- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Audio-to-visual Transcribing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article initially proposed for deletion as a non-notable neologism, used exclusively by the purveyors of this particular arts instruction method, which caused the article to border on spam. Article's author (by username, assumed to be one of the creators of said instructional technique) removed prod with only the edit summary correction. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable neologism. Hairhorn (talk) 20:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per both. Johnbod (talk) 02:14, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, non-notable neologism. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 17:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.