User talk:DMacks/Archive 67#Template:Transl

Archive 60Archive 65Archive 66Archive 67

Administrators' newsletter – May 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

Administrator changes

added Rusalkii
readded NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed Galobtter

Guideline and policy news

Miscellaneous


This Month in Education: April 2025

Tech News: 2025-20

MediaWiki message delivery 22:34, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

PEPCON Disaster

Hi DMacks. I would like to disagree with your assessment that the YT links are reliable. According to WP:NOYT and WP:COPYLINK, Youtube links should be by the primary publisher or a reliable secondary publisher. If the video is not affiliated with the original publisher, as is likely in this case, it probably violates copyright and should not be linked per WP:COPYLINK. You are free to disagree, this was just my reasoning for marking the sources. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 15:59, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

I agree that YouTube content is often suspicious. Anyone can post anything...possible reliability problem for works created by the uploader and possible copyvio problem for works created by others. But those are two independent and sometimes mutually exclusive problems. An authentic copy is not actually "created" by the uploader, but instead its reliability depends on who the creator actually is. The citation should point to the original, to the extent it's known, just like we cite an actual book or journal article rather than the database or library that gave us access. So I disagree that a YT clip of a commerical broadcast is generally a reliability problem. Look at my later edits, where I found a more complete version that even more strongly confirms the claims (and provides more detail). However, you're right that because it is a copyvio, it should not be linked. Fixed. DMacks (talk) 07:02, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
You make fair points. Generally I wouldn't say people falsify this stuff because it serves no purpose, but either way thanks for acknowledging my point about copyvios. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 06:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-21

MediaWiki message delivery 23:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-22

MediaWiki message delivery 20:02, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

This Month in Education: May 2025

Tech News: 2025-23

MediaWiki message delivery 23:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Deletion review for Urutau (3D Printable Firearm)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Urutau (3D Printable Firearm). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Superlincoln (talk) 14:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi. I don't believe the deletion of Template:Transl was appropriate. This is a long-standing template title, used since 2007 and only moved away from the title in 2022 (unlike the other redirects nominated in the RfD, which were created much more recently), and deletion unnecessariliy broke a lot of historical usage. I don't believe that there was consensus in the discussion to delete Template:Transl, as opposed to the others. I'm tempted to just IAR and re-create the redirect, though that probably won't last, so here I am following procedure to bring it up with the RfD closer before starting a DRV. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Paul_012. I stand by my decision based on the current discussion, which had many substantive comments and was open for much longer than usual to allow extensive participation. The concern about one-time pain during the migration was raised, but was reasonably addressed by bot action. Is there any current breakage? Does longevity have a basis in policy, especially when the longevity is of a problem that has a solution? Note that unambiguous shortcuts were proposed and I did not rule them out in my close (though because they were only a minority topic for discussion at all I did not give them substantial air in my closing statement). DMacks (talk) 15:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi DMacks, you made an edit remark on the AN/WQX-2 article on 25 August 2022 saying you felt the article meets WP:GNG. This article caught my attention last summer and I finally seem to have time to put some effort into editing it. In your edit remark, you quoted some report apparently, but I’m struggling to find the source. Do you happen to recall where you found that? — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 03:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

That is from the "Coast Guard’s Underwater Port Security" item in the External links (see the first paragraph of its "Technology Development" section). I don't know anything about this topic, so I don't think I can help find any new refs or shed more light beyond what others might find. DMacks (talk) 15:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

Interface administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef

CheckUser changes

readded L235

Oversight changes

readded L235

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2025-24

MediaWiki message delivery 01:14, 10 June 2025 (UTC)