- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Billiebob Ultralight Flightpark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Google searches bring up 130 hits which 0 of them are notable. They only prove the existence of this flight park. Nothing exists about it's creation, it has not made the news, and it has not been the discussion of an online area. It is completely non-notable. Delete Undead Warrior (talk) 02:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 02:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Grsztalk 03:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:N. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not yet meeting the current notability limits. rootology (C)(T) 00:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.