- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirected to General covariance. Arkyan • (talk) 20:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- General_coordinate_invariance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
- Delete, as the author of the article was probably unaware of General covariance. MP (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpatel (talk • contribs) 2007/04/04 22:45:23 [reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How about redirect there? Tizio 14:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to General covariance; merge any distinctive content (I'm not enough of a specialist to tell if there is any). Newyorkbrad 17:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I suppose a redirect would be ok. Everything that's in general coordinate invariance is already in general covariance, so a merger isn't needed. MP (talk) 09:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to General covariance per Newyorkbrad. Just going ahead and doing so wouldn't have required an AfD. —David Eppstein 20:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.