User talk:Serilly

Archives (Index)

2025/August 2025/September

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

On 3 October 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Toontown Rewritten, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that people used Toontown Rewritten for virtual Black Lives Matter protests in 2020? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Toontown Rewritten. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Toontown Rewritten), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:19, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chao Garden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 18:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Street cats in China, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 23:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article PostPet is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 16:27, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article PostPet has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:43, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article PostPet has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carolina2k22 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dariacore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) 13:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Serilly! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Carolina2k22 • (talk) 13:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Oshikatsu is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z. Patterson -- Z. Patterson (talk) 23:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Oshikatsu has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z. Patterson -- Z. Patterson (talk) 01:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Oshikatsu has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z. Patterson -- Z. Patterson (talk) 11:08, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this is proper talk page etiquette but I just wanted to say thank you for creating the page on xenofiction! As a fan of xenofiction I would love to see the genre become more organized and garner more discussion + authors, and I feel like having a presence on Wikipedia will really help that. A Streetcar Named Keanu (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I don't mind it at all! That's a big reason why I created the page, especially since it's a big part of children's literature and yet the name isn't very well known. ⋆˚꩜｡ serilly! (he/him) (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]