- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Cimarron. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley 00:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cimmarron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A topic about a boat brand that likely fails WP:N. Several searches, including customized ones such as [1] and [2] are not yielding any coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Cimarron for people can't spell; the boats aren't notable. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 08:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Cimarron per Roscelese; there really aren't enough independent sources to ascertain notability for the line of boats. dci | TALK 03:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per the above. Note I've created Cimmarron Boats as a redirect to Cabela's, which seems reasonable (and is, in fact, the actual name of the company/product), making this redundant. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.