User talk:Kiskeya Zero

Hi Kiskeya Zero! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 17:06, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to The Ford Simulator, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

• If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
• If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. linking to downloads of the game is inappropriate and a copyright concern Waxworker (talk) 19:36, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Porsche Legend has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sole source is mobygames, which is an unreliable WP:USERGENERATED source per WP:VG/RS, doesn't appear notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 19:38, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you either removed an Articles for deletion notice from an article, The Porsche Legend, or removed another person's comment(s) in an Articles for deletion debate. Removing AfD templates or editing others comments might make it difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment on the AfD discussion instead. – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 00:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Kiskeya Zero (talk) 00:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Noble Racing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

gamefaqs is an unreliable WP:USERGENERATED source per WP:VG/RS, no metacritic score, not seeing coverage outside of digitally downloaded, doesn't apepar notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 00:56, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kiskeya Zero. Thank you for your work on Ferrari Formula One. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and footnote each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability per WP:CORP. I will be moving it to draft space. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Scuderia Ferrari Race 2013 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Patently non-notable - Metacritic directs to a broken page and the TouchArcade page is an empty landing page with promotional information and no review.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noble Racing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noble Racing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 20:49, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thor (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability - sole source (after removing rom download refs which are a copyright issue) is a gamespot database listing, gamespot datebase noted as unreliable per WP:VG/RS, I was unable to find any coverage on Archive.org

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Waxworker (talk) 02:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. Thank you for helping in contributing to the website. However, that said, I'm a bit concerned about the number of warnings you've racked up in a relatively short amount of time here. Wikipedia is one of those things that can take some time to learn how it works. And that's fine. But it's important to make sure you read the warnings and try to learn from them. You can find yourself in trouble if you keep making the same mistakes over and over again.

First off, I generally don't recommend very new editors create articles right off the bat, but if you do, its essentially you know the basics.

1. WP:WIKIPEDIAADVENTURE and WP:5P are some broad informational.
2. Understanding the WP:GNG and WP:V is essential for creating articles.
3. Until you understand how to identify What Wikpedia defines as reliable/usable sources, its best to study up on areas that outline sources that are generally usable or unusable. WP:VG/S outlines video game centric sources, while WP:RSP covers more general sources.

Looking over your articles, it looks like you're not using nearly enough sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:V, and are using unreliable sources pretty frequently. (Mobygames is not usable, most YouTube videos fail WP:RSPYT.)

I know that's a lot of information. And its all the more reason why I don't recommend people jump in without understanding how the website works. Please slow down and take some time before creating further articles. No one expects you to be perfect right away. Everyone makes mistakes. But if you keep making the same mistakes, repeatedly in fast succession, you're likely to get your account restricted in the form of short-term blocks. So please take this advice to hear. Thanks. 20:56, 19 November 2025 (UTC) Sergecross73 msg me 20:56, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning - it doesn't appear you've taken my comment to heart considering this creation - GTI Racing - which still makes no effort to establish that the GNG is met. If you publish any more sloppy articles like this, your account will be temporarily blocked from editing. I'm trying to help and work with you here, but if you're going to disregard all guidance and keep going, then that's the next step. Sergecross73 msg me 16:51, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorryll try my best. Sorry for the trouble. Kiskeya Zero (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Fantastic Four (2005 video game), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 02:51, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trinitaria (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinitaria (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ram Racing (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Racing (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thor (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thor (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Waxworker (talk) 21:53, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Noval 760 games indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:45, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]