- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 21:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sandstone Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Solution"-speak article about another software company focusing on loan origination, internet and mobile banking and online financial management solutions to financial institutions. Contested proposed deletion, not mine. Only references are to an internal site and to a press release announcing the signing of a contract. I see nothing better. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
- On checking, I've got to agree with the nominator wholeheartedly. Delete.—S Marshall T/C 18:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources WP:RS to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Google searching turns up nothing beyond the subject's own press releases and some trivial listings. Wikipedia is not for promotion WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per lack of third-party sources, none of which were found on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.