- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Adam Phillips. Strong consensus to merge (non-admin closure) (talk→ Bwilkins / BMW ←track) 09:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sarus (language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I love Adam Phillips and his work, but I don't really think that his "Sarus" language has really gotten any press or notability beyond his works. Remurmur (talk) 08:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to Adam Phillips--Peephole (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Original nomination was not complete and overlooked. I listed it for today's log and completed the nomination. Regards SoWhy 19:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to Adam Phillips or possibly Constructed language. JJL (talk) 02:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I would not support merging with constructed language. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- fr33kman -s- 15:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Adam Phillips (animator). No individual notability for this conlang. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Adam Phillips. Not a notable article, but the Saurus content could be credited to him via the merge assuming 3rd party reliable verification. - DustyRain (talk) 06:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.