Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero Defect Zero Effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Make in India. Definite consensus for Merge here and Made in India seems the stronger target for the merge. Davewild (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Defect Zero Effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted and redirected Merged to Narendar Modi with Make in India per Winner 42. The slogan does not seem to have enough coverage for its own article. per GNG Jbh (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC) Edited to support merge. JbhTalk 20:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC) [reply]

*Keep A google search reveals several news articles on the subject from reliable sources. Including The Economic Times, The India Times (which was sourced in the article), The Hindustan Times, and Commodity Online. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:57, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge to Make in India, didn't realize that this existed. It definitely would be the proper place for this slogan though.
  • Comment - All of the news coverage simply note the slogan. So far I see no legislation or long term effect of encyclopedic note. As it stands this is appropriate for comment in a larger article but not for its own article. We do not document every political slogan. If it grows into a notable campaign an article might be appropriate. Right now it is WP:TOOSOON. Jbh (talk) 15:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.