- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:29, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- GoodBarber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:NSOFTWARE, and/or WP:NWEB due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Cited Newsweek article (ref 6) is clearly marked as a "sponsor" post and the Forbes contributor article (ref 10) is unreliable as a self-published source per WP:FORBESCON. The Mashable article (refs 2 and 11) lists this website as one of "10 excellent platforms for building mobile apps".
As far as French-language coverage cited in the article, I am seeing the same reliabilty issues with those sources. For example, the Nice-Matin article (ref 1) is labelled as "sponsored by Bpifrance" (sponsorisé par Bpifrance); coincidentally, Bpifrance.fr is cited in ref 3. Best, Bridget (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, Software, and France. Bridget (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. If GoodBarber were notable nobody would have to pay for it to be covered.RandFreeman 20:03, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.