User talk:Cathodography

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 60 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5.

	The Original Barnstar
	Pelo incrível trabalho de desenvolvimento em artigos sobre música brasileira nessa Wikipédia anglófona. Fiquei surpreso ao ver artigos como Tribalistas e Admirável Chip Novo tão completos e bem escritos por aqui. Parabéns! cósmico • talk 00:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Heaven or Las Vegas is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ALittleClass -- ALittleClass (talk) 07:25, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for starting on that review. I noticed you were busy and juggling a few nominations, so I've been going leisurely on the review pace as well. I'll look to get a move on it today and at latest tomorrow. mftp dan ^oops 13:54, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the slow pace of this review. I am done for now; critical reception will continue after some quote reduction. I will admit I am not known for a quick pace on reviews, and just wanted to extend a hand to keep your nomination from being thrown back in the pool, so again, thank you for bearing with me. mftp dan ^oops 15:32, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Vertigo (Wand album) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Leafy46 -- Leafy46 (talk) 03:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cathodography. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cement paste".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 14:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Vertigo (Wand album) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Leafy46 -- Leafy46 (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guninvalid was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Pretty good draft, but many of the sources look like individual song releases that seem to only cover her as being a featured artist, or at least that's the impression I get from ctrl+f-ing her name on the JP sources I can't read. The Journal du Japon is borderline but I'd call it acceptable, and Kai-You looks mostly fine untranslated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nanahira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

guninvalid (talk) 04:26, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cathodography! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! guninvalid (talk) 04:26, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Getting Killed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Face.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering how you came accross the research for the aforementioned strength testing methods and decided that you would like to write a Wikipedia-article about those tests. I am just curious, and maybe I will contribute to those articles at some point. :)

With kindest regards Maximilian Staudacher ~2025-38463-88 (talk) 09:50, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your contributions to articles about Brazilian music that have helped me learn so much more about the historical and musical context and lyrical interpretation of the classics! I love the music and know I am missing so much by not knowing the language and history, but your articles have helped fill some of those gaps for me. Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 04:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. 'Tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! Your contributions to Wikipedia in 2025 are greatly appreciated! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas, and here's to a happy and productive 2026! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Fruto Proibido is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Fruto Proibido has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 09:45, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see that you've used (or at least installed) a couple of AI-powered source verification scripts. Have you managed to make them work? Would be interested in your impressions - what worked and what didn't. Alaexis_¿question? 13:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Cathodography, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:24, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Fruto Proibido has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LastJabberwocky -- LastJabberwocky (talk) 10:04, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Heaven or Las Vegas has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ALittleClass -- ALittleClass (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and congrats...very nice work. Hope the experience wasn't spoiled too much by the aggro towards the end of the review. Ceoil (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here, and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]