| This is JacobGerace's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Stafylakis (December 1)
[edit]
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harry Stafylakis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hello! Thank you for reviewing my draft so quickly. I appreciate the work you do.
- I am not sure where specifically you see potential use of an LLM, but I can assure you that since I started making edits in the hopes of getting this draft accepted, I have manually typed every word and added every references.
- This draft was written by a different author than myself and was denied for lack of credible sources in August. Since then, I have added a handful of references and included only small changes to the body of the article itself.
- I am curious if somehow the minimal additions I have made appear to be written by an LLM, or if the original body of the article does. If the latter is the case, the first reviewer who denied the article did not mention that.
- I am open to making any necessary changes, but I honestly don't know where to start, and do not want to start hacking away blindly!
- Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
- @Pythoncoder {{Ping|Pythoncoder}} JacobGerace (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- The original body of the article is definitely generated by AI, so that's why I declined it. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Hello, JacobGerace!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:48, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
|
