User talk:Pi.1415926535

Welcome to my user talk page! If I left you a message, please respond on your talk page, and I'll be sure to reply there. Otherwise, start a new section on the bottom of the page and I'll reply as soon as I can!

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24

Hello, I must ask, why did you remove my latest edit to Grenada station? It shows the evolution of the station; one of them shows the first station before getting the 2nd floor addition and the first depot in 1894.

IC 9612 (talk) 08:47, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is not enough room in the prose for more than one image, since there is only one paragraph in the history section. Having 5 images in that section was causing formatting issues. If the prose is significantly expanded, more images can eventually be added in. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:15, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are only two ways the template is used and you are using neither. Stick to conventiopon with your edits. 161.29.202.46 (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@161.29.202.46: You keep saying "convention" but refuse to explain. What "convention" exists against using {{commonscat inline}}? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:49, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go and have a look at all the well edited articles! 161.29.202.46 (talk) 00:50, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your vagueness makes it impossible to discern what you mean. At this point, it's indistinguishable from trolling. Numerous high-quality articles including many GAs and FAs use that template. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:53, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You fool. Yes thwey use that template but not in thew manner that you are using it. Also, I don't believe you. Post some links. The inline version is ALWAYS used with a bullet point. Are you blind and as thick as two short planks! 161.29.202.46 (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:LAYOUTEL does not agree with your claims or edits:

• It lists two situations for using inline templates: "Inline" templates are used when box-type templates are not desirable, either because they result in a long sequence of right-aligned boxes hanging off the bottom of the article, or because there are no external links except sister project ones. In many articles, specially shorter ones with infoboxes, the right-aligned boxes problem will occur for viewers in desktop mode. That is why I used the inline template in Central West End station, Stadium–Armory station, and other articles.
• Regarding this edit, that MOS section explicitly allows having the commonscat either in the last unelated section, or as the only item in an external links section. I chose the latter because of the right-aligned boxes issue (in this case, images).
• It does not specify whether or not the template is to be used with a bullet point. The example does use a bullet point, but it's ambiguous whether that is simply because the example is already part of a list item. The template documentation does not specify either. Lacking explicit guidance, there's no compelling reason to make edits just to change it - and none of your edits have been to add the bullet point anyway. If you feel strongly about it, Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout would be the place to start a discussion.

Please cease with your personal attacks and accusations. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:43, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Delray Beach station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 08:03, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article South Station Bus Terminal has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 23:03, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Defunct/disused/former railway stations on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article North Wilmington station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article North Wilmington station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 18:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article North Wilmington station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 00:48, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Fall River/New Bedford Line is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:28, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Fall River/New Bedford Line has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Fall River/New Bedford Line has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]