- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Base and superstructure in marxist cultural theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page appears to be nonsense. What is the topic? Where are the resources? Any independent coverage? Sadly I don't find any clear-cut CSD reasons; G11 was the best hope but I don't see it. — Timneu22 · talk 16:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Base and superstructure is the foundational theoretical framework of Marxist theory (cultural and economic), but this article appears to be a summary of a non-notable discussion of the concept. It is actually something we should have an article on, if there isn't one, but this article isn't it and can't be made into it. 72.19.82.141 (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC) — Oi. That was me, didn't notice I was logged out. Kate (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I agree with everything that Kate said, except how it applies to this case. If there should be an article, but not this one, we blank the page and leave a one-sentence stub. I'm just not sure that this needs its own article, seeing as we don't have a general Base and superstructure in Marxism article from which this would be a spin-off. This subject might be better dealt with in Marxist philosophy or Marxist literary criticism, but if it does warrant its own article deletion is not an appropriate course of action, no matter how badly this one smacks of something written for a college essay. RJC TalkContribs 02:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. General treatment in Marxist philosophy would be entirely appropriate (and likely is already there). It's a foundational concept, it's not distinctly different between cultural theory and economics treatments. Kate (talk) 13:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Given the above. RJC TalkContribs 14:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.