Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubdisk Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubdisk Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not look to pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP; sources found during a WP:BEFORE search do not address the company directly with an appropriate level of depth. I also do not believe that being 'the first dubstep record label in Swindon' is enough of a reason for us to ignore the notability concerns. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Literally no recent mentions in reliable secondary sources, not notable at all, the dubstep craze has not taken over Swindon. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 19:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Current sources don't indicate WP:GNG. Setreis (talk) 16:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. My search turned up nothing. JSFarman (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails the general notability standards Jenyire2 07:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Unfortunately one of the few sources is a permanent dead link. Proving WP:N here will require more sources to be listed. Redoryxx (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non notable per available sourcing. Redoryxx (talk) 22:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.