User talk:Erictleung

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Erictleung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17595 was submitted on Feb 23, 2017 04:31:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Erictleung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because of my genuine interest in contributing to Wikipedia, which has been misclassified as a false positive "puppet user". If unblocked I would continue contributing to the freeCodeCamp page, which most of my contributions have come from. Otherwise, my other contributions have been for Pan-Genome and Metagenomics pages. These two pages are in the broader category of Bioinformatics and Computational biology, which are more of my expertise. I have not contributed to them as much because I am still new at contributing to Wikipedia. I have been following freeCodeCamp since its inception and I am familiar with the impact it has had on the developer community. That is why I felt the strong urge to contribute for the first time to its Wikipedia page as I believed in its importance and place on Wikipedia. I suspect I was blocked because of the majority of my edits have been made on freeCodeCamp page, which has been imposed upon me in error. My activity is understandably "suspicious." I'm both frustrated and impressed that I was blocked. However, I have not been contributing to Wikipedia for very long and that page was new enough for me to experiment with making changes. I now have more experience with contributing to pages and have now found the Wikipedia:Community_portal page. This page shows other open edit opportunities I can contribute to and links to other pages on how to start contributing to Wikipedia. If I have misinterpreted my block overall, please clarify the block and I can update my argument. As I have mentioned, I am still new to contributing. I will try to make some time to go through the Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia page for more advice on how to edit correctly and effectively. Thank you for taking the time to consider this appeal and volunteering your time to Wikipedia. I hope you'll allow me to help contribute to the Wikipedia community. - Erictleung (talk) 

Accept reason:

Taking a second look over the request and reviewing it in detail, there is a likelihood of this account being a sock, but not enough evidence at this time to hold that theory together completely, so i'm AGF unblocking. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 03:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @DeltaQuad: If I get this right, you blocked this account in connection with SRO and the edit filter police, but I don't see any behavioral connection. Is there some possibility that they are not connected? Vanjagenije (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Erictleung! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:47, Monday, April 3, 2017 (UTC)

Hi Erictleung,

Welcome to the ISMB/ECCB Editathon! We hope you find this a useful session, let myself or Kierano know if you have any questions. Thank you again for your improvements to computational biology coverage on Wikipedia, and if you're not already a member of WikiProject Computational Biology we encourage you to sign up! Amkilpatrick (talk) 12:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for attending! On behalf of the organisers, Kierano and Amkilpatrick, we'd like to thank you again for attending the ISMB/ECCB 2017 Editathon! Over the course of the session, we had edits on 25 unique Wikipedia articles and 5 Wikidata entries related to computational biology; we also created 3 new Wikipedia articles. Together, these have improved the coverage of computational biology and we appreciate your contributions! We will be writing a follow-up report for the Wikimedia Foundation and we'd love to hear your feedback on the session: Did you find it useful? Are you encouraged to make more contributions to Wikipedia in the future? Were there things that you thought could be improved? Please let us know your thoughts in the feedback section on the event's talk page; this will help us make future sessions even better. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from WikiProject Computational Biology, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Delivered: 19:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

	Lucky dip prize!
	We drew two prizes at random, weighted by participants scoring during the ISMB/ECCB 2017 Editathon: you've won a prize, congratulations! If you could contact me via email (alastair.m.kilpatrick@gmail.com) I'll arrange to have it sent to you! Amkilpatrick (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ISCB Wikipedia Competition 2017-18: entries open! The International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) and WikiProject Computational Biology are pleased to call for participants in the 2017-18 ISCB Wikipedia Competition. The ISCB aims to improve the communication of scientific knowledge to the public at large, and Wikipedia and its sister sites play an increasingly important role in this communication; the ISCB Wikipedia Competition aims to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles relating to computational biology. Entries to the competition are open now! Articles may be claimed until 1 Dec 2017 and the competition closes on 31 Dec 2017. For students/trainees: Entry to the competition is open internationally to students and trainees of any level, both as individuals and as groups. Prizes of up to $500 will be awarded to the best contributions as chosen by a judging panel of experts; these will be awarded at the Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology conference in Chicago in July 2018. As in previous years, the ISCB encourages competition entries for contributions to Wikipedia in any language, and contributions to Wikidata items. For teachers/trainers: We encourage you to pass this invitation on to your students, or even consider using the competition as part of an in-class assignment. Further details may be found at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Computational Biology/ISCB competition announcement 2017-18. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from WikiProject Computational Biology, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. (Message delivered:MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

ISCB Wikipedia Competition 2018: entries open! The International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) and WikiProject Computational Biology are pleased to call for participants in the 2018 ISCB Wikipedia Competition. The ISCB aims to improve the communication of scientific knowledge to the public at large, and Wikipedia and its sister sites play an increasingly important role in this communication; the ISCB Wikipedia Competition aims to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles relating to computational biology. Entries to the competition are open now; the competition closes on 31 Dec 2018. For students/trainees: Entry to the competition is open internationally to students and trainees of any level, both as individuals and as groups. Prizes of up to $500 will be awarded to the best contributions as chosen by a judging panel of experts; these will be awarded at the ISMB/ECCB conference in Basel, Switzerland in July 2019. As in previous years, the ISCB encourages competition entries for contributions to Wikipedia in any language, and contributions to Wikidata items. For teachers/trainers: We encourage you to pass this invitation on to your students, and consider using the competition as part of an in-class assignment. Further details may be found at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Computational Biology/ISCB competition announcement 2018. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from WikiProject Computational Biology, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. (Message delivered:MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

1. Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
2. We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
3. Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
4. The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
5. We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
6. More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
7. Citation details are important:
   • Be sure cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
   • Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
   • Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
   • Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
8. We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
9. Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!\
10. Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
11. Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries open! The International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) and WikiProject Computational Biology are pleased to call for participants in the 8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition. The ISCB aims to improve the communication of scientific knowledge to the public at large, and Wikipedia plays an increasingly important role in this communication; the ISCB Wikipedia Competition aims to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles relating to computational biology. Entries to the competition are open now; the competition closes on 17 May 2019. For students/trainees: Entry to the competition is open internationally to students and trainees of any level, both as individuals and as groups. Prizes of up to $500 will be awarded to the best contributions as chosen by a judging panel of experts; these will be awarded at the ISMB/ECCB conference in Basel, Switzerland in July 2019. As in previous years, the ISCB encourages competition entries for contributions to Wikipedia in any language. For teachers/trainers: We encourage you to pass this invitation on to your students, and consider using the competition as part of an in-class assignment. Further details may be found at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Computational Biology/8th ISCB Wikipedia competition announcement. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from WikiProject Computational Biology, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. (Message delivered:MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: a reminder Hello, this is a reminder that the International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) and WikiProject Computational Biology are currently calling for participants in the 8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition. The ISCB aims to improve the communication of scientific knowledge to the public at large, and Wikipedia plays an increasingly important role in this communication; the ISCB Wikipedia Competition aims to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles relating to computational biology. Entries to the competition are open now; the competition closes on 17 May 2019. For students/trainees: Entry to the competition is open internationally to students and trainees of any level, both as individuals and as groups. Prizes of up to $500 will be awarded to the best contributions as chosen by a judging panel of experts; these will be awarded at the ISMB/ECCB conference in Basel, Switzerland in July 2019. As in previous years, the ISCB encourages competition entries for contributions to Wikipedia in any language. For teachers/trainers: Please pass this invitation on to your students! We also encourage you to consider using the competition as part of an in-class assignment. Further details may be found at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Computational Biology/8th ISCB Wikipedia competition announcement. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from WikiProject Computational Biology, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Amkilpatrick (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries closing soon! Hello, this is to let you know that entries for the 8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition are closing soon! The ISCB aims to improve the communication of scientific knowledge to the public at large, and Wikipedia plays an increasingly important role in this communication; the ISCB Wikipedia Competition aims to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles relating to computational biology. Entries to the competition are open now; the competition closes on 17 May 2019. For students/trainees: Entry to the competition is open internationally to students and trainees of any level, both as individuals and as groups. Prizes of up to $500 will be awarded to the best contributions as chosen by a judging panel of experts; these will be awarded at the ISMB/ECCB conference in Basel, Switzerland in July 2019. As in previous years, the ISCB encourages competition entries for contributions to Wikipedia in any language. For teachers/trainers: Please pass this invitation on to your students! We also encourage you to consider using the competition as part of an in-class assignment. Further details may be found at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Computational Biology/8th ISCB Wikipedia competition announcement. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from WikiProject Computational Biology, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Amkilpatrick (talk) 14:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: deadline extended! Hello, this is to let you know that the editing deadline for the 8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition has been extended to 28 June 2019. We encourage you to participate and make the most of this extended editing period! Remember, prizes of up to $500 will be awarded to the best contributions as chosen by a judging panel of experts; these will be awarded at the ISMB/ECCB conference in Basel, Switzerland in July 2019. For teachers/trainers: Please pass this invitation on to your students! We also encourage you to consider using the competition as part of an in-class assignment. Further details may be found at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Computational Biology/8th ISCB Wikipedia competition announcement. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings from WikiProject Computational Biology, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Amkilpatrick (talk) 07:32, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Speed dating, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frequency (marketing), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

‍ Relativity 02:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Relativity!

Erictleung (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Datasaurus dozen article that you just made is really cool! What a cool way to demonstrate data visualization. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage says that you are in NYC. Consider saying hello at an in-person event planned at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC, such as the Prime Produce talks. Bluerasberry (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cup of coffee! Much appreciated. I just found out about Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC earlier this year. I hope to be more regular :) Hope to see you there at an upcoming event. Erictleung (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Opentrons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biohacker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Erictleung, you recently volunteered to review my proposal to recover some text about marketing mix optimization in the Marketing mix entry, thank you very much. In the Talk section, I have added a few comments to the discussion on this issue, as well as an alternative text I propose to add, which hopefully follows your observations. Could you give your opinion there as to whether I could add this new version of the text (or any modification of it)? Thanks again! EXPTIME-complete (talk) 11:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the four items you recently added to List of lists of lists is a list of lists. Reverting. —Tamfang (talk) 22:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamfang Ah, I appreciate the note and reminder! Erictleung (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are a good sport! —Tamfang (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Data clean room. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris I respect the move! I'll take action accordingly once I've added more to it. Thanks! Erictleung (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Erictleung. Thank you for your work on Dating Sunday. Another editor, MolecularPilot, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Interesting article, thanks for writing it. Clear WP:GNG pass. :)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MolecularPilot}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 06:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Can you provide context for where this concept came to be, why it is important? In what field is this studied? Who is using it and why? What other concepts does it relate to? "Graph databases" should be wikilinked.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Identity graph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 21:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erictleung! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Caleb Stanford (talk) 21:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just saw the change you made to factory model schools and I'm not sure why you made it. Your change doesn't match the content of the article and I don't see anything on the talk page explaining why. Could you say more about the change? EdHistory101 (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Which edit are you referring to? Are you referring to the short description change I made? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Factory_model_school&oldid=1280322676 Erictleung (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am! I see now that you added the short description - which is great! I didn't realize it was missing. The content, though, doesn't match the article's content. "term used by those advocating change to the American education system" works better. Can we change it to that? Thanks! EdHistory101 (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I'd agree with your assessment. I may have been too quick to summarize the article in the description. I'm also aiming to adhere to WP:SDLENGTH to be less than 40 characters. Although "term used by those advocating change to the American education system" is more accurate, short descriptions to be understandings are not intended to be definitions WP:SDNOTDEF (but if they are, that works).

I've updated the short description to hopefully compromise on accuracy and brevity. Erictleung (talk) 03:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Socket (cybersecurity), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Socket (cybersecurity) where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Erictleung. Thank you for your work on Green Tile Social Club. Another editor, Mrfoogles, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very well-cited article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mrfoogles}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mrfoogles (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erictleung,

Thank you for creating Polars (software).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Article may not meet WP requirements for companies/products, namely WP:NCORP. The policy requires multiple INDEPENDENT sources that discuss the product in SOME DEPTH. The sources in this article include (a) the companies own website; (b) two blogs. The only source that may be sufficiently reliable (see WP:RS) is ""An Empirical Study on the Energy Usage ....", which is probably has authors that work for the company or on the product. Can someone demonstrate that that source is INDEPENDENT from the company?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 14:30, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder, you have to register with UN security by Tuesday (today!) to attend the June 16 edit-a-thon. You also have to bring a government-issued ID with you. Pharos (talk) 19:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pharos Just filled it out - thanks for the reminder! Erictleung (talk) 19:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Erictleung. Thank you for your work on Synthetic minority oversampling technique. Another editor, Zzz plant, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Topic defintiely looks notable- Chawla et al publication has almost 38k citations, and there's plenty of other highly-cited works too. My only feedback is that this may be a difficult article to follow for a person who's not already familiar with SMOTE. I'm not a stats person so take with a grain of salt but I would maybe suggesting moving the block of code down to the bottom and starting out with a longer summary/overview so it can be more easily understood by non-technical folks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Zzz plant}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Zzz plant (talk) 02:06, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zzz plant: thanks for reviewing and giving your feedback, I appreciate it. It's a work in progress, so I'll continue making it more accessible for the general reader who isn't familiar with the topic. I'll tag you and/or others once I've made some progress to make it less technical. Thanks! Erictleung (talk) 18:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erictleung. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Identity graph, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ZADZADZ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZADZADZ (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--Slowking Man (talk) 05:28, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erictleung. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Socket (cybersecurity), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Erictleung. Thank you for your work on Chaos gardening. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 10:26, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]