User talk:PackMecEng

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

It's obvious that cleanup is needed. Removing tags under those circumstances don't look good to put it mildly. --Hipal (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're not making it look any better. [1][2] [3] [4]--Hipal (talk) 18:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes those are my 3 reverts and the message about your 4 reverts on the same page.[5][6][7][8] It looks like you are edit warring to me, I would self revert if I were you before we head to WP:AN3. PackMecEng (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, read the editing header on my talk page. All you had to do was ask. --Hipal (talk) 18:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It was in the message I put on your page, did you read that? PackMecEng (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Are you being serious? --Hipal (talk) 18:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I am missing something, what header are you referring to? I don't see any that would be relevant to this. PackMecEng (talk) 19:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On the top of my talk page and on the top of the editing page for my talk page, it says I am usually open to holding myself to one revert if you think it will help a situation. Just let me know. --Hipal (talk) 20:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And I did let you know here, which said at the bottom You are at 4RR, I would sugguest you self revert before it goes to WP:AN3 with the heading of the section being the article in question, before you used rollback to get rid of the message. Also in the edit summaries I let you know as well, also on the article talk page I mentioned it. It is not my job to make sure you are aware of how many times you are reverting people on articles. I was doing you a favor by saying it in 4 places your talk page, my talk, the article talk page, and the article history edit summaries. So yes, I am being serious, and have been nothing but. PackMecEng (talk) 20:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. --Hipal (talk) 20:45, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Are you using an ai in your editing? Some of what you are doing and writing doesn't make much sense, similar to what I usually find is the result of using an ai. --Hipal (talk) 20:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

no PackMecEng (talk) 20:34, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Do you understand why it looks like you do? --Hipal (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

also no PackMecEng (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It could be just that you're rushed, but I wanted to let you know what it looks like. --Hipal (talk) 20:41, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, there is nothing wrong with it from what I can see. Perhaps you are thinking of someone else. Judging by the other comment here you have the wrong person PackMecEng (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

nothing wrong with it Perfect example. You're assuming that you know the specifics that haven't been identified, then relying on other information on this page to determine that this line of discussion is all in error. --Hipal (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ok PackMecEng (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding to my comments. I had hoped they might be helpful. Apologies if they were a waste of time or worse. --Hipal (talk) 20:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not to be rude but are you ESL by chance? PackMecEng (talk) 01:08, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's the other editor who used ai. – LuniZunie_(talk) 20:36, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Very likely --Hipal (talk) 20:41, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]