Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artist Henry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Artist Henry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this guy does some cool work but lacks any of the coverage required for an article. COOLIDICAE🕶 20:23, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per WP:GNG. I would definitely support renaming the article, he is not known by "Artist Henry". Needs to be moved, imminently. Katzrockso (talk) 01:28, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
it's his brand name and i can confirm this depending on mostly well recognized sources i used. The difference it makes is this "Artisthenry" it's his social media handles while "Artist Henry" it's his studio name. So suggest me more about the change as a senior. I will change it. REXXAUUSD (talk) 22:36, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment table prepared by User:WomenArtistUpdates
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
The New Times Rwanda Interesting article, but ends with contact information for Henry Nyirigira , the subject of the "article" ? Unknown
No interview in Igihe No
No Interview No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.