- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was great advice, but delete. Sr13 00:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How to write a great speech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unencyclopedic. Has been tagged for a transwiki to wikibooks for almost a year; if nobody has bothered to do it by now, it's not likely to happen. A request for transwiki shouldn't be a permanant stay of excecution for a bad article. Vary | Talk 21:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, unsourced, unsalvagably unencyclopedic topic. -Cquan (after the beep...BEEP.) 22:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT an instruction manual. Would have been better off figuring out "How to write a great article." Clarityfiend 22:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. Useight 22:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. AecisBrievenbus 22:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, for reasons stated above.--Kathy A. 23:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Let's throw WP:OR in, as well. This is an essay, not an article. Someguy1221 23:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Cquan. — Taggard (Complain) 01:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Maxamegalon2000 05:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.