Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver-side (wolf)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Silver-side (wolf)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For starters it's an article about a word, which is discouraged per WP:NOTDIC. It's non-notable, because I can't find any source for the word in English or Celtic except the link to a promotional website. It's possible that the article is created as a hoax or to promote SilverSide Headwear. Sjö (talk) 06:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional article, no independent sources. Probably a hoax. Jack N. Stock (talk) 06:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the only mention is from a source that I removed already as being unreliable and promotional and has been tacked back on again possibly by a WP:COI editor trying to promote their company. --Domdeparis (talk) 09:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Now there's an actual WP:NOTDIC case for once. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTDIC, WP:HOAX or WP:REFSPAM: take your pick — Iadmc ♫^talk 19:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.