User talk:Profounder User

I plan to start some editing a lot, so created a doppelganger account titled User:Profoundly User to prevent vandal against me, I did it after hearing it on a tutorial from YouTube about editing for newbies, acts as a permanent page with zero edit (this is my main and single editing account) Profounder User (talk) 03:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It exists as "User:Profoundly User" but I can't make it since it's not allowed to make others pages in the first couple of days, I will make in a few days Profounder User (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

as a coin collector, just created a draft on a historical coin, tell me more about how to make edits and stuff so I can add references without getting errors Profounder User (talk) 03:04, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

just realized today that there are places where pages are tried to be deleted as soon as possible called a speedy deletion place, I just went against one of them which was historically significant Profounder User (talk) 17:35, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

created doppelganger and its ok, that tutorial said a good tip Profounder User (talk) 00:52, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

how do I use tags on Wikipedia, I see those all over the place and I have to do those edits manually, how do they work and what are they Profounder User (talk) 02:47, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I should start contesting certain speedy deletion notes, like the Final Battle 2002 thing I found in the speedy deletion Profounder User (talk) 13:19, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Cadge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Profounder User! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

can I start replying to deletion discussions, that I just found out about while reading the page about the deletion of articles on Wikipedia Profounder User (talk) 17:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong can I start replying to deletion discussions, that I just found out about while reading the page about the deletion of articles on Wikipedia Profounder User (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes anyone can reply to deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on My article was just Nominated for deletion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:28, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kline. I noticed that you recently removed content from 6KH4 bayonet without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kline • talk • contribs 18:53, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Kline instantly Draftify all of them, I blanked all those pages on bayonets since a blocked user made them and I want to recreate the text Profounder User (talk) 18:54, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

6KH2 bayonet, 6KH4 bayonet, and 6KH3 bayonet Profounder User (talk) 18:55, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Profounder User You can just do this by editing in your sandbox or draftspace and replacing the article when you are ready. Blanking the page is not a help and that is what the CSD tags are applied for. Kline • talk • contribs 18:57, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:44, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Kline can you add a sockpuppetry tag on the User:Advisor Einstein account, as that was a sockpuppet by me, as I confirmed it Profounder User (talk) 00:04, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

@Izno Complete List Of Sockpuppets of Alex132219georgia: User:Alex132219georgiacyber User:AnAstronautsPhotographsFromSpace User:Arthur5481 User:GiottoVSHenryGeorge User:IChewLens User:PeanutReed User:PlasmaReader User:Profounder UserUser:Profoundly User User:Sir Adam Barttelot (1328-1375) - Lesser Known Medieval Knight User:Advisor Einstein User:Craig Loudon (Mechanic) User:Craig (Mechanic) User:Craig (Hyper-Local Mechanic) User:JingoroEireiOno User:Joseph Circeo Junior Of London Profounder User (talk) 16:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Lavalizard101 @Alex132219georgia @Izno @Philknight @Choess @Moneytrees @Asilvering @Mfield I am requesting a global lock on Alex132219georgia in good-faith due to cross wiki abuse, this is because I nearly got blocked on Wikipedia commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AnAstronautsPhotographsFromSpace) and has caused further abuse and banned on the English Wikipedia, keep all articles and drafts created by the original master before the block, have a steward review my request, farewell, Alex132219georgia List Of Sockpuppets: User:Alex132219georgiacyber User:AnAstronautsPhotographsFromSpace User:Arthur5481 User:GiottoVSHenryGeorge User:IChewLens User:PeanutReed User:PlasmaReader User:Profounder User User:Profoundly User User:Sir Adam Barttelot (1328-1375) - Lesser Known Medieval Knight User:Advisor Einstein User:Craig Loudon (Mechanic) User:Craig (Mechanic) User:Craig (Hyper-Local Mechanic) User:JingoroEireiOno User:Joseph Circeo Junior Of London Profounder User (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  asilvering (talk) 07:37, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]