- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), lack of refs not best reason to delete (improve them), keep seems consensus, no recent action Fr33kmantalk APW 02:01, 14 September 2008 (UTC) redirect (see this) to Knurl (band), as there's no-one at all in favour of keeping this article in its present form. Daniel (talk) 06:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pholde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable band/project, fails to meet the guidelines of WP:MUSIC PKT 14:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of references. If the list of album releases was verified, it would suffice to pass WP:NMG. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/merge Seems to have adequate notability and might usefully be merged with related articles like Knurl (band). Colonel Warden (talk) 17:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I respectfully disagree about "Adequate notability", but perhaps Alan Bloor should have an article rather than the two projects connected to him. Or perhaps not. PKT 03:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.