- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Eduvo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 22:42, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't find coverage for this software either. -- Whpq (talk) 16:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability issues per nom. Dengero (talk) 01:50, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -Coverage for this software seems pretty minimal (other than places that are selling it). It clearly is not as notable as Blackboard Learning System. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 01:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.