- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Peacent 02:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Linux distribution. Chealer 17:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DES (talk) 00:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — A non-notable distribution. It isn't covered by significant media sources, and the few sources it has aren't independent. *Cremepuff222* 00:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Vanispamcruft. --Bren talk 07:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Calling this a Linux "distribution" implies that it's distributed as a product, which it isn't - it only exists as a component of the FireCast Media Appliance, which doesn't have an article. (Neither does the company that distributes it.) It might be worth mentioning in an article on this product if one existed; however, it's not noteworthy on its own. Zetawoof(ζ) 00:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, esp. Cremepuff's comments. Bearian 02:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not sufficiently notable. John Vandenberg 07:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.