User talk:Yousuf31

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yousuf31 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. I see that I was blocked indefinitely for personal attacks and disruptive editing. I now understand that personal attacks are not acceptable on Wikipedia and they only cause harm. I regret my past behavior and I want to apologize for it. If given another chance, I will focus only on constructive contributions, follow Wikipedia’s civility rules, and avoid hostile language. I would appreciate the opportunity to show that I can contribute positively. Thank you. Yousuf31 (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Surely you didn't need to be told that personal attacks are not acceptable, did you? Though perhaps the AI you used to write this needed to be told. We want to hear from you, not an AI. 331dot (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yousuf31 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for making Sock accounts, personal attacks and disruptive editing. I understand it isn't acceptable for personal attacks. Yousuf31 (talk) 15:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think your best chance of being unblocked is to take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts, and no logged out editing. PhilKnight (talk) 15:29, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yousuf31 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I can't wait for 182.5 days (6 months), I'll regret my past behavior Yousuf31 (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

and I'll be removing TPA to stop the disruption Star Mississippi 18:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2025

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Star Mississippi 18:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]