User talk:PatGallacher

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17

This page has archives. Sections older than 64 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Hello PatGallacher, I'd like to clarify my intention for changing the above article on Nicola Adams. She has mentioned in interviews numerous times that she is bisexual (and this was the reason for why she fought for a female partner on Strictly Come Dancing) so it was wrong for the article to mislabel her as gay. The cited reference that was already there does mention her bisexuality*, so that is why I didn't add my own cite.

• so this was in fact an incorrect cite for the misinformation I was trying to correct in the first place.

Hello PatGallacher, I just wanted to clear up the nature of my (now-reverted) edit to Arthur Mullard's article- I in no way sought to indicate 'doubt' regarding the allegations (as there's no way I personally could have any real knowledge of it), but wondered if perhaps the emphasis on his daughter's claims was too great given the absence of any other sources than the Sunday Mirror, which, as the Sunday edition of the Daily Mirror, is presumably subject to the same consideration given to the latter at Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources. Since you've reverted the edit I don't intend to try again, but I do think it a shame that no other sources- even referring to the allegations second-hand- seem to exist which would lend credibility to them, and more to the point, to the very insistent manner in which details of said allegations are presented in three separate sections of the article. Just wanted to let you know where I was coming from when I made the edit, lest it be considered that simple doubt regarding the truthfulness of his daughter's claims had motivated me. Thanks!

Restoring the correct ENGVAR of an article is fully compliant, respected editing MapReader (talk) 18:52, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PatGallacher. Thank you for your work on Cele Fierro. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 00:05, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your edits on Tyler James Robinson. Just asking, why did you delete the criminal status? Just wanna clarify. Thank you! (P.S.: I'm not a stubborn Wikipedian who will start an edit war with any random person, so...) HwyNerd Mike (tokk | contribs) 23:15, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you are on about. My edits were because the same article was included as a reference twice. He is not yet a criminal. PatGallacher (talk) 00:11, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm sorry you misunderstood. I'm referring to this edit wrong edit, this one. He is not yet a criminal (I know), but people like Sean Combs have not yet had a formal trial but still have a "criminal status" in their infobox. I have done the same with Robinson. If you can reformat it, it will be appreciated! HwyNerd Mike (tokk | contribs) 00:28, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I pass no judgement on this issue at this stage, take any dispute to the talk page. PatGallacher (talk) 00:41, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PatGallacher. Thank you for your work on Niall Geany. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add more references and make sure that each claim is backed up by a source. Additionally, please fix the bare URLs; I recommend using the {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help) and {{cite news}}: Empty citation (help) templates (among others). Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kiss Me, Kate (TV film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Wreck of the Number Nine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wreck of the Number Nine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-Samoht27 (talk) 17:33, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]