- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge JodyB talk 01:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Geometry constraint engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This should be copied to Wiktionary then deleted since it will never be more than a dictionary definition. Not enough sources, see here, to expand. Bridgeplayer 18:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The concept is certainly worth more than a dicdef. I suspect the lack of sources may indicate that we may already have an article on the subject, but under a different name. Let's see... constraint geometry, variational geometry, constraint geometry system, computational geometry, constraint algorithm. Meh, could be better. Rl 20:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with CAD. Adrian M. H. 20:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with CAD, where it is not yet mentioned. Han-Kwang 17:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand do not merge, but must be mentioned in CAD. --MaNeMeBasat 09:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.