- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep. `'mikka (t) 16:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
del. No encyclopedic content, Little internet coverage of the term. One of numerous "problem solving for dummies". `'mikka (t) 23:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. This is not "problem solving for dummies" but a quality methodology (you are not a consultant, are you? - no, don't hit me please! :), see for instance here or here. It is crappily written and might be a copyvio, that's true, but it has to exist... Grafikm_fr 23:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatever it is, the article in this form is exactly "do it yourself" and nothing else. I did see it mentioned in internet (I can use google, you know), and the several pages I've looked at were just like this article: a list of 1, 2, 3... 8. `'mikka (t) 15:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- here This link has 250 slides describing the method. It is more than enough IMHO... :) Grafikm_fr 16:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- HOwever many slides, only 35 unique google hits suggests me a very little notability. There are hundreds quality control silver bullets in the world. Which third party (besides consultants) discuss this approach? `'mikka (t) 16:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- here This link has 250 slides describing the method. It is more than enough IMHO... :) Grafikm_fr 16:23, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatever it is, the article in this form is exactly "do it yourself" and nothing else. I did see it mentioned in internet (I can use google, you know), and the several pages I've looked at were just like this article: a list of 1, 2, 3... 8. `'mikka (t) 15:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination withdrawn. It turns out that the most common term is 8D Problem Solving, and it seems quite visible, although the article needs work. `'mikka (t) 16:51, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.