| Commonly Requested Bots |
This is a page for requesting tasks to be done by bots per the bot policy. This is an appropriate place to put ideas for uncontroversial bot tasks, to get early feedback on ideas for bot tasks (controversial or not), and to seek bot operators for bot tasks. Consensus-building discussions requiring large community input (such as request for comments) should normally be held at WP:VPPROP or other relevant pages (such as a WikiProject's talk page).
You can check the "Commonly Requested Bots" box above to see if a suitable bot already exists for the task you have in mind. If you have a question about a particular bot, contact the bot operator directly via their talk page or the bot's talk page. If a bot is acting improperly, follow the guidance outlined in WP:BOTISSUE. For broader issues and general discussion about bots, see the bot noticeboard.
Before making a request, please see the list of frequently denied bots, either because they are too complicated to program, or do not have consensus from the Wikipedia community. If you are requesting that a template (such as a WikiProject banner) is added to all pages in a particular category, please be careful to check the category tree for any unwanted subcategories. It is best to give a complete list of categories that should be worked through individually, rather than one category to be analyzed recursively (see example difference).
Alternatives to bot requests
- WP:AWBREQ, for simple tasks that involve a handful of articles and/or only needs to be done once (e.g. adding a category to a few articles).
- WP:URLREQ, for tasks involving changing or updating URLs to prevent link rot (specialized bots deal with this).
- WP:USURPREQ, for reporting a domain be usurped eg.
|url-status=usurped - WP:SQLREQ, for tasks which might be solved with an SQL query (e.g. compiling a list of articles according to certain criteria).
- WP:TEMPREQ, to request a new template written in wiki code or Lua.
- WP:SCRIPTREQ, to request a new user script. Many useful scripts already exist, see Wikipedia:User scripts/List.
- WP:CITEBOTREQ, to request a new feature for WP:Citation bot, a user-initiated bot that fixes citations.
Note to bot operators: The {{BOTREQ}} template can be used to give common responses, and make it easier to keep track of the task's current status. If you complete a request, note that you did with {{BOTREQ|done}}, and archive the request after a few days (WP:1CA is useful here).
| Legend |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Manual settings |
| When exceptions occur, please check the setting first. |
| Bot-related archives |
|---|
Decap "External Links"
[edit]Decap "External Links" to "External links". Here is the search code (insource:/==External Links==/) I was just going to fix them with JWB but there are quite a lot. At least 7,900, possibly more. Here is the code with different spacing as well (insource:/== External Links ==/) That will generate a different set of results that also need fixing. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:29, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- WikiOriginal-9, 16,000 (regex times out). — Qwerfjkltalk 08:05, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Though this seems fairly trivial, so maybe just add to RegExTypoFix and forget about it? — Qwerfjkltalk 08:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Undone at WP:AWB/T. phuzion (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Phuzion: This new rule will not get the job done. As explained at Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Typos#Usage, most of the tools that use the typo list do not run the rules on section headings. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Good catch! Given that AWB and other tools won't actually utilize this rule, do you think it's worth removing from the RegExTypoFix list? I've marked the task as undone for now, as well. phuzion (talk) 12:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Phuzion: Yes, I've removed it. -- John of Reading (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! phuzion (talk) 13:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Phuzion: Yes, I've removed it. -- John of Reading (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Good catch! Given that AWB and other tools won't actually utilize this rule, do you think it's worth removing from the RegExTypoFix list? I've marked the task as undone for now, as well. phuzion (talk) 12:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Phuzion: This new rule will not get the job done. As explained at Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Typos#Usage, most of the tools that use the typo list do not run the rules on section headings. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- Though this seems fairly trivial, so maybe just add to RegExTypoFix and forget about it? — Qwerfjkltalk 08:06, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- A couple of points:
- So by all means do something to make it easier to fix MOS:HEAD errors in general, but please don't remove this handy signpost for where they can be found. William Avery (talk) 10:19, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- I wanted to mention that the same thing applies to "See Also", which is meant to be "See also". What is the update regarding this? I have started {{BOTREQ}} this since no one has gotten to it yet, and since AWB can't do it. I just need to know what the update is? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:17, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's probably changing
== *External +Links *==to==External links==. For that reason, AWB could probably do it. Steel1943 (talk) 04:54, 5 February 2026 (UTC)- @Steel1943 I thought someone said Given that AWB and other tools won't actually utilize this rule, do you think it's worth removing from the RegExTypoFix list? :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- That AWB cannot work on section headers...? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:38, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure AWB currently fixes these two specific titles. I know for sure I've recently had a "See Also" change to "See also" and I'm pretty sure EL is also being fixed. Gonnym (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Gonnym, yeah. I’ve actually abandoned this task. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure AWB currently fixes these two specific titles. I know for sure I've recently had a "See Also" change to "See also" and I'm pretty sure EL is also being fixed. Gonnym (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's probably changing
- I wanted to mention that the same thing applies to "See Also", which is meant to be "See also". What is the update regarding this? I have started {{BOTREQ}} this since no one has gotten to it yet, and since AWB can't do it. I just need to know what the update is? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:17, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, a more proper regex is
insource:/== *External +Links *==/. (@Vanderwaalforces: Not sure if this was considered, but pinging you in case.) Steel1943 (talk) 04:49, 5 February 2026 (UTC) - I may try to pick up this task as a one-time WP:AWB run. I don't know how to create a bot, but I may be able to perform this request as is with the regex string I determined. Steel1943 (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- I was just using AWB, and it found only 33 such issues in the article space as referenced in this thread ... I'm not sure how 16,000 were found. Either way, I corrected the 33 that AWB found. Steel1943 (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
- Putting in == *External +Links *==/ into AWB and running AWBtypos does indeed fix this. See this edit.
- FWIW, AWB found just over 5000 such articles, which is a lot, but could probably be chipped away at with AWB. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:12, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- Honestly, I think the regex isn't right. Most of what I found didn't have this on even using the regex. insource:/== *See Also *==/ and insource:/== *External Links *==/ basically found less than 100 between them in article space. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:17, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @Lee Vilenski: Odd since when I used AWB to look for that regex string, I received only 33 results (which I have since corrected). Is there some setting or something that needs to be changed to find these pages? Steel1943 (talk) 23:18, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- I fear we may have edit conflicted, see above. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:19, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- I did find a few more just searching for "External Links", but that is mostly articles saying "look at the section below", which also needs fixing, but even that was only like 150 Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:20, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's odd ... I received more results with "_" instead of "_+" between "External" and "Links". I guess Wikipedia's search function tends to time out quicker/frequently if a more greedy regex string is used, even if the greedy string technically has more applicable results. Steel1943 (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
- I see 14,301 pages in the original search link that Qwerfjkl posted. Gonnym (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, but how much of that is in article space? I found only a handful which were fixed. If we can find a list of articles, we can go from there. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski, this more optimised search gives 150 in mainspace. Qwerfjkltalk 19:51, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for that regex. I'll work my way through them. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:54, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think these ~1,000 non-talk or user pages (articles, drafts, portal, template, module, help, category, file) should all be fixed. The MoS applies the same as well. Gonnym (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- as much as 1000 is a lot, I don't think we need a dedicated bot run to fix it. I've been doing some AWB runs recently, can add this regex to it. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:33, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think these ~1,000 non-talk or user pages (articles, drafts, portal, template, module, help, category, file) should all be fixed. The MoS applies the same as well. Gonnym (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for that regex. I'll work my way through them. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:54, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski, this more optimised search gives 150 in mainspace. Qwerfjkltalk 19:51, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, but how much of that is in article space? I found only a handful which were fixed. If we can find a list of articles, we can go from there. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- I see 14,301 pages in the original search link that Qwerfjkl posted. Gonnym (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's odd ... I received more results with "_" instead of "_+" between "External" and "Links". I guess Wikipedia's search function tends to time out quicker/frequently if a more greedy regex string is used, even if the greedy string technically has more applicable results. Steel1943 (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
- I did find a few more just searching for "External Links", but that is mostly articles saying "look at the section below", which also needs fixing, but even that was only like 150 Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:20, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- I fear we may have edit conflicted, see above. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:19, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Citation source replacement with {{Cite Köppen-Geiger cc 2007}}
[edit]Hundreds (thousands?) of mountain articles use as a reference a paper titled "Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification" that was published in 2007 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Volume 11, Issue 5. Typically these use {{Cite journal}} passing in the appropriate values. However, the values were not consistently applied and so we have generated references that do not provide all the necessary information each time it's used nor is the information as complete as it could be. Thus, I created the template to provide complete information about the source reference so that it's consistent across Wikipedia. I then searched for "Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger" to find articles using this reference source and started replacing the citation source text with <ref name=KGcc2007>{{Cite Köppen-Geiger cc 2007}}</ref>. The search found other articles on rivers and human settlements also using this source reference. At this point, I have manually edited over 360 pages to make this change, the high majority being mountain articles but also a few articles about rivers and populated places. The search currently returns over 2800 results. So at this point I think it would be good if a bot could automate this edit to articles using this source reference. Typically in mountain articles, the citation is in a "Climate" section which usually begins with the sentence "Based on the [[Koppen climate classification]],". Other times it's in the lead section. Often the citation is using a named reference, typically "Peel" for the first author, although the paper does have three authors, which is why I chose to use KGcc2007 rather than Peel. Perhaps the reference could be named a bit different to denote it was a bot edit, e.g. <ref name=KGcc2007be>. I have been using "{{Cite Köppen-Geiger cc 2007}}" as the edit summary. RedWolf (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
- What is the need to mass replace all of these citations with this template? Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- pinging RedWolf —usernamekiran (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- In addition to what I already stated above, many of the raw source references are just using ISSN with a large range which if clicked would return a page with over 13,000 results (i.e. ISSN 1027-4606); I don't understand why editors gave a huge range. The template adds the DOI and BIBCODE as well as an archive link so there are direct links to the source paper. All uses of this source will have consistent and basically complete information. As well it provides all the other benefits with using a template (e.g. what links here for usage count). RedWolf (talk) 17:09, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- Using this template causes a no target error (see Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors)) when used in conjunction with short form references. Lake Nipisso as an example[2]. This could be avoided by whitelisting the template (which can be requested at Module talk:Footnotes), but that won't work as long as you're using #invoke for the cite (which short form refs just don't support). -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:26, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Web scrapping
[edit]Not sure a bot is best suited for this, but I'd like some form of web scrapper that would crawl this list https://www.elsevier.com/products/journals?query=&page=1&accessType=open-access&sortBy=relevance
And fetch the list of OA journals from Elsevier
- AACE Clinical Case Reports
- AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes
- AI Open
- AI Thermal Fluids
alongside a sample DOI from the journal, e.g.
- AACE Clinical Case Reports (10.1016/j.aace.2024.11.008)
- AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes (10.1016/j.aed.2025.12.012)
- AI Open (10.1016/j.aiopen.2025.01.002)
- AI Thermal Fluids (10.1016/j.aitf.2025.100024)
....
Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:09, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- This website loads its content on the client-side using JavaScript, which means scraping would require a browser automation tool such as Selenium, and would likely fail on many pages due to Cloudflare and other anti-bot protections. – DreamRimmer ■ 15:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Headbomb,
Journals
|
|---|
AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes (10.1016/j.aace.2024.12.006) AACE Endocrinology and Diabetes (10.1016/j.aed.2025.11.013) AI Open (10.1016/j.aiopen.2025.11.003) AI Thermal Fluids (10.1016/j.aitf.2025.100026) AJO International (10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100210) AJOG Global Reports (10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100580) AJPM Focus (10.1016/j.focus.2025.100454) ASPET Discovery (10.1016/j.aspetd.2025.100018) Academic Pathology (10.1016/j.acpath.2025.100229) Accounting Open (10.1016/j.accop.2025.100002) Accounting Theory and Practice (10.1016/j.accoth.2025.100007) Acta Adamantum (None) Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B (10.1016/j.apsb.2025.09.042) Acta Psychologica (10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106021) Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (10.1016/j.ad.2025.104511) Addiction Neuroscience (10.1016/j.addicn.2025.100246) Addictive Behaviors Reports (10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100644) Additive Manufacturing Frontiers (10.1016/j.cjmeam.2023.100101) Additive Manufacturing Frontiers (10.1016/j.amf.2025.200232) Additive Manufacturing Letters (10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100350) Advanced Agrochem (10.1016/j.aac.2025.12.001) Advanced Bionics (10.1016/j.abs.2025.12.001) Advanced Design Research (10.1016/j.ijadr.2025.08.003) Advanced Exercise and Health Science (10.1016/j.aehs.2025.11.005) Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research (10.1016/j.aiepr.2025.12.003) Advanced Interventional Materials (10.1016/j.advim.2025.100001) Advanced Light Materials (None) Advanced Membranes (10.1016/j.advmem.2025.100203) Advanced Nanocomposites (10.1016/j.adna.2025.11.003) Advanced Orthopaedics (10.1016/j.advop.2025.10.002) Advanced Powder Materials (10.1016/j.apmate.2025.100387) Advanced Scientific Instruments (None) Advanced Sensor and Energy Materials (10.1016/j.asems.2025.100167) Advances in Applied Energy (10.1016/j.adapen.2025.100258) Advances in Archaeomaterials (10.1016/j.aia.2025.100055) Advances in Bamboo Science (10.1016/j.bamboo.2025.100218) Advances in Biomarker Sciences and Technology (10.1016/j.abst.2025.12.005) Advances in Business and Management Research (None) Advances in Cancer Biology - Metastasis (10.1016/j.adcanc.2025.100163) Advances in Climate Change Research (10.1016/j.accre.2025.09.011) Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (10.1016/j.aime.2025.100177) Advances in Nutrition (10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100565) Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research (10.1016/j.aopr.2025.10.004) Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (10.1016/j.adoms.2025.100610) Advances in Patient-Reported Outcomes (10.1016/j.apro.2025.100303) Advances in Radiation Oncology (10.1016/j.adro.2025.101965) Advances in Redox Research (10.1016/j.arres.2025.100146) Advances in Sample Preparation (10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100227) Advances in Wind Engineering (10.1016/j.awe.2025.100085) Aerospace Traffic and Safety (10.1016/j.aets.2025.12.002) African Journal of Emergency Medicine (10.1016/j.afjem.2025.100905) Aging Brain (10.1016/j.nbas.2025.100155) Aging and Health Research (10.1016/j.ahr.2025.100260) Agricultural Environment and Sustainability (10.1016/j.ages.2025.100003) Agricultural Water Management (10.1016/j.agwat.2025.110029) Agriculture Communications (10.1016/j.agrcom.2025.100104) Agrifood Systems (None) Ain Shams Engineering Journal (10.1016/j.asej.2025.103887) Alexandria Engineering Journal (10.1016/j.aej.2025.11.043) Allergology International (10.1016/j.alit.2025.10.006) Allergy Medicine (10.1016/j.allmed.2025.100090) American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice (10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100675) American Journal of Medicine Open (10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100120) American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports (10.1016/j.ajoc.2025.102487) American Journal of Otolaryngology (10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104752) American Journal of Preventive Cardiology (10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101362) Ampersand (10.1016/j.amper.2025.100249) Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (10.1016/j.abd.2025.501251) Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (Versão em Português) (10.1016/j.abdp.2025.501221) Anales de Pediatría (10.1016/j.anpedi.2025.504029) Anales de Pediatría (English Edition) (10.1016/j.anpede.2025.504036) Animal Nutrition (10.1016/j.aninu.2025.11.002) Animals and Zoonoses (10.1016/s2950-2489(25)00096-3) Annals of 3D Printed Medicine (10.1016/j.stlm.2025.100225) Annals of Agricultural Sciences (10.1016/j.aoas.2025.100401) Annals of Hepatology (10.1016/j.aohep.2025.102111) Annals of Intensive Care (10.1186/s13613-025-01608-y) Annals of Thoracic Surgery Short Reports (10.1016/j.atssr.2025.06.024) Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights (10.1016/j.annale.2025.100189) Annals of Vascular Surgery - Brief Reports and Innovations (10.1016/j.avsurg.2025.100415) Appetite: Disordered Eating (None) Applications in Energy and Combustion Science (10.1016/j.jaecs.2025.100436) Applications in Engineering Science (10.1016/j.apples.2025.100278) Applied Animal Science (10.15232/aas.2025-02692) Applied Biomolecules: Bioactive Materials (None) Applied Catalysis O: Open (10.1016/j.catcom.2024.106892) Applied Catalysis O: Open (10.1016/j.apcato.2025.207083) Applied Computing and Geosciences (10.1016/j.acags.2025.100310) Applied Food Research (10.1016/j.afres.2025.101503) Applied Ocean Research (10.1016/j.apor.2025.104877) Applied Surface Science Advances (10.1016/j.apsadv.2025.100918) Apunts Sports Medicine (10.1016/j.apunts.2019.11.001) Apunts Sports Medicine (10.1016/j.apunsm.2025.100508) Aquaculture Reports (10.1016/j.aqrep.2025.103297) Aquaculture and Fisheries (10.1016/j.aaf.2025.05.005) Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus (10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100233) Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation (10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100497) Array (10.1016/j.array.2025.100627) Arthroplasty Today (10.1016/j.artd.2025.101882) Arthroscopy Techniques (10.1016/j.eats.2025.103921) Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation (10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101254) Artificial Intelligence Chemistry (10.1016/j.aichem.2025.100103) Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture (10.1016/j.aiia.2025.10.009) Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine (None) Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences (10.1016/j.aiig.2025.100171) Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences (10.1016/j.ailsci.2025.100137) Asia Pacific Management Review (10.1016/j.apmrv.2025.100389) Asia and the Global Economy (10.1016/j.aglobe.2025.100133) Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing (10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100828) Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology (10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100274) Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (10.1016/j.asmart.2025.09.003) Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (10.1016/j.ajps.2025.101105) Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (10.1016/j.ajsep.2025.10.002) Asian Journal of Surgery (10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.06.247) Asian Journal of Urology (10.1016/j.ajur.2025.04.008) Asian Nursing Research (10.1016/j.anr.2025.07.007) Asian Transport Studies (10.1016/j.eastsj.2025.100174) Aspects of Molecular Medicine (10.1016/j.amolm.2025.100093) Atención Primaria (10.1157/13053457) Atherosclerosis Plus (10.1016/s1567-5688(21)00014-3) Atherosclerosis Plus (10.1016/j.athplu.2025.12.004) Atmospheric Environment: X (10.1016/j.aeaoa.2025.100405) Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters (10.1016/j.aosl.2025.100655) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (10.1016/j.anzjph.2025.100300) Autonomous Transportation Research (10.1016/j.atres.2025.12.001) Avian Research (10.1016/j.avrs.2025.100324) BBA Advances (10.1016/j.bbadva.2025.100177) BJA Open (10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100503) Bacteriophage (10.1016/j.phage.2025.100001) Basic and Applied Ecology (10.1016/j.baae.2025.11.002) BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations (10.1016/j.tbench.2025.100247) Big Data and Earth System (10.1016/j.bdes.2025.100038) BioDesign Research (10.1016/j.bidere.2025.100049) Bioactive Materials (10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.12.027) Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports (10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.102408) Biofilm (10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100341) Biogeotechnics (10.1016/j.bgtech.2024.100157) Biological Control (10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105944) Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science (10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100651) Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry (10.1016/j.bionps.2025.100131) Biomass Futures (10.1016/j.bmf.2025.100008) Biomaterials and Biosystems (10.1016/j.bbiosy.2025.100122) Biomaterials and Living Medicine for Pharmaceutics (None) Biomedical Analysis (10.1016/j.bioana.2025.11.001) Biomedical Engineering Advances (10.1016/j.bea.2025.100204) Biomedical Instrumentation (10.1016/j.bmi.2025.100025) Biomedical Journal (10.1016/j.bj.2025.100838) Biomedical Technology (10.1016/j.bmt.2025.100113) Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy (10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118753) Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics (10.1016/j.birob.2025.100249) Biophysical Reports (10.1016/j.bpr.2025.100241) Biosafety and Health (10.1016/j.bsheal.2025.12.004) Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X (10.1016/j.biosx.2025.100727) Biotechnology Notes (10.1016/j.biotno.2025.10.002) Biotechnology Reports (10.1016/j.btre.2025.e00940) Blockchain: Research and Applications (10.1016/j.bcra.2025.100301) Blood Advances (10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017107) Blood Global Hematology (10.1016/j.bglo.2025.100045) Blood Immunology & Cellular Therapy (10.1016/j.bict.2025.100024) Blood Neoplasia (10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100176) Blood Red Cells & Iron (10.1016/j.brci.2025.100037) Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis (10.1016/j.bvth.2025.100112) Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio (10.1016/j.bsecv.2025.100477) Bone Reports (10.1016/j.bonr.2025.101889) Borsa Istanbul Review (10.1016/j.bir.2025.07.010) Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative (10.1016/j.bbii.2025.100146) Brain Disorders (10.1016/j.dscb.2025.100303) Brain Hemorrhages (10.1016/j.hest.2025.11.002) Brain Horizons (None) Brain Network Disorders (10.1016/j.bnd.2025.09.002) Brain Organoid and Systems Neuroscience Journal (10.1016/j.bosn.2025.100038) Brain Research Bulletin (10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111662) Brain Science and Child Development (None) Brain Stimulation (10.1016/j.brs.2025.11.009) Brain and Development Case Reports (10.1016/j.bdcasr.2025.100117) Brain and Environment (10.1016/j.braen.2025.100012) Brain and Spine (10.1016/j.bas.2025.105892) Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health (10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101151) Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844685) Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101730) Burns Open (10.1016/j.burnso.2025.100436) CASE (10.1016/j.case.2025.08.003) CHEST Critical Care (10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100213) CHEST Pulmonary (10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100192) CJC Open (10.1016/j.cjco.2025.12.012) CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease (10.1016/j.cjcpc.2025.05.005) CMI Communications (10.1016/j.cmicom.2025.105157) Cancer Neuroscience (None) Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy (10.1016/j.cpt.2025.03.005) Cancer Treatment and Research Communications (10.1016/s2213-0896(16)06001-1) Cancer Treatment and Research Communications (10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.101059) Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications (10.1016/j.carpta.2025.101062) Carbon Capture Science & Technology (10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100549) Carbon Neutral Technologies (10.1016/j.cnt.2025.100011) Carbon Resources Conversion (10.1016/j.crcon.2025.100313) Carbon Trends (10.1016/j.cartre.2025.100597) Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine: Interesting Cases (10.1016/j.crmic.2025.100131) Case Reports in Women's Health (10.1016/j.crwh.2025.e00770) Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering (10.1016/j.cscee.2025.101307) Case Studies in Construction Materials (10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05681) Case Studies in Thermal Engineering (10.1016/j.csite.2025.107519) Cell Death (10.1016/j.celld.2025.100001) Cell Genomics (10.1016/j.xgen.2025.101103) Cell Insight (10.1016/j.cellin.2025.100287) Cell Investigation (10.1016/j.clnves.2025.100050) Cell Reports (10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116693) Cell Reports Medicine (10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102506) Cell Reports Methods (10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101221) Cell Reports Physical Science (10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.103030) Cell Reports Sustainability (10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100604) Cell Stress and Chaperones (10.1016/j.cstres.2025.100139) Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (10.1016/j.jcmgh.2025.101622) Cement (10.1016/j.cement.2025.100162) Central Bank Review (10.1016/j.cbrev.2025.100228) Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior (10.1016/j.cccb.2025.100523) ChemPhysMater (10.1016/j.chphma.2025.10.007) Chemical Engineering Journal Advances (10.1016/j.ceja.2025.100989) Chemical Engineering Journal: Green and Sustainable (10.1016/j.cejgas.2025.100004) Chemical Physics Impact (10.1016/j.chphi.2025.100970) Chemical Thermodynamics and Thermal Analysis (10.1016/j.ctta.2025.100251) Chemistry of Inorganic Materials (10.1016/j.cinorg.2025.100135) Child Protection and Practice (10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100275) China Economic Quarterly International (10.1016/j.ceqi.2025.12.002) China Geology (10.31035/cg2023034) China Journal of Accounting Research (10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100457) China Welding (10.1016/j.cwe.2025.100015) Chinese General Practice Journal (10.1016/j.cgpj.2025.100086) Chinese Herbal Medicines (10.1016/j.chmed.2025.11.001) Chinese Journal of Aeronautics (10.1016/j.cja.2025.103670) Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry (10.1016/j.cjac.2025.100625) Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (10.1186/s10033-022-00816-y) Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (10.1016/j.cjprs.2025.09.001) Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment (10.1016/j.cjpre.2025.10.013) Chinese Journal of Traumatology (10.1016/j.cjtee.2025.10.003) Chinese Medical Journal Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (10.1016/j.pccm.2025.11.004) Chip (10.1016/j.chip.2025.100161) Circular Economy (10.1016/j.cec.2025.100172) Cirugía Cardiovascular (10.1016/j.circv.2025.11.007) Cities: Smarter Futures (None) City and Environment Interactions (10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100286) Cleaner Chemical Engineering (10.1016/j.clce.2025.100150) Cleaner Energy Systems (10.1016/j.cles.2025.100227) Cleaner Engineering and Technology (10.1016/j.clet.2025.101131) Cleaner Environmental Systems (10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100386) Cleaner Food Systems (10.1016/j.clfs.2025.100008) Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain (10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100280) Cleaner Manufacturing (None) Cleaner Materials (10.1016/j.clema.2025.100364) Cleaner Production Letters (10.1016/j.clpl.2025.100122) Cleaner Waste Systems (10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100462) Cleaner Water (10.1016/j.clwat.2025.100197) Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy (10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100196) Cleaner and Responsible Consumption (10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100376) Climate Change Ecology (10.1016/j.ecochg.2025.100105) Climate Physics and Atmospheric Science: Scientific Insights and Societal Challenges (None) Climate Risk Management (10.1016/j.crm.2025.100763) Climate Services (10.1016/j.cliser.2025.100631) Climate Smart Agriculture (10.1016/j.csag.2025.100094) Clinical Dental Journal (None) Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102224) Clinical Immunology Communications (10.1016/j.clicom.2025.12.002) Clinical Infection in Practice (10.1016/j.clinpr.2025.100528) Clinical Medicine (10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100541) Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (10.1016/j.cnp.2025.12.005) Clinical Nutrition Open Science (10.1016/j.yclnex.2020.09.001) Clinical Nutrition Open Science (10.1016/j.nutos.2025.12.007) Clinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders (10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100417) Clinical Surgical Oncology (10.1016/j.cson.2025.100115) Clinical Traditional Medicine and Pharmacology (10.1016/j.ctmp.2025.200256) Clinical Traditional Medicine and Pharmacology (10.1016/j.ccmp.2023.100127) Clinical Traditional Medicine and Pharmacology (None) Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology (10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101096) Clinical eHealth (10.1016/j.ceh.2025.10.003) Clinics (10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100855) Coacervates (None) Cognitive Robotics (10.1016/j.cogr.2025.11.002) Colloid and Interface Science Communications (10.1016/j.colcom.2025.100864) Communications in Transportation Research (10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100202) Comparative Immunology Reports (10.1016/j.fsirep.2023.100102) Comparative Immunology Reports (10.1016/j.cirep.2025.200267) Complementary Therapies in Medicine (10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103307) Composites Part C: Open Access (10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100685) Comprehensive Psychiatry (10.1016/j.comppsych.2025.152650) Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology (10.1016/j.cpnec.2025.100330) Computational Materials Today (10.1016/j.commt.2025.100045) Computational Particle Mechanics (10.1007/s40571-025-01105-w) Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (10.1016/j.csbj.2025.11.065) Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports (10.1016/j.csbr.2025.100078) Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update (10.1016/j.cmpbup.2025.100224) Computers & Education: X Reality (10.1016/j.cexr.2025.100126) Computers and Education Open (10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100323) Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100519) Computers in Human Behavior Reports (10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100905) Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans (10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100240) Construction and Building Materials in Transportation (None) Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101585) Continence (10.1016/j.cont.2025.102300) Continence Reports (10.1016/j.contre.2025.100100) Coordination Chemistry Research (10.1016/j.cocr.2025.100009) Corrosion Communications (10.1016/j.corcom.2025.03.004) Critical Care and Resuscitation (10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100149) Crop Design (10.1016/j.cropd.2025.100127) Crop and Environment (10.1016/j.crope.2025.09.003) Cure & Care (10.1016/j.ccwv.2025.100023) Current Developments in Nutrition (10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107611) Current Molecular Pharmacology (10.2174/0118761429377081250508081722) Current Pharmaceutical Analysis (10.1016/j.cpan.2025.12.001) Current Plant Biology (10.1016/j.cpb.2025.100568) Current Problems in Cancer: Case Reports (10.1016/j.cpccr.2025.100397) Current Problems in Surgery (10.1016/j.cpsurg.2025.101940) Current Proteomics (10.1016/j.curpro.2025.100051) Current Radiopharmaceuticals (10.1016/j.craph.2025.100014) Current Research in Behavioral Sciences (10.1016/j.crbeha.2025.100195) Current Research in Biotechnology (10.1016/j.crbiot.2025.100355) Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology (10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100256) Current Research in Environmental Sustainability (10.1016/j.crsust.2025.100280) Current Research in Food Science (10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101270) Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry (10.1016/j.crgsc.2025.100500) Current Research in Insect Science (10.1016/j.cris.2025.100119) Current Research in Microbial Sciences (10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100524) Current Research in Neurobiology (10.1016/j.crneur.2025.100154) Current Research in Parasitology and Vector-Borne Diseases (10.1016/s2667-114x(25)00103-7) Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery (10.1016/j.crphar.2025.100242) Current Research in Physiology (10.1016/j.crphys.2025.100181) Current Research in Structural Biology (10.1016/j.crstbi.2025.100174) Current Research in Toxicology (10.1016/j.crtox.2025.100271) Current Therapeutic Research (10.1016/j.curtheres.2025.100817) Cyber Security and Applications (10.1016/j.csa.2024.100065) Cyber-Physical Energy Systems (10.1016/j.cpes.2025.09.004) Data Science and Informetrics (10.1016/j.dsim.2025.12.001) Data Science and Management (None) Data Science and Management (10.1016/j.dsm.2025.12.001) Data and Information Management (10.1016/j.dim.2025.100120) Data in Brief (10.1016/j.dib.2025.112296) DeCarbon (10.1016/j.decarb.2025.100146) Decision Analytics Journal (10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100667) Decoding Infection and Transmission (10.1016/j.dcit.2025.100073) Deep Brain Stimulation (10.1016/j.jdbs.2025.12.001) Deep Resources Engineering (10.1016/j.deepre.2025.100234) Defence Technology (10.1016/j.dt.2025.07.008) Dental Research (10.1016/j.dtrs.2025.100009) Dentistry Review (10.1016/j.dentre.2025.100161) Desalination and Water Treatment (10.1016/j.dwt.2025.101591) Design Science Vision (10.1016/j.dsvis.2025.100002) Design and Artificial Intelligence (10.1016/j.daai.2025.100050) Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101654) Developments in the Built Environment (10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100824) Diabetes Epidemiology and Management (10.1016/j.deman.2025.100291) Dialogues in Health (10.1016/j.dialog.2025.100263) Digital Business (10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100147) Digital Chemical Engineering (10.1016/j.dche.2025.100284) Digital Chinese Medicine (10.1016/j.dcmed.2025.09.008) Digital Communications and Networks (10.1016/j.dcan.2025.05.003) Digital Dentistry Journal (10.1016/j.ddj.2025.100043) Digital Engineering (10.1016/j.dte.2025.100086) Digital Geography and Society (10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100153) Disease and Therapeutics (10.1016/j.dist.2025.100003) Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports (10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100398) EANM Innovation (10.1016/j.eanmi.2025.100020) EBES Sustainable Building (None) EJC Paediatric Oncology (10.1016/j.ejcped.2025.100481) EJC Skin Cancer (10.1016/j.ejcskn.2025.100773) EJVES Vascular Forum (10.1016/j.ejvssr.2019.11.001) EJVES Vascular Forum (10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2025.10.003) ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology (10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100277) ESMO Open (10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.106024) ESMO Rare Cancers (10.1016/j.esmorc.2025.100078) ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology (10.1016/j.esmorw.2025.100658) EULAR Rheumatology Open (10.1016/j.ero.2025.12.004) EURO Journal on Computational Optimization (10.1016/j.ejco.2025.100124) EURO Journal on Decision Processes (10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100063) EURO Journal on Decision Processes (10.1007/40070.2193-9446) EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics (10.1016/j.ejtl.2025.100173) Earth Critical Zone (10.1016/j.ecz.2025.100065) Earth Energy Science (10.1016/j.ees.2025.09.002) Earth History and Biodiversity (10.1016/j.hisbio.2025.100036) Earth System (None) Earth System Governance (10.1016/j.esg.2025.100306) Earthquake Research Advances (10.1016/j.eqrea.2025.100442) Earthquake Science (10.1016/j.eqs.2025.08.001) Eco-Environment & Health (10.1016/j.eehl.2025.100204) Ecological Indicators (10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114491) Ecological Informatics (10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103547) Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.119561) Educación Médica (10.1016/j.edumed.2025.101100) Egyptian Informatics Journal (10.1016/j.eij.2025.100873) Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research (10.1016/j.ejar.2025.07.003) Electrochemistry Communications (10.1016/j.elecom.2025.108093) Electronic Journal of Biotechnology (10.1016/j.ejbt.2025.100699) Emerging Animal Species (10.1016/j.eas.2025.100058) Emerging Contaminants (10.1016/j.emcon.2025.100614) Emerging Trends in Drugs, Addictions, and Health (10.1016/j.etdah.2025.100208) Endocrine and Metabolic Science (10.1016/j.endmts.2025.100284) Energetic Materials Frontiers (10.1016/j.enmf.2025.12.001) Energy & Environmental Sustainability (10.1016/j.eesus.2025.100043) Energy Conversion and Management: X (10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101451) Energy Efficiency First (10.1016/j.eef.2025.100009) Energy Geoscience (10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100516) Energy Nexus (10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100614) Energy Reports (10.1016/j.egyr.2025.12.030) Energy Reviews (10.1016/j.enrev.2025.100165) Energy Storage and Saving (10.1016/j.enss.2025.07.001) Energy Strategy Reviews (10.1016/j.esr.2025.102005) Energy and AI (10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100666) Energy and Built Environment (10.1016/j.enbenv.2024.07.002) EngMedicine (10.1016/j.engmed.2025.100113) Engineering (10.1016/j.eng.2025.11.031) Engineering Microbiology (10.1016/j.engmic.2025.100257) Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102250) Environment International (10.1016/j.envint.2025.109936) Environmental Advances (10.1016/j.envadv.2025.100679) Environmental Challenges (10.1016/j.envc.2025.101389) Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology (10.1016/j.enceco.2025.11.023) Environmental Functional Materials (10.1016/j.efmat.2025.12.001) Environmental Management: Economics and Policy (None) Environmental Management: Emerging Contaminants (None) Environmental Management: Engineering and Technology (None) Environmental Management: Smart Solutions (None) Environmental Nexus (10.1016/j.enex.2025.100002) Environmental Pollution and Management (10.1016/j.epm.2025.09.006) Environmental Science and Ecotechnology (10.1016/j.ese.2025.100650) Environmental Surfaces and Interfaces (10.1016/j.esi.2025.12.003) Environmental Technology & Innovation (10.1016/j.eti.2025.104681) Environmental and Experimental Botany (10.1016/j.envexpbot.2025.106298) Environmental and Sustainability Indicators (10.1016/j.indic.2025.101033) Epidemics (10.1016/j.epidem.2025.100876) Epilepsy & Behavior Reports (10.1016/j.ebcr.2019.03.001) Epilepsy & Behavior Reports (10.1016/j.ebr.2025.100841) Equity Neuroscience (10.1016/j.neuros.2025.100019) European Journal of Cancer: Supplement (10.1016/j.ejcsup.2021.06.003) European Journal of Cell Biology (10.1016/j.ejcb.2025.151526) European Journal of Medical Genetics (10.1016/j.ejmg.2025.105065) European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports (10.1016/j.ejmcr.2025.100315) European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X (10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100437) European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107392) European Journal of Radiology Artificial Intelligence (10.1016/j.ejrai.2025.100060) European Journal of Radiology Open (10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100717) European Poultry Science (10.1016/j.eups.2025.100013) European Research on Management and Business Economics (10.1016/j.iedeen.2025.100295) European Transport Studies (10.1016/j.ets.2025.100013) European Urology Open Science (10.1016/s1569-9056(19)35017-1) European Urology Open Science (10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.014) European Urology Open Science (None) Evolving Earth (10.1016/j.eve.2025.100104) Examples and Counterexamples (10.1016/j.exco.2025.100211) Experimental Gerontology (10.1016/j.exger.2025.112994) Experimental and Molecular Pathology (10.1016/j.yexmp.2025.105016) Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy (10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100688) Extracellular Vesicle (10.1016/j.vesic.2025.100100) Extracorporeal Life Support (10.21037/ecls.2017.04.01) Extreme Materials (10.1016/j.exm.2025.09.001) Eye Discovery (10.1016/j.edisc.2025.100005) F&S Reports (10.1016/j.xfre.2025.07.009) Farmacia Hospitalaria (10.1016/j.farma.2025.10.018) Farming System (10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100182) Fermented Foods (10.1016/j.ferfo.2025.100003) Finance Research Open (10.1016/j.finr.2025.100084) FirePhysChem (10.1016/j.fpc.2025.12.004) First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal (10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100102) Food Chemistry Advances (10.1016/j.focha.2025.101199) Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences (10.1016/j.fochms.2025.100339) Food Chemistry: X (10.1016/j.fochx.2025.103406) Food Hydrocolloids for Health (10.1016/j.fhfh.2025.100261) Food Nutrition (10.1016/j.fnutr.2025.100051) Food Physics (10.1016/j.foodp.2025.100069) Food Wellness (10.1016/j.foodw.2025.100035) Food and Waterborne Parasitology (10.1016/j.fawpar.2025.e00306) Foot & Ankle Surgery: Techniques, Reports & Cases (10.1016/j.fastrc.2025.100583) Forces in Mechanics (10.1016/j.finmec.2025.100345) Forensic Science International: Reports (10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100441) Forensic Science International: Synergy (10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100654) Forensic Sciences Research (10.1093/fsr/owaf045) Forest Ecosystems (10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100389) Franklin Open (10.1016/j.fraope.2025.100450) Frontiers of Architectural Research (10.1016/j.foar.2025.09.001) Fuel Communications (10.1016/j.jfueco.2025.100152) Fuel Processing Technology (10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108382) Fundamental Plasma Physics (10.1016/j.fpp.2025.100100) Fundamental Research (10.1016/j.fmre.2025.11.017) Future Batteries (10.1016/j.fub.2025.100133) Future Foods (10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100869) Future Healthcare Journal (10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100492) Gaceta Sanitaria (10.1016/j.gaceta.2025.102549) Gastro Hep Advances (10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100813) Gastroenterology & Endoscopy (10.1016/j.gande.2025.09.001) Genes & Diseases (10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101669) Genetics in Medicine Open (10.1016/j.gimo.2025.103472) Genomics (10.1016/j.ygeno.2025.111172) Geodata and AI (10.1016/j.geoai.2025.100030) Geoderma (10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117655) Geodesy and Geodynamics (10.1016/j.geog.2025.10.002) Geography and Sustainability (10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100400) Geohazard Mechanics (10.1016/s2949-7418(25)00066-4) Geomatica (10.1016/j.geomat.2025.100090) Geopsychiatry (10.1016/j.geopsy.2025.100038) Geoscience Frontiers (10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102215) Geosystems and Geoenvironment (10.1016/j.geogeo.2025.100471) Geriatric Nursing: Asia (None) Giant (10.1016/j.giant.2025.100372) Glial Health Research (10.1016/j.ghres.2025.100012) Global Challenges & Regional Science (10.1016/j.gcrs.2025.100023) Global Ecology and Conservation (10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e04014) Global Energy Interconnection (10.1016/j.gloei.2025.11.001) Global Environmental Change Advances (10.1016/j.gecadv.2025.100029) Global Epidemiology (10.1016/j.gloepi.2025.100236) Global Health Journal (10.1016/j.glohj.2025.11.001) Global Health Research and Policy (10.1186/s41256-025-00464-4) Global Medical Genetics (10.1016/j.gmg.2025.100084) Global Neurological Insights (None) Global Pediatrics (10.1016/j.gpeds.2025.100303) Global Transitions (10.1016/j.glt.2025.10.004) Global and Earth Surface Processes Change (10.1016/j.gespch.2025.100008) Glycoscience & Therapy (10.1016/j.glycos.2025.100019) Grain & Oil Science and Technology (10.1016/j.gaost.2025.08.002) Graphical Models (10.1016/j.gmod.2025.101309) Green Analytical Chemistry (10.1016/j.greeac.2025.100315) Green Carbon (10.1016/j.greenca.2025.04.002) Green Chemical Engineering (10.1016/j.gce.2024.10.004) Green Energy & Environment (10.1016/j.gee.2025.11.005) Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation (10.1016/j.geits.2025.100386) Green Energy and Resources (10.1016/j.gerr.2025.100162) Green Synthesis and Catalysis (10.1016/j.gresc.2025.12.002) Green Technologies and Sustainability (10.1016/j.grets.2025.100320) Green and Smart Mining Engineering (10.1016/j.gsme.2025.10.007) Gut Microbiology (10.1016/j.gutmic.2025.100002) Gut Microbiome and Health (10.1016/j.gmh.2025.100001) Gynecologic Oncology Reports (10.1016/j.gynor.2014.05.003) Gynecologic Oncology Reports (10.1016/j.gore.2025.102013) HardwareX (10.1016/j.ohx.2025.e00726) Health Care Transitions (10.1016/j.hctj.2025.100124) Health Policy OPEN (10.1016/j.hpopen.2025.100159) Health Policy in Asia (None) Health Sciences Review (10.1016/j.hsr.2025.100241) Healthcare Analytics (10.1016/j.health.2025.100442) Healthcare and Rehabilitation (10.1016/j.hcr.2025.100054) Heart Rhythm O2 (10.1016/j.hroo.2025.11.027) HeartRhythm Case Reports (10.1016/j.hrcr.2025.11.023) Heavy Rail (None) Heliyon (10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e44270) Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (10.1016/j.hjc.2025.12.001) Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy (10.1016/j.htct.2025.106233) High-Confidence Computing (10.1016/j.hcc.2025.100338) High-speed Railway (10.1016/j.hspr.2025.11.004) Horticultural Plant Journal (10.1016/j.hpj.2025.08.017) Human Factors in Healthcare (10.1016/j.hfh.2025.100122) Human Genetics and Genomics Advances (10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100552) Human Nutrition & Metabolism (10.1016/j.jnim.2019.100107) Human Nutrition & Metabolism (10.1016/j.hnm.2025.200353) Human Pathology Reports (10.1016/j.ehpc.2021.200474) Human Pathology Reports (10.1016/j.hpr.2025.300810) Human Settlements and Sustainability (10.1016/j.hssust.2025.10.002) Hybrid Advances (10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100579) HydroResearch (10.1016/j.hydres.2025.11.001) Hydrogen Economy & Engineering (None) Hygiene and Environmental Health Advances (10.1016/j.heha.2025.100161) IATSS Research (10.1016/j.iatssr.2025.12.001) IBRO Neuroscience Reports (10.1016/j.ibror.2020.08.004) IBRO Neuroscience Reports (10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.12.004) ICT Express (10.1016/j.icte.2025.09.011) IDCases (10.1016/j.idcr.2025.e02450) IFAC-PapersOnLine (10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.06.022) IHJ Cardiovascular Reports (10.1016/j.ihjccr.2023.08.001) IHJ Cardiovascular Reports (10.1016/j.ihjcvr.2025.12.001) IIMB Management Review (10.1016/j.iimb.2025.100618) IJC Heart & Vasculature (10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.08.004) IJC Heart & Vasculature (10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101846) IJID One Health (10.1016/j.ijidoh.2025.100094) IJID Regions (10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100807) IPEM-Translation (10.1016/j.ipemt.2025.100034) ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (10.1016/j.ophoto.2025.100110) Immuno-Oncology and Technology (10.1016/j.iotech.2025.101077) ImmunoInformatics (10.1016/j.immuno.2025.100062) Immunobiology (10.1016/j.imbio.2025.153147) In Silico Research in Biomedicine (10.1016/j.insi.2025.100154) Indian Heart Journal (10.1016/j.ihj.2025.11.053) Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal (10.1016/j.ipej.2025.12.019) Indoor Environments (10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100147) Industrial Crops and Products (10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.122503) Infection Prevention in Practice (10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100488) Infection, Genetics and Evolution (10.1016/j.meegid.2025.105864) Infectious Disease Modelling (10.1016/j.idm.2025.12.003) Infectious Medicine (10.1016/j.imj.2025.100230) Informatics and Health (10.1016/j.infoh.2025.08.001) Informatics in Medicine Unlocked (10.1016/j.imu.2025.101722) Information Geography (10.1016/j.infgeo.2025.100036) Information Processing in Agriculture (10.1016/j.inpa.2025.12.004) Innovation and Green Development (10.1016/j.igd.2025.100312) Innovative Practice in Breast Health (10.1016/j.ibreh.2024.100028) Integrated Diagnostics (None) Integrative Medicine Research (10.1016/j.imr.2025.101260) Intelligence-Based Medicine (10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100331) Intelligent Climate and Eco-Environment (10.1016/j.icee.2025.100001) Intelligent Geoengineering (10.1016/j.ige.2025.10.001) Intelligent Hospital (10.1016/j.inhs.2025.100029) Intelligent Medicine (10.1016/j.imed.2025.06.003) Intelligent Oncology (10.1016/j.intonc.2025.12.003) Intelligent Pharmacy (10.1016/j.ipha.2025.05.002) Intelligent Sports and Health (10.1016/j.ish.2025.10.003) Intelligent Surgery (10.1016/j.isurg.2025.12.002) Intelligent Systems with Applications (10.1016/j.eswax.2020.100040) Intelligent Systems with Applications (10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200612) Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery (10.1016/j.inat.2025.102165) International Dental Journal (10.1016/j.identj.2025.103994) International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance (10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100630) International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife (10.1016/j.ijppaw.2025.101182) International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology (10.1016/j.jandt.2025.09.002) International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences (10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100940) International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation (10.1016/j.jag.2025.105026) International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention (10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100087) International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention (10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200549) International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease (10.1016/j.ijcchd.2025.100642) International Journal of Cardiology Innovations (None) International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology (10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100661) International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering (10.1016/j.ijcce.2025.11.004) International Journal of Educational Research Open (10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100567) International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems (10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.111442) International Journal of Electrochemical Science (10.1016/j.ijoes.2025.101278) International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks (10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.11.003) International Journal of Infectious Diseases (10.1016/j.ijid.2025.108188) International Journal of Information Management Data Insights (10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100384) International Journal of Innovation Studies (10.1016/j.ijis.2025.09.004) International Journal of Intelligent Networks (10.1016/j.ijin.2025.11.005) International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture (10.1016/j.ijlmm.2025.07.009) International Journal of Lung Cancer (None) International Journal of Medical Microbiology (10.1016/j.ijmm.2025.151697) International Journal of Mining Science and Technology (10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.10.006) International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering (10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2025.100719) International Journal of Nursing Sciences (10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.12.017) International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances (10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100457) International Journal of Particle Therapy (10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.101289) International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X (10.1016/j.ijpx.2025.100467) International Journal of Sediment Research (10.1016/s1001-6279(25)00102-7) International Journal of Surgery Case Reports (10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.112132) International Journal of Thermofluids (10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101516) International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology (10.1016/j.ijtst.2024.10.005) International Psychogeriatrics (10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100088) International Review of Economics & Finance (10.1016/j.iref.2025.104813) International Soil and Water Conservation Research (10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.07.001) Internet Interventions (10.1016/j.invent.2025.100897) Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems (10.1016/j.iotcps.2025.05.001) Interventional Pain Medicine (10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100722) Intestinal Failure (10.1016/j.intf.2025.100343) Invention Disclosure (10.1016/j.inv.2025.100038) Italian Journal of Agronomy (10.1016/j.ijagro.2025.100078) JAACAP Open (10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.06.001) JAAD Case Reports (10.1016/j.jdcr.2025.10.059) JAAD International (10.1016/j.jdin.2025.08.013) JAAD Reviews (10.1016/j.jdrv.2025.12.001) JACC: Advances (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102487) JACC: Asia (10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.09.005) JACC: Basic to Translational Science (10.1016/j.jacbts.2025.101433) JACC: CardioOncology (10.1016/j.jaccao.2025.10.001) JACC: Case Reports (10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.105789) JACEP Open (10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100277) JADA Foundational Science (10.1016/j.jfscie.2025.100060) JAND Global Reports (10.1016/j.jaglob.2025.100001) JAPhA Pharmacotherapy (10.1016/j.japhar.2025.100025) JAPhA Practice Innovations (10.1016/j.japhpi.2025.100084) JCA Advances (10.1016/j.jcadva.2025.100195) JCIS Open (10.1016/j.jciso.2025.100163) JDS Communications (10.1016/s2666-9102(25)00224-8) JEM International (10.1016/j.jemint.2025.100001) JEM Reports (10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100201) JFO Open Ophthalmology (10.1016/j.jfop.2025.100184) JHEP Reports (10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101660) JHLT Open (10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100440) JID Innovations (10.1016/j.xjidi.2025.100436) JOS Case Reports (10.1016/j.joscr.2025.04.002) JPRAS Open (10.1016/j.jpra.2025.10.020) JSAMS Plus (10.1016/j.jsampl.2025.100132) JSES International (10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.017) JSES International (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.09.014) JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.09.001) JTCVS Open (10.1016/j.xjon.2025.09.014) JTCVS Structural and Endovascular (10.1016/j.xjse.2025.100088) JTCVS Techniques (10.1016/j.xjtc.2025.09.017) JTO Clinical and Research Reports (10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100936) JVS-Vascular Insights (10.1016/j.jvsvi.2025.100309) JVS-Vascular Science (10.1016/j.jvssci.2025.100396) Japanese Dental Science Review (10.1016/j.jdsr.2025.11.005) Jornal de Pediatria (10.1016/j.jped.2025.101457) Journal of Advanced Joining Processes (10.1016/j.jajp.2025.100366) Journal of Advanced Research (10.1016/j.jare.2025.03.007) Journal of Affective Disorders Reports (10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100997) Journal of Agriculture and Food Research (10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102565) Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global (10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100613) Journal of Allergy and Hypersensitivity Diseases (10.1016/j.jahd.2025.100060) Journal of Alloys and Metallurgical Systems (10.1016/j.jalmes.2025.100231) Journal of Anesthesia and Translational Medicine (10.1016/j.jatmed.2025.10.002) Journal of Applied Poultry Research (10.1016/j.japr.2025.100657) Journal of Aquatic Plants (10.1016/j.jap.2025.100002) Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity (10.1016/j.japb.2025.06.009) Journal of Asian Earth Sciences: X (10.1016/j.jaesx.2025.100213) Journal of Automation and Intelligence (10.1016/j.jai.2025.11.003) Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine (10.1016/j.jaim.2025.101241) Journal of Biological Chemistry (10.1016/j.jbc.2025.111003) Journal of Biomechanics Open (10.1016/j.jbmo.2025.100001) Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts (10.1016/j.jobab.2025.11.004) Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity (10.1016/j.jobb.2025.12.003) Journal of Bone Oncology (10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100735) Journal of CO2 Utilization (10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103290) Journal of Cardiac Failure - Intersections (10.1016/j.yjcafi.2025.12.001) Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101939) Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation (10.1016/j.jcjp.2025.100247) Journal of Chromatography Open (10.1016/j.jcoa.2025.100275) Journal of Clinical Insight (10.1016/j.jci.2025.100001) Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases (10.1016/j.jctube.2025.100575) Journal of Clinical Virology Plus (10.1016/j.jcvp.2025.100239) Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology (10.1016/j.jcte.2025.100426) Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology: Case Reports (10.1016/j.jecr.2025.100206) Journal of Computational Algebra (10.1016/j.jaca.2025.100041) Journal of Computational Mathematics and Data Science (10.1016/j.jcmds.2025.100130) Journal of Creativity (10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100117) Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research (10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100101) Journal of Dairy Science (10.3168/jds.2025-27342) Journal of Dental Sciences (10.1016/j.jds.2025.12.017) Journal of Dermatologic Science and Cosmetic Technology (10.1016/j.jdsct.2025.100127) Journal of Digital Economy (10.1016/j.jdec.2025.11.008) Journal of Dynamic Disasters (10.1016/j.jdd.2025.100040) Journal of Economic Criminology (10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100199) Journal of Economy and Technology (10.1016/j.ject.2025.07.001) Journal of Electronic Science and Technology (10.1016/j.jnlest.2025.100344) Journal of Electronic Science and Technology (None) Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders (10.1016/j.jeud.2025.100140) Journal of Energy Infrastructure (None) Journal of Engineering Research (10.1016/j.jer.2024.10.002) Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness (10.1016/j.jesf.2025.11.004) Journal of Food Composition and Analysis (10.1016/j.jfca.2025.108816) Journal of Food Protection (10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100685) Journal of Functional Foods (10.1016/j.jff.2025.107129) Journal of Future Foods (10.1016/j.jfutfo.2024.09.006) Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Open (None) Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100636) Journal of Ginseng Research (10.1016/j.jgr.2025.100970) Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (10.1016/j.jgar.2025.11.002) Journal of Government and Economics (10.1016/j.jge.2025.100159) Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online (10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100902) Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances (10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100964) Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters (10.1016/j.hazl.2025.100170) Journal of Hazardous Materials: Organics (10.1016/j.hazmo.2025.100009) Journal of Hazardous Materials: Plastics (10.1016/j.hazmp.2025.100026) Journal of Holistic Integrative Pharmacy (10.1016/j.jhip.2025.11.004) Journal of Hydrology X (10.1016/j.hydroa.2025.100212) Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies (10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102973) Journal of ISAKOS (10.1016/j.jisako.2025.101040) Journal of Industrial Safety (10.1016/j.jinse.2025.04.002) Journal of Infection (10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106664) Journal of Infection and Public Health (10.1016/j.jiph.2025.103116) Journal of Information and Intelligence (10.1016/j.jiixd.2025.12.005) Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience (10.1016/j.iintel.2025.100194) Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (10.1016/j.jik.2025.100924) Journal of Integrative Agriculture (10.1016/j.jia.2025.11.029) Journal of Integrative Horticulture (None) Journal of Intensive Medicine (10.1016/j.jointm.2025.10.003) Journal of International Ceramic Studies (10.1016/j.joics.2025.100034) Journal of Interventional Medicine (10.1016/j.jimed.2023.12.004) Journal of Ionic Liquids (10.1016/j.jil.2025.100183) Journal of Joint Surgery and Research (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2025.10.001) Journal of Lipid Research (10.1016/j.jlr.2025.100954) Journal of Liver Transplantation (10.1016/j.liver.2025.100305) Journal of Magnesium and Alloys (10.1016/j.jma.2025.11.014) Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open (10.1016/j.jmro.2025.100214) Journal of Management Science and Engineering (10.1016/j.jmse.2025.11.001) Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab (10.1016/j.clinms.2020.10.002) Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab (10.1016/j.jmsacl.2025.08.001) Journal of Materials Research and Technology (10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.12.072) Journal of Materiomics (10.1016/j.jmat.2025.101130) Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health (10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100220) Journal of Membrane Science Letters (10.1016/j.memlet.2025.100107) Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection (10.1016/j.jmii.2025.05.007) Journal of Migration and Health (10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100386) Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology Plus (10.1016/j.jmccpl.2025.100828) Journal of Mood & Anxiety Disorders (10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100165) Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience (10.1016/j.jnggs.2025.09.004) Journal of Natural Pesticide Research (10.1016/j.napere.2025.100173) Journal of Neurorestoratology (10.1016/j.jnrt.2025.100252) Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids: X (10.1016/j.nocx.2025.100222) Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity (10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100700) Journal of Optometry (10.1016/j.optom.2025.100589) Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.10.027) Journal of Orthopaedic Reports (10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100511) Journal of Orthopaedic Translation (10.1016/j.jot.2025.10.002) Journal of Palaeogeography (10.1016/j.jop.2025.100314) Journal of Pathology Informatics (10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100532) Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports (10.1016/j.epsc.2025.103158) Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open (10.1016/j.yjpso.2025.100251) Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis (10.1016/j.jpha.2025.101513) Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis Open (10.1016/j.jpbao.2025.100098) Journal of Pharmacological Sciences (10.1016/j.jphs.2025.12.005) Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology (10.1016/j.jpap.2025.100271) Journal of Physiotherapy (10.1016/j.jphys.2025.11.011) Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering (10.1016/j.jpse.2025.100265) Journal of Polar Science and Engineering (None) Journal of Power Sources Advances (10.1016/j.powera.2025.100197) Journal of Public Transportation (10.1016/j.jpubtr.2025.100146) Journal of Pyrogeography (10.1016/j.pyro.2025.100003) Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences (10.1016/j.jrras.2025.102088) Journal of Railway Science and Technology (10.1016/j.jrst.2025.08.001) Journal of Resource Insects (10.1016/j.jori.2025.100006) Journal of Responsible Technology (10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100144) Journal of Road Engineering (10.1016/j.jreng.2025.07.001) Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.01.047) Journal of Safety Science and Resilience (10.1016/j.jnlssr.2025.100234) Journal of Safety and Sustainability (10.1016/j.jsasus.2025.08.001) Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices (10.1016/j.jsamd.2025.101079) Journal of Sea Research (10.1016/j.seares.2025.102651) Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty (10.1177/24715492251348793) Journal of Sport and Health Science (10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101113) Journal of Sports Medicine, Animal Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy (10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100024) Journal of Sports Medicine, Animal Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy (None) Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases (10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108525) Journal of Structural Biology: X (10.1016/j.yjsbx.2025.100141) Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences (10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.12.001) Journal of Tissue Viability (10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100982) Journal of Trace Elements and Minerals (10.1016/j.jtemin.2025.100273) Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences (10.1016/j.jtcms.2025.12.006) Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine (10.1016/j.jtcme.2025.12.001) Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) (10.1016/j.jtte.2025.10.002) Journal of Translational Autoimmunity (10.1016/j.jtauto.2025.100334) Journal of Urban Management (10.1016/j.jum.2025.04.002) Journal of Urban Mobility (10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100174) Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques (10.1016/j.jvsc.2016.02.005) Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques (10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.102078) Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders (10.1016/j.jvsv.2025.102361) Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Research (None) Journal of Virus Eradication (10.1016/j.jve.2025.100620) Journal of Web Semantics (10.1016/j.websem.2025.100874) Journal of the Air Transport Research Society (10.1016/j.jatrs.2025.100094) Journal of the European Meteorological Society (10.1016/j.jemets.2025.100026) Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (10.1016/j.jfma.2025.12.006) Journal of the National Cancer Center (10.1016/j.jncc.2025.12.003) Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100291) Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (10.1016/j.jscai.2025.104000) KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering (10.1016/j.kscej.2025.100358) Kidney International Case Reports (None) Kidney International Reports (10.1016/j.ekir.2025.11.010) Kidney Medicine (10.1016/j.xkme.2025.101175) Kuwait Journal of Science (10.1016/j.kjs.2025.100485) LWT (10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118900) LabMed Discovery (10.1016/j.lmd.2025.100107) Landscape Architecture and Sustainability (10.1016/j.las.2025.100021) Language and Health (10.1016/j.laheal.2025.100071) Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery (10.1016/j.lers.2025.10.001) Latin American Journal of Central Banking (10.1016/j.latcb.2024.100142) Letters in Drug Design & Discovery (10.1016/j.lddd.2025.100196) Leukemia Research Reports (10.1016/j.lrr.2025.100553) Liver Research (10.1016/j.livres.2025.11.004) Machine Learning with Applications (10.1016/j.mlwa.2025.100823) Magnetic Medicine (10.1016/j.magmed.2025.100051) Magnetic Resonance Letters (10.1016/j.mrl.2025.200256) Maritime Transport Research (10.1016/j.martra.2025.100146) Mass Gathering Medicine (10.1016/j.mgmed.2025.100038) Materials & Design (10.1016/j.matdes.2025.115355) Materials Letters: X (10.1016/j.mlblux.2025.100251) Materials Reports: Energy (10.1016/j.matre.2025.100399) Materials Science for Energy Technologies (10.1016/j.mset.2025.12.001) Materials Today Advances (10.1016/j.mtadv.2025.100678) Materials Today Bio (10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102677) Materials Today Catalysis (10.1016/j.mtcata.2025.100134) Materials Today Electronics (10.1016/j.mtelec.2025.100186) Materials Today Quantum (10.1016/j.mtquan.2025.100055) Materials Today Sustainability (10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101271) Matrix Biology Plus (10.1016/j.mbplus.2025.100188) Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100310) Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes (10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100682) Measurement and Evaluations in Cancer Care (10.1016/j.ymecc.2025.100024) Measurement: Digitalization (10.1016/j.meadig.2025.100020) Measurement: Energy (10.1016/j.meaene.2025.100083) Measurement: Food (10.1016/j.meafoo.2025.100267) Measurement: Sensors (10.1016/j.measen.2025.101982) Mechanobiology in Medicine (10.1016/j.mbm.2025.100166) Medical Mycology Case Reports (10.1016/j.mmcr.2025.100755) Medical Reports (10.1016/j.hmedic.2025.100403) Medicina Clínica Práctica (10.1016/j.mcpsp.2025.100525) Medicine Plus (10.1016/j.medp.2025.100105) Medicine in Drug Discovery (10.1016/j.medidd.2025.100241) Medicine in Microecology (10.1016/j.medmic.2025.100160) Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices (10.1016/j.medntd.2025.100415) Medicine in Omics (10.1016/j.meomic.2025.100050) Memories - Materials, Devices, Circuits and Systems (10.1016/j.memori.2025.100137) Meta-Radiology (10.1016/j.metrad.2025.100173) Metabolic Engineering Communications (10.1016/j.mec.2025.e00266) Metabolism Open (10.1016/j.metop.2025.100430) Metabolism and Diseases (10.1016/j.metdis.2025.100001) Methods in Psychology (10.1016/j.metip.2025.100223) MethodsX (10.1016/j.mex.2025.103749) Micro and Nano Engineering (10.1016/j.mne.2025.100340) Mitochondrial Communications (10.1016/j.mitoco.2025.04.001) Molecular & Cellular Proteomics (10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.101468) Molecular Chemistry & Engineering (10.1016/j.mochem.2025.100035) Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports (10.1016/j.ymgmr.2025.101269) Molecular Metabolism (10.1016/j.molmet.2025.102277) Molecular Therapy Advances (10.1016/j.omtm.2025.101645) Molecular Therapy Advances (10.1016/j.omta.2025.201653) Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids (10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102791) Molecular Therapy: Oncology (10.1016/j.omto.2023.100741) Molecular Therapy: Oncology (10.1016/j.omton.2025.201094) Molecular and Cellular Probes (10.1016/j.mcp.2025.102054) Molecules and Cells (10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100301) Mucosal Immunology (10.1016/j.mucimm.2025.08.004) Multimodal Transportation (10.1016/j.multra.2025.100285) NAM Journal (10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100068) NFS Journal (10.1016/j.nfs.2025.100254) Nano Biomedicine and Engineering (10.1016/j.nbe.2025.100041) Nano Materials Science (10.1016/j.nanoms.2025.11.007) Nano TransMed (10.1016/j.ntm.2025.100100) Nano Trends (10.1016/j.nwnano.2025.100173) Natural Gas Industry B (10.1016/j.ngib.2025.11.004) Natural Hazards Research (10.1016/j.nhres.2025.02.005) Natural Language Processing Journal (10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100195) Nature-Based Solutions (10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100297) NefroPlus (10.1016/s1888-9700(25)00025-8) Nefrología (10.1016/j.nefro.2025.501366) Nefrología (English Edition) (10.1016/j.nefroe.2025.501370) Neoplasia (10.1016/j.neo.2025.101264) NeuroImage (10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121643) NeuroImage Stroke (None) NeuroImage: Clinical (10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103926) NeuroImage: Reports (10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100304) NeuroMarkers (10.1016/j.neumar.2025.100147) Neurobiology of Disease (10.1016/j.nbd.2025.107222) Neurobiology of Pain (10.1016/j.ynpai.2025.100207) Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms (10.1016/j.nbscr.2025.100138) Neurobiology of Stress (10.1016/j.ynstr.2025.100773) Neuroimmunology Reports (10.1016/j.nerep.2025.100267) Neurology Perspectives (10.1016/j.neurop.2025.100215) Neurología (10.1016/j.nrl.2025.501943) Neurología (English Edition) (10.1016/j.nrleng.2025.101893) Neuroscience Applied (10.1016/j.nsa.2025.106878) Neuroscience Informatics (10.1016/j.neuri.2025.100242) Neuroscience Research (10.1016/j.neures.2025.105006) Neurotherapeutics (10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00811) New Biotechnology (10.1016/j.nbt.2025.11.011) New Crops (10.1016/j.ncrops.2025.100084) New Microbes and New Infections (10.1016/j.nmni.2025.101682) New Techno-Humanities (10.1016/j.techum.2025.10.005) Next Bioengineering (10.1016/j.nxbio.2025.100011) Next Chemical Engineering (10.1016/j.nxcen.2025.100017) Next Energy (10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100488) Next Materials (10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101503) Next Nanotechnology (10.1016/j.nxnano.2025.100321) Next Sustainability (10.1016/j.nxsust.2025.100237) Nexus (10.1016/j.ynexs.2025.100115) Non-coding RNA Research (10.1016/j.ncrna.2025.11.006) North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ) (10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100827) Nuclear Analysis (10.1016/j.nucana.2025.100204) Nuclear Engineering and Technology (10.1016/j.net.2025.104059) Nuclear Materials and Energy (10.1016/j.nme.2025.102048) Nuclear Physics B (10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.117212) Nutritional Psychiatry (10.1016/j.nupsyc.2025.100002) Obesity Pillars (10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100239) Oil Crop Science (10.1016/j.ocsci.2025.07.003) One Health (10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101295) Open Ceramics (10.1016/j.oceram.2025.100895) Open Nuclear Energy (None) Open Respiratory Archives (10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100507) OpenNano (10.1016/j.onano.2025.100264) Operations Research Perspectives (10.1016/s2214-7160(25)00047-8) Ophthalmology Science (10.1016/j.xops.2025.100984) Optical Materials: X (10.1016/j.omx.2025.100433) Oral Oncology Reports (10.1016/j.oor.2025.100773) Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases (10.1016/j.omsc.2025.100432) Ore Geology Reviews (10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.107040) Originality (None) Osteoarthritis Imaging (10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100384) Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open (10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100708) Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia (10.1016/j.afos.2025.10.003) Otolaryngology Case Reports (10.1016/j.xocr.2025.100719) PEC Global (10.1016/j.pecglo.2025.100002) PEC Innovation (10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100450) Papers in Regional Science (10.1016/j.pirs.2025.100129) Parasite Epidemiology and Control (10.1016/j.parepi.2025.e00471) Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics (10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101327) Patterns (10.1016/j.patter.2025.101430) Pediatric Hematology Oncology Journal (10.1016/j.phoj.2025.100497) Pediatrics and Neonatology (10.1016/j.pedneo.2025.11.002) Periodontology Journal (None) Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism (10.1016/j.pau.2025.100053) Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (10.1016/j.pecon.2025.09.001) Petroleum (10.1016/j.petlm.2025.11.004) Petroleum Exploration and Development (10.1016/s1876-3804(25)60648-3) Petroleum Research (10.1016/j.ptlrs.2025.05.007) Petroleum Science (10.1016/j.petsci.2025.12.024) Pharmaceutical Science Advances (10.1016/j.pscia.2025.100100) Pharmacoeconomics and Policy (10.1016/j.pharp.2025.11.001) Pharmacological Research (10.1016/j.phrs.2025.108065) Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine (10.1016/j.prmcm.2025.100732) Photoacoustics (10.1016/j.pacs.2025.100783) Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy (10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.105314) Physics Letters B (10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140028) Physics Open (10.1016/j.physo.2025.100358) Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology (10.1016/j.phro.2025.100889) Phytomedicine Plus (10.1016/j.phyplu.2025.100935) Plant Communications (10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101675) Plant Diversity (10.1016/j.pld.2025.12.003) Plant Nano Biology (10.1016/j.plana.2025.100234) Plant Phenomics (10.1016/j.plaphe.2025.100108) Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110986) Plant Stress (10.1016/j.stress.2025.101158) Polymer Testing (10.1016/j.polymertesting.2025.109070) Poultry Science (10.1016/j.psj.2025.106226) Power Electronic Devices and Components (10.1016/j.pedc.2025.100134) Practical Laboratory Medicine (10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00515) Precision Measurement (None) Precision Medication (10.1016/j.prmedi.2025.100065) Precision Medicine and Engineering (10.1016/j.preme.2025.100053) Precision Pathology (None) Preventive Medicine Reports (10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103332) Preventive Veterinary Medicine: Regional Studies and Reports (None) Procedia CIRP (10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.015) Procedia Computer Science (10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.072) Procedia Structural Integrity (10.1016/j.prostr.2025.07.012) Progress in Disaster Science (10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100500) Project Leadership and Society (10.1016/j.plas.2025.100195) Propulsion and Power Research (10.1016/j.jppr.2025.09.006) Prostate International (10.1016/j.prnil.2025.07.003) Psychedelics (10.1016/j.psyche.2025.100007) Psychiatry Research Case Reports (10.1016/j.psycr.2025.100305) Psychiatry Research Communications (10.1016/j.psycom.2025.100243) Public Health in Practice (10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100699) Pulmonary Function Diagnostics (10.1016/j.pulmfd.2025.100001) Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare (10.1016/j.qrmh.2025.100033) Quantum Review Letters (10.1016/j.qrl.2025.12.001) Quaternary Environments and Humans (10.1016/j.qeh.2025.100091) Quaternary Science Advances (10.1016/j.qsa.2025.100305) Radiation Medicine and Protection (10.1016/j.radmp.2025.12.003) Radiology Case Reports (10.1016/j.radcr.2025.11.068) Rangeland Ecology & Management (10.1016/j.rama.2025.11.002) Rare (10.1016/j.rare.2025.100116) Real-World Data and Regulatory Science (None) Redox Biochemistry and Chemistry (10.1016/j.rbc.2025.100069) Redox Biology (10.1016/j.redox.2025.103962) Regenerative Therapy (10.1016/j.reth.2025.101053) Regenesis Repair Rehabilitation (10.1016/j.rerere.2025.12.003) Regional Science Policy & Practice (10.1016/j.rspp.2025.100261) Regional Sustainability (10.1016/j.regsus.2025.100280) Renewable Energy System and Equipment (10.1016/j.rese.2025.07.001) Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition (10.1016/j.rset.2025.100133) Reproduction and Breeding (10.1016/j.repbre.2025.12.001) Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis (10.1016/j.rpth.2025.103274) Research in Cold and Arid Regions (10.1016/j.rcar.2025.03.003) Research in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (10.1016/j.redii.2025.100063) Research in Globalization (10.1016/j.resglo.2025.100329) Resilient Cities and Structures (10.1016/j.rcns.2025.12.005) Resources Chemicals and Materials (10.1016/s2772-4433(25)00067-4) Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances (10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100046) Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances (10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200300) Resources, Environment and Sustainability (10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100272) Respiratory Medicine Case Reports (10.1016/j.rmcr.2025.102345) Results in Applied Mathematics (10.1016/j.rinam.2025.100677) Results in Chemistry (10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102990) Results in Control and Optimization (10.1016/j.rico.2025.100637) Results in Earth Sciences (10.1016/j.rines.2025.100148) Results in Engineering (10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108579) Results in Materials (10.1016/j.rinma.2025.100841) Results in Optics (10.1016/j.rio.2025.100940) Results in Physics (10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108555) Results in Surfaces and Interfaces (10.1016/j.rsurfi.2025.100688) Resuscitation Plus (10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101187) Review of Materials Research (10.1016/j.revmat.2025.100133) Revista Argentina de Microbiología (10.1016/j.ram.2025.11.004) Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (10.1016/j.recot.2025.12.002) Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes (10.1016/j.rmclc.2025.12.002) Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (10.1016/j.repc.2025.08.009) Revista de Gastroenterología de México (10.1016/j.rgmx.2025.09.008) Revista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition) (10.1016/j.rgmxen.2025.12.006) Revista de Investigación Clínica (10.1016/j.ric.2025.100030) Rice Science (10.1016/j.rsci.2025.11.003) Risk Sciences (10.1016/j.risk.2025.100030) Rock Mechanics Bulletin (10.1016/j.rockmb.2025.100235) SLAS Discovery (10.1016/j.slasd.2025.100293) SLAS Technology (10.1016/j.slast.2025.100385) SSM - Health Systems (10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100161) SSM - Mental Health (10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100577) SSM - Population Health (10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101883) SSM - Qualitative Research in Health (10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100682) STAR Protocols (10.1016/j.xpro.2025.104275) Safety and Health at Work (10.1016/j.shaw.2025.11.004) Schizophrenia Research: Cognition (10.1016/j.scog.2025.100409) Science Talks (10.1016/j.sctalk.2025.100496) Science in One Health (10.1016/j.soh.2025.100145) Science of Remote Sensing (10.1016/j.srs.2025.100343) Scientia Horticulturae (10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114562) Scientific African (10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e03132) Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research (10.1016/j.sbsr.2025.100924) Sensors International (10.1016/j.sintl.2025.100358) Sensors and Actuators Reports (10.1016/j.snr.2025.100407) Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare (10.1016/j.srhc.2025.101176) She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation (10.1016/j.sheji.2025.10.001) Sleep Epidemiology (10.1016/j.sleepe.2025.100127) Sleep Medicine: X (10.1016/j.sleepx.2025.100168) Smart Agricultural Technology (10.1016/j.atech.2025.101697) Smart Civil Infrastructures (None) Smart Energy (10.1016/j.segy.2025.100218) Smart Materials in Manufacturing (10.1016/j.smmf.2025.100102) Smart Materials in Medicine (10.1016/j.smaim.2025.09.001) Smart Power & Energy Security (10.1016/j.spes.2025.12.001) Smart Underground Engineering (10.1016/j.sue.2025.11.004) Social Sciences & Humanities Open (10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102361) Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy (10.1016/j.sel.2025.100176) Societal Impacts (10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100161) Software Impacts (10.1016/j.simpa.2025.100802) SoftwareX (10.1016/j.softx.2025.102469) Soil & Environmental Health (10.1016/j.seh.2025.100191) Soil Advances (10.1016/j.soilad.2025.100095) Soil Security (10.1016/j.soisec.2025.100222) Soils and Foundations (10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101713) Solar Compass (10.1016/j.solcom.2025.100149) Solar Energy Advances (10.1016/j.seja.2025.100126) Solid Earth Sciences (10.1016/j.sesci.2025.100271) South African Journal of Chemical Engineering (10.1016/j.sajce.2025.11.001) Space Habitation (10.1016/j.spaceh.2025.100044) Space Solar Power and Wireless Transmission (10.1016/j.sspwt.2025.11.004) Sports Medicine and Health Science (10.1016/j.smhs.2025.12.003) Statistical Learning and Data Science (None) Stem Cell Reports (10.1016/j.stemcr.2025.102719) Stem Cell Research (10.1016/j.scr.2025.103887) Structural Heart (10.1016/j.shj.2025.100771) Superconductivity (10.1016/j.supcon.2025.100221) Supply Chain Analytics (10.1016/j.sca.2025.100188) Supramolecular Materials (10.1016/j.supmat.2025.100133) Surgery Case Reports: Advances and Techniques (10.1016/j.sycrs.2025.100151) Surgery Open Digestive Advance (10.1016/j.soda.2025.100241) Surgery Open Science (10.1016/j.sopen.2025.11.002) Surgery in Practice and Science (10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100323) Surgical Oncology Insight (10.1016/j.soi.2025.100198) Sustainability Analytics and Modeling (10.1016/j.samod.2025.100049) Sustainable Chemistry for Biodiversity (None) Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action (10.1016/j.scca.2025.100171) Sustainable Chemistry for Energy Materials (10.1016/j.scenem.2025.100028) Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment (10.1016/j.scenv.2025.100306) Sustainable Cities and Society: Advances (10.1016/j.scsadv.2025.100015) Sustainable Futures (10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101579) Sustainable Geosciences: People, Planet and Prosperity (10.1016/j.susgeo.2025.100012) Sustainable Horizons (10.1016/j.horiz.2025.100164) Sustainable Operations and Computers (10.1016/j.susoc.2025.12.002) Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship (10.1016/j.stae.2025.100126) Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology (10.1016/j.synbio.2025.11.012) Systems and Soft Computing (10.1016/j.socl.2021.100025) Systems and Soft Computing (10.1016/j.sasc.2025.200429) TAO (10.1016/j.tao.2025.100019) Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (10.1016/j.tjog.2025.05.018) Talanta Open (10.1016/j.talo.2025.100603) Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology (10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100360) Telematics and Informatics Reports (10.1016/j.teler.2025.100282) Tetrahedron Chem (10.1016/j.tchem.2025.100151) Tetrahedron Green Chem (10.1016/j.tgchem.2025.100091) The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Open Science, Education, and Practice (10.1016/j.osep.2025.11.001) The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics (10.1016/j.ajsl.2025.10.001) The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases (10.1016/j.bjid.2025.104609) The Breast (10.1016/j.breast.2025.104662) The Cell Surface (10.1016/j.tcsw.2025.100167) The Crop Journal (10.1016/j.cj.2025.08.013) The EANM Journal (10.1016/j.eanmj.2025.100008) The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences (10.1016/j.ejrs.2025.11.005) The Innovation (10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101190) The Journal of Aging Research & Lifestyle (10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100054) The Journal of Climate Change and Health (10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100621) The Journal of Finance and Data Science (10.1016/j.jfds.2025.100155) The Journal of Frailty & Aging (10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100102) The Journal of Liquid Biopsy (10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100453) The Journal of Nutritional Physiology (10.1016/j.jnphys.2025.100008) The Journal of Pediatrics: Clinical Practice (10.1016/j.ympdx.2022.100084) The Journal of Pediatrics: Clinical Practice (10.1016/j.jpedcp.2025.200195) The Journal of Physiological Sciences (10.1016/j.jphyss.2025.100053) The Journal of Precision Medicine: Health and Disease (10.1016/j.premed.2025.100019) The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease (10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100399) The Journal of nutrition, health and aging (10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100757) The Lancet Digital Health (10.1016/j.landig.2025.100934) The Lancet Global Health (10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00405-x) The Lancet Healthy Longevity (10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100808) The Lancet Microbe (10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101310) The Lancet Planetary Health (10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101391) The Lancet Primary Care (10.1016/j.lanprc.2025.100076) The Lancet Public Health (10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00257-9) The Lancet Regional Health - Africa (10.1016/j.lanafr.2025.100006) The Lancet Regional Health - Americas (10.1016/j.lana.2025.101344) The Lancet Regional Health - Europe (10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101578) The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia (10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100703) The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific (10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101772) The Microbe (10.1016/j.microb.2025.100647) The Royal College of Radiologists Open (10.1016/j.rcro.2025.100447) The Swine Journal (None) The Veterinary Journal: Pharmacology & Toxicology (None) Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters (10.1016/j.taml.2025.100650) Theriogenology Wild (10.1016/j.therwi.2025.100142) Thoracic Radiology (None) Thrombosis Update (10.1016/j.tru.2025.100226) Thyroid Science (10.1016/j.thscie.2025.100034) Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases (10.1016/j.ttbdis.2025.102578) Tomography of Materials and Structures (10.1016/j.tmater.2025.100081) Total Environment Microbiology (10.1016/j.temicr.2025.100051) Toxicology Reports (10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.102190) Toxicon: X (10.1016/j.toxcx.2025.100237) TransMed (None) Transactions of Materials Research (10.1016/j.tramat.2025.100143) Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (10.1016/s1003-6326(25)66920-2) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (10.1016/j.transm.2025.100197) Transformative Energy (None) Transformative Medical Materials (10.1016/j.trmm.2025.100001) Translational Dental Research (10.1016/j.tdr.2025.100063) Translational Medicine of Aging (10.1016/j.tma.2024.12.001) Translational Oncology (10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102638) Translational Research in Anatomy (10.1016/j.tria.2025.100454) Transnational Corporations Review (10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200159) Transplantation Reports (10.1016/j.tpr.2025.100194) Transport Economics and Management (10.1016/j.team.2025.09.002) Transportation Engineering (10.1016/j.treng.2025.100414) Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (10.1016/j.trip.2025.101777) Transportation Research Procedia (10.1016/j.trpro.2025.03.091) Transportation Research Today (None) Trauma Case Reports (10.1016/j.tcr.2025.101268) Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease (10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102948) Trees, Forests and People (10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101108) Trends Open (None) Tribology and Interfaces (None) Tropical Agricultural Sciences (10.1016/j.tas.2025.100002) Tropical Cyclone Research and Review (10.1016/j.tcrr.2025.11.012) Tumour Virus Research (10.1016/j.pvr.2020.100202) Tumour Virus Research (10.1016/j.tvr.2025.200325) Ultrasonics Sonochemistry (10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107719) Unconventional Resources (10.1016/j.uncres.2025.100264) Underground Space (10.1016/j.undsp.2025.06.001) Urban Governance (10.1016/j.ugj.2025.12.002) Urban Transitions (10.1016/j.ubtr.2025.100020) Urology Case Reports (10.1016/j.eucr.2025.103281) Urology Horizons (None) Urology Video Journal (10.1016/j.urolvj.2025.100376) Vaccine: X (10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100760) Value in Health Regional Issues (10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101555) Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia (10.1016/j.vaa.2025.11.008) Veterinary Vaccine (10.1016/j.vetvac.2025.100145) Veterinary and Animal Science (10.1016/j.vas.2025.100553) VideoGIE (10.1016/j.vgie.2025.08.009) Virologica Sinica (10.1016/j.virs.2025.12.007) Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware (10.1016/j.vrih.2025.08.002) Virus Research (10.1016/j.virusres.2025.199675) Visual Informatics (10.1016/j.visinf.2025.100302) WFUMB Ultrasound Open (10.1016/j.wfumbo.2025.100099) Waste Management Bulletin (10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100276) Water & Ecology (10.1016/j.wateco.2025.100020) Water Biology and Security (10.1016/j.watbs.2025.100406) Water Cycle (10.1016/j.watcyc.2025.06.005) Water Research X (10.1016/j.wroa.2025.100459) Water Resources and Industry (10.1016/j.wri.2025.100336) Water Science and Engineering (10.1016/j.wse.2025.08.001) Water-Energy Nexus (10.1016/j.wen.2025.12.005) Watershed Ecology and the Environment (10.1016/j.wsee.2025.10.006) Wearable Electronics (10.1016/j.wees.2025.10.002) Weather and Climate Extremes (10.1016/j.wace.2025.100846) Wellbeing, Space and Society (10.1016/j.wss.2025.100332) Wind Energy and Engineering Research (10.1016/j.weer.2025.100021) Women and Children Nursing (10.1016/j.wcn.2025.05.001) World Allergy Organization Journal (10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101145) World Development Sustainability (10.1016/j.wds.2025.100260) World Journal of Acupuncture - Moxibustion (10.1016/j.wjam.2025.12.005) World Neurosurgery (10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124601) World Neurosurgery: X (10.1016/j.wnsx.2025.100552) Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik (10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.12.005) aBIOTECH (10.1016/j.abiote.2025.100012) animal (10.1016/j.animal.2025.101730) animal - open space (10.1016/j.anopes.2025.100115) animal - science proceedings (10.1016/j.anscip.2025.08.113) e-Prime – Nexus of Electrical, Electronic, and Intelligent Engineering (10.1016/j.prime.2025.101140) e-Prime – Nexus of Electrical, Electronic, and Intelligent Engineering (None) eBioMedicine (10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.106075) eClinicalMedicine (10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103728) eNeurologicalSci (10.1016/j.ensci.2025.100597) eScience (10.1016/j.esci.2025.100452) eScience Energy (10.1016/j.esen.2025.100004) hLife (10.1016/j.hlife.2025.07.004) iGIE (10.1016/j.igie.2025.08.001) iLIVER (10.1016/j.iliver.2025.100208) iOptics (10.1016/j.iopt.2025.100019) iPharma (None) iScience (10.1016/j.isci.2025.114420) |
Source code
|
|---|
import json
# from curl_cffi import requests
import requests
# from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
session = requests.Session()
def get_page(n):
url = "https://www.elsevier.com/api/search/journal-catalog-search"
data = {
"query": "",
"page": n,
"filters": {
"acceptanceRateLte": None, "acceptanceRateGte": None,
"citeScoreLte": None, "citeScoreGte": None,
"impactFactorLte": None, "impactFactorGte": None,
"timeToFirstDecisionLte": None, "timeToFirstDecisionGte": None,
"accessType": ["open-access"],
"subjectAreas": None
},
"sort": "relevance"
}
headers = {"Content-Type": 'text/plain;charset=UTF-8'}
return session.post(url, json=data, headers=headers).text
#def get_example_doi(url):
# if not url.startswith("https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/"):
# return None
# # print(f"Fetching: {url}")
# # impersonate="chrome110" mimics a Chrome browser's TLS signature
# response = session.get(url, impersonate="chrome110")
#
# soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, 'html.parser')
#
# if response.status_code == 403:
# print("Blocked (403).")
# return None
#
# try:
# return soup.select_one("div[hidden='']").text
# except AttributeError:
# print("Attribute error")
# return None
def get_doi_from_crossref(issn):
try:
url = f"https://api.crossref.org/works?filter=issn:{issn}&rows=1&sort=published&order=desc"
r = requests.get(url, timeout=10)
data = r.json()
if data["message"]["items"]:
return data["message"]["items"][0]["DOI"]
except Exception as e:
print("Exception fetching doi:", e)
return None
return None
def main():
final = 128
for page in range(1, final+1):
try:
data = json.loads(get_page(page))
except json.JSONDecodeError:
print("Failed to retrieve catalog JSON.")
return
for result in data["searchResponse"]["items"]:
title = result["titles"]["primary"]
issn = result["identifiers"].get("issn")
example_doi = None
if issn is not None:
# print(f"ISSN: {issn["formatted"]}")
example_doi = get_doi_from_crossref(issn["formatted"])
print(f"{title} ({example_doi})")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
|
@Qwerfjkl: could something similar be done with these: https://freejournals.org/current-member-journals/ ? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:19, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Headbomb, not much to work off here; the site doesn't give the issns. But with a naive lookup on crossref:
Journals
|
|---|
Advances in Combinatorics (10.19086/aic.2026) Algebraic Combinatorics (10.5802/alco.457) Algebraic Geometry (10.14231/ag-2026-004) Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse (None) Australasian Journal of Combinatorics (None) Combinatorial Theory (10.5070/c65465680) Discrete Analysis (10.19086/da.38591) Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (None) Electronic Communications in Probability (10.1214/25-ecp749) Electronic Journal of Combinatorics (None) Electronic Journal of Differential Equations (10.58997/ejde.2026.13) Electronic Journal of Probability (10.1214/26-ejp1493) Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations (10.14232/ejqtde.2026.1.2) Electronic Journal of Statistics (10.1214/26-ejs2487) Epijournal de Géométrie Algébrique (None) Extracta Mathematicae (10.17398/2605-5686.40.2.143) Higher Structures (None) INTEGERS (10.1515/integ.2012.12.issue-1) Journal de l’Ecole polytechnique – Mathematiques (None) Journal of Computational Geometry (None) Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications (10.7155/jgaa.v30i1.3166) Journal of Logic and Analysis (10.4115/jla.2025.17.6) Journal of Universal Computer Science (None) Le Matematiche (None) Logical Methods in Computer Science (10.46298/lmcs-22(1:5)2026) New Zealand Journal of Mathematics (10.53733/610) North West European Journal of Mathematics (None) Open Journal of Mathematical Optimization (10.5802/ojmo.48) Probability Surveys (10.1214/25-ps32) Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas (10.15446/recolma.v58n2.121031) Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina (10.33044/revuma.v62n1a04) SIGMA (10.53712/sigma.v11i1.2635) SMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics (10.5802/smai-jcm.137) Statistics Surveys (10.1214/26-ss155) Theory and Application of Graphs (None) TheoretiCS (10.46298/theoretics.26.3) Theory of Computing (10.4086/toc.2025.v021a011) Agua y Territorio (None) Avocetta (10.30456/avo.28753) Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry (10.3762/bjoc.22.19) Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology (10.3762/bjnano.17.20) Boletín de la Unión de Ornitólogos del Perú (None) Communications in Kinesiology (10.51224/cik.2025.7647) European Journal of Taxonomy (10.5852/ejt.2026.1039.3195) Free Neuropathology (None) GEUS Bulletin (10.34194/5f80b592) Journal of Numerical Cognition (10.5964/jnc.16725) Journal of Open Source Software (None) Journal of Systems Research (10.5070/sr3.62177) Journal of Theoretical, Computational and Applied Mechanics (None) Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis, and Theory (None) Norwegian Journal of Geology (10.17850/njg105-1-1) Open Journal of Astrophysics (None) Peer Community Journal (10.24072/pcjournal.679) Psicológica (None) Precision Nanomedicine (10.33218/001c.154449) SciPost Physics (10.21468/scipostphys.20.2.042) SciPost Physics Core (10.21468/scipostphyscore.9.1.010) SciPost Physics Lecture Notes (10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.114) SciPost Physics Proceedings (10.21468/scipostphysproc.18.008) Sedimentologika (10.57035/journals/sdk.2026.e41.1914) Treubia (10.14203/treubia.v31i2.568) Veterinary Evidence (10.18849/ve.v11i1.731) Volcanica (10.30909/vol/kotd5867) ACME (10.7202/1111249ar) Critical Education (None) Ecology, Economy and Society – the INSEE journal (None) Education Policy Analysis Archives (10.14507/epaa.34.9212) Europe’s Journal of Psychology (10.5964/ejop.19085) Fennia (None) International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives (None) Journal of Boredom Studies (None) Journal of Political Ecology (10.2458/jpe.10019) Meta-psychology (10.15626/mp.2024.4155) Psychology of Language and Communication (10.58734/plc-2025-0019) Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society (None) Revista de Psicologia UNLP / Journal of Psychology UNLP (None) Studia Z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies (None) Social Psychological Bulletin (10.32872/spb.v14i3.33574) Studies in Communication Sciences (10.24434/j.scoms.2026.02.8400) Anuario de Estudios Filológicos (10.17398/2660-7301.48.261) Biolinguistics (10.5964/bioling.21469) Cadernos de Linguística (10.25189/2675-4916.2025.v6.n3.id796) Constructions (None) Energeia (None) Glossa (10.61989/6kkkds06) International Journal of Language and Law (None) Internet Policy Review (10.14763/2026.1.2079) Italian Journal of Linguistics (None) Journal of Cultural Analytics (10.22148/001c.144809) Journal of Electronic Publishing (10.3998/jep.9283) Journal of Historical Syntax (None) Laboratory Phonology (None) Language Documentation and Conservation (None) Studies in Arts and Humanities (10.18193/sah.v7i1.210) |
Source code
|
|---|
import requests
journals = """
Advances in Combinatorics
Algebraic Combinatorics
Algebraic Geometry
Annales de la Facult├® des Sciences de Toulouse
Australasian Journal of Combinatorics
Combinatorial Theory
Discrete Analysis
Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science
Electronic Communications in Probability
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations
Electronic Journal of Probability
Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations
Electronic Journal of Statistics
Epijournal de G├®om├®trie Alg├®brique
Extracta Mathematicae
Higher Structures
INTEGERS
Journal de lÔÇÖEcole polytechnique ÔÇô Mathematiques
Journal of Computational Geometry
Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications
Journal of Logic and Analysis
Journal of Universal Computer Science
Le Matematiche
Logical Methods in Computer Science
New Zealand Journal of Mathematics
North West European Journal of Mathematics
Open Journal of Mathematical Optimization
Probability Surveys
Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas
Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina
SIGMA
SMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics
Statistics Surveys
Theory and Application of Graphs
TheoretiCS
Theory of Computing
Agua y Territorio
Avocetta
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
Boletín de la Unión de Ornitólogos del Perú
Communications in Kinesiology
European Journal of Taxonomy
Free Neuropathology
GEUS Bulletin
Journal of Numerical Cognition
Journal of Open Source Software
Journal of Systems Research
Journal of Theoretical, Computational and Applied Mechanics
Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis, and Theory
Norwegian Journal of Geology
Open Journal of Astrophysics
Peer Community Journal
Psicol├│gica
Precision Nanomedicine
SciPost Physics
SciPost Physics Core
SciPost Physics Lecture Notes
SciPost Physics Proceedings
Sedimentologika
Treubia
Veterinary Evidence
Volcanica
ACME
Critical Education
Ecology, Economy and Society ÔÇô the INSEE journal
Education Policy Analysis Archives
EuropeÔÇÖs Journal of Psychology
Fennia
International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives
Journal of Boredom Studies
Journal of Political Ecology
Meta-psychology
Psychology of Language and Communication
Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society
Revista de Psicologia UNLP / Journal of Psychology UNLP
Studia Z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies
Social Psychological Bulletin
Studies in Communication Sciences
Anuario de Estudios Filol├│gicos
Biolinguistics
Cadernos de Linguística
Constructions
Energeia
Glossa
International Journal of Language and Law
Internet Policy Review
Italian Journal of Linguistics
Journal of Cultural Analytics
Journal of Electronic Publishing
Journal of Historical Syntax
Laboratory Phonology
Language Documentation and Conservation
Studies in Arts and Humanities
"""
def get_journal_issn(name):
url = f"https://api.crossref.org/journals?query={name}"
response = requests.get(url)
data = response.json()
for item in data["message"]["items"]:
if item["title"].lower() == name.lower() and item["ISSN"] and len(item["ISSN"]) > 0:
return item["ISSN"][0]
return None
def get_doi_by_issn(issn):
try:
url = f"https://api.crossref.org/works?filter=issn:{issn}&rows=1&sort=published&order=desc"
r = requests.get(url, timeout=10)
data = r.json()
if data["message"]["items"]:
return data["message"]["items"][0]["DOI"]
except Exception as e:
print("Exception fetching doi:", e)
return None
return None
def main():
for title in journals.split("\n"):
name = title.strip()
if name == "":
continue
issn = get_journal_issn(name)
doi = None
if issn is not None:
doi = get_doi_by_issn(issn)
print(f"{name} ({doi})")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
|
- No guarantee of correctness here. Qwerfjkltalk 21:47, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
- I was thinking you could load up each journal page, select a random article, and get the DOI root from there? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:45, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Headbomb, that's not feasible here, all of the journals have different websites. Qwerfjkltalk 12:20, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- I was thinking you could load up each journal page, select a random article, and get the DOI root from there? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:45, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Redirects related to those nominated at RfD
[edit]Per the initial discussion at Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion#Avoided double redirects of nominated redirects I believe there is consensus for an ongoing bot task that does the following:
- Looks at each redirect nominated at RfD
- Determines whether there are any other redirects, in any namespace, that meet one or more of the following criteria:
- Are marked as an avoided-double redirect of a nominated redirect
- Are redirects to the nominated redirect
- Redirect to the same target as the nominated redirect and
- Differ only in the presence or absence of diacritics, and/or
- Differ only in case
- If the bot finds any redirects that match and which are not currently nominated at RfD, then it should post a message in the discussion along the lines of:
- The bot should not take any actions other than leaving the note, the goal is simply to make human editors aware that these redirects exist.
I don't know how frequently the bot should run, but it should probably wait at least 15 minutes after a nomination before checking or editing so as not to get into edit conflicts or complications as discussions of multiple redirects are often nominated individually and then the discussions manually combined. Thryduulf (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- There is a strong consensus; if there are no objections in the next day or so, I'll file a BRFA. In the meantime I'll code up the bot. GalStar (talk) 17:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I've just thought of a third case to check for: differences only in hyphenation/dashes. Thryduulf (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Actually that's generalisable to differences only in punctuation. Thryduulf (talk) Thryduulf (talk) 03:40, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- @GalStar is there any update on this? Thryduulf (talk) 20:01, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm still working on it. I'm still getting some of the underlying tooling working, but I should be done soon. GalStar (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 16:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
- If anyone is wondering, I'm currently porting my code to toolforge, so it can run continuously, and without the unreliability of my home network. This is taking longer than I expected however. GalStar (talk) 17:17, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 16:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
BRFA filed GalStar (talk) (contribs) 20:56, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- I'm still working on it. I'm still getting some of the underlying tooling working, but I should be done soon. GalStar (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
- I've just thought of a third case to check for: differences only in hyphenation/dashes. Thryduulf (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Restored from Archive 87. The BRFA mentioned above (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/GraphBot 2) was abandoned before a working bot was written so the task remains outstanding. Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion#Avoided double redirects of nominated redirects received no objections to my reinstating this request. Thryduulf (talk) 20:05, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Thryduulf Is there a current discussion that falls into this category that I can test on? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know of any off the top of my head. I can't think of an easy way to find any other than by doing what this requests asks a bot to do (i.e. look through all nominated redirects and check for similar ones). Thryduulf (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Thryduulf You’re right, I just put some logics together and tried it; I couldn’t find any too. Maybe there currently isn’t any, but I have coded this task btw, maybe I should file a BRFA? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:59, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Thryduulf Take a look at my test at testwiki. I intentionally created a redirect drama. What do you think? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
BRFA filed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2026 (UTC)- I'm not going to get a chance to look until this evening, sorry. Thryduulf (talk) 13:36, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know of any off the top of my head. I can't think of an easy way to find any other than by doing what this requests asks a bot to do (i.e. look through all nominated redirects and check for similar ones). Thryduulf (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
The BRFA has been withdrawn by the operator (Vanderwaalforces) if any other operator wants to take on the task. Thryduulf (talk) 15:51, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Update broken Svenska Dagbladet archive URLs
[edit]Svenska Dagbladet has recently changed the URL structure of its historical newspaper archive, causing many archive links on Wikipedia to break.
Old format (broken):
- https://www.svd.se/arkiv/YYYY-MM-DD/PAGE/SVD - for example: https://www.svd.se/arkiv/1960-08-17/9/SVD
New format:
- https://www.svd.se/arkiv/YYYY-MM-DD/SVNY/PAGE - for example: https://www.svd.se/arkiv/1960-08-17/SVNY/9
I request a bot run to automatically update all affected links in articles to the new format so that the archive references become functional again. Saftgurka (talk) 15:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- WP:URLREQ can help with this. – DreamRimmer ■ 15:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll try asking there. Saftgurka (talk) 08:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
List of Wikipedians by non-automated/manual edits
[edit]There are various lists of Wikipedians by edit count and related stats. One that I'd be interested to see would be Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by non-automated edit count. I think the presence of such a list might be a small help re Editcountitis, as it'd recognize/incentivize editors whose edit count has not been juiced through tons of (typically low-value) automated edits.
Would anyone be interested in coding a bot to populate and maintain such a page? Courtesy pinging Legoktm and 0xDeadbeef, who run the bot that updates the overall edit count list, in case either of you might be up for it. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 20:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- How is non-automated edit vs automated edit defined? Legoktm (talk) 22:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- This thing knows. Folly Mox (talk) 22:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Interesting, it's controlled by MediaWiki:XTools-AutoEdits.json. Legoktm (talk) 23:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- This thing knows. Folly Mox (talk) 22:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Sounds like we need three lists: total, manual and (semi-)automated. Or possibly two: manual and (semi-)automated. The negative/subtraction name "by non-automated edit count" rather should be a positive name "by manual edit count". I'm not convinced automated edits are typically low-value, anyway, manual edits often have the same characteristics. Plus it's so hard to tell since automation can take many forms that are impossible to track. -- GreenC 03:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- XTools doesn't distinguish between semi-automated and automated edits, so if we're using their definitions, we won't either, at least to start. I'm guessing that there may be some blurriness that would make such a distinction tricky.
- "manual edit count" sounds fine for the page name.
- Regarding your other points, we're never going to come up with a perfect measure of editor contributions. This list will need a caveat lector just like the other — the goal is just to provide another angle that perhaps incrementally reduces the incentive to game the system. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
The above request, transcluded from WP:Bot requests/Archive 85#List of Wikipedians by non-automated edits, expired after a day in July 2023. Sdkb has agreed that it would be a good idea to request this again. List of Wikipedians by manual edits could be an alternative title and is the one currently linked to in TM:Wikipediholism, which is how I discovered this potentially interesting statistical compilation. Cheers, HKLionel TALK 12:58, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Website to article mass redirect creation
[edit]Many articles on Wikipedia have a Website listed in their infobox and/or as an external link. I was thinking it would be good to have redirects from websites which do not have their own pages to articles on subjects that are hosted on said websites. Many popular articles already have such redirects, such as google.com -> Google Search, however there are a plethora more that do not. Due to the massive scope of this, would it at least be possible to:
- Go through all articles with a value for Website in its infobox
- There are different types of infoboxes which all have Website fields; I don't know if that would be a problem or not...
- Obtain the domain/URL from the listed Website, removing the www and HTTP protocol (e.g. https://www.example.com would become example.com), stopping if it is invalid
- Some infoboxes link the Website (e.g. Example Official Website), so it would have to get the URL rather than the text somehow (Sorry that I don't know how this works
)
- Some infoboxes link the Website (e.g. Example Official Website), so it would have to get the URL rather than the text somehow (Sorry that I don't know how this works
- Create a redirect from that domain to the article (if a page named the domain doesn't already exist) with these redirect categories:
{{Redirect category shell| {{R from domain name}} {{R unprintworthy}} }}
- For pages with paths (e.g. example.com/page; or would the inclusion of these be excessive?),
{{R from URL}}would be used in place of{{R from domain name}}
- For pages with paths (e.g. example.com/page; or would the inclusion of these be excessive?),
I initially attempted to do this manually, but quickly realized the sheer scale at which this would need to be done. I don't know if this is a task better suited for AutoWikiBrowser, userscripts, related WikiProjects, or manual editing (though I risk catching editcountitis)... but I think it would be helpful to have these redirects, as it seems searching for some websites on Wikipedia will not even show their relevant articles in the search results. I don't have a readymade list, but I have a feeling this would involve a lot of pages. I'll attempt to compile a list of these pages if needed. Does anyone know how to best do this? Thanks! Some helpful person (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Seems like something that should be raised at WP:VPR first, to see if the community in general thinks that having a redirect for every domain name is something we even want. Anomie⚔ 23:24, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah... I don't see this happening, but I could be wrong; demonstrating consensus is a must for this sort of ask/task. Primefac (talk) 00:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- I could see this being done for current domains redirects, but i doubt the mass creation of domain redirects would be supported, unless strongly curtailed by something like 'top 100 most popular websites' or something. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:19, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. Didn't realize this would require consensus. I only skimmed through the policies on mass editing, but the mass page creation section of the editing policy gave me the impression that wasn't required for redirects... though I suppose creating redirects for every single website is a little different than creating redirects for certain alternative names. I just thought it made sense to be able to search for a website domain and immediately find the relevant article. I guess I'll stick to adding them on a case-by-case basis for now, as I don't know if I could convincingly pitch it to others in the face of more important things. Some helpful person (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Well, redirects aren't covered by MASSCREATION specifically, but they are still subject to BOTPOL overall, which does require consensus for any bot task. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:43, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, I probably should have read the policies a little closer before proposing this... but I don't suppose this means I could sit down and create all of these redirects manually either? Some helpful person (talk) 00:56, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Some helpful person, that would be a bad idea. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Okay then. I guess I got a little carried away... Some helpful person (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with that, it's good to see folk interested in Wikipedia, and new ideas are always welcome (even if they aren't implemented). Primefac (talk) 11:48, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Okay then. I guess I got a little carried away... Some helpful person (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- Some helpful person, that would be a bad idea. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, I probably should have read the policies a little closer before proposing this... but I don't suppose this means I could sit down and create all of these redirects manually either? Some helpful person (talk) 00:56, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Well, redirects aren't covered by MASSCREATION specifically, but they are still subject to BOTPOL overall, which does require consensus for any bot task. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:43, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. Didn't realize this would require consensus. I only skimmed through the policies on mass editing, but the mass page creation section of the editing policy gave me the impression that wasn't required for redirects... though I suppose creating redirects for every single website is a little different than creating redirects for certain alternative names. I just thought it made sense to be able to search for a website domain and immediately find the relevant article. I guess I'll stick to adding them on a case-by-case basis for now, as I don't know if I could convincingly pitch it to others in the face of more important things. Some helpful person (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- I could see this being done for current domains redirects, but i doubt the mass creation of domain redirects would be supported, unless strongly curtailed by something like 'top 100 most popular websites' or something. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:19, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah... I don't see this happening, but I could be wrong; demonstrating consensus is a must for this sort of ask/task. Primefac (talk) 00:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- This is a useful idea. For example, many citations have
|website=google.combut the recommendation and best practice is to use the actual name Google. Currently there is no database the matches "domain = full name". This could be useful for tool makers that carefully use the data. -- GreenC 18:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)- User:Some helpful person: if you want a list of the largest domains I can provide that ie. nytimes.com has 370,000 URLs etc.. sorted from largest to smallest. Then choose the top 1,000 for this project. You could probably cover a large percentage of all links with just 1,000 redirects - which I doubt anyone would notice or even care much. -- GreenC 18:23, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- Oh wow, I didn't even consider that use case. This sounds like a good approach, as it's not every website ever but the ones most referenced on Wikipedia. That list would be super helpful as well if it isn't too much trouble. I assume the redirects must be created manually? Thanks in advance! Some helpful person (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- User:Some helpful person: if you want a list of the largest domains I can provide that ie. nytimes.com has 370,000 URLs etc.. sorted from largest to smallest. Then choose the top 1,000 for this project. You could probably cover a large percentage of all links with just 1,000 redirects - which I doubt anyone would notice or even care much. -- GreenC 18:23, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Removing links to copyvio site
[edit]worldradiohistory.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Originally requested by LaundryPizza03 at WP:AWBREQ, but Sophisticatedevening suggested it would be easier for a bot. There are 28,012 links to this site in sources in mainspace [3]. This also turns up 1,963 more. I'm not fully sure about the feasibility of this with a bot as I don't know much on the technical side, but I thought it was worth forwarding this here if a bot could knock out at least some of these. In line with the previous chakoteya cite removal, if this is the only citation it should be removed and replaced with a {{cn}}. Courtesy ping to LuniZunie and also see m:Talk:Spam blacklist#worldradiohistory.com. HurricaneZetaC 01:03, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- Given I am an editor in the topic fields in question (WP:TVS and WP:WPRS) I can provide some assistance.
- The vast majority of these links will inevitably be going to Broadcasting magazine (which underwent multiple name changes over the years and is now the website Broadcasting & Cable) or to the Broadcasting yearbooks. Sammi Brie has been utilizing a ProQuest media database she has access to (but regrettably is not in TWL, else I would be using the database myself) to insert replacement tags in the
id=fields. My thought is such a bot command would have to be staged and deal with those instances right off the bat. Also of note @HurricaneZeta there's alsoamericanradiohistory.comhere and here and, to a much lesser extent,davidgleason.comhere and here. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 12:47, 14 January 2026 (UTC) - One thing I would strongly suggest (and I know Sammi Brie would agree) is that the refs should not be junked altogether but to simply have the URLs stripped. The refs can be converted into ones that either have a ProQuest ID tag or are offline. Very rarely are they just bare urls. I do not know if that makes the bot command more complex or simple. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 13:10, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, I will note that...
- There are some cases in which the publication is out of copyright, e.g. early years of Television Digest pre-1963 without a copyright notice, or where the author/publisher has contributed the work to WRH, e.g. Duncan's American Radio. These are probably legitimate.
- Several years ago, in my older GAs and FAs, I overbuilt ProQuest IDs onto WRH references to Broadcasting except in a handful of cases. (I recall some issues in the 1970s that ProQuest did not have.) This was done very deliberately to allow the WRH URLs to be removed at a later time.
- Unlike Chakoteya, the problem is not reliability of the publications (headlined by a series of broadcasting and music industry trades — Broadcasting (& Cable), Radio & Records, etc.) but their availability online.
- Some of these sources are unfortunately not available via other means. And even ProQuest poses a problem for all editors I know of but two. I also strongly strongly encourage getting TWL to subscribe to the ProQuest collection Entertainment Industry Magazine Archive. It is not in TWL's ProQuest offerings at present (I have different, institutional access), and obtaining it would help me point editors to legitimate ways to link to Broadcasting and in some cases (their year range is unfortunately fairly limited) Radio & Records. As a result, there are only two people I know of who can access the ProQuest IDs included in many of my articles (the other is Flip Format) and probably hundreds of ProQuest IDs that not even most Wikipedia editors can open.
- What I don't want is for innocent editors—who right now have no other way of accessing many of these sources—and their pages to be caught up in this by removing references wholesale from articles. I'd much prefer something like Special:Diff/1158839954 where the references remain intact without WRH links. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 17:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- To second Sammi Brie, I object to having a bot simply purge any and all refs tied to WRH outright. That type of request is incredibly punitive and potentially unnecessary. Broadcasting magazine itself is not a copyvio (and is actually a rather important trade magazine that covered much of the history of radio and television), but the links to it hosted by WRH are a gray area. A case can be made for removing the URLs on all Broadcasting refs linked to WRH (and also those of Radio & Records and Billboard) and converting the refs to {{Cite magazine}} format, not dissimilar to what Mikeblas was doing in the above example. At the time, I objected to Mike's rationale, but over two years later can understand the nuance of it now, which also is a sincere apology to Mike on my end.
- Given how different my request is from the OP, I would be willing to make a bot request of my own if that would be appropriate. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 19:38, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for pinging me, and thank you for your apology.
- I'd love to see a bot take care of these links once and for all. Removing the URLs while leaving behind the rest of the "offline" reference information is compeltely feasible.
- I'm made uncomfortable by some of the generalizations here, though. There are lots of different magaiznes scanned at these sites, and I don't think there's any majority -- particularly not a "vast" one.
- I see there's talk about blacklisting the site m:Talk:Spam_blacklist#worldradiohistory.com. Is there a reason that it shouldn't be blacklisted at Wikipedia:Spam blacklist instead (or as well)?
- Finally, the claims that certain copies of material are or are not copyvio have to be made very carefully and usually can't be easily done. Linking to copyvio material makes the Wikipedia project vulnerable, and linking to external material needs to be done very carefully. (This is all made clear in Wikipedia policy.) -- mikeblas (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- If it is listed at the meta Spam blacklist, it would apply to every Wikimedia wiki, making listing at the local page redundant. Tenshi! (Talk page) 01:19, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Mikeblas:
did you create a bot at all for those tasks? I'm trying to remember if you had or not.I'm sorry, brain fail on my end... it had been over two years and I thought you had constructed something.
If so I would like to talk with you because I have been mulling multiple proposals on maintenance-related things. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 02:19, 15 January 2026 (UTC)- I don't have a Wikipedia bot. But I do have some C# code that parses things up and removes the links. It converts {{cite web}} to {{cite magazine}}, then renames the parameters that have to be fixed up. -- mikeblas (talk) 02:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ahh I gotcha, it makes sense. I based my below proposal off of what you had done prior. :) One of these days I need to implement C# code on my end if but to make some tasks easier. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 04:03, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- One reason I link to worldradiohistory.com is because sometimes they're the only source of information for chart positions, specifically those of Radio & Records and RPM. Our previous source for RPM positions was flaky and incomplete, meaning about half of 1989 and a few positions from 1993 were missing entirely. I feel like wholesale removing links to worldradiohistory would do more harm than good. If there are concerns about copyvio, then they should be handled case by case. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm confused by your comment. Radio & Records and RPM are sources, but worldradiohistory is not. -- mikeblas (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- What I mean is that in at least a few cases, worldradiohistory is the only place I can find that information in the first place. The Radio & Records Canada Country charts used to be on WP:BADCHARTS due to a lack of an accessible archive, but the existence of worldradiohistory was enough to get them taken off WP:BADCHARTS. How else can the positions be cited if not through worldradiohistory? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
- The positions can be cited using the source publication itself. -- mikeblas (talk) 17:53, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
- I think the point here is that you can use a pirate site to access a citation you couldn't obtain otherwise, but you shouldn't link to it in the citation. We don't link to Sci-Hub in references to scientific papers. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:55, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
- What I mean is that in at least a few cases, worldradiohistory is the only place I can find that information in the first place. The Radio & Records Canada Country charts used to be on WP:BADCHARTS due to a lack of an accessible archive, but the existence of worldradiohistory was enough to get them taken off WP:BADCHARTS. How else can the positions be cited if not through worldradiohistory? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm confused by your comment. Radio & Records and RPM are sources, but worldradiohistory is not. -- mikeblas (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- One reason I link to worldradiohistory.com is because sometimes they're the only source of information for chart positions, specifically those of Radio & Records and RPM. Our previous source for RPM positions was flaky and incomplete, meaning about half of 1989 and a few positions from 1993 were missing entirely. I feel like wholesale removing links to worldradiohistory would do more harm than good. If there are concerns about copyvio, then they should be handled case by case. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ahh I gotcha, it makes sense. I based my below proposal off of what you had done prior. :) One of these days I need to implement C# code on my end if but to make some tasks easier. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 04:03, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- I don't have a Wikipedia bot. But I do have some C# code that parses things up and removes the links. It converts {{cite web}} to {{cite magazine}}, then renames the parameters that have to be fixed up. -- mikeblas (talk) 02:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Broadcasting magazine citation cleanup request
[edit]This is a counterpropsal to the above bot request, and one that is likely more judicious and practical. Also would be the first of several that are based off of Special:Diff/1158839954:
- All refs and citations to Broadcasting magazine in various iterations, including Broadcasting-Telecasting and Broadcasting & Cable that have URLs pointing to either
worldradiohistory.com,americanradiohistory.comordavidgleason.comhave said URLs removed. This is not going to be complicated as the base URL isworldradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/*oramericanradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/* - If the citation template is
cite weborcite news, convert it tocite magazineand thewebsite=orwork=field to themagazine=field. - If there is no
id =field or if that field is empty, add the following invisible comment:|id = <!-- needs ProQuest ID tag -->. This can be a good way to track what refs need to be rebuilt and tended to. - I'm not sure if this part is possible but can the refs, if they do not have a name, be given one based on the
datefield? If the source date is, for example, "July 1, 1932" or "1 July 1932", then tag the ref as<ref name="BC19320701">?
If this is doable and functional, I would like to extend this to other publications used as citations that are currently linked to worldradiohistory. Broadcasting is cited the most from said website so this would be the largest such task, by far. Tagging Sammi Brie and Mikeblas. Courtesy ping to LunieZunie and HurricaneZeta. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 03:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- This is fine and better than removing it outright since it retains the citation itself - the objective is just to remove the link. HurricaneZetaC 03:22, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
- Removing the link is a big nono. That's how you find it on webarchive etc... The solution, if a new main site isn't available, is to have
|archive-url=added to these templates. I also fail to see how these violate COPYVIO. If they did, these magazines would have long issued a DMCA takedown of WRH and the site wouldn't be winning awards for digital preservation. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:33, 17 January 2026 (UTC)- I know bots can find archive links - can one be programmed to do that? As for the copyright infringement, the notice linked in the original local spam blacklist request was https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Radio_and_Hobbies.htm. HurricaneZetaC 20:42, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, and for those, you get pointed to https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Radio_and_Hobbies.htm, which have been DCMA takedowned. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:48, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Fair point, but just from searching I can find a few scans of magazines that are pretty clearly not of copyright and seem to have been reproduced without permission. While some of them are out of copyright one scan I found included the barcode printed at the front and was from 2000, with a copyright notice. HurricaneZetaC 21:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Fair use allows for archiving copies to be made and distributed. We should not presume copyright violation when none have been shown, especially from an award-winning archival site that has a proven history of respecting DCMA takedowns requests. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Headbomb Fair use does not cover scanning the entirety of a magazine and uploading PDFs for all to see. Internet Archive learned this lesson to the tune of millions of dollars when it lent out unlimited ebooks per copy, and why Anthropic didn't pay for scans of books it destroyed. The large majority of links to WRH are for scans of copyrighted magazines in clear violation of WP:COPYLINK Mach61 07:03, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
- Fair use allows for archiving copies to be made and distributed. We should not presume copyright violation when none have been shown, especially from an award-winning archival site that has a proven history of respecting DCMA takedowns requests. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
- Fair point, but just from searching I can find a few scans of magazines that are pretty clearly not of copyright and seem to have been reproduced without permission. While some of them are out of copyright one scan I found included the barcode printed at the front and was from 2000, with a copyright notice. HurricaneZetaC 21:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, and for those, you get pointed to https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Radio_and_Hobbies.htm, which have been DCMA takedowned. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:48, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- I know bots can find archive links - can one be programmed to do that? As for the copyright infringement, the notice linked in the original local spam blacklist request was https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Radio_and_Hobbies.htm. HurricaneZetaC 20:42, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
- Removing the link is a big nono. That's how you find it on webarchive etc... The solution, if a new main site isn't available, is to have
- I would like to circle back on this request, if possible. And to clarify, this request would be the first of multiple bot requests to rectify the issue with WorldRadioHistory.com and to untangle tens of thousands of savable citations. Other bot requests would clean up and sanitize citations from Billboard and Radio and Records, followed by all Broadcasting Yearbook citations and, finally, all citations generated from search inquiries (which I did not include here only because the URL strings are very different). From there, the remainder of specialty magazines and trades linked to WRH can be appraised.
- I do want to stress that having the invisible comment in the
idfield can go a long way to essentially repairing tens of thousands of citations and resolving substantial technical debt. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 20:47, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Move links clean up request
[edit]I think that cleanup bots should replace link's that havent been edited once the target page is moved to somewhere else shane (talk to me if you want!) 23:30, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- Probably a bad idea for a bot task. See WP:NOTBROKEN. Anomie⚔ 00:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Not done for the template at the top so this will archive. (do you need to be a botop to mark it?) HurricaneZetaC 20:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Unnecessary disambiguations
[edit]Is there a way a bot could find instances of unnecessary disambiguations? Specifically, instances of articles named "Title (parenthetical)" where there isn't currently an article at just "Title". (In other words, something like Floofy (band) existing where Floofy is still a redlink.)
I ask this because sometimes I see people stick (film) or (band) at the end of article names unnescessarily, or sometimes the non-parenthetical gets deleted via AFD or PROD and the parenthetical version is never moved to reclaim the title. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:15, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- I’ve also seen several instances of this during NPP, I will try coming up with something. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- I did a quick database query and found a total of 37,887 of these, which is far too large to make any kind of useful report. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:50, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- Can these be moved by a bot? If better information is needed before a bot run, then maybe sort by disambiguation and move the ones we know for sure can be moved (pages with
(film),(country film), etc.). Gonnym (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2026 (UTC)- Yeah, that might narrow it down. Start with ones that are "Name (film)" in cases where "Name" doesn't exist, then maybe the same with (band), as those are the two I see most often. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:20, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- All 37,000 can't be moved by a bot because sometimes the actual name of a proper noun includes parentheses, like Barugh (Great and Little) (okay, Barugh technically exists, but I'm not convinced there aren't any like that where the base name is red). Specific parenthetical disambiguators can probably be botted; see Wikipedia:Database reports/Specific unnecessary disambiguations. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:27, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- Can these be moved by a bot? If better information is needed before a bot run, then maybe sort by disambiguation and move the ones we know for sure can be moved (pages with
- TenPoundHammer, from my work on Wikipedia:Missing redirects project I obtained User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/55, which BD2412 organized. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- Well, this is quite it then. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Qwerfjkl: I have been meaning to ask your permission to subdivide that page, as it is of rather unwieldy length. Cheers! BD2412 T 21:49, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- BD2412, by all means. — Qwerfjkltalk 22:28, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Qwerfjkl: I have been meaning to ask your permission to subdivide that page, as it is of rather unwieldy length. Cheers! BD2412 T 21:49, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Qwerfjkl: sweet, that's a big help Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:46, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
- Well, this is quite it then. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Automatically add Template:AI-retrieved source
[edit]Since we have Template:AI-retrieved source, it would be nice if a bot could add this template to refs based on whether they have the utm_source parameter set to a LLM value. (See User:Headbomb/unreliable for a list of these utm_source values).
Sources that were manually verified by someone can simply be marked as "good" by removing the utm_source parameter. Laura240406 (talk) 21:56, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- I would be interested in developing this (n.b. I see that {{AI-retrieved source}} suggests either adding a
|checked=parameter or commenting out the template rather than modifying the source URL). — chrs || talk 02:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Infobox links to football statistics
[edit]For those players that appear in lists such as List of men's footballers with 1,000 or more official appearances, List of men's footballers with 100 or more international caps, List of women's footballers with 100 or more international caps, List of footballers with 500 or more goals or List of women footballers with 300 or more goals, create a link that would lead to that respective page (or its list subsection) directly from the relevant number in the infobox, as is already the case in the Cristiano Ronaldo article when it comes to the international caps statistic, for example.
For lists such as List of men's footballers with 50 or more international goals, List of women's footballers with 100 or more international goals, List of footballers with 500 or more goals or List of women footballers with 300 or more goals, the same may be done, with the caveat that many of their statistics already link to player-specific lists (like in the case of the Barbra Banda article, for example), which is of course preferable and should not be changed.
I have not managed to find examples of such lists in other sports, otherwise they could be included as well.
Thank you a lot for consideration! BasicWriting (talk) 01:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting To be honest, your request isn't clear, at least to me. Mind explaining better? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how better to explain this. This is a further example of an infobox that does have a link and this of one that doesn't. You may also see some of my mechanical contributions to this end, like the last one here, before I realized the task was too broad. Thanks a lot! BasicWriting (talk) 15:37, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting So, I took my time to look at this, and I think it is more technical that it seems; we do not have a clear if–then logic yet. I wanted to ask "Which infobox fields are in scope?" but then I realised that the field is not consistent. For example, Ivan Perišić, the International caps field that needs to be linked is
| nationalcaps4 =, but in another article, like Barbra Banda, the field was| nationalcaps2 =, and for Robert Lewandowski, it is| nationalcaps3 =; in all, that is pretty inconsistent if you ask me. It is not a problem that it is inconsistent, it is only inconsistent for a bot to actually efficiently and correctly work with. Although, I can see that the equivalent| nationalteam# =for these articles is usually only mentioning the "country", which is something we could use to streamline. - Can you provide a fixed whitelist of list pages the bot may link to? Must the player be explicitly present on the list page?, Is linking to the list page sufficient, or must it be player-anchored?
- The request is conceptually valid, but currently underspecified. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:09, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for looking into this! The way this particular issue could be streamlined is that, if we take the article about international caps as an example, the international caps that ought, according to my proposal, to link to that respective list, are by definition all the international caps above 100. So the bot could be considering the number itself and linking any number of 100 and above to said list. If only the player articles that the list links to are considered, then those players will very likely be those explicitly present on the list page (and same for other lists), so the whitelist could simply be all the articles being linked to by the nine lists I have listed. However, the important caveat is that, again, some of those statistics do already have links to player-specific lists, like in my List of international goals scored by Barbra Banda case, so I'd envision the bot as checking for those instances too and not changing them. As for anchoring, so far, those infobox links that are present are not anchored so far, but perhaps they could be to make it easier for the viewers.
- The only issue with this strategy would be those players, who have completed the milestone playing for several teams. But this seems to not be an issue with, say, those players who competed for both West Germany and later Germany (like Lothar Matthäus), as their infobox statistics is taken together, and it is probably the case in other instances too (such as, the goals in the infobox are listed separately for various teams, but the infobox does provide a total sum).
- These are my thoughts, but obviously I am not as gifted in coding as to foresee all possible issues with taking this route. BasicWriting (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting I am still exploring other ways to correctly identify which
| nationalteam# =we can correctly look at. Is it true that most of these Country names are almost always linked to “COUNTRY national football team”? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2026 (UTC)- I would think so (in case of the international lists, anyway). BasicWriting (talk) 22:33, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting For this list and this one too, take anybody listed there as an example, what value in the infobox should be linked to these lists? Please do the same for the last 4 lists you mentioned. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Of the lists you've mentioned: for the first one,
| totalcaps =, for the latter,| totalgoals =, at least that is my base understanding. In the latter case, the link would look better if it were not taking the parentheses the goals are shown in, but I think that does indeed happen automatically already. Not every player does have the sum listed in the infobox, but that should not be not an issue, I imagine. (Or we might write a different bot that first sums the infobox statistics, but that is a different task altogether.) - For the list you've mentioned earlier, it would indeed show a country name after
| nationalteam# =, but some of those might be names of non-existing countries. It might be practical to make it navigate to the largest number among the national teams. - In case of women footballers, much of the same holds with the further caveat that their infobox statistics seem to be oftentimes lacking, so the bot won't link many instances.
- In any case, I would, as a precaution, make the bot first look at the number it is linking, and check whether it is truly equal or greater than 1000, 500, 300, 100 etc. in those respective situations. And, again, not apply any of the above in the case there already is a link present in the infobox field, which is going to be the case mostly with
| nationalgoals# =. - In some ways, I have changed my mind and I don't think it would be a good idea to work on the club statistics at all and just keep our focus on the international statistics. The reason for that is that the club statistics do indeed follow various methodologies and the numbers seem way more inconsistent within the lists and the infoboxes. Possibly, they could know more about that in the respective portal.
- Secondly, and I am even less certain of it, given that some of the international goals fields in the infobox already link to player-specific lists, providing a link in the cases they don't to the general list could possibly border with WP:EASTEREGG, among some interpretations of that rule.
- The cases where, I think, we should definitely go forward without any qualms are thus List of men's footballers with 100 or more international caps and List of women's footballers with 100 or more international caps, even though those might be the hardest to program.
- Thank you a lot for your help! BasicWriting (talk) 11:12, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting As a matter of fact, those are the only two lists I think we can correctly work on with a bot. Because I looked at List of men's footballers with 1,000 or more official appearances and found Tommy Hutchison, for example, in the list table, it says "1,178+", but in his article we only have "983". The other lists cannot work because they will very much require human editorial judgment which would not be appropriate for a bot. Same thing applies to the 300-500 or more goals lists.
- I think we can also work on/with the XX or more international goals since they usually accompany the international caps lists. But just to be clear, did you say you do not want the international goals to be linked if the international caps is linked? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- No, that's not what I said. What I was saying in the original request was that the international goals themselves already link to player-specific lists, and changing those should be avoided (so the bot should just for numbers above a certain threshold and ones that are not part of a link already. BasicWriting (talk) 13:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, got it! I also want to say that, the figures in some of the articles are different from the ones in the list. Take Eseosa Aigbogun for example and the List of women's footballers with 100 or more international caps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:59, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- It does seem that her particular case might be one of a missing update. But this is again why I said the bot ought to first check the actual number in the infobox. If it is above 100 (in the case of the two lists we ought to go through with), and it is a player whose article is being linked by the list, there is a high probability they did appear more than a hundred times and thus the number ought to be linked through. The men's list does mention some of the cases where the number differs and this is due to whether a country's national football team is a member of FIFA or not and different approaches in counting the appearances against them. Something like that might be the case here as well. So, to conclude, in cases like hers, the bot should not link the article to the list. BasicWriting (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Coding... Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)- @BasicWriting Check these diffs, it worked like magic; Special:Diff/1336581922, Special:Diff/1336581949, Special:Diff/1336581978. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- These are truly epic! Thank you for your work!
- The handballers might indeed be a similar case, but if we take a look at List of female handballers with 1000 or more international goals, I do notice some eventualities, given for example how Jasna Kolar-Merdan played for multiple national teams and her infobox doesn't provide a sum for the appearances. But that is fine if we forgo the cases where the sum is not shown. The male list, which, by the way, has to be moved to "List of men's handballers with 1000 or more international goals" (which will go on to request myself), seems to have some fringe cases too, like that of Frank-Michael Wahl or Talant Dujshebaev, where the sums are missing (but these instances are few and far between and may be addressed manually). BasicWriting (talk) 22:15, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- If this is okay, then I can go ahead and file a BRFA for this task. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- I also observed that List of handballers with 1000 or more international goals might just be in the same situation. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:37, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- It does seem that her particular case might be one of a missing update. But this is again why I said the bot ought to first check the actual number in the infobox. If it is above 100 (in the case of the two lists we ought to go through with), and it is a player whose article is being linked by the list, there is a high probability they did appear more than a hundred times and thus the number ought to be linked through. The men's list does mention some of the cases where the number differs and this is due to whether a country's national football team is a member of FIFA or not and different approaches in counting the appearances against them. Something like that might be the case here as well. So, to conclude, in cases like hers, the bot should not link the article to the list. BasicWriting (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, got it! I also want to say that, the figures in some of the articles are different from the ones in the list. Take Eseosa Aigbogun for example and the List of women's footballers with 100 or more international caps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:59, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- No, that's not what I said. What I was saying in the original request was that the international goals themselves already link to player-specific lists, and changing those should be avoided (so the bot should just for numbers above a certain threshold and ones that are not part of a link already. BasicWriting (talk) 13:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Of the lists you've mentioned: for the first one,
- @BasicWriting For this list and this one too, take anybody listed there as an example, what value in the infobox should be linked to these lists? Please do the same for the last 4 lists you mentioned. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- I would think so (in case of the international lists, anyway). BasicWriting (talk) 22:33, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting I am still exploring other ways to correctly identify which
- @BasicWriting So, I took my time to look at this, and I think it is more technical that it seems; we do not have a clear if–then logic yet. I wanted to ask "Which infobox fields are in scope?" but then I realised that the field is not consistent. For example, Ivan Perišić, the International caps field that needs to be linked is
- I'm not sure how better to explain this. This is a further example of an infobox that does have a link and this of one that doesn't. You may also see some of my mechanical contributions to this end, like the last one here, before I realized the task was too broad. Thanks a lot! BasicWriting (talk) 15:37, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
BRFA filed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 02:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting I will not be working with the handballers (men's and women's), I think those are small number of entries altogether and can be manually worked on. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:08, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Dear Vanderwaalforces, I have finished working on the handballers, and it led me to another (perhaps less complicated) suggestion: we could also try to link all players in these lists to them by the virtue of the "See also" section, where we would list the corresponding lists they're in (again, excluding those links already present). This way we could capture even the lists that are for various reasons we've talked about above not applicable for the infoboxes. BasicWriting (talk) 11:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting That makes sense. I have added that functionality now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:33, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- Dear Vanderwaalforces, I have finished working on the handballers, and it led me to another (perhaps less complicated) suggestion: we could also try to link all players in these lists to them by the virtue of the "See also" section, where we would list the corresponding lists they're in (again, excluding those links already present). This way we could capture even the lists that are for various reasons we've talked about above not applicable for the infoboxes. BasicWriting (talk) 11:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- @BasicWriting I will not be working with the handballers (men's and women's), I think those are small number of entries altogether and can be manually worked on. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:08, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
UTM Bot Request
[edit]Hi! I have a bot idea, and since I don't have the knowledge of how to code it, I'll share my idea:
links = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (var link of links) {
var href = link.getAttribute("href");
if (!href) continue;
if (href[0] == "#") href = location.href + href;
else if (href[0] == "/") href = location.protocol + "//" + location.pathname;
var source = new URL(href).searchParams.get("utm_source");
if (source !== null) {
// Add page to Category "Pages with utm_source={source}"
}
}Iterate through all namespaces, then through all pages in that namespace. Please share any questions with me. Thanks! SeaDragon1 (talk) — Happy new year! 14:01, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- @SeaDragon1 Does that category exist? What problem are we solving with this? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- It makes sorting easier. SeaDragon1 (talk) — Happy new year! 14:20, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- Besides, I'm pretty sure there are a lot of non-existent categories that pages still put themselves in. SeaDragon1 (talk) — Happy new year! 14:24, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure what you're sorting. I have a bot task that removes utm_source tags from URLs, is that what you're wanting? Primefac (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Well, I mean we can know WHICH pages have WHICH
utm_sourcetags, so we don't have to scour every single page. SeaDragon1 (talk) 20:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC) - Hello? SeaDragon1 (talk, contribs, happy birthday!) 17:24, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
- HELLO? SeaDragon1 (talk, contributions) 16:09, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Primefac? SeaDragon1 (talk, contributions) 16:09, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- I personally don’t understand this request tbh, it’s not well put together at least to me. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:44, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- What I mean is:
- We can organize pages based on what UTM source the links in the article have.
- For example, this would be in Category:Pages with utm_source=chatgpt.com:
[https://example.com/page?utm_source=chatgpt.com]SeaDragon1 (talk, contributions) 18:43, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- I personally don’t understand this request tbh, it’s not well put together at least to me. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:44, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Primefac? SeaDragon1 (talk, contributions) 16:09, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Primefac, is there any worry of it removing a useful flag of an AI-generated reference? — Qwerfjkltalk 19:57, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not particularly concerned about the content of the utm values, I suspect a large number have been removed but utm tracking doesn't necessarily mean the site itself is AI-generated. Primefac (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Primefac, no, but it could suggest that the source may not verify the text. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:50, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- Do we have a consensus, or..? SeaDragon1 (talk, contributions) 14:33, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- Primefac, no, but it could suggest that the source may not verify the text. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:50, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not particularly concerned about the content of the utm values, I suspect a large number have been removed but utm tracking doesn't necessarily mean the site itself is AI-generated. Primefac (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Well, I mean we can know WHICH pages have WHICH
- I'm not entirely sure what you're sorting. I have a bot task that removes utm_source tags from URLs, is that what you're wanting? Primefac (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Besides, I'm pretty sure there are a lot of non-existent categories that pages still put themselves in. SeaDragon1 (talk) — Happy new year! 14:24, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- It makes sorting easier. SeaDragon1 (talk) — Happy new year! 14:20, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Infobox settlement country label easter egg/overlink delinking
[edit]Way back in the early days of the project Template:Infobox settlement was created, and all was good. This template was inserted into many thousands of pages before someone realized "hey, maybe we shouldn't include the link subdivision_type = [[List of sovereign states|Country]] and it should be just be subdivision_type = Country for reasons of A) it's an WP:EASTEREGG link and B) people know what a country is, it doesn't need linking. Discussions were had on the template talk page, and the link was swiftly removed. However this was not before the template had been copied onto many thousands of settlement article pages, and this link still persists there to this day on many. I've been removing it when I see it, but this seems like a very simple and uncontroversial job for a bot to perform. It appears simple (it's only in the Template:Infobox settlement section of an article) and it's always the same field. Thoughts? Canterbury Tail talk 18:12, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Canterbury Tail, search gives 150,000 articles. I can take care of this, but I've a bit busy so it would have to wait until the weekend. If anyone else wants to have a go before then feel free. — Qwerfjkltalk 22:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
BRFA filed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you all kindly. Canterbury Tail talk 23:30, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Hip-hop hyphens
[edit]Although Wikipedia's categories for the genre of music use the spelling hip-hop with a hyphen, the redlinked category report sees a constant infusion of pages where somebody has either erroneously used the unhyphenated "hip hop" on a new article instead of the existing categories, or tried to flip longstanding articles that were in the existing categories back to the unhyphenated spelling for some reason. There are always at least one or two, and sometimes several more, "hip hop" categories for which the exact same category already exists at the "hip-hop" form, on that report pretty much every single time it updates with new redlinked categories.
So I wanted to ask if there would be any support for ensuring that any category with a hyphenated hip-hop spelling also has a categoryredirect from the unhyphenated hip hop, so that this stops being my problem to fix and can be left to the bots that fix categoryredirect errors instead? And if so, then is there a bot that could be set loose on creating the redirects? Bearcat (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Establishing support for these 800-some category soft-redirects be created would probably be better done at WP:Village pump (proposals), or maybe WT:WikiProject Hip-hop. P.S. You may want to rename Category:Comedy hip hop musical groups. Anomie⚔ 19:30, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Request for bot to perform automated task related to MOS:POSLINK
[edit]I'm requesting that a task be created for a bot to perform the following action per MOS:POSLINK that has very little chance of having any false positives:
Replace
[[Foo|Foo's]]with[[Foo]]'s.
This can probably be a task that runs an indefinite amount of times, probably once every month or so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:38, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Is there any consensus for a bot to mass replace these for MOS:POSLINK though? Tenshi! (Talk page) 21:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- WP:BOTREQUIRE doesn't require that, and the content of MOS:POSLINK was formed by a RfC. But, if that route needs to be taken, by all means, bureaucracy away! Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- This seems like a WP:COSMETICBOT to me. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Interesting, didn't know that existed. (But, then again, I don't read the bot policy page that much.) Whatever happens here happens, but either way, this policy was recently formed via consensus and this type of change has ... almost no false positive chance. Steel1943 (talk) 21:55, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Technically not WP:COSMETICBOT, as it does make a difference to the rendering of the link. Anomie⚔ 00:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- It does not make a difference in the rendering of the link. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- It does, though. Foo's is different from Foo's. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 06:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Vanderwaalforces: It may be difficult to see, but notice the differences between how the "
's" is linked in both the links Myceteae made above. Steel1943 (talk) 20:18, 1 February 2026 (UTC)- Maybe I was understanding "rendering" differently. But why I said there's no difference is that both of them have the same href= and title= values, only the display text is different. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- COSMETICBOT rules are primarily about whether the rendered HTML differs between the two edits. Removing whitespace does not affect how the page is rendered. Changing the formatting of a URL from Foo's to Foo's does affect the HTML output of the page. In my opinion, this does not count as a cosmetic edit. phuzion (talk) 17:07, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Maybe I was understanding "rendering" differently. But why I said there's no difference is that both of them have the same href= and title= values, only the display text is different. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Vanderwaalforces: It may be difficult to see, but notice the differences between how the "
- It does, though. Foo's is different from Foo's. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 06:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- It does not make a difference in the rendering of the link. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I'm not objecting to this, was just wondering if there was or not. Tenshi! (Talk page) 21:53, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, I was thinking that your question was based off of it being some kind of prerequisite to perform such a task (as I would've expected from a place that has editors that are probably rather technical.) My apologies for the misunderstanding. Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- As I understand, there is no requirement that bot requests must have consensus beforehand, although for contentious tasks (e.g. an adminbot that deletes G13'd drafts) it would likely need a consensus to run such a bot. Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- I think for a task that is borderline COSMETICBOT like this one, even if not strictly required, it would be a good idea to get consensus beforehand. — Qwerfjkltalk 14:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- It looks like there was an RFC that created a subsection of the MOS that indicates that we shouldn't have the 's inside of links. I'd say that's a pretty good consensus. I'll see if I can come up with something. Primefac (talk) 20:18, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
I'd say that's a pretty good consensus.
Agreed. This bot would straightforwardly correct clear cut violations of MOS:POSLINK, a recent addition to the MOS which made following a well-attended and near-unanimous RFC. Thanks @Primefac for working on this and thank you to @Steel1943 for suggesting this fix. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 20:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- It looks like there was an RFC that created a subsection of the MOS that indicates that we shouldn't have the 's inside of links. I'd say that's a pretty good consensus. I'll see if I can come up with something. Primefac (talk) 20:18, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think for a task that is borderline COSMETICBOT like this one, even if not strictly required, it would be a good idea to get consensus beforehand. — Qwerfjkltalk 14:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- As I understand, there is no requirement that bot requests must have consensus beforehand, although for contentious tasks (e.g. an adminbot that deletes G13'd drafts) it would likely need a consensus to run such a bot. Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, I was thinking that your question was based off of it being some kind of prerequisite to perform such a task (as I would've expected from a place that has editors that are probably rather technical.) My apologies for the misunderstanding. Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- This seems like a WP:COSMETICBOT to me. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- WP:BOTREQUIRE doesn't require that, and the content of MOS:POSLINK was formed by a RfC. But, if that route needs to be taken, by all means, bureaucracy away! Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any updates on this? Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- No. It's still on my list. Primefac (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
Mass-delinking of word "population" in articles about Japanese populated places, etc.
[edit]Please see Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks § Mass-delinking of word "population" in articles about Japanese populated places. I was sent here but there are so many odd things going on that this is just a pointer, for now. Graham87 (talk) 08:56, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Graham87 Tbh, I think the move request discussion makes sense, and that what's needed now is for the fate of the current population and population (human biology) articles to be determined; I would support the move.
- But then, if the move happens, then it articles linking to the current population that are not related to human biology would still need to be updated, which makes the whole thing really complicated as you've mentioned. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:45, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- This will likely be a very simple bot run. I'd be happy to knock this out once we have determined the fate of those two articles. Please feel free to ping me if/when we come to a conclusion. phuzion (talk) 17:01, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Request for Co-operator for User:FireflyBot
[edit]Hello, Bot afficiandos,
I regularly handle stale drafts for the project and for the past year, I have gotten nervous about FireflyBot's operation. I check every six months to make sure that it is operating daily because, in the past, when it has stopped working, it can take months before anyone notices its inactivity. As long as I have been around, its malfunctioning, at least regarding CSD G13 notices, has been rare, maybe 3 times over the past five years, but it performs this essential but rarely noticed task which is informing content creators when their drafts and sandboxes are hitting the 5 month mark for inactivity. When the calendar hits 6 months, the draft then becomes eligible for speedy deletion, CSD G13. My one issue with FireflyBot is that it only does the 5 month notification once for drafts and I wish it would do so every time the inactivity level hits 5 months but let's leave that matter for another discussion. But these 5 month notices are very useful, it helps content creators keep track of their work and lessens the number of restoration requests at WP:REFUND from editors who want their expired drafts to be restored after a CSD G13 deletion.
The reason why I am posting this here is that the bot oprerator, User:Firefly has not been active as an editor in over a year and also no longer has admin privileges. The last time I emailed them, back in early 2025, I didn't get a reply and I think they have moved on from working on the project. Even though FireflyBot is very reliable, I was wondering if any knowledgeable editor would be willing to sign on as a co-operator of this bot in case there are any problems in the future. I don't anticipate any trouble but it would put me at east if I knew there was a backup bot expert I could turn to if there were any emergencies. I don't know if this requires approval from Firefly or we could just make this an informal agreement but I thought I would be proactive and make the request now instead of waiting until a problem emerges at some point in the next few years. Thanks, in advance, for any assistance offered. Liz Read! Talk! 00:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I wouldn't mind being a maintainer since I also am looking after a tool of Firefly's, however the major problem is that the Toolforge Standards Committee will in most cases refuse to give other editors the bot passwords or OAuth consumer keys in adoption request transfers, which in essence is what is needed to log in as FireflyBot. Essentially, if an error occurred and FireflyBot stopped working and if Firefly isn't around, a full takeover of its tasks would be needed by a new bot. Tenshi! (Talk page) 00:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- DreamRimmer bot III is already approved as a backup bot. – DreamRimmer ■ 00:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) That is useful to know that there's a backup already. Has the G13 notifications stopped after that BRFA at all? Tenshi! (Talk page) 00:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- DreamRimmer bot III is already approved as a backup bot. – DreamRimmer ■ 00:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's probably worth setting up notifications via Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor if you/we are worried that the bot might silently stop working. Legoktm (talk) 01:05, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Useless non-free no reduce tags
[edit]{{Non-free no reduce}} is intended to keep a bot (I think it is DatBot (talk · contribs)) from downsizing large non-free images to no more than 100k square pixels. Therefore, it is redundant and pointless if an image with size ≤100k has this tag. I recently found an image File:Gangbusters title.png that had this tag with a size of 418×239 px (99902 px2). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:16, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
- This page is for bot requests. Are you requesting a bot? SeaDragon1 (talk, contributions) 16:11, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, because this is an issue that is trivial to handle and likely to recur in the future. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:40, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- So from a bot perspective, how often (generally speaking) does this sort of thing happen? Primefac (talk) 12:56, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- Looks like there are currently 204 such images, 41 with the latest file revision in 2025 and one so far in 2026. There are also four audio files with the tag: File:J Dilla - Don't Cry.ogg, File:J Dilla - Time, The Donut of the Heart.ogg, File:Jane Remover - Dreamflasher.ogg, and File:Kanye West - Blood on the Leaves.ogg.I note 57 of the 204 are in Category:Sports uniforms, 54 of them last uploaded in 2024. Many appear to be templated images showing two variations of a uniform, in contrast to others (over 100000px2) that have three variations (e.g. File:ECM-Uniform-PHI.png vs File:ECA-Uniform-DET.png), which makes me suspect they started tagging all new template images with {{Non-free no reduce}}. Anomie⚔ 19:55, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- So from a bot perspective, how often (generally speaking) does this sort of thing happen? Primefac (talk) 12:56, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, because this is an issue that is trivial to handle and likely to recur in the future. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:40, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
archive.today cleanup
[edit]Cross-posting Wikipedia:Link rot/URL change requests § Migration away from archive.today, but as a non-standard URL replacement I think this would be more appropriate for a new bot task.
After an RFC, links to archive.today have been deprecated and should be removed as expeditiously as possible. The current instructions are at WP:ATODAY. It would be amazing if a bot could loop through all links to dot-today and:
- Get the page being archived (chopping off the
https://archive.(fo|is|li|md|ph|today|vn)/<numbers>/prefix from archive URLs, like https://archive.today/20120710094053/http://freespace.virgin.net/howard.anderson/loospreparations.htm) - If the URL is available at archive.org, replace the dot-today link with a dot-org link. Dot-org has an API for fetching already-archived URLs, and it also returns the appropriate date for the
|archive-date=(from {{cite xxx}}) or|date=(from {{webarchive}})) parameters. - If the page is not archived at archive.org:
- If the original URL is still live, try to archive it at archive.org (after a lot of digging, I found the API instructions for saving a page). If archiving works, replace the dot-today link with dot-org; otherwise, remove the WP:EARLYARCHIVE.
- If the original URL is dead, tag the link with
{{New archival link needed|date={{subst:monthyear}}|bot=insert your bot's name here}}
Thanks a million, in advance. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:50, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is not an appropriate task for a bot. sapphaline (talk) 22:08, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree; if we manage to run things like IAbot and WaybackMedic, which have to deal with the same hurdles, we can find a way to make it work. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:11, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- IABot and WaybackMedic archive live URLs; of course doing so is 1000 times easier than trying to archive dead URLs. sapphaline (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- They... do in fact archive dead URLs? Unless you select
Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)
, IABot only adds archives to dead URLs. WaybackMedic task 3 and 4 do likewise. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:23, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- They... do in fact archive dead URLs? Unless you select
- IABot and WaybackMedic archive live URLs; of course doing so is 1000 times easier than trying to archive dead URLs. sapphaline (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree; if we manage to run things like IAbot and WaybackMedic, which have to deal with the same hurdles, we can find a way to make it work. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:11, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- You have to verify that the content relevant to the citation is actually available at the live url and/or archive.org. This is not always true, and it is not possible to reliably do this by bot. A few days ago I found an instance where the URL was dead and the archive link was of a 404 page, fortunately an older archive snapshot actually had the content saved but this required my abilities as a human to determine. Thryduulf (talk) 22:51, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- It should be possible to automatically extract and compare content, and replace the archive.today link with the alternative link if the match percentage is very high, but this would certainly be more resource-intensive than a search-and-replace bot. Bit of brainstorming here: Wikipedia talk:Archive.today guidance#Bot for checking for identical text. Dreamyshade (talk) 23:26, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- To build off of this, Wikipedia talk:Archive.today guidance#Most common links suggests that there are 600+ instances that can be fixed by a bot swapping from archive.today to the Internet Archive along with 1,000+ instances where a page changed urls and could be updated by changing the link with a bot. --Super Goku V (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- It should be possible to automatically extract and compare content, and replace the archive.today link with the alternative link if the match percentage is very high, but this would certainly be more resource-intensive than a search-and-replace bot. Bit of brainstorming here: Wikipedia talk:Archive.today guidance#Bot for checking for identical text. Dreamyshade (talk) 23:26, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think a bot is premature. I'm feverishly trying to edit pages from my watchlist (that contain archive.today) in the hopes I can get them all done before "some bot" comes along and yanks them out from under me. I'm occasionally using the archived archive.today link (on a browser with uBlock Origin) to see the page. Sometimes it's worthless (like a 404 page copied) and I can just remove it from the Wikipedia article, but other times I've been able to use other URLs and title wording found on that archive.today page that have led to me successfully finding (a) actual live pages with newer URLs, and (b) archive.org pages which weren't available to me with only the information found in the Wikipedia article. To resolve about 10% (estim.) of the archive.today links, I've needed to view the archive.today copy. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 23:14, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- This proposed bot would not entirely remove any links. It would replace links to dot-org ones, and tag ones that can't be replaced. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:29, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Okay. That's acceptable. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 23:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- This proposed bot would not entirely remove any links. It would replace links to dot-org ones, and tag ones that can't be replaced. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:29, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- A couple big points: We need a bot - the task is too large to do manually, and the RfC close is unambiguous that these links need to go. The bot is technically difficult - We have plenty of comments from people who know what they're talking about indicating that the full task is not possible to automate without many errors. I definitely think we want a bot that gets used in a staged approach. As a first step, peeling the archive off of links we believe are alive leaving the live link solves a large fraction of the problem. After that we can start working on the rest website by website to figure out if other archive sites are consistently good, consistently impossible, or messy, and handle the first 2 automatically while leaving the third group for a manual cleanup. Tazerdadog (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Remember that while removing archives from a live link may solve today's hot-button issue it is simultaneously creating a different problem for the future if the link is not archived somewhere else. Thryduulf (talk) 01:18, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, a run from IAbot over the affected articles after it stops linking to archive.today would probably be in order. That said, the archive.today issue is absolutely the urgent one. Tazerdadog (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree that we should wilfully create future problems without regard for how to solve them. The urgency of replacing archive.today is entirely artificial. Thryduulf (talk) 02:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- There is consensus that it should be removed as quickly as possible because it is an unreliable source containing malware. That sounds pretty urgent to me. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- No, there was consensus to remove links "as soon as practicable" due to alleged verifiability issues. Even if there was consensus that the code was malware and/or that it required action (and there was no consensus on that matter alone) the "urgency" is entirely chosen by some of the participants in the RFC. A "solution" that creates new problems without regard to solving them is not a practicable one. Thryduulf (talk) 03:03, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Many edits might create future problems. But we are worried about the present. I don't see why a solution which might cause isolated problems at some indeterminate point in the future is not practicable. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)There is a strong consensus that Wikipedia should not direct its readers towards a website that hijacks users' computers to run a DDoS attack
, and then linking to our guideline about malware, sounds like there is consensus that the link is malware. I haven't heard a single argument (other than proof by assertion) to rebut the arguments based on the literal definition of malware. To reiterate, we define malware asany software intentionally designed to cause disruption to a computer, server, client, or computer network
. It is software (obviously), it causes disruption to a computer network (that's what a DDOS is), and it was intentional. It is malware.- Regardless of the technicalities of whether archive.today's code is or isn't malware, simply removing links is more than "might" cause "isolated problems" it's will cause problems of unknown magnitude, potentially tomorrow. WP:V is a core, non-negotiable policy that we absolutely must have regard for because there is a big difference between accidentally creating problems on a small scale through good-faith ignorance and wilfully and recklessly causing known problems on an unknown scale through haste. Thryduulf (talk) 03:23, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Correct, and that's why removing links to an unreliable source is urgent. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:26, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Except removing the links without replacement isn't urgent for any reason other than the desire of a few self-selecting Wikipedians, and it isn't beneficial or desirable for any reason at all. Further, if you believe that any of the problems being discussed here is links to an unreliable source then you have grossly missunderstood the issues. The issue at hand is ensuring that WP:V will be continued to be met in the future, long after the present moral panic has blown over and cooler heads once again prevail. This is an issue that we have no choice but to address ideally before but certainly no later than the time we address the removal of the existing archive. Thryduulf (talk) 03:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Houseblaster responded to my same concerns above:
This proposed bot would not entirely remove any links. It would replace links to dot-org ones, and tag ones that can't be replaced.
▶ I am Grorp ◀ 03:44, 23 February 2026 (UTC)- That's good, but it isn't part of this proposal by Tazerdog,
As a first step, peeling the archive off of links we believe are alive leaving the live link solves a large fraction of the problem.
Thryduulf (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- That's good, but it isn't part of this proposal by Tazerdog,
- @Thryduulf Having material sourced to a website that we know (you get to interact with the evidence of alterered screenshots - specifically compare [4] with with archive.today website, if you'd need to) is a WP:V issue. We need to ensure WP:V is met - but just because I can verify the claim to a screenshot of a newspaper somebody put on reddit, alongside a "trust me bro, this is legit" doesn't mean I it's guaranteed protection under the verification policy. In fact, it isn't - if the claim is related to living people, and I believe it to be contentious, then it's 100% not guaranteed and policy dictates that we remove or better source the material without delay. Now, whether a bot it is the best way to do that, I'll leave to people who actually have experience with dealing with bots on Wikipedia. But to say something to the effect of "we have to keep a website we know has forged material around because they're the only way I can verify these sensitive BLP claims (one of the few things for which we actually require an inline citation)" is, quite frankly, ludicrous. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 05:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Almost none of that is related to the actual reality of the situation, as opposed to unsubstantiated and unverified claims about what the archive.today might be doing. When all the hyperbole and exaggeration is put to one side, it is equally important that we ensure WP:V is met tomorrow as well as today as it is to remove archive.today links that there is a tiny possibility might not be accurate (and in none of the cases has anyone demonstrated any changes that are relevant to any material verified, I don't even recall any allegations of such but there are so many accusations in so many parallel discussions I may have missed some). Your final sentence also makes it clear you haven't actually read and/or understood much of what I'm saying. Thryduulf (talk) 05:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Thryduulf, if you looked through the list at WP:NOTGOODSOURCE, and compared it to what we know about this collection of archives, do you think you'd be left feeling like it's a reliable archive?
- "It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" – Um, nope. In fact, the owner appears to be going out of their way to ruin their reputation.
- "It is published by a reputable publishing house" – Heading determinedly into the "disreputable" territory, wouldn't you say?
- "It has a professional structure in place for deciding whether to publish something, such as editorial oversight or peer review processes" – Professionalism is a good word to describe what's missing here.
- Remember Lugnuts' parting claim that he'd deliberately falsified information in some articles, and how that has haunted some editors for years, even though there's no evidence that Lugnuts ever did that to any article? This situation is worse than that. We have proof that this website is doing that, and the risk is enough to turn most editors against it. We don't meet WP:V's requirements by having an unreliable archived copy of a now-dead website.
- Also, have you noticed the pattern? We say "at least they're not doing X" on one day, and the next day, they do X. We say, "well, they might be doing X, but at least they're not doing Y", and the next day, they do Y. So please think about WP:BEANS before you post any more comments about how they haven't transgressed some further bright line yet. It's already bad enough. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- WAID has, as expected, said this far more eloquently than I could. One additional point, though, @Thryduulf -- I've stuck to what archive.today has done and threatened to do, and taken those threats seriously. I have made more speculative posts, but over all, not that many.. But I could, if you'd like? For example, let's take the statement we got from the WMF:
[5]We know that WMF intervention is a big deal, but we also have not ruled it out, given the seriousness of the security concern for people who click the links that appear across many wikis.
- Hopefully now we, as a
few self-selecting Wikipedians
, have taken steps to limit the spread of links, the WMF won't need to take further action. But they might. Forcibly removing all links is something they 100% have the right - some may argue an obligation - to do. I'd rather that we, as a community, deal with the links first, making efforts to switch the links to alternative archives or alternative sources when possible. On our own terms. Because the WMF has made it clear that they haven't ruled out acting, and I think we'll do a better job. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 06:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC)- I agree with your interpretation of the WMF's statement. However, it's not the only way this decision could be taken out of our hands. Global blacklisting was proposed today at m:Requests for comment/Deprecate archive.today. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:59, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Stupid question - I know the enWiki blacklist and (and the edit filter, in this particular care) ideally doesn't prevent us from editing pages with the blacklisted link, only from adding the link. (Which I've gotten around when requesting cv-revdels by spelling out the "www.example.com" as "www dot example dot com" I think that gets a bit messed up when it comes to reverts. Does anybody know if the global blacklist works similarly, or is the only difference the fact that it impacts all Wikipedia projects? Does it impact all Wikipedia projects, actually? I'm assuming it blocks all namespaces - I think our filter has exceptions for archive .is /today links for project-space areas (which incidentally facilitates cleanup). Have I made a stupid mistake in that assumption? GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 08:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Special:AbuseFilter allows per-namespace options. MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist unfortunately does not. I believe the only thing that's different about the global blacklist is that ours only affects us, and the global one affects all the wikis. WhatamIdoing (talk) 08:19, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Stupid question - I know the enWiki blacklist and (and the edit filter, in this particular care) ideally doesn't prevent us from editing pages with the blacklisted link, only from adding the link. (Which I've gotten around when requesting cv-revdels by spelling out the "www.example.com" as "www dot example dot com" I think that gets a bit messed up when it comes to reverts. Does anybody know if the global blacklist works similarly, or is the only difference the fact that it impacts all Wikipedia projects? Does it impact all Wikipedia projects, actually? I'm assuming it blocks all namespaces - I think our filter has exceptions for archive .is /today links for project-space areas (which incidentally facilitates cleanup). Have I made a stupid mistake in that assumption? GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 08:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I agree with your interpretation of the WMF's statement. However, it's not the only way this decision could be taken out of our hands. Global blacklisting was proposed today at m:Requests for comment/Deprecate archive.today. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:59, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Thryduulf, if you looked through the list at WP:NOTGOODSOURCE, and compared it to what we know about this collection of archives, do you think you'd be left feeling like it's a reliable archive?
- Almost none of that is related to the actual reality of the situation, as opposed to unsubstantiated and unverified claims about what the archive.today might be doing. When all the hyperbole and exaggeration is put to one side, it is equally important that we ensure WP:V is met tomorrow as well as today as it is to remove archive.today links that there is a tiny possibility might not be accurate (and in none of the cases has anyone demonstrated any changes that are relevant to any material verified, I don't even recall any allegations of such but there are so many accusations in so many parallel discussions I may have missed some). Your final sentence also makes it clear you haven't actually read and/or understood much of what I'm saying. Thryduulf (talk) 05:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Houseblaster responded to my same concerns above:
- Except removing the links without replacement isn't urgent for any reason other than the desire of a few self-selecting Wikipedians, and it isn't beneficial or desirable for any reason at all. Further, if you believe that any of the problems being discussed here is links to an unreliable source then you have grossly missunderstood the issues. The issue at hand is ensuring that WP:V will be continued to be met in the future, long after the present moral panic has blown over and cooler heads once again prevail. This is an issue that we have no choice but to address ideally before but certainly no later than the time we address the removal of the existing archive. Thryduulf (talk) 03:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Correct, and that's why removing links to an unreliable source is urgent. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:26, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Regardless of the technicalities of whether archive.today's code is or isn't malware, simply removing links is more than "might" cause "isolated problems" it's will cause problems of unknown magnitude, potentially tomorrow. WP:V is a core, non-negotiable policy that we absolutely must have regard for because there is a big difference between accidentally creating problems on a small scale through good-faith ignorance and wilfully and recklessly causing known problems on an unknown scale through haste. Thryduulf (talk) 03:23, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- No, there was consensus to remove links "as soon as practicable" due to alleged verifiability issues. Even if there was consensus that the code was malware and/or that it required action (and there was no consensus on that matter alone) the "urgency" is entirely chosen by some of the participants in the RFC. A "solution" that creates new problems without regard to solving them is not a practicable one. Thryduulf (talk) 03:03, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- There is consensus that it should be removed as quickly as possible because it is an unreliable source containing malware. That sounds pretty urgent to me. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree that we should wilfully create future problems without regard for how to solve them. The urgency of replacing archive.today is entirely artificial. Thryduulf (talk) 02:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, a run from IAbot over the affected articles after it stops linking to archive.today would probably be in order. That said, the archive.today issue is absolutely the urgent one. Tazerdadog (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Remember that while removing archives from a live link may solve today's hot-button issue it is simultaneously creating a different problem for the future if the link is not archived somewhere else. Thryduulf (talk) 01:18, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I am currently workshopping a related proposal at the village pump idea lab. tl;dr: the tasks of GreenC_bot/WaybackMedic and IABot can probably do some work on the second part, but it's somewhere between unlikely and unclear whether full automation is technically feasible and desirable. Adding the new cleanup tag specific to this problem (its name may be changed to Template:Deprecated archive per the VPI discussion) and removing problematic links should be the bare minimum and both of those tasks can be automated. mdm.bla 01:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Also @HouseBlaster: Currently the tag does not have a
|bot=parameter. Can that just be added into the template? mdm.bla 01:15, 23 February 2026 (UTC)- It can. It (probably) wouldn't change the output; it would just alert editors viewing the page source code that the tag was placed by a bot. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Template adjusted. [new archival link needed] now displays properly with the bot parameter. mdm.bla 01:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think you misunderstood the way it normally works: usually, the bot parameter has zero effect on the template. It just exists, and doesn't trip the unknown parameter check. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:31, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @HouseBlaster: Thanks for the adjustments; I'm not a prolific template creator and overthought that whole thing wayyyyyy too much. mdm.bla 05:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think you misunderstood the way it normally works: usually, the bot parameter has zero effect on the template. It just exists, and doesn't trip the unknown parameter check. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:31, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- It can. It (probably) wouldn't change the output; it would just alert editors viewing the page source code that the tag was placed by a bot. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Also @HouseBlaster: Currently the tag does not have a
Three domain names that we can remove
[edit]As Dreamyshade mentioned, about ~12K of these links go to three websites:
- nytimes.com
- newspapers.com
- washingtonpost.com
These two newspapers maintain their own archives (and so do major public libraries). The middle one is an archive itself. I suggest that unwanted archive links to all three of these could simply be removed by bot. It's only ~2% of the links, but since 100% of the archive links to these domain names are unnecessary for WP:V purposes, then nothing more than a simple removal is needed, and we should get that 2% of the job done. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- If a bot removes archive-urls from articles in my watchlist purview, I'll revert them to restore the archived links. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:43, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Grorp, Newspapers.com is an archive. The source is the newspaper. Newspapers.com is an archive of the source. Archive.today is an archive of an archive of the source. Why do you need an archive of an archive of the source? WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- You don't. This subsection and your post above was ambiguous. It seemed to suggest a bot should remove ALL |archive-urls of things like nytimes.com... not just remove archive.today links for nytimes. My bad if I read it as the wrong fork of the ambiguity. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:51, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- We are only talking about removing "unwanted archive links" (and in my case, only ones that are 100% unnecessary for WP:V purposes). That includes archive.today but also "archive dot lots of other things", since that same owner has multiple domain names. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Who has conclusively decided what archive links are unnecessary/unwanted? There are multiple Wikipedia pages dedicated to combating link rot, many of which are even encouraging users to archive everything to help preserve verifiability. And evidently according to WP:PLRT the pervasive threat of link rot has become such a concern that all new links added to Wikipedia are automatically archived. This messaging from WP:DEADREF and WP:MDLI is very confusing. --skarz (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Skarz, do we need someone to "conclusively" decide every single thing? Or do you think that editors could use their own best judgement to make decisions? Imagine someone saying "Gee, that's a common university textbook. I remember lugging it around in my backpack. Amazon still sells hardback copies. Okay, we probably don't need a link to an online 'archive' for that book". WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- You completely sidestepped my legitimate question and gave me some bogus strawman argument. Nice. Reminder that your own words are that you are removing archives that are "100 unnecessary." Nevertheless, I am not aware of entire textbooks being archived on Wikipedia nor do I support that endeavor. I am, however, aware that Wikipedia policy encourages webpage archival to prevent link rot which in turn protects WP:V. Thanks, and have a great night. --skarz (talk) 01:09, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- Well, unlike you, I have seen whole books get archive links spammed into the citation (and yes, I did complain to the bot op at the time), and I do think those are 100% unnecessary.
- Link rot is a potential problem for websites. Link rot is not a problem for dead-tree media. For example, every source archived in Newspapers.com is a scanned copy of a physical newspaper page. Those sources exist on paper. A URL that allows you to read a dead-tree source online is a Wikipedia:Convenience link. It is not a necessity. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:01, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- Here's an example of me removing an archive link for a whole text book. The book's available on Amazon for about $25, and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Cost applies. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- You completely sidestepped my legitimate question and gave me some bogus strawman argument. Nice. Reminder that your own words are that you are removing archives that are "100 unnecessary." Nevertheless, I am not aware of entire textbooks being archived on Wikipedia nor do I support that endeavor. I am, however, aware that Wikipedia policy encourages webpage archival to prevent link rot which in turn protects WP:V. Thanks, and have a great night. --skarz (talk) 01:09, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- We also had a formally closed well attended RFC close with a need to remove all of the archive.today links. We're trying to be courteous and do that in a way that minimizes future linkrot, but we do have to do it. In this case, the live links are expected to be stable for these domains. If you want to run behind the bot with a fixed archive bot, great! But standing in the way because removing some links that absolutely need to be removed might cause some issues in the future is unpersuasive when we have the strongest consensus you can get on Wikipedia that these links as is are causing major issues right now. Frankly, how/if/with what priority these links get rearchived is out of scope here - we have to remove these, and the discussion of how to get them rearchived can be separated out. Tazerdadog (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- I am hardly "standing in the way" of anything, I was asking clarification on which archive links are considered unnecessary per WP:PLRT. --skarz (talk) 01:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Skarz, do we need someone to "conclusively" decide every single thing? Or do you think that editors could use their own best judgement to make decisions? Imagine someone saying "Gee, that's a common university textbook. I remember lugging it around in my backpack. Amazon still sells hardback copies. Okay, we probably don't need a link to an online 'archive' for that book". WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- Who has conclusively decided what archive links are unnecessary/unwanted? There are multiple Wikipedia pages dedicated to combating link rot, many of which are even encouraging users to archive everything to help preserve verifiability. And evidently according to WP:PLRT the pervasive threat of link rot has become such a concern that all new links added to Wikipedia are automatically archived. This messaging from WP:DEADREF and WP:MDLI is very confusing. --skarz (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- We are only talking about removing "unwanted archive links" (and in my case, only ones that are 100% unnecessary for WP:V purposes). That includes archive.today but also "archive dot lots of other things", since that same owner has multiple domain names. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Some Newspapers.com archive links are necessary because the publication is no longer available there. For instance, WSWG extensively cites a newspaper Newspapers.com only had available for a few days. It is not even searchable now. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 04:55, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- So? We're not citing the newspapers.com archive. We're citing the newspaper itself. If you're citing The Mulberry Advance, and it happened to be available
|via=the Newspapers.com archive, and now it's not available through that archive, then – who cares? It's still a valid printed-on-paper source, even if you can't see it anywhere online. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- So? We're not citing the newspapers.com archive. We're citing the newspaper itself. If you're citing The Mulberry Advance, and it happened to be available
- You don't. This subsection and your post above was ambiguous. It seemed to suggest a bot should remove ALL |archive-urls of things like nytimes.com... not just remove archive.today links for nytimes. My bad if I read it as the wrong fork of the ambiguity. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:51, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Grorp, Newspapers.com is an archive. The source is the newspaper. Newspapers.com is an archive of the source. Archive.today is an archive of an archive of the source. Why do you need an archive of an archive of the source? WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes please! This is a good start - it's a meaningful chunk of sources, and it should help us dial in the process. Tazerdadog (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Reference spam detector
[edit]I would like to see a bot that would detect likely Reference spam, and generate a confidence score internally, the way User:Cluebot NG does. Ideally, at high levels of confidence, perhaps it could just revert as Cluebot does, but in any case, it ought to generate a project page with a table or log of rated edits so that humans could review the results, comment, perhaps define a confidence threshold for auto-reverts, and of course, provide data for refining and tuning the algorithm.
I seem to be spending more and more time analyzing and reverting WP:REFSPAM, and a lot of them are very obvious and really should not need human intervention. If someone is a new editor, adds substantially the same citation to multiple articles, with no added content (or brief, near-identical content), and has few or no edits outside one topic area (i.e., an WP:SPA), odds are very high they are a ref spammer. Mathglot (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Iranian village capitalization
[edit]Trivial I know but the exact string of:
insource:/"|settlement_type = village"/
returns at minimum 10,000 incorrectly capitalized infoboxes. They all pretty much seem to be Iranian village stubs created by User:Carlossuarez46. The lowercased village should be changed to Village. Example: [6] ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- This should be super easy for someone with an AWB bot. I'm busy for about a month, but you can ping me at the end of March if you have trouble finding a bot op and I can start the process then. (The first step in the process is a BRFA.) –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:10, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- I can do a BRFA. Novem, do you think something like will be approved without much hiccups? Wondering maybe if concerns about cosmetic edits or similar would be raised. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:06, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think WP:COSMETICBOT will be a problem. That policy is for edits that don't change the visual appearance of the page. This bot would be capitalizing a letter, which is a visual change. For reasons unrelated to COSMETICBOT, I'd estimate there's a 50% change the BRFA gets approved easily, and a 50% chance that they ask for a consensus somewhere such as a village pump first. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- Tip: If you can point to recently approved BRFAs for similar replacements (in both type and number of articles affected) that were completed without running into community complaints, that can help avoid being asked to find consensus elsewhere. If you can point to a reasonably well-attended WikiProject discussion, that can help too. Anomie⚔ 13:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will file a brfa in a day, after I get a bit free from real life. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:42, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- Tip: If you can point to recently approved BRFAs for similar replacements (in both type and number of articles affected) that were completed without running into community complaints, that can help avoid being asked to find consensus elsewhere. If you can point to a reasonably well-attended WikiProject discussion, that can help too. Anomie⚔ 13:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- MOS:HEADCAPS is clear: "Capitalize the first character of the first element if it is a letter" ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:47, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think WP:COSMETICBOT will be a problem. That policy is for edits that don't change the visual appearance of the page. This bot would be capitalizing a letter, which is a visual change. For reasons unrelated to COSMETICBOT, I'd estimate there's a 50% change the BRFA gets approved easily, and a 50% chance that they ask for a consensus somewhere such as a village pump first. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
BRFA filed, please do tell if I missed something, filed it just before I sleep. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Fix disambiguate links after page move
[edit]After a recent page move several pages link to a disambiguation page. Requesting link change from Tennis performance timeline comparison to Tennis performance timeline comparison (women) (1978–present) for pages listed and sorted here. Note:first time performing a request of this nature, which may not be properly worded. 8rz (talk) 11:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Done with AutoWikiBrowser and JWB. phuzion (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- Many thanks. 8rz (talk) 00:09, 27 February 2026 (UTC)