- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –MuZemike 00:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- F.C. Barcelona squad numbers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Used twinkle, however something seems to have gone awry. Article topic not notable, just a collection of stats, and I'm not sure what's gained by having it. Sandman888 (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 07:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - violates WP:LISTCRUFT, nothing to be gained by this. GiantSnowman 07:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:NOT#STATS. In my opinion, this article contains no information of encyclopedic value. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep With respect, nom resembles WP:JDLI. Eliteimp (talk) 16:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- With "respect", keep resembles "I just like it" Sandman888 (talk) 20:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:LISTCRUFT. Armbrust Talk Contribs 07:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- To the dark side of the moon and quickly nothing encyclopaedic about this at all, pure list cruft. BigDom 06:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above arguments. --MicroX (talk) 19:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: what about Arsenal F.C. squad numbers? I mean, if we are going to delete Barça's, we should delete both. — Luxic (talk) 09:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Looks like a clear cut case of WP:LISTCRUFT to me. I fails to see how this list has any encyclopedic value. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]- You seem quite keen to delete this list. Did you perhaps mean the Arsenal article? Sandman888 (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; a step too far into non-encyclopaedic stats assembly. Any interesting features can be summarised in the main article. TerriersFan (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-encyclopaedic. – PeeJay 13:53, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as per Sir Sputnik - Does not add to the encyclopedic value, most (if not all) is on other pages. Codf1977 (talk) 15:05, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.