User talk:Ilovebread7271

Hello, Ilovebread7271, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created, such as HIDE & SEEK 3, may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – for contributing to other articles. Writing a new article is tough, so getting experience elsewhere is useful.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dan arndt (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article HIDE & SEEK 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM, lacks any sources or references.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Dan arndt (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HIDE & SEEK 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HIDE & SEEK 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have made your page into a draft, due to the draft-like nature of your page and due to the fact your page has no sources and in the references section you stated “sources will be added on the 13-14 January” which indicates the page is better to be a draft and so you can incubate the page and submit it for review at a latter stage, I shall put the submit for review template which you can use later. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know! Are Fandom Wiki sources ok as well? There are other sources I will use, but I just wanted to know if this is ok. Also, how long does a submission request take? Thanks! I'll update and submit the draft. Ilovebread7271 (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fandom wikis can be edited by whoever and so Wikipedia does not find it a reliable source, however a newspaper or film critic website would count.

A submission can take anywhere from 2-3 weeks if not longer, it’s a bit of a gamble. If you need help or assistance you can ask at the Teahouse. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 08:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:NFF yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HIDE & SEEK 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nil🥝 04:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilovebread7271! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nil🥝 04:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilovebread7271. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by SomeoneDreaming (talk) 02:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Hi Ilovebread7271. Thank you for your work on 2026 Verizon outage. Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is a list of references, however no inline citations. Information needs to be verifiable. Please move the sources to their correct place in the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 07:51, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Currently (since I'm a new creator), I don't know how to add inline citations, which is why I want to add it to the Teahouse. However, I can assure that my citations are verifiable. Ilovebread7271 (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide more links, please? Not a single one you put on the page is real. ThatTrainGuy1945 (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to truly notify you @Ilovebread7271 ThatTrainGuy1945 (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2026 Verizon outage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. feedmepaperr (talk) 15:16, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ilovebread7271! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Make Edits to an Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]