Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sprint (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sprint (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally prodded by me with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement." Deprodded by creator w/out explanation, subsequent edits don't seem to address the concern sufficiently, IMHO. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, SPA contribution, ordinary paid spam pattern (add to comparison, add page, vanish.) –Be..anyone (talk) 02:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't seem to pass the notability criteria. Cinteotl (talk) 09:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.