two things: when a draft has been declined, please don't create the exact same page as an article. Secondly, there are no sources in the draft (or in the new article you created). You were right to remove the unreliable sources, but unless there are actual sources of the kind described on your user talk page, there cannot be an article. The best advice I can offer you is to read the information on your user talk page, and follow the links from the draft decline notices. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 09:22, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree with you moving the Nathan Schauf article to draft. You might want to take a look at the other article(s) created by Jaredryandloneria (talk · contribs) as I suspect the same applies. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:05, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	For your enviable and astonishingly resilient ability to assume good faith. You set a fine example. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, @Wikishovel:! --bonadea contributions talk 20:44, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that Ashish Chanchlani had recently directed the series Ekaki, which is his first web series as a director, and I had also seen its coverage. So I thought it would be easily pass notability, so I prepared this draft by reducing the protection of the creation protection. I know that there are still many things that can be improved in the draft I wrote and some parts may seem a bit promotional. But the purpose was just to give more detailed information. However, the tone of the writing feels like a promotional one, I think that's the biggest obstacle. Even though three-four books cover his early life, career and other things. I have provided references for all the information in the article. Any suggestions on this blp article. Morekar (talk) 13:55, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea. Thanks for going out of your way to give feedback on my draft (American Pronatalist Movement). I will admit it confused me a bit though. Your feedback instructs me to use sources that were in depth, secondary, reliable and independent of the subject. This is obviously a good rule and I had read the notability page before drafting that article. I'll admit my sources have some problems. There are only four major ones (plus a fifth for supplementary details), which may or may not be enough (I'm a new user and don't know). But I did make sure they were a) from accredited secondary sources (npr, bbc, etc) and b) were dedicated articles on the subject, and all happened to be quite lengthy and in depth. Obviously I trust your instincts as a wikipedian better than my own (something I meant genuinely, though for the life of me I can't make that sound non-sarcastic, sorry), but I'm really not sure what I should do differently. Thanks.

P.S. I noticed the bit at the top about you being preoccupied with other matters but figured you being active reviewing drafts meant you were back on wiki for a bit. If you are busy I 100% understand if this isn't your #1 priority. Orholam (talk) 22:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Orholam: thank you for your message. Yeah, life (or rather, sadly death) has been happening but as you say, I am reviewing drafts now and then and am not completely away from Wikipedia. The main problem with your draft is that it appeared to be about an organisation – American Pronatalist Movement – but that was not supported by the sources. I think your sources are fine, as such, it's just a matter of what they really talk about. Does that make sense at all? --bonadea contributions talk 11:33, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: Hi again. Sorry I left this response three weeks. I did see your reply the day after but didn't respond for some reason. I'm not sure I understand, but I imagine that's just a matter of not understanding what wikipedia wants. I think I'll table the draft for a few months (things are getting kind of busy anyhow) and rewrite it once I can find some more info to really distinguish the American movement from its other-place counterparts. Again, not sure why I put off responding this far and I'm sorry I did so.

Hope you and yours are holding out okay. Orholam (talk) 19:34, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You just now removed my reference to nbc news, again, after saying you didn't. Here is one of the things you removed:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-georgia-election-interference-case-dropped-rcna246069 </ref>

See for yourself.

As said, am doing a complete rewrite today. Please wait until tomorrow before again removing references. I plan on changing them all, today. It may be I am misunderstanding the changes you made. If so, I apologize. Rick Norwood (talk) 15:20, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rick Norwood: Thank you for your message. As I said, the source you link above was never removed (by me or anyone else) – I was actually rather careful to öeave it in. If you can't see it in Draft:Peter J. Skandalakis there must be something amiss with your browser! I have removed the long hagiographic quotes from the junk source https://bioworths.com/pete-skandalakis-biography/ , as well as that source (which had been added four times to the draft). You can see this for yourself: my first removal, my second removal. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 18:07, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I think I might see how the misunderstanding arose. When you view my edit, the left-hand column does show that the nbc source was removed from the section where you'd placed, but if you look at the right-hand column you'll see that I also added the source in the remaining section. (I hope that makes sense!) Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 18:22, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your help. I will now try starting again, and see how far I get. Rick Norwood (talk) 20:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to the version I posted today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Peter_J._Skandalakis

There are two points on which I especially need help, footnotes 3 and 4. I was unable to create footnote 3, and do not know what I am doing wrong. And I tried to make footnotes 2 and 4 identical, so there would only be three footnotes visible. That didn't work, either.

Thanking you in advance for any help you can offer. Rick Norwood (talk) 21:22, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing my draft with the notice I had on there. Apologies, I got a bit too carried away with editing I accidentally removed it. Just wanted to send you public thanks. SimonMubarak (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the previous review and feedback.

I have revised the draft extensively to address the concerns: - Removed all potentially promotional language for a fully neutral tone. - Focused content on verifiable facts supported primarily by independent secondary sources.

Notability is demonstrated through significant coverage in: - The Atlantic (2016, "The Math Revolution") – multiple paragraphs on the company's platform, community, and role in math education. - Common Sense Education review – detailed analysis of divisions, resources, and educational model. - Cathy Duffy Reviews – comprehensive review of curriculum, textbooks, and online tools.

The article is ready for a re-review. I'm ready to make any further adjustments. Thanks! Davidninjaking (talk) 21:49, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea Davidninjaking (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding an AfC comment for a draft you rejected on November 11: Does the draft, in your opinion, meet G3 or G15 or G11? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:56, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Bonadea,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 18:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 18:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bon', thanks for the reminder that this Bjak thing is not a new thing but an old... uh, friend. I've seen these at Bjak, Bjak Group and Bjak.my, each one also in ALL CAPS, and the whole lot in both the draft and main spaces, which gives me 12 titles – do you remember any other variants? I'm going to try to plug this particular time sink a bit, by protecting the main space titles, but leaving the draft ones open as honey pots. Thoughts? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:04, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Bjak.com, praps? I think it's a good idea to keep the drafts unprotected. --bonadea contributions talk 12:06, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the .com domain is theirs, so probably worth including in this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sure enough, Draft:Bjak.com has already been tried. Good catch, thanks! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And meanwhile, I am disappearing down the rabbit hole of all the Joe Bartolozzis! I wonder if it's a meme somewhere. --bonadea contributions talk 12:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I saw, have fun! :) If you need someone to come mop up the mess, give us a shout. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bonadea, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Park Jeong-koo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 09:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@CoconutOctopus: Fair enough – I thought it was an IAR situation, but that's of course always a matter of individual judgment. I will draftify and redirect instead, which amounts to the same thing. --bonadea contributions talk 09:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If it has been draftified already and the author recreated it that counts as an objection to draftificatiom per WP:DRAFTNO. I would suggest a BLPPROD or AfD rather than draftifying again, as it's likely to just be moved back a third time. CoconutOctopus talk 09:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sajjad Hussain Palash This article was created by Masum Ibn Musa, later another person with the same name tried to create a paid article. This article is currently complete. This article violates significant policy. Please check it out. Md Joni Hossain (talk) 13:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to do the email to the oversight team or shall I? MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 16:04, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MetalBreaksAndBends: If you have time to do it, that would be great. Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 16:14, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do! MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor
		In 2025 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:05, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Draft:Adel Adili - Feedback from MCA Timber Editorial Team Hi Bonadea, I am writing to you on behalf of the editorial team at MCA Timber regarding the recent "Reject" status of the draft for Adel Adili. We were quite concerned by the decision, as it seems there has been a significant misunderstanding of both the artist’s professional standing and the intent behind recent edits. Mr. Adili is a visual artist with over 35 years of experience in the global VFX industry, including lead creative roles in major international cinema. We would like to clarify two points: Technical confusion: The recent removal of templates (blanking) was not a bad-faith attempt to disrupt the page. Our team was simply trying to resolve the "Invalid topic" red-flag notifications that appeared on the dashboard. As we are still learning the technical intricacies of Wikipedia’s interface, this was a naive attempt to "fix" a visual error, not to hide previous review history. Identity Correction: A major reason for this draft is that "Adel Adili" is currently linked on various film pages to an unrelated athlete (Adel Adili ). We are attempting to provide a properly sourced biography to ensure Wikipedia’s internal linking for these major film projects is accurate. We believe the sources provided, such as Entrepreneur and Firstpost, meet the criteria for significant coverage. If the rejection is based on a specific professional evaluation of the portfolio's merit, we would appreciate a detailed explanation so we can understand why such a high-profile career is being deemed "not notable". We hope we can move past the technical misunderstandings and focus on the factual merits of the subject's career. Best regards, Editorial Team, MCA Timber MCA Timber (talk) 16:45, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 72, November–December 2025

• Renewed partnerships
• Spotlight: Strengthening Wikimedia Collaborations with and for Open Science

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:43, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Bonadea and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

I created Draft:Bihar Aur Sufivad, and added all the references I got over the Internet. It includes the book reviews and Interviews of the author. I'm sure that it passes WP:NBOOKS, pls guide me to fix the article. Wanderer (talk) 18:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@IAmTheOnlyUnknownWandererInIndia: Adding every single source you can find is almost never a good idea. Have a look at this information. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 15:13, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea. Okay so I have to add the refs which are useful and should not be interviews. Wanderer (talk) 15:17, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]