Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (13th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to ウィキペディア. (non-admin closure) AlphaBeta135  talk 02:24, 3 April 2025 (UTC)‎[reply]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Not a notable website. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Userify to User:Miminity GIVE ME THIS WEBSITE. Cold Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Dickipedia, and Elon Musk will cut a check for a billion dollars. BBQboffin^{grill me} 05:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, independent non-trivial sources galore. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 12:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Everyone involved in the writing of this article has a COI. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 18:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Since Wikipedia is not a reliable source, any sources analyzing Wikipedia are, by extension, unreliable. There are therefore no reliable sources on the topic and it should be deleted for not meeting WP:GNG. Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 20:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete per above. We have Britannica, World Book, Americana, etc. ѕιη¢єяєℓу ƒяσм, ᗰOᗪ ᑕᖇEᗩTOᖇ 🏡 🗨 📝 23:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge it with Encyclopædia Britannica. •TechScience2044 (|send me a note|) 08:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.