- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Bangladesh Navy. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Field Intelligent Stuff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article appears to be a hoax. I see one result on Google, but none related to it. JJ98 (talk) 10:33, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Bangladesh Navy, merge the information. As it seems a part of Bangladesh Navy. — Tanvir 11:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Bangladesh Navy. --Ragib (talk) 19:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: let's not rule out that this may be a typo of the word "staff". I couldn't imagine anyone naming an official entity as "Stuff"... bahamut0013wordsdeeds 21:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Indeed - this is a typo of 'Field Intelligence Staff' which appears to be a Bangladeshi military unit - see page 4 of this US State Department document for some evidence that it exists/has existed. My Google searches of combinations of the units name don't provide any indications that it's notable. Nick-D (talk) 02:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Hatashe made a copy-and-paste move to Field Intelligent Staff and redirected this article there at 07:15 on 6 August 2010. At 11:16 on 11 August 2010, Kuyabribri reverted and nominated the copied article under CSD G6. Content on both has remained identical thus far. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 18:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Indeed - this is a typo of 'Field Intelligence Staff' which appears to be a Bangladeshi military unit - see page 4 of this US State Department document for some evidence that it exists/has existed. My Google searches of combinations of the units name don't provide any indications that it's notable. Nick-D (talk) 02:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Redirect to Bangladesh Navy; appears to have limited or no notability or encyclopedic value, typo or not. A simple reference as a unit of the Bangladesh Navy under the main article on the subject would do.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 03:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable unless enough of a source can be found to justify a mention under Bangladesh Navy, in which case rename (move) this to "Field Intelligence Staff (Bangladesh Navy)" and redirect it there. The single reference in the PDF listed above is not enough for that. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maybe not notable;
just a heads-up: someone tagged it as a candidate for speedy deletion (Kuyabribri).Bigtopみんな空の下 (トーク) 16:45, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.