- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- CALPASC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:ORG - but maybe I am wrong! SarahStierch (talk) 02:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter (talk) 02:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No, you're not wrong. This run-of-the-mill lobbying group fails WP:ORG. All I could find in a search was press releases, no independent coverage at all. --MelanieN (talk) 23:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per MelanieN. Jim Carter (talk) 15:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.