User talk:MrOllie

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 48 hours may be auto-archived by if there are more than 4.

Continuous removals

You are removing text people have seen a lot of trouble to write, because of lack of citations or you are not happy with the used sources. Instead you should ask for citations, not remove the whole text. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability/Removal_of_Unsourced_Material 91.153.111.4 (talk) 22:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You might or might not be interested

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#UtherSRG. As you've been mentioned a few times, I thought it appropriate to let you know. Knitsey (talk) 17:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing I can do about the block I issued, as it has now long since expired, but I apologize for it nonetheless. I was out of line. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting the infos about Keynote NF in the article "Keynote" (note taking program)

Dear MrOllie, you deleted the information about Keynote NF from the article about "Keynote". You wrote as comment - as I understood it - that the information about Keynote NF should not be part of this article. I understand that argument, wanting to clearly separate two articles, but there are the following problems to that argument: ◆1. There is no article about "Keynote NF". So if you want a clean separation of these two topics, you should instead of deleting, move the "Keynote NF" to a new article and then counter-link these two articles together. ◆2. The article "Keynote" has a Marker put on it, that questions its notability. "Keynote" (the original software) is no longer developed. So an article about "Keynote" is in fact rather a historical information (even though the software is still perfectly usable). But if we add the information about the successor software "Keynote NF" which is actively developed and offers massive improvements, then this article is of a practical use for a reader, meaning the notability of this article is increased. ◆3. Outlining software is not a widely known type of software, yet it is a type of software that could be beneficial for a wide array of people, as is allows a very different and creative type of storing informations. Therefore it makes sense to not only keep the article about the original software, but to also add infos about the improved successor.

I am looking forward to read your constructive suggestions about the Keynote-Article. With friendly greetings, AT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.12.130.62 (talk)

It does not meet Wikipedia's inclusion requirements, (see WP:N), so it cannot be a new article. And we do not advertise later day forks without the required sourcing. Wikipedia policy requires that this be left out. - MrOllie (talk) 17:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt answer, dear MrOllie.

Now following your argumentation, if the additional information is considered by a policy as useless, then the notability of the base-article is not improved, so

why do you not also delete the "Keynote"-Article?

I am looking forward to read your constructive suggestions. With friendly greetings, AT. 185.12.130.62 (talk) 10:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it ought to be deleted you are welcome to nominate it for that. MrOllie (talk) 16:06, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MrOllie, if you ask me, I do not know how to do that. But you seem to know your way around Wikipedia, that is why I am asking you! ~2025-34907-24 (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't take requests or edit at the direction of others. MrOllie (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]