Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarePlus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Due to notability and promotional concerns. Davewild (talk) 20:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CarePlus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ADMASQ. Take away the many press releases and what you have left is two one thin piece from RFID Journal and The Miami Herald. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Brianhe (talk) 02:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree, it's an WP:ADMASQ, which fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:03, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep- Sources seem enough to establish notability, the page can be marked with advert tag instead of deletion.Amitbanerji26 (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Welcome back, it's been a long time since you edited. Tagging is not meant to be an alternative to fixing. Either the article should be fixed if it can be, or it should be deleted. — Brianhe (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I'm confused; article says CarePlus is a nurse paging system but one of the sources refers to it as a health care plan. Are these two different companies/products? —Мандичка^YO 😜 01:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good catch; Miami Herald story was unrelated to this article; I removed it. Brianhe (talk) 01:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: That CarePlus is very large. The health insurance brand, "Care Plus," has a lot of capital in the U.S. It is, however, a brand within a larger corporation, I think. Hithladaeus (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Promotional material telling you (yes, you) why you should get/invest in this exciting product. There isn't any description of the product as a factor in care facilities or its effects upon them. Hithladaeus (talk) 18:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.