- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ProjectSim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Absolutely non-notable software product; article by single-purpose account. No indication of notability, nor have I found any coverage at all. Haakon (talk) 12:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete zero coverage online (not even a project website), article doesn't assert notability, editor's username indicates WP:COI. Possible WP:HOAX. Empty Buffer (talk) 12:58, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination, possible speedy delete as a very brief article without context or content. More unremarkable back-office software: project process and organization simulation software. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found zero sources. Joe Chill (talk) 15:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hard to determine for sure whether this even exists, and it certainly isn't notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.