- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- RE/flex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This computer program does not appear to meet WP:GNG/WP:NSOFT. Of the five sources in the article, one is written by the article creator, Robert van Engelen, and thus not independent coverage; another is a brief passing mention; and the three book sources have no mention of the program since they were published before it was created. My WP:BEFORE does not turn up any better sources. Zeibgeist (talk) 00:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Computing, and Software. Zeibgeist (talk) 00:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: It's mentioned in a few papers, e.g. [1], [2] (note the second one is a bachelor's thesis which is unreliable per WP:SCHOLARSHIP) but this doesn't amount to significant coverage. I note that the project creator has made arguments on the talk page that are not based on our notability guidelines. Being used in other non-notable software systems is not an indicator of notability, same with Github stars. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.