User talk:Daiv373

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gustavo José Fernando Bolivar De Jesús Illingworth Baquerizo. Thanks! Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ruud Buitelaar was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NPOL. Article does not show significant coverage WP:SIGCOV in multiple independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gustavo José Fernando Bolivar De Jesús Illingworth Baquerizo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Daiv373! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Daiv373. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gustavo José Fernando Bolivar De Jesús Illingworth Baquerizo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Baquerizo family, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:41, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources do not match the text, for example source 2 does not mention politicians, diplomats, intellectuals, and entrepreneurs. This is why we can't allow article written by LLM, the policy is WP:LLM. It would be good to have an article on this club, it appears to be notable, and there are sources available, particularly if the library is included.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Club de la Unión and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 23:51, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback and you are absolutely right, I used it as a base but edited sources and verified manually, also added relevant info such as buildings and some individuals I saw listed as prominent members to help explain more. It's a very rich institution so much more to add hope the rest of the community can contribute too. Sources are correctly added and yes much to add on the library itself Daiv373 (talk) 11:42, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Daiv373 - thanks for improving the draft. And the approach of doing a shorter article first and expanding later is also a good way forward. Spanish wikipedia has a substantial article on the library, as I am sure you are aware. The three problems with the article now are that

a) Source five, the club's history page simply does not say that diplomats etc used to be members. That's an LLM fabrication, and we can't allow that.

b) Some language is promotional - as an encyclopedia we tend to be quite boring in our choice of words. That is easy to fix.

c) Also the list of notable members - Wikipedia isn't a directory. My suggestion there would be to restrict it just to those people who already have Wikipedia entries, I think that is 6 men; plus if any other names really should get an entry in Wikipedia one day (though I didn't see any other names). Where did you get this list of names from? Since it isn't sourced and some are still alive, we have particular policies on verification there.

If you wish, I can edit the article for you, but you may prefer to do it. ChrysGalley (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well source 5 if you click on it lower on the page says "socios del club la Union" then says the quote by Carlos Alberto Arroyo and lists him as a member of the club and past Ecuadorian President, if you slide it does the same for Otto Arosemena, and recently Guillermo Lasso. As for the rest of the members it was off the book with the history of the club by Jose Gomez Iturralde it has major members and founding members, I noted the munipa article also used it some of the tome by Ezzio Garay on Guayaquil's historical society. That source is available on scribd. I'll make a quick edit to address those issues, but I would appreciate your help in refining it and preparing it for publication if you have the time. Daiv373 (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I did some corrections and removed some language, you can edit what you deem necessary thank you ! Daiv373 (talk) 14:47, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]