User talk:CycoMa2

Hello

Women in Red | July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343 Online events: New: Alphabet run M & N | Women in Red turns 10 | Kenya Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: The World Destubathon, 16 June - 13 July 2025 Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period! 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women) 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women) Tip of the month: A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements, but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I know some people are gonna point out notability and NOTGENEAOLOGY with some of the biographies I am writing.

I am totally aware of these policies the reason I have all these biographies is because every single one of these individuals are important to the historical narrative.

For example, Draft:Michel Cadotte, Jr was involved in the war of 1812 and numerous historians written about his involvement in the war. They also talk about how he was an interpreter. He was also apparently involved in a land ownership controversy.(This controversy apparently lasted for decades.) And he married a chief’s daughter.

So by all measurements he is notable.

This is the same case with the Hatfields.

Both families I am writing about have alot of notable members.

I don’t think there are any notable members who past the 1940s. So I am gonna stop once I reach that point.

Basically the reason why I have so many biographies is because this is one of those unique cases where the entire family is notable.

The issue is that information for many of these individuals is hard to create biographies for. There is numerous reasons for this. CycoMa2 (talk) 00:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know alot of y’all are most interested in other topics I write about.

Don’t worry I haven’t abandoned biology, religion, or mythology topics. I am just busy with writing about history. History is just a topic I have always wanted to write more about. CycoMa2 (talk) 00:24, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of allegedly cursed objects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of allegedly cursed objects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:41, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to make a new draft:Draft:Ownership of Sault Ste. Marie controversy

The reason I decided to make this draft is because many sources have touched upon this and they have also said that this was an issue even in the early 20th century.

Also my biography on Jean Baptiste Cadot is getting too long.

I haven’t looked too much into this issue because right now I am more interested in writing biographies. This so called controversy is probably not very relevant in the 21st century, laws back then were completely different than they are today. Right now I haven’t seen any sources talk about any living descendants of Jean Baptiste Cadot carrying about this matter.

My grandfather was a registered tribal member and he serviced im the United States armed forces and my dad identifies as Native American and served in the United States armed forces.

Both my dad and grandpa appeared to have been aware of Cadottes for a long time and both of them appeared to believed they were descendants of the Cadottes. Both men appeared to not care about the issue.

But then again my relationship with both men is challenging.

But I am making this article because it was clearly an issue that was for a long time. CycoMa2 (talk) 19:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Astra Travasso was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ephraim Hatfield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Astra Travasso (talk) 18:27, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Astra Travasso Here is the thing, these aren't just passing mentions.

Hello, CycoMa2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Astra Travasso (talk) 18:27, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know a lot of y’all are scrolling through my contributions and I have seen many of the suggestions from y’all.

All I ask from y'all is to give me time. There is tons of evidence that most and possibly all of the my current drafts are notable topics. CycoMa2 (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a long history where I managed to prove numerous topics as notable. Just look at the following articles I written:

Original Character

RainFurrest

Devil's Icebox (cave)

Edge of Hell (Kansas City)

I do believe there is a good chance that 2 of my drafts are gonna have to be deleted due to lack of evidence of notability. CycoMa2 (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your missing information tag on the William Gillis (businessman). Could you name this book about the Ozarks? Roast (talk) 04:27, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Guerreroast it’s called The Ozarks in Missouri History: Discoveries in an American Region CycoMa2 (talk) 04:35, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to just submit the draft for Athanasie Cadot.

It is very obvious this woman is notable enough for Wikipedia standards and there is enough reliable sources on her.

I’ll just work on her more and more over time. CycoMa2 (talk) 09:43, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My father gets money from the federal government because of his ancestry. That is another reason I felt the need to declare COI.

So yes without a document Michel Cadotte is without a doubt my ancestor. CycoMa2 (talk) 20:28, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just inform you all this because this goes above and beyond bragging about cool relatives.

People actually get benefits from this stuff. CycoMa2 (talk) 20:38, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Another draft has been created.

More work. Rip CycoMa2 (talk) 19:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine just tired as hell. Maybe I should take the day off today. CycoMa2 (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Based on the sourcing I'm not convinced this historical figure is notable enough for an article. The sources I was able to access are either non-reliable (power point slides), or about other topics, e.g. French-Canadian settlement around Lake Huron in general. The one possibly good and relevant source is Silberberg, but I could not access that one. Still, we need multiple reliable sources. Also, the formatting could use some work to improve readability, such as the "Life" section, which could be collapsed into a single prose section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Athanasie Cadot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@WeirdNAnnoyed What is wrong with the other sources?

Brenda Child has been referenced by Minnesota Historical Society

just look at this.

Tobola is at the University of Wisconsin. Just look.

DuLong was used as a citation by Silberberg. CycoMa2 (talk) 12:04, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I bring up Child because she talks about this figure quite a bit. DuLong doesn’t say too much on her though. CycoMa2 (talk) 13:58, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Child has been referenced in the following Wikipedia articles:

Ojibwe

Gender roles among the Indigenous peoples of North America

Netnokwa

American Indian boarding schools CycoMa2 (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John P DuLong was referenced in Europäische Stammtafeln CycoMa2 (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

O'Meara was used as a source in the following Wikipedia articles:

James Aldridge

Battle of Jumonville Glen

Battle of Fort Necessity

Fort Granville

Battle of Fort Ligonier CycoMa2 (talk) 18:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It looks like a nonissue now because it seems the article has been moved out of draftspace. But to answer your question, the DuLong references do not appear to be peer reviewed or published by a recognized publishing house, which was my concern. Child may well be a RS but I don't have access to the book so I can't verify it covers Cadot in any depth. Same with Silbernagel (not Silberberg, sorry, I was multitasking). But this was a borderline case and I think you did a pretty good job finding information on this obscure but possibly quite important person. If there had been accessible online versions of Child and Silbernagel that could demonstrate significant coverage (not passing mentions) then I would have approved. Your article is much, MUCH better than most drafts I reject at AfC. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:53, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@WeirdNAnnoyed to be honest the only reason I submitted it through AFC was because this historical figure was my ancestor.

Let’s just said my dad told when I was a little kid I had Native American blood. I believed him at first but doubted it when I entered my preteens.

It is complicated but let’s just say I am pretty white passing, this wasn’t properly explained to me, and other reasons I shouldn’t talk about.

I only recently found out it was 100% true when my dad shown me his Indian money and it had Cadotte on it. I felt like my dad receiving benefits because of his ancestry justified the reason why I declared COI.

That is why I submitted through AFC. But many other contributors told me there was no need to declare it.

But I am just declaring it just to be safe. CycoMa2 (talk) 15:35, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! You've been popping up in my watchlist tagging articles for referencing issues. Thank you for doing that work!

One request, though -- could you please try to consistently use edit summaries? It helps some of the rest of us know which edits do and don't need our attention. An edit with no summary is an almost automatic "ugh, I have to check whether this is vandalism", even when it turns out to be a good edit.

Thanks! -- Avocado (talk) 01:39, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Avocado sorry for the late reply.

Sorry for not using my edit summaries back there. CycoMa2 (talk) 13:11, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good! I'm sure you'll use them more in the future. Keep up the good work! -- Avocado (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Avocado okay the truth is I am really tired. Like beyond tired.

I have been working on writing numerous articles all by myself. Like I literally drove across the United States just to get sources. The room I am in right now has like 100 books from like 3 different libraries. CycoMa2 (talk) 04:58, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Indigenous women | Film and stage Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Wikipedia:Developing Countries WikiContest runs 1 July 2025 until 30 September 2025 Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Please do not remove AfC declines like here and here, they are meant to stay on the draft. The draft can, and should, be resubmitted without removing them. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 08:16, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four the only reason I submitted through AFC is because they of my potential COI. I can move it to main whenever I want. CycoMa2 (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I've stated otherwise, but do note that if you move the article directly to main then another editor may move it back to draftspace, aka WP:DRAFTIFY. This is allowed by point one of WP:DRAFTREASON which states such moves are acceptable if "The article was created by an editor who appears to have a conflict of interest, but it did not go through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process". You are a COI editor, and are expected to utilize the AfC process for subjects which you have a conflict with as stated at WP:COIEDIT. In the meantime please do not remove any more AfC declines.

Also, are you in any way being compensated for your editing on Wikipedia as described at WP:PAID? Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 05:57, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four

I am not paid for editing.

Basically my mother told me she is related to the people involved in this feud. CycoMa2 (talk) 06:01, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought something seemed familiar, I remember reading your disclosure at COIN. It's a pretty tenuous COI in my opinion, but either way declines really should stay on drafts just like the comments that accompany them say. What brought me to the draft in the first place was that removing the decline tripped the "Unusual action at AfC" edit filter [1]. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 06:18, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four to be honest I know it’s an unusual COI.

There are many reasons I felt like I had too:

The first reason is because JD Vance claims that a certain person in this event is a distant cousin of his.

I literally read through Vance’s memoir and he said that Draft:Jim Vance (1832) was a relative of his. No seriously he literally claims he is a relative to Jim Vance in his book Hillbilly Elegy.

I haven’t looked too deep into these claims but from what I have seen it appears there is some controversy in regards to his alleged background.

The second reason is because let’s just say members of both families involved in that feud done controversial things. When I say they done a lot of controversial things I mean a lot.

From what I have researched so far the families involved in the feud descended from men who fought against and pushed Native Americans out of their homes.

It’s bad enough that most of them were confederates, committed murders, and some slept with their cousins. lol. CycoMa2 (talk) 21:05, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Mama Angebi, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:24, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax oh sorry about that. There was an article I was planning on working on but I just gave up on it and no longer wished to work on it. CycoMa2 (talk) 03:14, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Thank you for your efforts in starting this draft. However, there was a previous attempt to write an article for this subject. I've restored that previous draft over yours. Perhaps you can help get this draft over the goal line. Cheers! - UtherSRG (talk) 16:39, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG My mistake when I typed in the name of the channel on the wiki I gained no results. Don’t understand why I didn’t see the draft. CycoMa2 (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh now I see. The draft was deleted. CycoMa2 (talk) 17:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Drafts that have not been edited for six months get deleted per WP:CSD#G13. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349 Recognized as the most successful topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run Q & R | Women writers & their works | Microstates Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Wikipedia:Developing Countries WikiContest runs 1 July 2025 until 30 September 2025 Tip of the Month: Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published. Progress ("moving the needle"): The WikiProject Women in Red homepage is usually updated weekly, using the Humaniki tool. Sadly, Humaniki has been out of action since 23 June. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi CycoMa2. Thank you for your work on Athanasie Cadot. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 16:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

I try to write high quality articles and high quality edits as best as I can. But at times I am sick and tired of working on it, so at times I just say good enough.

I am telling you all of this because I am not doing this due to COI, I just don't wanna work on it anymore. CycoMa2 (talk) 21:36, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You guys gotta keep in mind I have checked out like 100 books from like 3 different libraries in America.

I am tired as hell. CycoMa2 (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run S & T | Women in STEM | Halloween Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Sister wikiproject Women in Green October 2025 Good Article Edit-a-thon focuses on What Women Do Tip of the Month: Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia. Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period: 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women) 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women) Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Do forgive me if I may or may not come off as being too much use to discussions.

I am in my final semester of college. Let’s just say I am doing a semester long project recruiting people to Wikimedia and it’s projects. CycoMa2 (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CycoMa. According to WP:EDR#CycoMa1, you remain under a topic ban from medical pages, broadly construed. While I suppose it is debatable whether the entirety of the article Sex is a "medical page", comments you have been making on its talkpage like [2] and [3] definitely are about the medical aspects of that article. Please review WP:TOPICBAN regarding what exactly is covered by a topic ban. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 16:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin By the end of this year can we discuss that topic ban by any chance?

There are a few things I believe can be useful to bring up and I believe I have been changing.

Not now because I am busy with college. CycoMa2 (talk) 16:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to appeal that ban at any time at WP:AN, although recent violations of it may be held against you. However, until or unless it is successfully appealed, the ban applies to you in full. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 16:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said it will be months from now. CycoMa2 (talk) 01:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2025 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV25, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hi CycoMa2. Thank you for your work on Interracial relations among Native Americans in the United States. Another editor, Netherzone, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article. During reviewing I fixed two duplicate references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 23:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run: U, V, W | Asian women Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Women in Red's Asian women event is part of the global Wikipedia Asian Month 2025 campaign. You are welcome to add your contributions to both event pages. Tip of the Month: Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each biography, including at least one source for each paragraph. Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year. 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women) 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women) Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Awause Dodem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 November 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agender, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some people identify with no gender? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agender. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Agender), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ENA (Web series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y, Z | Food and drink | Women who died in 2025 Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Global Translat-a-thon 2025 06 December 2025 Tip of the Month: Lists of deaths by year is a good resource for the December / January meet-up Women who died in 2025 Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Aldon Turrill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beaver Wife, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gateway to Madeline, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cadotte Island, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Debra Amesqua, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ownership of Sault Ste. Marie controversy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hello! I came across your draft of the History of Ojibwe. I'm impressed. Since we seem to have worked on some overlapping sections, I'd love for us to have some collaboration on the section of your article about the Dakota-Ojibwe War. Minnastronomer (talk) 05:34, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Minnastronomer that would be nice. Forgive me for the late response. CycoMa2 (talk) 23:23, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'll work on the section about the Dakota-Ojibwe war, and let you know if I see any problems! Minnastronomer (talk) 01:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360 Online events: New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025 Announcements from other communities Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026. Tip of the month: Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "ENA".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cadotte Island".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David Aldon Turrill".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CycoMa2. Thank you for your work on Madeline Cadotte. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi, There is a lot of unncessary bolding in the Names section that needs removed. A lot of her descendents are unlikely to be notable and a lot of red links can be removed. The promo stuff needs to go e.g. I am proud.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 17:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep One of her children is notable as a stand alone biography.

I did remove the red links for many of her descendants.

Also do forgive me if the stuff I added to this biography came off as promotional.

I was getting extremely tired when I was writing this biography. CycoMa2 (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CycoMa2: Its a bit promo but its more puffy. It doesn't mesh on "proud" They don't need to say it. Its a historical article and entirely unnecessary. scope_creep^Talk 17:51, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep the puffy language might have been impacted by the sources I was citing.

A lot of the sources kept using puffy language and I was struggling on wording the language in a more neutral manner, this was the case from both native and non-native sources. CycoMa2 (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@CycoMa2: It doesn't need all that stuff at the end. Its needs taken out and proper copyedit done. The quotes need to go. They don't add anything of real value. The subject isn't about them. I've add a copyedit tag to it, so the guild can take a look at it. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 18:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep this is possibly a stupid question but is mentioning places named after her fine? CycoMa2 (talk) 21:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course. Its perfectly fine to list all that stuff in the award and honours section, e.g. Odonymy for monuments and buildings and streets. scope_creep^Talk 21:31, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the subsection on her descendants.

I guess I was so tired too the point that I didn’t notice the issues with it. CycoMa2 (talk) 07:15, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Beaver Wife".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gateway to Madeline".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @CycoMa2. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 6 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 15:30, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mama Angebi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Debra Amesqua".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hello, CycoMa2. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ownership of Sault Ste. Marie controversy".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ajijaak Dodem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jessie Lee Maynard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jim Vance (1832), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asa Harmon McCoy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycoMa2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vance Family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | March 2026 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:MAR26]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:13, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:CycoMa1 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

These edits in particular: [4] & [5]

In the future, maybe don't remove notices of merge discussions. It is a discussion, after all, even if a lot of people disagree. Correct me if I'm wrong on any of this! Thanks. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 18:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]