Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Wolves Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shadow Wolves Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not notable. My search for sources did not turn up independent reliable sources. MrClog (talk) 15:34, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTPROMO. No independent notability that I can determine. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 06:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Might be a case of TOOSOON. They seem to be involved in a number of non trivial productions, but to what extent is far from obvious, and in any case such would be leaning on INHERIT rather than esablishing a reputation and hence independent notability. I was thinking of a redirect to I'm Here Too, which if its controversy and awards are as claimed then it should have been notable enough to have its own article, but no. Aoziwe (talk) 11:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.